• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
@Emissary of the Prophets: You've got me scratching my head now. I've always pronounced the "ch" in German "ich," "bach," "nicht," and "Mädchen" as the same consonant. What's the distinction between the voiceless velar and palatal fricatives in this context? I wonder if regional pronunciation has something to do with it.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
@Emissary of the Prophets: You've got me scratching my head now. I've always pronounced the "ch" in German "ich," "bach," "nicht," and "Mädchen" as the same consonant. What's the distinction between the voiceless velar and palatal fricatives in this context? I wonder if regional pronunciation has something to do with it.
I don't know about 98% of what you guys talk about here, but ich vs Bach is kinda like a swooshing sound vs something is in your throat.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Sceal ic fǽhþu dreógan - I must endure enmity. Here the sceal ic is decipherable via Scandinavian, and dreógan is not initially clear but turns out to be a relative of Scandinavian dryg. And Scottish English apparently has dree in the same meaning. But our friend fǽhþu? I see it's supposed to be an ancestor of modern English feud but that etymology seems less than obvious. Very interesting that fǽhþu, assuming a pronunciation like [fæːx.θ], with or without another vowel at the end, sounds more similar to the Baltic root pikt (pikts, piktas, etc), meaning angry. Fascinating!
Wiktionary agrees with you that feud/fǽhþu are cognate with Baltic piktas--which is sending me for a loop because I was under the impression Baltic was a satem language like Slavic, Armenian, and Indo-Iranian, but the original PIE root is *peyḱ-, which should yield /s/ in a satem language. (Though I do know that satemization is only 100% consistent in Indo-Iranian.)
But this explication of Ænglisc vowels and consonants might be so excessively nerdy on my part as to make my more casual readers' heads explode.
No, my head is not going to explode. I very much appreciate the deep-thinking of the commentators who read this AAR. This could be the deepest thread in AARLand that I've found so far. Learning something almost daily from reading just the comments here.
 
  • 1Love
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
@Nikolai: Haha, and for me it’s a swooshing sound I make in my throat. :) But you can definitely hold your own here too. You deciphered those Anglo-Saxon bynames in seconds!

@Chac1: Thanks very much, that’s extremely gratifying. My friends and I do have rather niche interests in dead languages, classic literature, and history of all kinds, but I’m very pleased to hear that you’re enjoying our banter.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
@Emissary of the Prophets: You've got me scratching my head now. I've always pronounced the "ch" in German "ich," "bach," "nicht," and "Mädchen" as the same consonant. What's the distinction between the voiceless velar and palatal fricatives in this context? I wonder if regional pronunciation has something to do with it.
The palatal fricative is pronounced a little more to the front of the mouth, with partial closure at the hard palate rather than the soft palate. Wikipedia has audio files and diagrams which are pretty helpful: /ç/ vs. /x/. Dialects of German are not my specialty. Off the top of my head, I don't know any German dialect that pronounces /ç/ as [x] in all positions, but I know some dialects (Hamburg, I think?) are notorious for pronouncing it as [ʃ].
 
  • 1Love
  • 1
Reactions:
@Emissary of the Prophets: Aber ich spreche Hochdeutsch! :) I should probably reach out to my cousins in Freiburg im Breisgau and see if there is any difference in their experience.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
That makes sense, actually. Now that I think of it, I think one of the distinctive features of Swiss German/High Alemannic is no /ç/--though IIRC those dialects have a uvular fricative /χ/ instead (like a voiceless French R). Other forms of Hochdeutsch might be similar.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
@Emissary of the Prophets: Not sure. I thought my great-aunt's Badener dialect was pretty much unintelligible back in the '90s, and Schwyzertüütsch might as well be a whole different language. :p
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Lore: Noble Houses of the Myrcna
LORE: NOBLE HOUSES OF THE MYRCNA

VHONIv4.jpg

Like many early medieval tribal cultures, the most fundamental unit of Ænglisc society was the hús (“house,” i.e. “household,” “family”). Each family belonged to a larger kinship group known as a cynréd (“kindred” or “clan”), of whom the senior-most member was the ealdor (“elder” or “chieftain”). A group of related kinships constituted a cynn (“kin,” i.e. “tribe”), and a collection of allied or related tribes was a folc (“folk,” “people,” or “nation”).

We know the names of hundreds of Ænglisc kindreds from this period, almost all of which end with the suffix “-ing” or “-ling,” which was an indicator of descent or belonging. However, the names of the three most prominent families of Mierċe (outside of the royal Iclingas) remain uncertain. Scholars refer to these lineages as the “B,” “C,” and “W” dynasties because of their proclivity for choosing dithematic names for their heirs that began with these respective initials. The names of these kindreds that are used in this story are therefore conjectural, but they are nonetheless actual Ænglisc tribal names—simply the ones that made the most sense to use in this context. Their family seats are likewise mostly educated guesses. A few random details below have also been invented to fill in the gaps, which have been woven in seamlessly with the facts as we currently understand them.

