• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
The tail has a sting in it, then. This feels to my amateur brain like the sort of evidence that would be thrown out by a haughty judge in any normal circumstances, but seeing as 90% of the Establishment has a vested interest in it succeeding then I imagine it will acquire the necessary weight…

Let the games begin!

a former Lord Mayor (I am enjoying the slightly pathetic way in which this is being reeled off at every turn)
Yes, me too. Gives the whole affair the character of a Priestley play – which is entirely deserved.
 
The tail has a sting in it, then. This feels to my amateur brain like the sort of evidence that would be thrown out by a haughty judge in any normal circumstances, but seeing as 90% of the Establishment has a vested interest in it succeeding then I imagine it will acquire the necessary weight…
I agree but for different reasons. In normal circumstances I believe most judges apply a bit of legal common sense and would throw it out, because it wouldn't really serve the cause of natural justice to stop two people getting divorced when they both want it. It would be the haughty prim types who would accept the evidence and allow the King's Proctor to investigate and they would be technically correct to do so, whether they would be "right" to do so or not is a harder question I admit.

In any event the accusation looks solid enough to justify a case being brought and that is all that is really required, by the time the case is resolved the political/constitutional crisis will be long over.
 
The tail has a sting in it, then. This feels to my amateur brain like the sort of evidence that would be thrown out by a haughty judge in any normal circumstances, but seeing as 90% of the Establishment has a vested interest in it succeeding then I imagine it will acquire the necessary weight…
I agree but for different reasons. In normal circumstances I believe most judges apply a bit of legal common sense and would throw it out, because it wouldn't really serve the cause of natural justice to stop two people getting divorced when they both want it. It would be the haughty prim types who would accept the evidence and allow the King's Proctor to investigate and they would be technically correct to do so, whether they would be "right" to do so or not is a harder question I admit.
Yeah in between the floodgates opening and poltcial ambition, the floodgates usually win. The case is already up in court, the judge already assigned. So the chances of someone trying to pressure the judge are very small, and the judge accepting any such nonsense is nill.
In any event the accusation looks solid enough to justify a case being brought and that is all that is really required, by the time the case is resolved the political/constitutional crisis will be long over.
This was my read on it. They don't expect to win. They just want to stop it going through on the nod and actually make it a court case. In which case, scheduling will mean it will not be done before parliament has to come back and boot everyone involved out of office.
 
On Chapter 61:
While the Privy Council may be persuaded (or, as I understand from my discussions with the Prime Minister, configured in such a way as to agree) to agree, should the King give notification, as I believe that he soon will, of his intention to marry, then many commentators will speculate on the application of this statute and whether the King is in difficulty is this element, section 3, which requires the consent of MPs and Lords.
“Walter,” Lloyd George asked Monckton, “you’re a lawyer.
With a statement (among those in the rest of the advice) like that above, DLG’s statement is of course bleeding obvious! :D A sentence long, qualified and obscure - er, nuanced - enough to choke anyone. :p
There are some dark times coming for the King and Lloyd George.
So it would appear. A cleft stick, just where it is most painful and inconvenient! :confused:
Chapter 62, Westminster, 26 October 1936
“He has asked me to convey to you evidence that recent divorce proceedings in Hampshire are not as they first seem.”
Da da DAAAH! Cue the Establishment pantomime villain, acting through a couple of plausibly deniable intermediaries.
He believed that Willis and, especially, his client, had been leaned upon by Neville Chamberlain (or one of his coterie)
Nifty Nev and his little pack of toadies V DLG and his basket of deplorables. They all deserve each other, but the people neither.
It has it all: sex, lying, a courtroom drama, the gloriously pompous title of the ‘King’s Proctor’, a former Lord Mayor (I am enjoying the slightly pathetic way in which this is being reeled off at every turn), Freemasons, and is the foundation for everything else to follow.
Noel Coward could have a field day with this! I’d pay good money for a COVID safe performance right now of this smash hit musical farce.
I have to confess that in a world of venal, rather tainted characters, Sir Thomas Barnes is a good man.
The word that comes across from reading his biographies is ‘decent’
Make him PM!
As for the BUF, I accept, with limited enthusiasm, that I will need to deal with the idiot (Mosley) - it's coming up...
Ugh, I trust there will be some silly pictures of him posing pompously in black skivvies and footer bags.
 
1.png


Chapter 63, Broadcasting House, 29 October 1936

1628712567544.png


“Here he comes,” a junior producer, nominated in the DG’s ‘orders’ as ‘car-door opener’ said in a hushed voice.

“Quiet! Stations everyone!” The line, which already approaching Guards-standard, smartened even further. Reith had been insistent on the maximum possible ceremony for the visitor.

