• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Screenshot_20250331_151700_Chrome.jpg

These should also be corridors
 
  • 12Like
  • 6
  • 1
Reactions:
I have a general question about the maps feedback. So whenever you post feedback posts of certain regions there's still input and suggestions for changes coming in. Do you consider those and continue to make changes or is the feedback post basically just on information on how it's gonna be?
 
  • 4Like
Reactions:
Markets
Markets.png

Now, with some additions and new coloring changes.
I like it! Despite the utter wasteland-riddled-mess this region is, it's really clear to read imo.
The outlines really helps distinguishing it from each other and from the wastelands, while the paper map provides a nice neutral tone to distinguish high and low access parts.
10/10 imo.
 
  • 14
  • 9Like
Reactions:
Thanks so much for taking the time to go so thoroughly through my previous topography suggestions, it looks like a LOT of them made it onto this version!
Glad to see my effort wasn't in vain :D
 
Last edited:
  • 15Like
  • 2Love
Reactions:
I have a general question about the maps feedback. So whenever you post feedback posts of certain regions there's still input and suggestions for changes coming in. Do you consider those and continue to make changes or is the feedback post basically just on information on how it's gonna be?
They still read all the threads and make changes, but they're unlikely to make another updated thread with compiled changes.
 
They might be too small to show up on the map, but did we get some Zoroastrian Armenians, as per my suggestion here?

Similarly, the highlands of Georgia and Abkhazia should have some small pagan populations remaining
 
Last edited:
  • 7Like
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
Khorasani Turks seem extremely overrepresented now, I think they were already overrepresented in the original post but now you've made all of Iranian Khorasan Turkic!

I see Qashqai culture in the changelist but they are nowhere to be found on the map.

Disappointed at the lack of Tat and Udi cultures, though I suppose Udis as Lezgins is better than nothing.

Properly speaking the Adhari culture should speak Tabaristani not Persian, though Tats of course would speak Persian. This is one reason Tat culture should be separated.

Would like to see Central Asian Arabs, though I suppose they might not show up on the map.

Do the Jews of Kurdistan, Dagestan and Transoxiana have their cultures properly portrayed as Aramaic and Persian-speaking?

Not a fan of the Orthodox color change personally.

edit: grammar
 
Last edited:
  • 12Like
  • 3
Reactions:
trebizond should be the despotate of trebizond, meaning it should be a duchy not a county. only seeing it now. also it should have a little bit more natural harbor.

other than that this looks great! love the new market map change btw!!
 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
  • 2
Reactions:
Is there no distinction between Zaydis, Ismailis and Twelvers?

Also, please use "Shia" and not "Shiite", even in Arabic, the "-ite" is a suffix to conjugate the word to indicate the genetive declination only when referencing the person who the Shia belong to (i.e., "Shi'ite Ali").
 
  • 4Like
  • 1
Reactions:
I like it! Despite the utter wasteland-riddled-mess this region is, it's really clear to read imo.
The outlines really helps distinguishing it from each other and from the wastelands, while the paper map provides a nice neutral tone to distinguish high and low access parts.
10/10 imo.
Since this is something on which we disagreed earlier on, I will make a point that I'm also good with this version of colouring.
 
  • 6Like
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions: