and suspicious on Day 1?Admittedly, my ironhide vote was quite stupid since I didn't realize I was putting him so far above all the other candidates due to knowing I was about to be unavailable. Day 1 having 17 players really messes things up for me since I never play lites. At the time I figured he was a good candidate since he has a more difficult time playing as a baddie, and his inactivity was very unusual in his case. As for wondering if we should tie, that's just what I'm accustomed to doing day 1 and I didn't know to do otherwise.
Cymsdale seems strange to me, though I've never played with them to know whether it's usual behavior or not. They were the first to push ironhide above others, getting ironhide to 4 when the next candidate had 2, and they didn't give any reasoning for their vote switches. Today they encourage voting the active players under the assumption that activity is more common for wolves, which may be true, though I think I tend to hide in the shadows more as a baddie, and I remember noticing the opposite is also true for others such as wagon. It kinda seems like it could be a play to make the village silent until it dies of inactivity and lack of info. Lastly:
This post is strange, just as wagon noticed. You only have heightened suspicion of two players and in between suspicion of another, and go after the in between one? Why?
Vote cymsdale
nah, he way sus. Leaving my vote on @Emperor Ike for now b/c I also think he's a wolf.
Might change it later to confirm @Cymsdale