The producer duly performed his duty and the door was opened with aplomb. The Archbishop of Canterbury (ignoring the producer and the welcoming line) marched straight to the waiting figure of Sir John Reith, the Director General of the BBC.

1628712581138.png


“Sir John,” Archbishop Lang was curt.

“Your Grace,” Reith, like Lang also a Scot, was equally brief. You wouldn’t, from the clipped, emotionless tones, realise they were old acquaintances.

“This is the Lord’s work, you know,” Lang muttered as he was escorted in. His expression was tense, and he was clearly apprehensive.

Waiting for the Archbishop were Geoffrey Dawson, editor of The Times, and Lord Halifax, both bald, lanky, sombrely dressed Englishmen. Dawson had been promised an interview with Lang and it had been agreed that Halifax, a close friend of both, would be there to ensure that the right messages were conveyed. Reith hovered close by as the Archbishop was led to the studio, one of the larger ones, which was surprising for a one person broadcast. But as Dawson, Reith and Halifax stood, each flanked by his advisors, it was clear why Reith had opted for a larger venue.

“Your Grace,” a BBC staffer said nervously, “we’ll count you down, as the announcer is talking, and then the red light,” he pointed to a bulb, “means that you’re on.”

“And we are going out?”

“Across the nation,” the staffer confirmed.

“Across the world,” Reith muttered sourly. “Places, everyone,” he said to no one in particular. Halifax awkwardly took a chair, its scraping earning him frosty looks from Lang and Reith.

From somewhere else in the building, one could just make out. “This is the BBC National Programme speaking to you from London, I am Alvar Liddell. And now, an address to the nation by His Grace,” the staffer began silently counting down, “The Archbishop of Canterbury,” the light turned red the second Liddell finished his introduction.

Lang looked petrified for all of a second, but then found his resolve and looked sternly at the speech below him. Wordlessly (and, thankfully, quietly) Halifax handed a copy to Dawson.

“I have sought the unusual recourse,” Lang began, confident but not arrogant, “of talking to you this way as we face, together, a moment of national trial.” He paused, his solemnity and bluntness immediately summoning a spirit of national emergency. “Irrespective of whether you are a member of the established church or our brethren in the other denominations, I speak, now, to you all.”

1628712595866.png


Reith looked at Halifax and shrugged, as if admitting that Lang wasn’t as bad as he had feared he would be. Dawson was quietly scribbling away, darting back and forth to his copy of the speech.

“One week ago His Majesty the King approved a request from his supporters in Parliament,” this was key, tying the Parliamentary and religious issues together, “to close our Parliament, both in the Commons and the House of Lords, down until December. Those supporters,” this was another agreed tactic: Chamberlain and Sir John Simon had been insistent that Lang would not refer to the Lloyd George administration as a government, “seek to avoid the examination of uncomfortable and unassailable truths. The truth is that His Majesty has fallen under the dark influences of corrupt and malevolent forces. But redemption is possible, as the good Lord himself said, ‘blessed is the man that feareth the Lord; he hath great delight in his commandments, riches and plenteousness shall be in house, and his righteousness shall endureth for ever’.

He was settled into his routine now, the rhythm steady and the pitch adequate. He was a stern Victorian so spoke as a stern Victorian. But it didn’t matter; all were very aware that they were witness to a historical moment.

“And I do not wish His Majesty ill, nor speak evil of his character,” Lang droned on, very much in the manner of a parson giving a sermon. “Seldom, if ever, has any British Sovereign come to the Throne with greater natural gifts for his kingship. Seldom if ever has any Sovereign been welcomed by a more enthusiastic loyalty. From God he had received a high and sacred trust. Yet,” the ‘yet’ was almost shouted, “by his own will he has forsaken his duty, one could almost say abdicated the honour of his role, he has surrendered that trust. With characteristic frankness, he has poured out his heart, spilled open his feelings, into the waiting arms of the press.” Reith winced at the mangled metaphors, Lang’s only real error so far. “With characteristic frankness, he told us his motive; it was a craving for private happiness.”

Lang paused, taking a sip of water. “Strange and sad it must be that for such a motive, however strongly it pressed upon his heart, he should have disappointed hopes so high and abandoned a trust so great. Even more strange and sad is it that he should have sought his happiness in a manner inconsistent with the Christian,” he rolled the ‘c’ in ‘Christian’ magnificently, “principles of marriage, and within a social circle whose standards and ways of life are alien to all the best instincts and traditions of his people. Let those who belong to this circle know that today, at this hour, they stand rebuked by the judgment of the nation which loves its King Edward.”

