used my psychic this night, which pinged back 4 baddies. Curse hit then seems unlikely, since that would imply 3 starting baddies in an 18 player game. How can an apprentice lead to a no hunt?
My bad, apprentices can't lead to no hunts, no.
Was thinking ways baddies could pick up people.
Anyway, 4 baddies indeed suggests it wasn't a pick up, which is good. We're 15 players left, I think, so that leaves 11 villagers and 4 baddies.
until Cymsdale pushes ironhide up to 4 votes when the rest were still on 2.
Then MAW comes along an hour later and pushes it up to five
I agree that that's suspicious.
No, it's not. It can give us data, and crucially it can also prevent moronic behaviour like targeting the survivor as they clearly must be a wolf. As such, a day 1 tie in a big often can be good, actually.
How many times have we not had a close race of two villlagers with the survivor then run up the following day as clearly they had to be a wolf who was saved?
Does anyone besides beartjah find @MAWofdoom ’s behavior suspicious?
I do. Pushing up a candidate that far is quite suspicious, and MAW dhlhld know rhat.
Also surprised nobody mentioned that Wagon kind of videofanned in his first post after the day 1/night 1 post.
And if you look closely you'll see it was deliberate.
Just felt too similar to the original to not mention it.
But the biggest thing to me is definitely Wagonlitz trying to take charge and orchestrate a switch to run-up historydude. For not having voted yet Wagon tries to command a whole vote switch to history dude even as other players are pointing out how likely it was to be a bad idea. Rubs me the wrong way, as does Dedonus (who pointed out how likely it was that lynching historydude would be a bad idea) then jumping on.
I just find all the elements of a switch to an easy scapegoat at almost the last minute to indicate something fishy. The priority close to deadline day 1 should be avoiding a tie, especially if every candidate of consequence is targeted purely for not voting. A confused attempt at a switch while facing pushback is one of the surest ways to end up with a tie day 1, and Wagonlitz has been around long enough to know that.
I had voted when I made the switch.
In fact, I believe I was rhe very first to vote day 1.
And a tie day 1 isn't necessarily bad.
You of all people should know that, as you've probably ranted the most of everybody about how stupid people can be when they run up the survivor solely for surviving when a villager died.
Probably a low-trait game is my guess.
I agree.
Personal note: Love the activity, wish I had time to read it all.
Today we're packing up and going on our honeymoon. We may have time to read and post tonight, but this morning, definitely not.
Hope it goes well.
Vote MAW
.png){kind=avatar}