It is
vassal = { country = AAA country = BBB }
country AAA (U11 FE) is the vassalizer of country BBB (China).
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
vassal = { country = AAA country = BBB }
country AAA (U11 FE) is the vassalizer of country BBB (China).
yea i saw that after i posted
Anways, anything else about the design/purpose of the event you want to share?
Well, with those two OR statements (I'm confused by the snip ), do you have to be a vassal of one of the minors and have a province controlled by a minor? So a minor has to vassalize and it or another minor must control one of the "important" provinces in order to knock China down?
), do you have to be a vassal of one of the minors and have a province controlled by a minor? So a minor has to vassalize and it or another minor must control one of the "important" provinces in order to knock China down?
China must either be a vassal of one of its contenders or all other stuff must be achieved.Originally posted by Garbon
Okay I figured out the snip bit...
The event at the bottom must have fired though no matter what.
Then don't all the vassal triggers in that OR towards the bottom need to be including inside the first OR? Otherwise if you do two separate OR statements doesn't that mean that you have to fufill a condition in both? So instead it would be:
Code:
[color=green]
event = {
id = {147010
trigger = {
OR = {
[color=yellow]vassal = { country = U11 country = CHI }
vassal = { country = U12 country = CHI }
vassal = { country = U13 country = CHI }
vassal = { country = U14 country = CHI }
vassal = { country = MCH country = CHI }[/color]
AND = {
OR = {
AND = {
control = { province = 649 data = MCH }
control = { province = 650 data = MCH }
control = { province = 651 data = MCH }
control = { province = 652 data = MCH }
control = { province = 653 data = MCH }
control = { province = 654 data = MCH }
control = { province = 655 data = MCH }
control = { province = 1562 data = MCH }
control = { province = 1563 data = MCH }
control = { province = 1564 data = MCH }
control = { province = 1565 data = MCH }
control = { province = 1567 data = MCH }
}
AND = {
control = { province = 649 data = U11 }
[/color][color=red]
=snip=
[/color][color=green]
control = { province = 1567 data = U14 }
}
}
NOT = {
countrysize = 3
stability = 2
}
}
}
event = 14704
}
random = no
country = CHI
name = "Loss of the Divine Providence"
desc = "As the war and open rebellion continue within China, the Emperor's legitimacy slowly wears away until only himself and a few loyal members still recognize him as the true ruler of the Middle Kingdom."
style = 2
action_a = {
name = "I am still the true emperor!"
command = { type = stability value = -1 }
command = { type = country which = U14 }
command = { type = sleepevent which = 147010 }
}
}
[/color]it might be easier to read that way, but it essentially does the same thing. I've made sure that the nesting was done correctly.
hahaha . sorry i cant help it. when i saw the size of the trigger i just want to laugh.
well, its all ok, but i think the countrysize can now be removed since it would be done in the priority order set of events. as for stability, do u think the chances of CHI retaining stab above 1 is high? the alternative way would be to impose stability minimum on the minor gaining the tag. i think the alternative way is better, since it is much less likely for the minors to have low stability. so the stab trigger here can be removed. that would remove the NOT statement and simplify the trigger, which is good .
about the commands, there might be other stuff that could be added in later, like vp effects (or maybe badboy, relations). what is the last sleepevent command for though?
. sorry i cant help it. when i saw the size of the trigger i just want to laugh.well, its all ok, but i think the countrysize can now be removed since it would be done in the priority order set of events. as for stability, do u think the chances of CHI retaining stab above 1 is high? the alternative way would be to impose stability minimum on the minor gaining the tag. i think the alternative way is better, since it is much less likely for the minors to have low stability. so the stab trigger here can be removed. that would remove the NOT statement and simplify the trigger, which is good
.about the commands, there might be other stuff that could be added in later, like vp effects (or maybe badboy, relations). what is the last sleepevent command for though?
Because of the nature of the setup in that if you want each contender to have more than 1 chance, you need to have the coimmand sleep itself when its done otherwise it will cause glitches later on.
Subsequent events (FE if you wanted in each nation to get 5 tries) would have a trigger that the previous event for losing the status as china had triggered.