“And with that, we should all of us remember the words with which we mark the accession of a British Sovereign and pray for his life and service. Wherever you are listening, please take a moment to enter the presence of the Lord. ‘O God, who providest for thy people by thy power, and rulest over them in love, vouchsafe so to bless thy servant our King, that under him this nation may be wisely governed, and thy Church may serve thee in all Godly quietness, and grant that he being devoted to thee with his whole heart, and persevering in good works until the end, may, by thy guidance, come to thine everlasting kingdom, through Jesus Christ thy Son our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with thee and the Holy Ghost, ever one God, world without end, Amen’.”

====
GAME NOTES

Another snappy update with another one of the ‘hammer blows’; and if the legal action was one with limited (initial) consequences (beyond negative media commentary from half of the papers) this one could be seen as a ‘biggie’ – the leader of the Church of England bursting forth upon the airwaves to denounce (even if he slyly denies it) the King of England.

To the personalities and this probably feels like the ‘B’ team or ‘second eleven’; and I struggle to particularly like any of them. Reith and Lang are dull, earnest, mildly creepy canting hypocrites, but of course they both picked the right side OTL and here, and I have to accept the strength of their arguments against the King. Both are assets to Chamberlain and would have been at the van of any campaign to damage the King. The power of the BBC in this era is unmatched (unlike the newspapers where the split is roughly 50/50) and short of the King storming Broadcasting House I cannot see a ‘like’ avenue for him. Similarly, the old fashioned view of cap-doffing Christian values might occasionally be overdone, but a denunciation from the Church of England matters hugely in this era. For those interested, the biblical quotes come from Psalms 112 and the Book of Common Prayer’s Ascension Day prayers. Much of the speech comes from, in adapted form, Lang’s real address after the OTL abdication for which he was roundly, at the time, criticised (seemingly for its gloaty, 'told you so' tone). It was effective in OTL, cementing the view that the abdication had been the right action at a time when Edward still had a small but not insignificant minority supporting him remaining / returning as King. Here, it's even more effective.

But I must confess that I find Reith and Lang sanctimonious and patronising and, oh God, put them in the zeppelin please @TheButterflyComposer !

We’ve seen two actions as the resistance to the King mobilises; more are on the way, dear reader. But we now need to throw in a random event, something that could destabilise things further, to show that this is not merely constitutional ping-pong but that sometimes political battles can have physical casualties...

That's much higher profile and a lot more money immediately backing the divorce questioning, not to mention whoever is actually behind the former lord mayor's case.

The Press will run with this, indeed, both sides will have to. Makes the government look even worse, the King even worse, the dominions as the actual defenders of British morality (!!!) And pretty much inflamed the whole situation. Whether or not the divorce gets through now doesn't really matter. It will almost certainly not be finalised before parliment is recalled.

Yes, and as @El Pip and others comment below whether or not it succeeds kinda doesn't matter - the Government's slim hope of hanging on long enough for the Decree Absolute is toast.

The moral: never underestimate the lawyers. :D

Mwah ha ha! But yes, good points.

Paper only matters if everyone decides it does.

The Magna Carta had to be signed thrice for a reason. And then reissued another two times for it to stick.

It has gotten easier to make 'amendments' to the British constitution since then and have them stick..but not that much easier.

Well, here people will decide that it does matter (at least long enough to drag it before a court)...

The tail has a sting in it, then. This feels to my amateur brain like the sort of evidence that would be thrown out by a haughty judge in any normal circumstances, but seeing as 90% of the Establishment has a vested interest in it succeeding then I imagine it will acquire the necessary weight…

Let the games begin!


Yes, me too. Gives the whole affair the character of a Priestley play – which is entirely deserved.

I agree but for different reasons. In normal circumstances I believe most judges apply a bit of legal common sense and would throw it out, because it wouldn't really serve the cause of natural justice to stop two people getting divorced when they both want it. It would be the haughty prim types who would accept the evidence and allow the King's Proctor to investigate and they would be technically correct to do so, whether they would be "right" to do so or not is a harder question I admit.

In any event the accusation looks solid enough to justify a case being brought and that is all that is really required, by the time the case is resolved the political/constitutional crisis will be long over.

Yeah in between the floodgates opening and poltcial ambition, the floodgates usually win. The case is already up in court, the judge already assigned. So the chances of someone trying to pressure the judge are very small, and the judge accepting any such nonsense is nill.

This was my read on it. They don't expect to win. They just want to stop it going through on the nod and actually make it a court case. In which case, scheduling will mean it will not be done before parliament has to come back and boot everyone involved out of office.

So yes. All that needs to happen is that a court case messily looks at this, and the King and the Simpsons are a laughing stock. If the Government is still standing then the trickle of desertions from DLG will become a torrent and then the fun really begins...

