Vargas should not be Fascist. He was, in fact, a little far away from the fascists despite their close relationship. He was a unique figure in politics, he flirted with both the Brazilian industrial/rural oligarchy AND the lower classes of society. I really don't know what that means in terms of HoI's politics. The real Brazilian fascist is Plínio Salgado, and he's already in the game.Gaspar Dutra is a LWR when serving Vargas and SC for serving in the military and as President after Vargas. I don't think he should be PA as head of government. He should remain SC.
Joao Neves da Fontoura likewise got his job under Vargas and then had a later political comeback.
As for Vargas himself, he is a LWR in paradox's old minister file. I'd peg him for more of a PA/FA, but he is admittedly sort of hard to place. Anyway, he was removed from power in a coup but was later democratically re-elected. Hence the SC version of him.
Vargas should not be Fascist. He was, in fact, a little far away from the fascists despite their close relationship. He was a unique figure in politics, he flirted with both the Brazilian industrial/rural oligarchy AND the lower classes of society. I really don't know what that means in terms of HoI's politics. The real Brazilian fascist is Plínio Salgado, and he's already in the game.
I mostly agree with you, but i think that the reelected Vargas in the 50s should be SD not SC. Him his second term he abandoned the oligarchies and focused his policies on the lower classes.
Re: Vargas,
I'm a little reluctant to change Vargas in light of your inability to agree on what he should be changed to. If I may offer my own input--many fascists actually had very deep sympathies with the poor, and if you look at Mussolini's biography you'll find out he was originally a socialist. Many, many people over time drifted from left to right, sometimes simply as a result of personality conflicts within the left. I read Vargas as someone who made this shift also. I think, though, one of the defining differences between left and right dictators is the attitude towards organized religion. Fascists (except for Hitler) generally tried to cultivate a relationship with the Church, especially the Catholic Church, whereas the left-wing types tended to be anti-clerical. One option is to put him in as SD and SC. If the government is only mildly dictatorial then he can be accepted as a minister. In view of his anti-communism I think he should not be LWR.
EDIT: I read him as an opportunist, perhaps leftist from 1930-1932, PA from about 1932 to 1945 and SD in 1951. (180 degrees reverse of Paradox's interpretation!) This implies that Dutra's and Fonturas' designations as LWR are also wrong. That means the Stalinist ministers may need start date revisions. I'd say if Vargas moves too far towards democracy the military deposes him and sleeps his PA personality, leaving only the SD persona.
Ringwraith_JP: Do you agree with this assessment of him as PA or do you have another opinion? I've gone through the scenarios and found out that Paradox puts Brazil in as LWR except in 38 where Brazil is PA. Which do you think is correct?
LATE EDIT: I'm inclined to do this for BOTH Vargas and Juan Peron of Argentina--change them to Social Democrats and put in a second PA persona. Paradox has done something similar with Sheng Shicai (Sinkiang) so this is not without precedent. That way their numbers stay the same for compatibility reasons with other mods. But the practical effect of having Vargas as LWR is that the Soviet Union can sometimes ally Brazil with +200 relations. In real life I don't think Stalin would have had a snowball's chance in Hades of convincing Vargas to join the Comintern. On the other hand, had Hitler won the war, there is a very real chance he'd agree to join the German alliance. Comments please--agree or disagree?
Ringwraith_JP,
I did put in everyone with dual entries except for Vargas himself. Do you want a second entry for Vargas also as SD from 1936 onwards? I can easily do that by changing the start date of his 51 HOS entry to 36 and adding another one for HOG. And I can start Gomes at any time 1937 or earlier. What is your preference? I was also thinking of making Brazil PA but with political left set to 3 or 4, so one click of the mouse could make Brazil SC or LWR, and two clicks would make it FA, but the default and AI behavior would be PA. Does that meet with your approval?
Is that really necessary to clone all of Vargas' cabinet? It had some substantial changes, the cabinet is the one i posted up there.OK here's what I propose:
1) Make Vargas' initial cabinet PA/SC as posted
2) Clone Vargas' ministers as SD
3) Start Eduardo Gomes in 36 and change him to SL for gameplay reasons--this is so that the game engine is less likely to install Prestes the Stalinist unless Brazil is taken to Leninist or something. If I don't do that then the game engine is likely to install Prestes as HOS/HOG for social democracy.
I'm talking about the 36 cabinet.Is that really necessary to clone all of Vargas' cabinet? It had some substantial changes, the cabinet is the one i posted up there.
Ringwraith_JP
Changed my mind while you were posting and am making him SC. If I make him PA then Salgado never comes in. Acceptable?
The issue is this: If you tweak the sliders, the game engine will automatically change the leaders at certain points, and sometimes it is best to set the ideology a little bit off the "real" ideology. Otherwise you have to write more events to handle the situation. For example if I make Vargas PA then I have to write an event to make Salgado come in if Brazil becomes National Socialist.
For gameplay reasons people may want to play Brazil with alternate histories and tweak the sliders their way. Should Brazil be Social Conservative (just barely democratic) in 36 or should it be PA?
hey nomonhan, i've just tried ur mod and i think it's a great idea. but i found a few bugs:
1. in the industry tech page, the encryption/decryption lines point to the wrong computing machines
2. i've played the cold war scenario with comunist china (loads of fun) but when the Kuomintang (the nationalists) retreats to taiwan, the province xinjian (or something like that... some xinsomething in manchuria) still remains owned by nat chi and occupied by com chi.
3. in the same situation (cold war with com chi) when the korean war starts for some reason "the fading sun" event (jap surrenders to china) gets triggered and PRK becomes puppet of com chi; and then the event which makes PRK a soviet puppet gets fired and PRK makes peace with the allies while com chi is still at war.
4. after the PRC was formed in tibet event i chose to tell them to rejoin (or something like that) instead of direct war and tibet went with "we can not resist" (which the name suggests should have gave me all the tibetan territories) but nothing happened...