• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Tinto Maps #9 - 5th of July 2024 - Carpathia and the Balkans

Greetings, and welcome to another Tinto Maps! This week we will be taking a look at Carpathia and the Balkans! It will most likely be an interesting region to take a look at, with a lot of passion involved… So I’ll just make an initial friendly reminder to keep a civil discussion, as in the latest Tinto Maps, as that’s the easiest way for us to read and gather your feedback, and improve the region in a future iteration. And now, let’s start with the maps!

Countries:
Countries.png

Carpathia and the Balkans start in a very interesting situation. The Kingdom of Hungary probably stands as the most powerful country in 1337, but that only happened after the recovery of the royal power enforced by Charles I Robert of the House of Anjou, who reined in the powerful Hungarian nobility. To the south, the power that is on the rise is the Kingdom of Serbia, ruled by Stefan Uroš IV Dušan, who has set his eyes on his neighbors to expand his power. The Byzantine Empire, meanwhile, is in a difficult position, as internal struggles ended in Andronikos III being crowned sole emperor, at the cost of dividing the realm; both Serbia and Bulgaria have in the past pressed over the bordering lands, while the Ottomans have very recently conquered Nicomedia. The control over the Southern Balkans is also very fractioned, with a branch of the Anjou ruling over Albania, the Despotate of Epirus under the nominal rule of Byzantium as a vassal, Athens, Neopatria and Salona as vassals of the Aragonese Kings of Sicily, Anjou protectorates over Achaia and Naxos, and only nominal Byzantine control over Southern Morea. It’s also noticeable the presence of the Republics of Venice and Genoa, which control several outposts over the Adriatic and Aegean Seas. A final note: in previous maps, Moldavia was shown in the map, but we’ve removed it from it, and it will most likely spawn through a chain of events in the 1340s.

Dynasties:
Dynasties.png

The House of Anjou rules over Naples, Hungary, Albania, Achaia, and Cephalonia; they’re truly invested in their push for supremacy over the region. Apart from that, each country is ruled by different dynasties, except for Athens and Neopatria, ruled by the House of Aragón-Barcelona.

Locations:
Locations 1.png

Locations 2.png

Locations 3.png

Locations 4.png
This week we’re posting the general map of the region, along with some more detailed maps, that can be seen if you click on the spoiler button. A starting comment is that the location density of Hungary is noticeably not very high; the reason is that it was one of the first European maps that we made, and we based it upon the historical counties. Therefore, I’m already saying in advance that this will be an area that we want to give more density when we do the review of the region; any help regarding that is welcome. Apart from that, you may notice on the more detailed maps that Crete appears in one, while not being present in the previous one; because of the zooming, the island will appear next week along with Cyprus, but I wanted to make an early sneak peek of the locations, given that is possible with this closer zoom level. Apart from that, I’m also saying in advance that we will make an important review of the Aegean Islands, so do not take them as a reference for anything, please.

Provinces:
Provinces.png

Provinces! Nothing outstanding to be commented on here; as usual, we’re open to any feedback regarding them.

Terrain:
Climate.png

Topography.png

Vegetation.png

Terrain! The climate of the region is mostly divided between Continental and Mediterranean, with some warmer and some colder regions. Regarding the topography, the Carpathian mountains are famously important and strategic, while the Balkans are a quite hilly and mountainous region, which is also greatly covered by woods and forests.

Cultures:
Cultures.png

Here comes the fun part of the DD: The cultural division of the Balkans! A few comments:
  1. Hungary is full of different minorities. Transylvania, especially, is an interesting place: there we have a mix of ‘Hungarians’, ‘Transylvanians’ (which are the Romanian-speaking inhabitants of the region), ‘Transylvanian Germans’, and ‘Szekely’ people.
  2. We have divided the Southern Slavic-speaking region into their dialectal families of Slovene, Croatian, Bosnian, and Serbian.
  3. The Southern Balkans are mostly divided among Bulgarian, Albanian, and Greek cultures.
  4. We’re also portraying plenty of other cultures, such as Dalmatians, Aromanians, Sclavenes, Arvanites, Cumans, Jasz, or Ashkenazi and Romanyoti Jews.