I agree that the High Court will hate this when it chaotically lands on their doorstep; but as @TheButterflyComposer points out, the listing will take an age to get before a judge. The real damage here is the reputational harm done by the Proctor even considering foul play...

Nifty Nev and his little pack of toadies V DLG and his basket of deplorables. They all deserve each other, but the people neither.

These recent skirmishes have been horrible to write up...
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
The truth is that His Majesty has fallen under the dark influences of corrupt and malevolent forces.
An excellent one sentence quote for the back of a book on vampires or some such...
Seldom, if ever, has any British Sovereign come to the Throne with greater natural gifts for his kingship.
[BGCOLOR=rgb(54, 54, 54)]Seldom if ever has any Sovereign been welcomed by a more enthusiastic loyalty.[/BGCOLOR]
Ah...we are back in the pulpit and lying our asses off, I see.
Another snappy update with another one of the ‘hammer blows’; and if the legal action was one with limited (initial) consequences (beyond negative media commentary from half of the papers) this one could be seen as a ‘biggie’ – the leader of the Church of England bursting forth upon the airwaves to denounce (even if he slyly denies it) the King of England.
Reaproachment is going to be critical for the monarchy and church after this...but I think it unlikely to happen compeltly due to everyone in the new royal family going forward is Scots presbitarian...this may drive a wedge betweenness the crown and church, and the church and state, depending on how this plays out after the abdication.
The power of the BBC in this era is unmatched
One of the largest corporations in the world, and the largest broadcaster for many decades. An excellent propaganda and intelligence tool.
But I must confess that I find Reith and Lang sanctimonious and patronising and, oh God, put them in the zeppelin please @TheButterflyComposer !
What's the maximum capacity of the Hindenburg? We are fast approaching the time when a new HOI4 AAR may be incoming so...I may actually have to write a list, then refine it down...
 
We’ve seen two actions as the resistance to the King mobilises; more are on the way
Given that in TTL it will take a truckload of dynamite to blast him out, it may take something like Stalin’s ten blows of 1944 to get rid of him!
 
Um. I rather expected the revelation of Chamberlain's crew spying on the royal family to have a lot more weight - any weight, actually, since it seems to have passed without remark. If there was anything that could splinter Chamberlain's block, or prevent the spied-upon future George Sixtus from doing everything in his power to wreck Chamberlain's hopes, that would have been it. And yet - not a ripple?

And the Archbishop's claim that "I do not wish His Majesty ill, nor speak evil of his character" contrasts rather starkly with, "by his own will he has forsaken his duty, one could almost say abdicated the honour of his role, he has surrendered that trust'. The Archbishop, methinks, is a canting hypocrite with a very large and shiny axe to grind.

The Establishment needs to take care. Humiliating the King over a divorce proceeding is one thing, but whacking him over the head with the Canturbury Cross might 'gin up some sympathy for him. It is possible to overplay this hand.
 
As I've mentioned previously I am less bothered by Lang, probably because my expectations of Archbishops of Canterbury are so low. He is undoubtedly guilty of the many traits @Le Jones accuses him of, but honestly what did anyone expect from an Archbishop?

I would defend him against hypocrisy though, he probably doesn't wish to speak ill of His Majesty and the House of Bishops doubtless wishes this entire unpleasantness had never occurred, the Church did not rush into this but has given the King many chances to recant and change his mind. Fundamentally though the King's plans are utterly in opposition to the monarch's role as head of the Church (to say nothing of the wider problems) so the Archbishop has two options; support a complete change in church doctrine that has zero support outside the King's circle or speak out against the King. By going against his wish to keep quiet he is putting duty over personal comfort, which is consistent with the behaviour he wishes the King to adopt. I can see no hypocrisy there.

I'm also unsurprised that the tapping revelations have had little public impact, they don't really affect the constitutional situation and are not going to change anyone's mind on the big issue. However once that issue is settled then I think they will be a major factor in the dynamics of the government and Neville's interactions with others, it's just everyone has agreed to park them for now while they fight the common enemy.
 
Indeed, the Church has handled this with...Grace. As for Chamberlain, he's going to have all sorts of problems after the election and booting out the monarch, not least of which rebuilding the Conservative party and fighting the espionage shit.

And then there's Hitler and all that.
 
Lang's pontification here reminds me a little of old mediaeval addresses to monarchs who have done poorly - it was always the advisors such as Despenser that were criticised, not directly the monarch. And so it seems here, the monarch almost portrayed as a victim (if a willing one) of another. In this respect seems very very plausibly traditional.

What's that old bit of British political wisdom - he who wields the knife does not wear the crown? I think Chamberlain - if DLG et al do fall - may find the position he has long sought to be most uncomfortable.
 
