-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I spotted an Engels too, I'm looking for Marx now.
- 35
- 5
- 3
.png){kind=avatar}
@Pavía must all feedback from the original Tinto Maps be reposted here, because it was clearly overlooked?
- 28
- 5
- 2
- 1
For some reason even Pskov is monarchy, although its political system was somewhat identical to Novgorod’s
- 17
- 5
Circassia’s state religion should be Catholic, not orthodox
Also, Circassia wasn’t properly unified before Inal the Great did so.
Inal the Great - Wikipedia
Zichia - Wikipedia
- 17
- 13
- 3
I too am disappointed, the cultural setup especially is egregiously wrong. You didn't even fix the Mari and Mordvin being displaced from their homelands.
- 27
- 8
@Pavía did you take in consideration my post about the possessions of the Italian republics in the region(fondacos and fortresses) or do you still have to?
- 6
- 4
Development is mostly bs and the devs yet have to explain what exactly it represents and how it is calculated. My impression is that they designed it around gameplay, much less around historic reality. Sarai should most definetly outshine most of Europe.
EDIT:
No idea what people are disagreeing with. Development implies human activity. If you think that empty forests have more human activity than an entire city of +100 000, then you seriously need to reconsider your life choices (/s). Sarai is among the largest cities in Europe in this time period. Some no name duchies/one province minors should most definetly not have more development.
Last edited:
- 18
- 3
- 3
- 1
- 1
Please, no Kominternivske, Nikolaev, Proletarsk. A lot of names have Crimean-Tatar era names or mentioned on old maps.
provided some more historic suggestions:
Last edited:
- 27
- 20
- 9
- 1
Yeah, the feedback map feels a bit rushed to me as well, with many useful proposals for location and province names, development map (too low in many places of GH), raw goods, and even government forms (Viatka and Pskov are still not republics) and some other stuff not being implemented. Although the changes for the religious map look really nice.
- 16
- 1
Circassia as a unified state shouldn't be a thing to begin with, some of its tribes were catholics, other orthodox and other still pagan
- 18
- 3
- 1
Kazan was one of the richest areas of the Golden Horde. Why is it red compared to neighbouring areas?
Sviyazhsk, a city that was not even built at this date, has more development than Kazan!
Why no development in the capital region?
- 46
- 12
- 1
An ideal solution would be splitting the tag with a Circassian IO so the tribes can band together against external threats
- 8
- 3
- 1
- 1
Visual bug right here, the wastelands have the "colour" of the inhabitable locations
- 14
- 2
- 1
What is the pipeline through which you edit pop setup in locations? How does it happen? Because to me it seems extremely sluggish given how few changes there are to them in not just this but other feedbacks. I really would like to know so that we can have a clearer picture on the pace you are working here.
- 7
- 2
Ideally yes, but I doubt they are going to make up an IO this late in development, also from what I founf the Circassian tribes at the time were pretty distanced from one another, splitting the tag is fine for now
- 7
- 1
.png){kind=avatar}
Calling the Eastern Kipchak dialict "Uzbek" is kinda anachronistic. Though if the language is called Kipchak I guess my earlier suggestion to call it Kipchak wouldn't work, but I still feel like this may lead to some needless confusion, especially concidering that the gane covers the timefrane of ethnogenesis of modern Uzbeks who, while incorporating some significant aspects of Kipchak are still preteminantly Karluk
- 7
- 1