The following were the most prominent noble families of Mierċe during the eighth century:

The Iclingas: The royal dynasty of the Myrcna.
Dynastic Head(s): Ealdorman Heardberht (de jure), Ealdorman Offa (de facto)
Family Seat(s): Tomeworthig, Mierċe (royal court), Legaceaster, Wreocensæte (Offa’s hold)

Named for their great ancestor Icel, the warlord who first led the West Ængle across the Norþsæ to Britannia, this once mighty dynasty is now a dying breed. This is due in part to the misdeeds of their most prominent scion, the notorious King Penda Hæþen (“the Heathen”), who ruthlessly dominated the neighboring kingdoms for years until he was slain in battle in A.D. 655. The subsequent period of internecine conflict between his descendants ensured that they eventually became entirely extinct in the patrilineal line. The most senior Iclingas in the eighth century were therefore the descendants of Penda’s brother, King Eowa, which included the murdered King Æthelbald and his kinsman, Offa. Their ealdor at this time was technically Ealdorman Heardberht, brother of the late king, but he was elderly and infirm. It fell to Ealdorman Offa to lead the dynasty, as the only remaining Iclinga of any prominence who was of sound mind and body.

The Ceolingas: The “C” dynasty of Mierċe.
Dynastic Head: Ealdorman Cuthberht
Family Seat: Ægelsburh, Middel Ængle

A cadet branch of the Iclingas who were descended from a sister of King Penda. She returned to Mierċe after being repudiated by her husband, King Cœnwalh of West Seaxe (who was himself a descendant of a warlord named Ceol, hence the dynastic name). Although their noble lineage was through a lesser line, this comparative lack of prestige ultimately served in their favor, as it meant that their lineage survived when many of their higher-born kin perished during the decades of civil strife following Penda’s demise (making the tragic fate of Cynethryth’s family all the more ironic). The Ceolingas tended to be consummate survivors and clever politicians who stepped in to fill the gaps left by their less-fortunate kinsmen. Most of them had names that began with “Ceol-,” “Cœn-,” “Cyne-,” “Cwén-,” and “Cuth-” as a mark of their heritage. The murder of Ealdorman Cyneberht meant that the leadership of this family devolved upon his brother, Cuthberht.

The Beorningas: The “B” dynasty of Mierċe.
Dynastic Head: King Beornræd Swica (“the Traitor”)
Family Seat: Ligeraceaster, Útera Mierċe

The dynasty of the usurper and regicide, King Beornræd. They claimed descent from Beowulf, the legendary culture hero of the Geatas, and had a reputation for relentless brutality to match that of their purported ancestor. Their line may have originally hailed from the lands of the Beornice (possibly “bear-like ones,” referring to their bravery) in Northanhymbra, as their warriors’ ancestral totem was the bear. Most of them had names that began with “Beorn-,” “Beorht-,” “Bryht-,” and “Burg-.”

The Wigingas: The “W” dynasty of Mierċe.
Dynastic Head: Ealdorman Wigheard
Family Seat: Badecanwelle, Pecsæte

A Myrcna family that rose to prominence in the northern hill country. They claimed descent from Wiglaf, a hearth-companion of Beowulf and a prominent member of his warband. As such, they were distant kin to the Beorningas. Their proximity to Hréopandún meant that they regularly participated in the Witenagemot. The ealdor of their dynasty at this time was Ealdorman Wigheard. In fact, all of them had names that began with “Wig-.”

The Ossingas: The royal dynasty of the Hwicce.
Dynastic Heads: Petty Kings Eanberht, Uhtred, and Ealdred (jointly)
Family Seat: Wincelcumbe, Hwicce

This lineage was descended from the marriage of a Hwicce king and a daughter of King Oswiu of Northanhymbra, who was a mighty overlord of Britannia (called a “Bretwalda”). Their sons all bore names that began with “Os-“ in honor of their grandfather’s noble lineage (although that tradition soon fell out of fashion because of Mierċe’s longstanding rivalry with Northanhymbra). Due to Hwicce’s law of partible inheritance, each king divided his lands and wealth between his heirs, who then ruled the kingdom jointly. At this time, the kings of the Hwicce were three brothers, Eanberht, Uhtred, and Ealdred. Their father had likewise previously shared the kingdom with his own brothers, but he was the only one who had surviving issue. Their royal titles notwithstanding, these petty kings only kept their thrones by acknowledging the suzerainty of the Myrcna.

The Ealingas: The royal dynasty of the Lindisware.
Dynastic Head: Petty King Eanfrith
Family Seat: Lindcylene, Lindissi

At this time, the kings of the Lindiswara were tributaries or vassals of the Myrcna rather than part of the kingdom proper. That is how their dynasty preserved its semi-independence for so long, by swearing fealty to whichever of their neighbors was strong enough to exercise regional hegemony (usually either Mierċe or Northanhymbra). They were shrewd negotiators, but not particularly reliable in a fight. In the eighth century, most of them had names that began with “Ea-,” “Ean-,” or “Eald-.”