I've just come back to this. This is like watching a car crash frame by frame. Each update, some more damage is done, but the result remains uncertain and quite far into the future. It is a fascinating look into the political machinations of Britain during those crucial pre-war years. Even if the history is alternative, the characters and modus operandi feel quite real.
 
I've just come back to this. This is like watching a car crash frame by frame. Each update, some more damage is done, but the result remains uncertain and quite far into the future. It is a fascinating look into the political machinations of Britain during those crucial pre-war years. Even if the history is alternative, the characters and modus operandi feel quite real.
In universe, people are going to stress that this period of nothing much happening was the turning point and perhaps where the fortunes of war for the UK was decided.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
1.png


Chapter 64, London, 1 November 1936

1630051080797.png


The marchers, 185 ‘official’ crusaders, men of Jarrow (of whom 175 had started the journey a month ago and the remaining 10, like the stage posts of old, replacements kept at readiness to relieve tired or injured walkers) and then a dozen or so supporters (ranging from the essential to the useful to, in Reg McKay’s case, the useless, mere followers at this stage) were in striking distance of their destination, the Communist Party’s ‘rally for jobs’ in Hyde Park to which they had been invited. As Reg trudged through the drizzle he reflected on how much had occurred since their departure a month ago, both personally and nationally. Reg would have adopted his dad’s biting, mocking cynicism if the march was described as his ‘coming of age’ but it had nevertheless been close to a formative experience. Whether it was the optimistic, determined send off from Jarrow or the beauty of Ripon Cathedral, the shockingly bright, airy new towns or more recently the growing sense of anticipation as they neared the capital, he felt as though he had experienced a lifetime of memories in a month. Whitburn, his sleepy coal mine and fishing village home, felt a world away. He hadn’t mentioned it to anyone, but he wasn’t going back.

How to slip away was the thought constantly on his mind as they neared central London, as well as where he would go or what he would do. He strongly suspected that his dad would have somehow reached out (through gritted teeth and operatic reluctance) to Uncle Vernon, his mam’s younger brother and something of the ‘black sheep’ of the family. Reg had always liked Uncle Vern, with his flashy suits, new cars and occasional Americanisms he was like a visitor straight out of the pictures, liberally showing off his wealth and splashing his relatives with gifts before vanishing to wherever it was that he went. Dad thoroughly disapproved, Reg could tell, but tolerated the visits as they were rare and fleeting. But as the crowds thickened as they trudged through the grey sprawl of the London suburbs, Reg half expected to see the whip thin moustache of Uncle Vern under a broad brimmed hat.

“Penny for them lad, you were away with the fairies,” Albert Briggs, one of the tougher of the marchers, said in gentle mocking.

Reg shrugged. “Just thinking of what comes next.”

Briggs nodded. “Aye, it’ll be a canny joke if all we get in London is ignoring.”

Reg shook his head. “I meant after London.”

“Train home and back to staring into the street,” Briggs said with grim resolve, as if the matter had long been pre-ordained. He looked shrewdly at Reg. “Or are you staying down here?”

Reg shrugged again, an after a pause decided that this interest from Briggs made a welcome change from endless introspection. “I’m not sure yet.”

Briggs was quiet, clearly thinking through the problem. “What about our Ellen?” This was said as if Ellen Wilkinson MP was not Jarrow’s elected member but a niece who was doing well for herself. “She might need a lad who is good with a pen. Or she might know someone else.”

It was a good idea, and a more attractive one than the emerging default plan of making for the nearest recruiting Sergeant. And that wasn’t because he had a yearning for being shot at in Palestine (the news of the British Army’s ‘surge’ into the Palestine Mandate had been acquired through hasty glances of newspapers and all too brief conversations with well-wishers when they rested) but because he couldn’t for the life of him think of an alternative. His fondest memory of the march had been the balmy, tranquil evening spent in Ripon Cathedral where the Dean, a kind man, had taken it upon himself to give a guided tour of the building and grounds to any marcher who wanted it (they all had, unanimously). It had damn near converted him to a career in the Church (not that was really an option for a working class lad from Tyneside).

“Ere, Ms Wilkinson, what do you think,” Briggs shouted up to the front of the march where Ellen Wilkinson was happily engaging with the crowds, “what do you think about taking young Reg on?”

1630051099242.png


Wilkinson turned awkwardly to see who had made the comment, realised she didn’t quite recognise the voice, and instead seemed to focus upon her worries.

“Don’t fret about her lad,” Briggs said calmly, although his eyes were darting around the crowds, "she’s just worried about the rally.”

The Jarrow marchers, arriving from the North, were a slow, plodding mass, not unlike something large, and bovine. Their pace regulated by, of all things, a harmonica band, they trudged toward their destination. Reg noticed that the usually sombre, middle class crowds had almost imperceptibly become younger, edgier. Insults, in a broad accent that some of the march supporters identified as that of East London, were hurled angrily by this crowd, many of whom, Reg realised, were shadowing the marchers.

Briggs was exchanging muttered comments with some of the other older Jarrow men. “Lads, keep calm, don’t shout back. That’s what they’re after.” His eyes darted around the crowd again. “The bloody Polis are doing nothing,” he said angrily.

To Reg’s untutored eye the London Police looked woefully unprepared and undermanned. Probably expecting some minor fringe clashes as the majority of the marchers went around their task placidly, a hostile crowd of spectators was palpably not part of their plan. “Surely Mr…”

“No lad,” Briggs said sadly, “they’re outnumbered. They’ll only get stuck in if there is a proper fight.”

The crusade, like a wounded animal assailed by a swarm of predators, staggered on; if anything the marchers increased their pace as if nearly two hundred tired North Easterners could outrun these fresher, younger hecklers.

The crusaders finally reached Marble Arch and turned a sharp right towards Hyde Park. The bystanders were more numerous here, the denser crowds providing some relief from the mockery. Finally, one of the younger Jarrow men snapped, though only when a young man in black shouted that they should “fucking well go back to the pit.”

“We’re bloody shipbuilders you thick Cockney,” he quipped, causing the crusaders to chuckle and their morale to improve. They entered the park, and the wary welcome from the Communist Party members was enough to make them relax.

“Comrades!” An announcer called. “Here they are, having walked all they way from Newcastle…”

“…Jarrow, for Christ’s sake, it’s on the bloomin' banner!” One of the marchers, tired, shouted this with evident frustration.

“And now the Member of Parliament for Jarrow, Ms Ellen Wilkinson, will address us. I ask you to hear her words with courtesy.” There was muted applause.

“Friends!” Wilkinson said, throwing her fist into the air. “While our so-called Government is worrying about whether a man can get married, nothing has been done for the people of this country!”

1630051113993.png


There were cheers, she had wondered about referring to the King’s troubles and had decided that they could not be avoided.

1630051127620.png


“We have come, over two hundred miles, from a far away community forgotten by this worthless Government. Friends! Jarrow as a town has been murdered. It has been murdered as a result of the arrangement of two great combines, the shipping combine on the one side and the steel combine on the other. And what has the Government done? Either this mockery of a Government or its predecessors?” She paused. “Nothing! I do not wonder that this cabinet does not want to see us."

Reg, out of the corner of his left eye, could see a dark shape approaching silently at the edges of the Park. It was clearly a group of people. More Police, perhaps? He felt his stomach tighten.

Wilkinson hadn’t noticed. “There must be a change for the good of the people of this country…”

“Now, my boys,” an aristocratic voice brayed from somewhere behind Reg. “Go get ‘em, and good huntin’!”

There was cheering, yelling, and the figures in black ran towards the rally. Wilkinson, who was still speaking, was now completely drowned out by the panicked screams of the left and the taunting cheers of the right. Finally one of the CPGB organisers dragged her from the stage. The Communists and Jarrow people split, some going to resist the blackshirts (for Reg realised that was who they were) with many more running each and every way to escape.

Reg was terrified; the only violence that he had ever known were silly schoolboy fights and the occasional clip round the ear from his dad. The blackshirts were good; although hugely outnumbered, their disconcerting noise and their sheer energy gave them a shocking effectiveness. They were close to Reg now, some of them, he could see, were not much older than he was. The police were doing their best, trying to separate the two increasingly intertwined groups.

“Get away with you,” Briggs said, “go on lad, now!” A blackshirt, hearing the exchange, ran up to him and very professionally punched Briggs once to the stomach. Briggs folded, gasping for air, staggering to his knees.

1630051139104.png


“Go,” Briggs croaked, as the blackshirt delivered another blow.

Reg obeyed. He fled as though the hounds of hell were at his tale. The blackshirts, with thousands of other potential victims, ignored him and fought with those who remained. As the rally members recovered from the shock of the blackshirt descent upon them they fought back. Hyde Park was now a patchwork of dozens of private fights as small groups of communists/marchers and blackshirts scrapped. The air seems to vibrate with the shouts, screams and groans of the incident.

Reg continued to run. He finally escaped the park, ignoring the excitable reporters who waited on the edges of the park to grab interviews with the protagonists. Reg saw policemen, about a hundred he guessed, forming up to methodically advance into the park. He also saw a strange man, like one of the Germans or Italians from the pictures, standing in a car. He looked worried, agitated.

1630051153080.png


“It wasn’t supposed,” he said in an odd, tight voice, “to be like this. Scare them off,” he said pleadingly, “that’s what I said.”

“They’ll blame you, Tom,” another figure, in a smart civilian suit, said languidly, “silly, isn’t it.”

“You!” Reg felt a hand lightly slap down on his shoulder. “You’re part of this!” It was Uncle Vern, of course it was, looking, with his oily moustache and shiny suit, utterly out of place in this exploding world of communists, marchers, fascists and lots, lots, of violence.

“Uncle Vern…”

“…do you have any idea how much trouble you’re in,” Uncle Vernon said, anxiously rather than angrily. Reg noticed that his North Eastern accent was much more pronounced than usual. “Thank God your dad got word to me.”

“Trouble, Blenkinsop?” That the other well-dressed man.

“Er, no. But my dammed nephew wanted to er, get stuck in,” Uncle Vernon said in a passable imitation of the other man’s languid drawl. “Made an ass of himself. You wounded?” He snapped this question at Reg.

“No, but the march, the rally, Ms Wilk…”

“…not another word,” Uncle Vernon hissed, before turning to the other man. “I’d better get him home for a wash, seems he can’t resist a good scrap!”

====
GAME NOTES

The readAARship will, I hope, forgive the plot contrivance that lanced a couple of boils in one convenient chapter. But I wanted to close off the Jarrow Crusade at the same time as deal with an issue that I have deliberately avoided for the past 60 or so chapters – Mosley and his group.

To Mosley first; for a detailed analysis of the man please consult @DensleyBlair's masterpiece. Essentially he is, at this stage in UK history, something of a political outsider while socially remaining firmly in the establishment (his first wife was Lady Cynthia Curzon, daughter of the Tory grandee and former Viceroy, his mistress and second wife was Diana Mitford). His journey as a politician beggars belief. Elected as a Conservative MP in 1918 he then 'crossed the floor' and sat as an independent, before joining Labour. Given some responsibility for reducing unemployment, the rejection / ignoring of his ever radical solutions saw him resign and leave Labour (of course) to form the New Party, which started off as a reasonably respectable but interventionist group but then went down the authoritarian route. Visits to the fascists of Europe in the early 30s made those authoritarian undertones an overt culture and by 1932 you have the British Union of Fascists. Quite a political journey, that. The key to this, for me, is the man; I accept that I say this as a man from the 2020s, but he is a bloody idiot. Watch any newsreel of him and you realise that the past is indeed a foreign country. The sad thing is that I see shades of this political opportunism in our current Parliament (particularly the current Cabinet). Like @El Pip and others on this forum I have been around a while, and am not naïve to the world and its ways. But that this swaggering fool could remain vaguely prominent for so long speaks, to me, of the collapse of British political energy in the 20s and 30s and the moral bankruptcy of many in the Upper and Upper-Middle classes. I'm not advocating a Commonwealth or CPGB led state, but something was definitely rotten in the state of Denmark (or the UK) at this time.

But what would he do here? I’m positing that he reins in his blackshirts until the Parliamentary crisis had fully developed; you’ll note that in this TL we avoided the ‘Battle of Cable Street’ as Mosley would want, I believe, to see how the Parliamentary impasse develops. I also think that his marriage to Diana Mitford would be delayed (remember, Hitler was a guest at their wedding - now that's a party) as 'Tom' (to his friends and intimates) would want to stay close to events. Now, with Parliament shut and the resistance to Lloyd George organising, Mosley has unleashed his members to make an impact. Despite their militaristic uniforms and titles they are not particularly disciplined; I can easily see a strategy of disruption and undermining going out of control and resulting in a mass brawl in Hyde Park.

It's a shame that the Crusade ended this way, it will now, in this TL, probably be remembered either as a tragic failure, demonstrating the recklessness of public protest, or at worst a provocation that the BUF answered. Wilkinson was as shrill and animated as portrayed, and while Briggs is entirely fictional (I have agonised over this - but I didn't want to offend anyone by portraying a well-known name being beaten up) he is based on the grimly stoic types who were the backbone of the march. The Ripon Cathedral episode is also true, it stands out among many of the recollections as one of the more spontaneous and human experiences and it struck me as something that our fictional Reg would enjoy. The idea of both an Uncle Vern(on) and a young marcher wanting to remain in London may seem far-fetched but they have their roots in history. One (unnamed) marcher was retrieved by a relative at an early stage of the march, and one John Farndale, one of the younger marchers, did indeed stay in London where he became a baker's assistant. The tragedy of this TL is that there will be a lot, I suspect, of accusations that 'but for the BUF...' the march would have achieved something. Of course in OTL it didn't, the petition of 10000 signatures was lost, there was no steel works or industrial relief, and the whole thing ended in embarrassing, slightly anti-climatic failure. But that is paradise compared to this TL...