Religions:
Religion.png

This one is also interesting. Apart from the divide between Western Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, we have the Krstjani in Bosnia, Bogomils (the pink stripes both in Bosnia and Macedonia), and Paulicians in Thrace. The Jewish populations do not pass the threshold percentage to appear on the map, but there are plenty of communities across the region.

Raw Materials:
Raw Materials.png

The materials of the region. Something very noticeable is the richness of minerals, with plenty of Iron, Copper, Tin, Lead, Gold, and Silver. Specifically, Slovakia is very rich, and you definitely want more settlers to migrate to the region, and exploit its resources. The region is also very rich in agricultural resources, as you can see.

Markets:
Markets.png

The region is mostly divided among four markets: Venice, Pest, Ragusa and Constantinople.

Country and Location population:
Population 1.png

Population 2.png

Population 3.png

Population 4.png
Country and location population (which I’ve also sub-divided, and is under the Spoiler button).

And that’s all of today! I hope that you find the region interesting; we certainly think that it is. Next week we will go further south, and we will take a look at the Syrian Levant and Egypt. Cheers!
 
  • 193Like
  • 69Love
  • 7
  • 4
  • 3
  • 1Haha
Reactions:
Will the we get unique stuff for Serbian church since to this day they follow pagan traditions? They were allowed by the church to make it easier for them to convert the population, some of them are traditions that honor pagan gods but just done in the name of saints, seems too cool to be left out imo.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
There are also Transylvanian Germans in Srebrenica, Budimlja, Mitrovica, and Novo Brdo.
Germans very very important miners everywhere in medieval Serbia - from the current locations, they should also exist in Kruševac (representing the Koznik mines), Krupanj, Kučevo and Rudnik. In addition, Novo Brdo should have a nicely-sized Dalmatian population, representing the Ragusan merchant colony of Janjevo, and small Dalmatian populations in most locations in West Serbia (notably Ras/Trgovište), Užice, Pljevlja, Prijepolje and Višegrad, as well as Rudnik, Kruševac and Niš for the same reason.

Niš should also have a small Greek and Jewish minority, and probably be more populated than nearby locations
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
A few romanian provinces have some mistakes. They should be:
Cudalvi -> Cudalbi
Rușii de Vede -> Roșiorii de Vede
Hateg -> Hațeg
Strimba -> Strîmba
I don't know if this is a font thing, but the letter ă has a rounded "hat", not sharp as â and î.
Also why is the dynasty named Basarabs instead of Basarab?
 
  • 3
Reactions:
Finally, I also miss two minorities:
  1. There should be some small jewish population in some western towns. Judenburg, in Austria, is an example (maybe not in today's focus), but there were more communities in some western Hungarian towns.
  2. Gypsies were starting to enter the Balkans around game start. Their migrations could add some flavor now there is an in-game population model
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
A few romanian provinces have some mistakes. They should be:
Cudalvi -> Cudalbi
Rușii de Vede -> Roșiorii de Vede
Hateg -> Hațeg
Strimba -> Strîmba
I don't know if this is a font thing, but the letter ă has a rounded "hat", not sharp as â and î.
Also why is the dynasty named Basarabs instead of Basarab?
Roșiorii de Vede was called Rușii de Vede up until the interwar period.
 
  • 3
  • 2Like
Reactions:
If you want to have Bosnian as a distinct culture, it should not be this homogeneous, only central parts would be populated by Bosnians as you see them. Southern parts (Hum) only came to be part of Bosnia some 11 years earlier, and it was populated mostly by Orthodox Serbs.

Pelješac should be part of Republic of Ragusa. It was bought from Serbia after Stefan Dušan came to power. Ragusa would pay yearly tribute to Serbian kings/tzars, and later to there successors, Bosnian kings.
Is there a way to split Ragusa location into at least two locations? Territories around city of Dubrovnik where bought from Bosnia in early XV century.

And as for that yearly tribute that I mentioned, will it be represented in the game in some capacity?
If you want I could provide some historiacl sources.
Southern parts of Bosnia (Hum) were known to have early Serbian Orthodox influence through the presence of churches there, but discussing whether there was a large ethno-linguistic majority of them at this time is difficult, so I would say a striped Serbian minority in Hum would probably be sufficient. Definitely more accurate than 100% Bosnian.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
I hope it's not too guaranteed that his death will result in the slow collapse of his empire, at least.
We prefer to avoid heavy railroads; so it should be avoidable (as the forming of the Serbian Empire, in the first place).
 
  • 30Like
  • 9Love
  • 2
  • 2
Reactions:
Alright, got time to look over these locations more in depth so here we go
apologies if I'm getting annoying

- Argyrokastro can alternatively be called 'Deropolis' or 'Dropoli'
- While Preveza is attested since the 1200s, the region was still moreso associated with the nearby abandoned Nikopolis
- Edirne could do with losing its eastern half, either to Byzantium or as a new prov called Saranta Ekklisies
- With the above in mind, Edirne and Evros could be merged into 1 province, either called Thrace to cater to modern regional conceptions or Macedonia, to cater to the Byzantine ones, or Edirne, for the Ottomans
- Similarly, Lower Macedonia can be called Strymon, and Upper Macedonia Pindos
- Alexandroupolis in Evros was founded after WW1 to honor King Alexander of Greece, the location should be called Didymoteicho
- Drama was called Dyrama at the time
- Lesbos is the name of the entire island, the name of the most prominent settlement there at the time is Molyvos
- Parga is a good name but an alternative you could use for that place is Thesprotia
- Komotini existed, but it was a new settlement at the time, the place should take after Mosynopolis nearby
- Euboea at the time was called Euripos
- Instead of naming the entire North Aegean after one of its islands, maybe use Voreio Aigaio instead
- Similarly for Naxos, it can be called Kyklades / Kykladai
- Tinos was more prominent than Mykonos within the confines of that location
- +my previous comments abt Andravida and Tripolitsa


About production, now
- Thebes should produce dyes or silk
- Chios could produce fruit (or maybe medicaments? idk abt that) to represent the local production of mastic, which was important enough to be considered a personal monopoly of both the Byzantine Emperor and the Ottoman Sultan when either controlled the island
- I'm assuming gems represent the silversmithing tradition of the city of Ioannina, though of note the region is also fairly known for its meat and cheese (the silversmithing SHOULD take precedent though, yeah)
- Arta should produce fruit
- Corinth could have marble or stone to represent the incessant recycling of material from ancient temples to build forts and the such in the region, like in the Acrocorinth or the Hexamilion
 
Last edited:
  • 4Like
  • 2
Reactions:
The default will most likely be 'Wikipedia standard' (that means, either English or their current endonym). There might be some exceptions for this, of course, but we also want to have a game rule set for 'full English' play, if some players prefer that to the cultural dynamic names. Feel free to post inconsistencies, and we will try to have them incorporated.
Thank you so much for confirming this! One of Johan's comments a while ago had me really worried.
Dynamic names are fun, but I like readability and knowing where places are better.
 
Were Bosnians really separate from Serbians or Croats at that point in time? Wasn't a Bosnian cultural identity only shaped later, during the ottoman times?
I wonder if it would be possible to have bosnians appear from serbians and croats that convert to any muslim denomination? Does the code allow this?
 
