-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Transylvanians are majority in Sziget, Hadad, and Nagybanya, while Hungarians are the majority in Huszt, Nagyszollos, Szatmar and Zilah. As far as I can tell, that's pretty accurate.
- 1
Oh sorry, it's hard to tell where each province ends in the culture maps. If that's the case then I see know issues in that region, maybe flipping Dés to Hungarian majority and a transylvania minority.
Thanks!
.png){kind=avatar}
Wouldnt say so. It seems most people just gave up after seeing their suggestions not added, while the ones who didnt were simply drowned in 60 pages of Moldova copy paste messages from the last balkan thread.
- 8
- 4
- 3
- 1
Part of it is also that people seem to think that the devs are obliged to take whatever suggestions come their way and that any suggestion that wasn't added was either ignored or missed. Reality is that the devs did in fact do a lot of historical research of their own and can disagree with some of the suggestions in question based on their own findings.
- 5
- 3
- 1
While I dont disagree, when even suggestions such as "everybody is the same colour making it near impossible to tell who is who in wich province" gets also ignored then it puts doubt on this since there is very little historical research you can do to justify having completely seperate cultures neighbouring one another be the same colour.
- 7
- 1
Well, I hope the developers see the feedback on page 61 for the current Croatian provinces and that they will make changes because the current Croatian provinces are factually incorrect and not historical. Zagorje and the people from Zagorje "Zagorci" had and have a distinct identity, Zagorje is a very small subregion in Croatia,
even the name itself it's not appropriate. Zagorje itself means "Za" after "gorje" mountains (it means behind the mountain Medvednica north of Zagreb). This is obviously not an appropriate name for a large piece of central Croatia. Putting the locations they put under the Zagorje province is like calling all of South America the province of Texas.
For the Lika province, putting Rijeka in it is wrong, but putting the islands of Krk, Rab, Cres and other smaller islands in the same Lika province is criminal. Where did they find that information? If they feel lazy, let them divide Croatia into the provinces of Slavonia, Croatia proper and Dalmatia and then those three provinces can be divided into northern, central, southern or in the case of Slavonia into western, central and eastern. Because you absolutely cannot justify it by saying that they did their own research because they didn't do enough or they found the wrong information.
And as my first thing I said in the last feedback is that the relationship between Croatia and Dalmatian culture must be excellent and Dalmatian culture should be accepted in Croatia because that's how they were. I can already see how it will be easier to assimilate Serbian culture because they are Slavs, even though Serbs had a stronger identity and have preserved their identity in Croatia, and Dalmatian culture will be more difficult just because it is not Slavic.
even the name itself it's not appropriate. Zagorje itself means "Za" after "gorje" mountains (it means behind the mountain Medvednica north of Zagreb). This is obviously not an appropriate name for a large piece of central Croatia. Putting the locations they put under the Zagorje province is like calling all of South America the province of Texas.
For the Lika province, putting Rijeka in it is wrong, but putting the islands of Krk, Rab, Cres and other smaller islands in the same Lika province is criminal. Where did they find that information? If they feel lazy, let them divide Croatia into the provinces of Slavonia, Croatia proper and Dalmatia and then those three provinces can be divided into northern, central, southern or in the case of Slavonia into western, central and eastern. Because you absolutely cannot justify it by saying that they did their own research because they didn't do enough or they found the wrong information.
And as my first thing I said in the last feedback is that the relationship between Croatia and Dalmatian culture must be excellent and Dalmatian culture should be accepted in Croatia because that's how they were. I can already see how it will be easier to assimilate Serbian culture because they are Slavs, even though Serbs had a stronger identity and have preserved their identity in Croatia, and Dalmatian culture will be more difficult just because it is not Slavic.
Last edited:
- 4
- 1
Maybe they just wanted to challenge players to see the suggestions and decide based on their own assessments of what would be acceptable for the game.
Or did they not know how to decide because who knows about all the historical minor regions for each country?
- 1
- 1
I know, but now they've received feedback and like I said, I hope they fix it.
In the Tinto Maps Special Edition we can see that the Greek culture has finally been given a more distinct colour from Bulgarian. There might be some other changes. The borders unfortunately look the same from first glance.
- 4
I would have preferred if they were light blue and Turkish was red...
- 1
Looks like there were some culture changes. For the better and for the worse. If anyone can make a more zoomed in and clearer image please do so.
- 3
- 1
It looks like smaller province cant show their minority provinces from this height otherwise alot of romanians and slovaks would have been removed from existence out of nowhere in Hungary. Its still not possible to tell Albanians and Aromanians apart but we finally gained victory with greeks not bleeding into Bulgarian culture and vice versa.
- 4
- 2
Do I spy Hungarian Sáros and Slovak Abaúj, when it should be the opposite?
- 1
The quality is atrocious, (edit: I meant the quaility of me cropping out and zooming in the relevant part, not the map itself being atrocious) sorry for that, but yeah, seems like.
They also made some previously hungarian stuff croatian, and didn't touch the serbian ethnic border.
Question is, how recent is the map? Could it be somewhat older, or it's the 2025 january state of the game.
The former is copium so most likely the latter.
They also made some previously hungarian stuff croatian, and didn't touch the serbian ethnic border.
Question is, how recent is the map? Could it be somewhat older, or it's the 2025 january state of the game.
The former is copium so most likely the latter.
Last edited:
- 4
- 3
Already asked this question in the map thread. Will report if I get a answer-
- 3
- 2
- 1