Apologies for the delay, BTW - Afghanistan has been demanding all of my spare time as I sit, rapt, while hell unfolds. I'm not making a political point, but there is a human tragedy unfolding. If anyone has contacts either in the country or in the US / UK / allied militaries, you have my best wishes. It's just awful - FWIW I have visited the country as a legal advisor for hire and find the whole thing deeply troubling.

Reaproachment is going to be critical for the monarchy and church after this...but I think it unlikely to happen compeltly due to everyone in the new royal family going forward is Scots presbitarian...this may drive a wedge betweenness the crown and church, and the church and state, depending on how this plays out after the abdication.

A very good point, the rebuilding of strained / destroyed relationships is going to be awful.

Given that in TTL it will take a truckload of dynamite to blast him out, it may take something like Stalin’s ten blows of 1944 to get rid of him!

The edifice does fall quickly, actually. While I have delayed the response of the opposition, now that they are mobilised it will be quick.

Um. I rather expected the revelation of Chamberlain's crew spying on the royal family to have a lot more weight - any weight, actually, since it seems to have passed without remark. If there was anything that could splinter Chamberlain's block, or prevent the spied-upon future George Sixtus from doing everything in his power to wreck Chamberlain's hopes, that would have been it. And yet - not a ripple?

I'm also unsurprised that the tapping revelations have had little public impact, they don't really affect the constitutional situation and are not going to change anyone's mind on the big issue. However once that issue is settled then I think they will be a major factor in the dynamics of the government and Neville's interactions with others, it's just everyone has agreed to park them for now while they fight the common enemy.

Indeed, the Church has handled this with...Grace. As for Chamberlain, he's going to have all sorts of problems after the election and booting out the monarch, not least of which rebuilding the Conservative party and fighting the espionage shit.

So these comments, I think, get to the heart of it - most of the skullduggery can be happily thrown at Baldwin's door and the true naughtiness of Chamberlain via his personal spy system are probably still being worked out. He has questions to answer, but as everyone says, that can be done nicely and safely after the King is moved along.

Lang's pontification here reminds me a little of old mediaeval addresses to monarchs who have done poorly - it was always the advisors such as Despenser that were criticised, not directly the monarch. And so it seems here, the monarch almost portrayed as a victim (if a willing one) of another. In this respect seems very very plausibly traditional.

That's exactly the point - in his own way Lang is admonishing the Crown, but doing so in a way that allows the King (just) some wriggle room. But this is an important speech - a call to arms for the Anglican Communion.

I've just come back to this. This is like watching a car crash frame by frame. Each update, some more damage is done, but the result remains uncertain and quite far into the future. It is a fascinating look into the political machinations of Britain during those crucial pre-war years. Even if the history is alternative, the characters and modus operandi feel quite real.

Thanks! I'm doing my best to get on with it, but keep stopping off at interesting points!

In universe, people are going to stress that this period of nothing much happening was the turning point and perhaps where the fortunes of war for the UK was decided.

Undoubtedly.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
I suspect parliament will have the good sense to stay quiet about the shit Chamberlain is in until after he is elected, boots the king out and order is restored. They can then rail on him for all he's worth and probably drive the government down to a rather weak position.

But again, this is foreboding as well because we simply do not have a wartime leader waiting in the wings to take over when Hitler goes berserk. The King's First Minister situation with Halifax or someone like him folding as soon as France falls looks very likely from where we are now.
 
But, Chamberlain's misdeeds may be the only weapon DLG has left. How is he not shouting it to the rooftops?
And say what? The king was being spied on because his bride to be is a nazi?
 
No- say that beloved George V, his revered wife and all his family members were spied upon for no reason but political power.
Demonstrate the claim with the proof you have, carry the war into the newspapers, and let the fire burn.
 
No- say that beloved George V, his revered wife and all his family members were spied upon for no reason but political power.
Demonstrate the claim with the proof you have, carry the war into the newspapers, and let the fire burn.
Feel like this new info will only lead to further info, which will lead to more info...and the more the public knows about this whole affair, the more DLG will not only not get out of this cleanly but at liberty...
 
Just a good little anecdote this time, and indeed a typically nasty and absurd cameo from Tom the Teapot (Crackpot, Shitepot etc).

As for Afghanistan - I agree but won’t say too much, only that I know many people who served there and worked in a policy area that was intimately involved in it for about 14 years, though never directly on an Afghanistan desk. It is nothing but an awful tragedy on so many levels.

And tragic in the ancient Greek sense of the word. We’ve certainly had hubris along the way, and are now witnessing the exodus of the whole story. This part of it, anyway. And it could end up being a trilogy, if this is the end of the second work. I suspect it may be far from over yet.