In my game, it seems like almost every AI country (including HRE minors) built a fort on its capital, as well as other forts. Maybe tweak down the AI's proclivity for building forts.
- 1
- 1
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
The event to make Korea Manchu’s tributary appears to be broken, I got the event, took the option to make them my tributary but they’re still ming’s tributary.
- 1
Two comments on balance that probably aren't bugs, so I'm leaving them here. These are from an observation game I ran today.
- The AI seems to not value choosing a naval doctrine enough. Since the cost rises with naval size, it usually makes sense for a country to pick one before expanding its navy.
- None of the Ottomans, Portugal, Castile, Aragon and France had a naval doctrine despite all except possibly Portugal easily having enough income.
- I'd guess Genoa and Korea picked a naval doctrine after running out of building slots if Tunis and the Papal State didn't both pick a naval doctrine despite having dozens of available building slots.
- All of the countries with a naval doctrine had either Wooden Wall or Free Oarsmen, so they all probably picked it for the combat bonuses.
- The AI is almost too good at increasing crownland now. All of the countries I checked had multiple estate privileges that cost crownland to enact.
- Most monarchies and republics had 40-80 crownland in 1518. England at 90 and Sweden at 24 were notable exceptions.
- European theocracies had a harder time accumulating crownland, with most having 30-40 crownland. I can't tell if this is specific to Europe because there are so few theocracies outside of Europe.
- Countries with Indian estates typically had 35-65 crownland.
- Hordes usually had 60-80 crownland and other tribes typically had 30-40.
Last edited:
I think with border forts becoming a thing, now is the right time to add 'dismantle fort' as part of the peace offerings.
- 7
- 2
- 1
- 1
Heya, these changes are super great! I did find one issue though:
"- Monuments will no longer degrade on nation release." - This doesn't seem to work for Yerevan when Armenia is released from the QQs. The monument still gets downgraded to level 0 from it's starting level 1. Note that in this situation I was playing as the QQs and did the release at game start.
"- Monuments will no longer degrade on nation release." - This doesn't seem to work for Yerevan when Armenia is released from the QQs. The monument still gets downgraded to level 0 from it's starting level 1. Note that in this situation I was playing as the QQs and did the release at game start.
suitable to replace "**(Chinese)"，In reality these cultures have their own Chinese names:
Tibetan→Zang【藏】
Korean→Chaoxian【朝鲜】
Vietnamese→Jiaozhi【交趾】/Annan【安南】
Last edited:
- 4
- 1
- 1
- 1
Why patch name is France? France gets only Hundred year war change. Korea gets alot more contents lol.
- 1
They're still working on a lot of contents, and I hope there will be a special government regarding apanages.
Rather than giving this war a special CB, why not reducing the AE to all reconquested provinces? Or perhaps only for defending countries?
- 3
- 2
Does feel like there could be a better solution since Assam was ruled by a Tai people at the time.
The culture change also has NVK using generic units now. Should either go with the units Jurchen/Manchu are using or the Inuit units.
- 1
Is it me or did Jianzhou loose their Lucky nation status? This might explain why we don't see AI Qing as often. Also, I've seen that they never attack Shun whenever they form (in the interference event), so they let them grow stronger until they can't do anything about it.
- 1
While someone is working on french cultures, could you remove the "aquitaine " culture which isn't used anymore?
Will something be done in the near future regarding colonial nations expanding outside of their colonial region? It would be nicer if they could restrain from expanding into other colonial regions (or if they do thanks to a war caused by their overlord then they should automatically release a new colonial nation once they enter a different colonial region). It's a bit immersion breaking to have a colonial nation have territory in four different colonial regions (especially if some of the provinces are enclaves).
- 3
- 2
Privateering bug is still not fixed. Please fix as I want to play pirate nation.
Sure. Strong Duchies is an Estate Privilege. This change specifically made the AI better at using it. Which in this case mostly means to use it more often.
- 4
Experimenting with Nahuatl nations, and I now have almost no desire to use the Flower Wars CB. Nahuatl need to border as many provinces as possible, or they'll run out of targets too quickly, so needs to be able to conquer and vassalize in a single war, not pick one or the other. I'm currently just making claims and using the conquest CB most of the time. It's more AE but I can handle it. It's still frustrating that progress has been slowed because of this, because New World nations were already a very time sensitive affair.
- 6
I just started up the beta(as Haixi) and Jianzhou was still a lucky nation
Burgundy rivalling Castille always makes the Burgundian Inheritance a lost cause.
Edit: 10 out of 10 restarts.
Edit: 10 out of 10 restarts.
Last edited:
I don't know what are you talking about.
I understand your point. However, I think we'll keep in the current order, as gameplay-wise it makes a bit more sense to boost colonization before trade efficiency.
We already had a back-and-forth debate about this topic among the dev team, so we had second and third thoughts before doing this change, which we think it's the best for the game right now regarding this issue. As it's already being tested in an Open Beta, we'll obviously will gather feedback about it, and we'll see if we have to make further changes, of course.
Well, it's not the best fix we've done ever, it's legit that you point this out. We're trying to address the Burgundian Succession incident, and it's not easy at all, so we implemented this a temporary fix, to see how it works. We'd want to eventually come to a better solution for it, but it will require some more time, TBH.
Nope, we haven't changed Lucky Nations in this patch.
- 7
- 2
- 2
- 1
- 1
I'm glad you're back to more frequent updates. I hope you can make it 4 patches a year again.