***​

Author's Note:
Historically, the Iclingas eventually died out and the "B," "C," and "W" dynasties fought over the Mercian throne until the last man standing married a West Saxon princess and became a vassal of Alfred the Great. Somehow, I don't think things are going to play out quite the same in Mead and Blood, but don't expect these feuding houses to get along. This concludes the second history book update. I'm pleased to report that Chapter 2 is already in the works. Thanks for reading, and as always, please feel free to share your thoughts!

CW2TMPg.png
 
Last edited:
  • 3Like
  • 2Love
Reactions:
Really useful overview. With this many precariously allied and outright feuding clans, it’s easy to see how no Mercian king would ever truly be able to sit easily on the throne. Will Offa be the man to bring some unity to the realm?
 
  • 2
  • 1Love
Reactions:
Really useful overview. With this many precariously allied and outright feuding clans, it’s easy to see how no Mercian king would ever truly be able to sit easily on the throne. Will Offa be the man to bring some unity to the realm?
Somehow, someone, needs to unite the clans into one, coherent unit. Might take generations, tbh.
 
  • 1Love
  • 1
Reactions:
Scholars refer to these lineages as the “B,” “C,” and “W” dynasties because of their proclivity for choosing dithematic names for their heirs that began with these respective initials.

And these letter names are easier to refer to! I don't know what it is about the old Anglo-Saxon names but they're pretty much the perfect example of the kind of names I find difficult to remember. Badecanwelle and Eanberht confuse my brain somehow.
 
  • 1Love
  • 1
  • 1Haha
Reactions:
@DensleyBlair: Indeed, and when the king is perceived as merely the first among many powerful nobles, rather than some sacrosanct personage, it becomes very easy for rival nobles to covet the throne.

@Nikolai: Agreed, but that’s the sort of thing that will take centuries, honestly. England’s noble families were still feuding as late as the fifteenth century. Read The Wars of the Roses by @coz1 if you don’t believe me.

@WPCSolver: Yes, I get that. For every charming, rustic word like “folc,” there’s a real tongue-twister like “heorþgeneátas.” Incidentally, Badecanwelle is modern Bakewell, home of the famous tarts. A lot can change in 1,200 years.

 
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Badecanwelle is modern Bakewell, home of the famous tarts.
Hoping we all get our just desserts soon enough with the next chapter. Good historical context.
 
  • 2Love
  • 1
Reactions:
Anglo-Saxons you say? I must admit my knowledge of this period is Offa's Dyke and a few related nuggets so the history posts have been exceptionally useful in explaining who is who and what is why.

On the main story as it were it is intriguing, as has been said Offa is a name to conjure with and Lady Cynethryth seems like she will be quite a feisty character as she pursues fǽhþu. In contrast Beornræd seems either over confident or a bit of an idiot (or I suppose both) for his pursuit of Cynethryth, on this showing she is too strong willed to submit and too dangerous to leave alive. It looks likely he will pay the blood price for misjudging her.
 
  • 2
  • 1Love
Reactions:
@Chac1: Thanks, I hope so too! I don’t think I’ve ever had a Bakewell Tart personally, but they look very tasty. Another item on the bucket list for the next time I cross the pond.

@El Pip: Offa’s Dyke, you say? ;) I’m glad the history book posts have been informative thus far. The last thing I want to do is bore my audience! As for Beornræd, he is actually quite a clever schemer, but it’s possible he may have met his match in Offa. We’ll see. But when it comes to his actions re: Cynethryth, shall we just say it’s clear that Beornræd is thinking with body parts other than his brain? When you get a closer look at her in the next update, I think it will become very apparent why he’s taken such an interest in her. Thanks for reading!
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
@Nikolai: Agreed, but that’s the sort of thing that will take centuries, honestly. England’s noble families were still feuding as late as the fifteenth century. Read The Wars of the Roses by @coz1 if you don’t believe me.
Sure, sure. But even then the king, if capable, had far more sway then this.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions:
@Nikolai: Well, it is currently a time of civil war after all. For four decades, King Æthelbald dominated not only all the great families of Mercia, but also all the rival kingdoms of southern Britain. But his sudden assassination has thrown the established order into turmoil.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
The old status quo seems destroyed. That could be an issue for Offa,

Also, I found the references to Beowulf interesting. How much will that text be referenced in the story?
 
  • 2
  • 1Love
Reactions:
@HistoryDude: Yes, even if Offa defeats Beornræd, there will be quite a lot to do to restore Mercia’s prior stability and power. As for Beowulf, it seemed an obvious connection to make with the “B” Dynasty. The story may be referenced every so often; I may even quote from it. It seems appropriate, considering it is the most well-known piece of Old English literature to have survived to the present day.
 
  • 2
  • 1Like
  • 1Love
Reactions: