• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Now it's needed to take the mandate AND being of chinese culture group at that moment, to get that mission tree. That culture requisite should be relaxed for historical flavour. (Or completely removed for fun, ideally, but well...)
IMO any culture that can sinicize should get it. Dai Viet, and Altaic-Mongolia
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Land of the Christian Sun still seems pretty buggy. The general-to-ruler succession does not play nicely with Monarchy, Theocracy, or Republic unless you pick very specific reforms.

- Appease the Patriarchate now applies in every province that is part of a state with a Patriarchate.
Assuming you mean "Assign Metropolitan," does this apply only to existing states with a Metropolitan or also to future states which are later assigned a Metropolitan?

Fixed an issue of the "Protectors of Eastern Christianity" modifier being removed too soon for Japan.
I see that the mission describes this modifier as a 30-year modifier on 1.35.4. On my 1.35.3 campaign, this was an "until the end of the game" modifier. Is this intended to make not-Catholic Christian Japan more viable?

Anglican Japan when?
 
Last edited:
  • 1
Reactions:
Or just any nation that takes the mandate.
That is somewhat impossible due to how missions are scripted. Let's look into it!
Every missions file has a set of missions scripted inside it. These missions occupy certain columns and rows (sort of like an X/Y axis)
The EoC missions all occupy specific positions on the X Y axis and are especially handmade one by one to fit with all Chinese / Korean / Japanese trees.
If I was to make them compatible with any other country (like France for example) I would have to make a new version of these missions from scratch with different X Y positions on the axis that would be compatible with France.
And that would be necessary x 20 / 30 / however many nations we want to grant these missions to.

Let's not even tackle the whole "QA must test the content" side of this endeavor, it would take way too long unfortunately
 
  • 13
Reactions:
Was the capitalization typo fixed for one of the exploration ideas? The idea that lowers trade company costs and another cost. One of the costs has a "c" and the other has a "C". Both should either be lowercase or uppercase.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
  • 4
Reactions:
I don't see any fix in the list (sorry if i lost it) for the nations breaking their PU because of their government. This is not fixed?
I don't think that this is a bug. Only monarchies are supposed to be able to become junior partners. The iberian wedding event was missing a check for the government type so that Aragon could become a junior partner after turning republic, but this was changed in 1.35.4, so that the iberian wedding can only happen if both Aragon and Castile are monarchies. And the chance for Aragon to turn republic in the event "Sindicat Remença" was lowered to 10%. Do you know any other ways how a non-monarchy can become a junior partner?
 
I don't think that this is a bug. Only monarchies are supposed to be able to become junior partners. The iberian wedding event was missing a check for the government type so that Aragon could become a junior partner after turning republic, but this was changed in 1.35.4, so that the iberian wedding can only happen if both Aragon and Castile are monarchies. And the chance for Aragon to turn republic in the event "Sindicat Remença" was lowered to 10%. Do you know any other ways how a non-monarchy can become a junior partner?
I'm not talking about the iberian wedding, im talking about the mission CB conquered ones. If you have a PU cb against something with a republic type nation when conquering them their government should change.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
I'm not talking about the iberian wedding, im talking about the mission CB conquered ones. If you have a PU cb against something with a republic type nation when conquering them their government should change.
Forcing a personal union on a republic in a war already changes them to a monarchy through the on_war_lost on_action since version 1.30. But there are only very few ways how you can even use the CB against a republic, because all missions which give a PU CB should use valid_for_personal_unions_trigger to make sure that the target is a monarchy (do you know any missions which are missing this check?) and even if you get the CB, you would lose it unless the target has the ambrosian_republic reform or the flag neapolitan_republic.
 
  • 3
Reactions:
Forcing a personal union on a republic in a war already changes them to a monarchy through the on_war_lost on_action since version 1.30. But there are only very few ways how you can even use the CB against a republic, because all missions which give a PU CB should use valid_for_personal_unions_trigger to make sure that the target is a monarchy (do you know any missions which are missing this check?) and even if you get the CB, you would lose it unless the target has the ambrosian_republic reform or the flag neapolitan_republic.
It doesn't. I did it on the previous update with Castille on Aragon and they remain a republic... the PU lasted until the next election. There was a bug report on this, bunch of other users had similar issues, mostly with Castille/Aragon and anything that involved Poland/Commonwealth.
 
  • 2
Reactions:
It doesn't. I did it on the previous update with Castille on Aragon and they remain a republic... the PU lasted until the next election. There was a bug report on this, bunch of other users had similar issues, mostly with Castille/Aragon and anything that involved Poland/Commonwealth.
The problem with Castile/Aragon should be fixed, because Castile can't get the iberian wedding anymore if Aragon is a republic. I guess that the problem was that you forced a PU on Castile while they had a republic Aragon as a junior partner and this might have bypassed the force-change of the government type, because Aragon wasn't your war target.
I'm not sure which Poland/Commonwealth issue you mean. Is it about forcing a PU on the senior partner of a country which has an elective monarchy(e.g. Bohemia)? I think there is a bug remaining in that specific circumstance, because the check which prevents the election event for junior partners doesn't work while they change from one overlord to the other(forcing a PU directly on the elective monarchy doesn't have that problem).