Last edited:
Code:
[color=green]
event = {
id = 147016
random = no
country = U11
name = "This fighting gets us nowhere!"
desc = "N/A"
trigger = {
ai = yes
not = {
exist = CHI
war = { country U11 country = U12 }
war = { country U11 country = U13 }
war = { country U11 country = U14 }
war = { country U11 country = MCH }
}
}
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1654 }
offset = 300
deathdate = { day = 29 month = decemeber year = 1819 }
action_a = {
name = "Ok"
command = { type = ai which = divided_china.ai }
}
}
[/color]
Code:
[color=green]
#
# Europa Universalis. China AI
#
# 100 = Total warmonger, 0 = absolute pacifist
war = 15
# To determine if we fight to the death or not.
ferocity = no
# The amount of provinces we try to colonize at the same time
expansion = 0
#Which countries to conquer if possible. (to guide nation historically)
combat = { CHI }
#How important is it to gather troops close to base
base = 1.0
#How important is it to be as close to target position when gathering troops.
front = 1.0
#Evaluation factors for conquer plans
conquer =
{
# multiply enemy province value
enemy = 1.0
# multiplying supply factor
supply = 1.0
# factor for distance to not owner provinces
distance = 1.0
# factor for owned provines
owner = 3.0
# Multiplier for provinces not in supply.
notsupply = 1.0
# Multiplying the base constant for conquer.
base = 1.0
}
[/color]
Code:
[color=green]
#
# Europa Universalis. China AI
#
# 100 = Total warmonger, 0 = absolute pacifist
war = 5
# To determine if we fight to the death or not.
ferocity = no
# The amount of provinces we try to colonize at the same time
expansion = 1
# % of the time we prefer to establish a tradingpost if both are good.
tradingpost = 100
# Bonus for areas to establish colonies adjacent to previous ones.
neighbour = 10
# Bonus/Penalty for establish colonies adjacent to other countries.
enemies = -1
# 100 = max trader rate, lesser means slower focus on sending a trader.
traders = 100
# 100 = Total monopolist, will refuse trade as much as possible.
monopoly = 25
#Which countries to conquer if possible. (to guide nation historically)
combat = { U11 U12 U13 U14 MCH KOR TIB DAI }
#How important is it to gather troops close to base
base = 1.0
#How important is it to be as close to target position when gathering troops.
front = 1.0
[/color][color=red]
#The Strategic Decision after Zheng Ho's Journey#
event = {
id = 3703
random = no
country = CHI
name = "EVENTNAME3703"
desc = "EVENTHIST3703"
style = 1
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1435 }
offset = 1720
deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1455 }
action_a ={
name = "ACTIONNAME3703A" #Inward Perfection#
command = { type = domestic which = CENTRALIZATION value = -5 }
command = { type = domestic which = ARISTOCRACY value = 10 }
command = { type = domestic which = SERFDOM value = 10 }
command = { type = domestic which = MERCANTILISM value = 10 }
command = { type = domestic which = LAND value = 10 }
command = { type = domestic which = QUALITY value = -10 }
command = { type = domestic which = OFFENSIVE value = -10 }
command = { type = land value = 1000 }
command = { type = infra value = 1000 }
command = { type = stability value = 6 }
command = { type = ai which = china_perfectionist.ai }
}
action_b = {
name = "ACTIONNAME3703B" #Balanced Position#
command = { type = domestic which = CENTRALIZATION value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = ARISTOCRACY value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = SERFDOM value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = INNOVATIVE value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = MERCANTILISM value = -1 }
command = { type = domestic which = LAND value = -1 }
command = { type = domestic which = QUALITY value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = OFFENSIVE value = 1 }
command = { type = land value = 500 }
command = { type = infra value = 500 }
command = { type = naval value = 500 }
command = { type = trade value = 500 }
command = { type = stability value = -2 }
}
action_c = {
name = "ACTIONNAME3703C" #Outward Expansion#
command = { type = technology which = muslim }
command = { type = domestic which = CENTRALIZATION value = 3 }
command = { type = domestic which = ARISTOCRACY value = -3 }
command = { type = domestic which = SERFDOM value = -5 }
command = { type = domestic which = INNOVATIVE value = 5 }
command = { type = domestic which = MERCANTILISM value = -5 }
command = { type = domestic which = LAND value = -5 }
command = { type = domestic which = QUALITY value = 5 }
command = { type = domestic which = OFFENSIVE value = 3 }
command = { type = naval value = 2000 }
command = { type = trade value = 2000 }
command = { type = stability value = -6 }
command = { type = revoltrisk which = 60 value = 8 }
command = { type = ai which = china_expansionist.ai }
}
}
[/color]Expansionist
Code:
[color=green]