  • 1
Reactions:
A few things I noticed regarding locations in modern Serbia borders, from north to south:

1. Change Zenta to Subotica (don't know the Hungarian name), Subotica is more important and one of the bigger cities in Vojvodina
2. Can't read the location name above Kovin, west of Timisoara, what is it?
3. Kovin is even today a small town, not bigger than 10k inhabitants, better to change it to Pančevo (wiki link - Pančevo was first mentioned in 1153 and was described as an important mercantile place)
4. Debrc is a small village south of the Sava, only known because of a medieval church and nothing else. The location should either be changed to Novi Sad, or Srem (Syrmia, Szerem), as Srem is geographically right in between Sava and Danube
5. Instead of Jagodina (not sure if it is, but looks like it), place Kragujevac, it was a settlement already settled by the end of 12th century
6. Ravno - first time hearing of this, Zaječar much better suited, 3 Roman emperors were born there
7. Trgovište - not to be confused with Romanian Targoviste, Ras or Raška would be much much better
8. Peč should be Peć
9. Glubočica can be Leskovac instead, Leskovac is just center of the area. If not, then Dubočica is most commonly used

Provinces:

1. Donji-Kraji sounds very unnatural, maybe just Krajina?
2. Usora and Soli - Slavonija?
4. As per the current locations - Syrmia - existing + Debrc, Mačva - Krupanj, Valjevo, Gradac, Belgrad, Šumadija - Smederevo, Rudnik, Jagodina, Žiča, Braničevo - existing + Stalać, Niš - existing + Kruševac, Toplica can be scrapped
5. Podrinje can be renamed to Hercegovina
6. Serbian / Slavic version of Illyria is Ilirija
The province changes you suggested are not correct.

1. Donji-Kraj was the Medieval Bosnian name for this area.
2. Ditto with Usora and Soli, Slavonija is a part of Croatia further north.
5. Podrinje is the correct name for the area in this period. Hercegovina is what Hum came to be known as following the rule of Herceg-Stjepan Kosaca in 1449.
 
  • 5Like
Reactions:
Great work as usual. Did you implement a pop of Greek peasants (or even tribesmen...) following the hellenic religion in the middle finger of peleponnesian peninsula? I know they were most probably fully converted by the year 1000, but who knows. I can envision one or two very isolated villages of fishermen following the old ways until much later, even 1350...
 
  • 9
Reactions:
If I remember correctly Johan mentioned that rivers will have impact on proximity and trade. But in none of Tinto Maps posts we saw rivers have any impact on trade. Only coast propagate proximity now, major rivers should as well.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
With the risk that all of these things have already been pointed out, here are my few quite basic comments:

I noticed a couple typos, Győr is written as Györ, and Kolozsvár is written as Koloszvár

The location names around Hungary (maybe other places too, but I'm less familiar with them) are sometimes names of towns, sometimes names of areas/regions, I don't know if this is a concern in any way, just wanted to point it out

The name "Budapest" is anachronistic to the period, and as a province name it is quite weird even today, it should be simply Pest
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Alexandroupoli shouldn't exist here, it was founded in the 19th century by the Ottomans as Dedeağaç, renamed in honor of king Alexander when it was reconquered by the Greeks in 1920
 
  • 6Like
  • 1
Reactions:
We didn't have the proper tools to portray them correctly, I think. Maybe we could have them, but there are a couple of things that we'd need to have first, and I'm not entirely sure if we'll get them.
I'm assuming by proper tools you mean having them migrate a lot even outside of markets and borders ? Regardless i think even just having romani pops in the places that historically had a big romani population is better than not having them at all.
 
  • 4Like
  • 1
Reactions:
It's avoidable means just save scum so Dusan lives and get a better heir then Uros V.
If you read the character TT, you'd see that characters aren't randomly generated when necessary and that there's an actual representation of, say, the royal family in this case. Plus given that Uroš V was born in 1336, no amount of savescumming will save you from his rule. You just have to set the realm up properly so that it holds together past his rule.
 
  • 2Like
  • 2
Reactions: