Aldo said:Brittany for me?![]()
If you want to sub and will take an AI country once Johan is available...
Aldo said:Brittany for me?![]()
Hyzhenhok said:If you want to sub and will take an AI country once Johan is available...
Slargos said:I'd say restart actually. But that's just me.![]()
It doesn't really matter to me either. If we restart though Johan can have Brittany since the starting Duke and his sons wifes are too old to produce kids which means it is hard to have the dynasty survive.Jarkko Suvinen said:Ok, there is a vote wether to restart or not.
CURRENT STANDING
Restart: 2 votes
Continue: 1 vote
Please send in your vote!
(I won't vote unless it goes even, because it is all the same to me, didn't get to play much last night)
I agree a King does add flavour to the game. It might also be better to place all players within France - the Lorraine and Savoi players gets a little bit outside of the action. Anyone knows good counties that are vassals of France directly?Sterkarm said:NOOOOOO!!!!!
I was enjoying being King so much... but perhaps we could have some player, maybe Johan, as King of France? Even though my son would be a bastard, I wonder what happens when a player plays the first in line to inherit another player... probably crash. I think we should somebody as King though, I really do like it a lot better. But, he should have semisalic primogeniture instead of salic?
EDIT: By the way Jark, your duchy is in good shape, you didn't have to experience the height of the Bubonic Plague as we all have, and I did grant you many counties in North Africa, and I think I may have granted you a ducal title. That's why I think we need a King, so that the vassals are actually vying for favor in the eyes of the King.
The important thing is to (also) make the wife young.Jarkko Suvinen said:Ok, a list of (wild) suggestions for next edition.
3) Duke of Brittany made a youngster