#
# Europa Universalis. China AI
#
# 100 = Total warmonger, 0 = absolute pacifist
war = 10
# To determine if we fight to the death or not.
ferocity = no
# The amount of provinces we try to colonize at the same time
expansion = 2
# % of the time we prefer to establish a tradingpost if both are good.
tradingpost = 95
# Bonus for areas to establish colonies adjacent to previous ones.
neighbour = 10
# Bonus/Penalty for establish colonies adjacent to other countries.
enemies = 0
# 100 = max trader rate, lesser means slower focus on sending a trader.
traders = 100
# 100 = Total monopolist, will refuse trade as much as possible.
monopoly = 15
#Which countries to conquer if possible. (to guide nation historically)
combat = { U11 U12 U13 U14 MCH KOR TIB DAI }
#How important is it to gather troops close to base
base = 1.0
#How important is it to be as close to target position when gathering troops.
front = 1.0
[/color]
Code:
[color=green]
#
# Europa Universalis. China AI
#
# 100 = Total warmonger, 0 = absolute pacifist
war = 0
# To determine if we fight to the death or not.
ferocity = no
# The amount of provinces we try to colonize at the same time
expansion = 0
# 100 = max trader rate, lesser means slower focus on sending a trader.
traders = 65
# 100 = Total monopolist, will refuse trade as much as possible.
monopoly = 80
#Which countries to conquer if possible. (to guide nation historically)
combat = { U11 U12 U13 U14 MCH KOR TIB DAI }
#How important is it to gather troops close to base
base = 1.0
#How important is it to be as close to target position when gathering troops.
front = 1.0
[/color]but once it's fired it's fired and wont fire again. dont need to sleep it.
the divided china thing should happen even if China exists, as it could be a situation where China controls a few provinces one of which mandatory (what u raised). also 1654 is a bit too early, i thought we said 40 years or something.
i dont agree the strategic decision should be changed. if it is changed it is better off just deleting it now.
Really? I rhought it could...ifso then yes, its uneeded.
i thought it said 1674...ok....as for the 1st one...perhaps....i gotta go now though so i can't really comment.
No all i did was change the AI...that's it. So this would have no effect for humans and make the china AI less likely to set upp TP after the event...just a minor change i saw everyone seeming to agree with.
Last edited:
no, the startdate of the events says 1654. it should be 1684 if 40 years.
EUnderhill did suggest that. well, as long as it is born in mind that the change is only temporary, i guess i can live with ai switching. i think u should incorporate the commenting sentence u have just above the two AI scripts u posted, or something to the same effect, just to make sure that they are temporary.
as for the other 2 AI, the minors should have all other minors on their attack list in addition to China and be extremely warlike, foerocity = yes for Southern Ming. after 40 years, it can be warmonger can be lowered to something like 40. China shouldnt have Tibet and Korea and Dai Vet in their attack list by the way. i'll also need to look at the factors for conquer plans. Actually, i sent all the relevant information to MKJ some time ago to help him in his PAI mod but i have not seen him finished working on it. if he has already done the work it would be convenient to have a look and use whatever's in there.
Yea the change is temporary (although that word is quite elastic as it may be awhile before the event can be removed. That was near the bottom of my list of things to do).
MKJ care to respond?
Here are two thoughts I've had, playing China:
What do y'all think?
jay
The EEP/AGC merger discussion for China
- The collapse of China events IMO should be reworked so that if the Manchu have not existed since 1430, the rebels institute a new gov't themselves. Also, there should be an alternate history where one can fight the power of the eunuchs at the expense of increased flak from the ministers and the destabilization of the country - but reducing the subsequent revolutions during the reign of the inept Chinese emperors. I know this is AGC-y counterhistory, but it really seems like Chinese history offers a number of places in this era when really obvious missteps were taken: being able to right them would make China much more rewarding to play.
- In a similar vein, if the treasure fleet wasn't scrapped & the player chooses the "Remain open" option in the 'Closing of the Ming' event - it's ridiculous that there should be no more explorers for China for the next four centuries. Especially if the Siberian gold mines & SE Asian trading outposts were found, there would have been further exploration and development. Considering that China is already overpowered somewhat, though, it shouldn't get as many as a European major - but 1-2 per century is at least realistic.
What do y'all think?
jay
The EEP/AGC merger discussion for China
I'm not sure I get what you mean, but there already is an event that grants the Manchu independence if they don't exist in the beginning of the 17th century.
I thought that was exactly what happened in "real" history.