• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Is it not compatible? I have been playing it fine for 15 mins, it seems fine to me, and it's now possible to marry people of different religions (though I have only tested it as the Ironborn)
 
Does anybody have a quick fix for the 1.103 update? I don't like waiting and if they take too long...

It's already compatible. Feel free to update.

I'm having a problem with the reclaim ancestral sword cb.

As soon as i declare war it ends stating casus belli invalid.

I'm trying to reforge ice as a stark king. I'm attacking the king of the iron
islands because he has the lannister sword. I already have the house mormont sword in my possession.
 
I'm having problems with the "Your son is angry that they dont hold a fief"-mechanic, both gameplaywise and in regards to lore.
For those who dont know, if you refuse to give them land (a county/lord-level title) when they ask (all the time) you get 5 tyranny, giving a global -5 opinion and -0.05 prestige per month.

As an extreme example take Walder Frey:the guy has about 40 sons and grandsons, all of them unlanded. Since the penalty stacks, I ended up with -40 opinion penalty within a year, obviously making plots, diplomacy and pretty much everything impossible.

Now, in the books pretty much all of them were unlanded (or at least did not have a "lord"-level title) and this didn't make everyone in the realm hate him, and I can't think of any situation where the sons would demand huge tracts of land from their father.

Sure, their sons might have small estates, but nothing close to ruling an entire county. My proposal is to remove this feature from this mod altogether, as it really makes no sense mechanically or lorewise.
 
I'm having problems with the "Your son is angry that they dont hold a fief"-mechanic, both gameplaywise and in regards to lore.
For those who dont know, if you refuse to give them land (a county/lord-level title) when they ask (all the time) you get 5 tyranny, giving a global -5 opinion and -0.05 prestige per month.

As an extreme example take Walder Frey:the guy has about 40 sons and grandsons, all of them unlanded. Since the penalty stacks, I ended up with -40 opinion penalty within a year, obviously making plots, diplomacy and pretty much everything impossible.

Now, in the books pretty much all of them were unlanded (or at least did not have a "lord"-level title) and this didn't make everyone in the realm hate him, and I can't think of any situation where the sons would demand huge tracts of land from their father.

Sure, their sons might have small estates, but nothing close to ruling an entire county. My proposal is to remove this feature from this mod altogether, as it really makes no sense mechanically or lorewise.

I disagree removing it completely -- but mostly. A better alternative would be that heirs apparent and second-in-lines of kings and perhaps lords paramount can ask for a predefined title, as with the Lordship of Dragonstone for the heir to the Iron Throne. Summerhall for the second son sounds appropriate.
 
I think it'd be pretty cool, if your character has the lustful trait, to have the option to visit a brothel in the intrigue section. I have a soft spot for bastards in this game, not sure why (I suppose, really, I just like making cadet branches XD ).
 
I think it'd be pretty cool, if your character has the lustful trait, to have the option to visit a brothel in the intrigue section. I have a soft spot for bastards in this game, not sure why (I suppose, really, I just like making cadet branches XD ).
Just go on a long trip through Westeros bedding every eligible woman you find. You're bound to get a living bastard out of it.
 
Just go on a long trip through Westeros bedding every eligible woman you find. You're bound to get a living bastard out of it.

Of course, half of Westeros is addicted to moon tea which will only end up clogging up the interface. Playing as Maegor the Cruel, I bedded some fifty women with favourable traits throughout the Realm, got twelve pregnant (including the High Septoness ... twice.) and ended up with three living children.
 
Of course, half of Westeros is addicted to moon tea which will only end up clogging up the interface. Playing as Maegor the Cruel, I bedded some fifty women with favourable traits throughout the Realm, got twelve pregnant (including the High Septoness ... twice.) and ended up with three living children.

Yeah it sucks. But oh well, power on you noble lord!

Maybe they should make Moontea cost 1gold or something. So only highborn women could do it.

That's a great idea.
 
On the matter of moon tea and bedding - I believe some possibility of harsher repercussions from the liege would be in order. I mean: I once bedded and impregnated firstborn daughter of King of Westeros this way, and I tried to bed his wife too (though it proved futile - and I let my amors go after 4-5 tries)... I am sure I should risk more :)

Aaaaand the most hilarious is that if I tried (albeit unsuccessfully) to bed queen regnant, then she would lose more than me in case of rejection :)
 
You can bed whoever is in the court your character is in. So - if you are e.g. chancellor of Iron Throne at the court of King's Landing, then you can bed anyone on the court of Iron Throne, queen included.

Also - you can e.g. try to bed this stupid vassal's wife if you raise army in this province and appoint your character as commander. Great way to roleplay indulgent lords!

Edit: In this playthrough, AI Aegon choose... Harrenhall... as his capital o_0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Another possibility would be the option for the husband to FORBID the woman from using Moontea. Could you really imagine Ramsay Bolton letting his wife to drink Moontea? Or Tywin Lannister? Or Randyll Tarly? Sure, perhaps they would never find out. But what if they found out? And would their wives try to do it, even if they hate them?

The husband should be able to watch them closely. I hate that I don't really have any voice into that. Besides, yeah, women drinking moontea are far too frequent.
 
Another possibility would be the option for the husband to FORBID the woman from using Moontea. Could you really imagine Ramsay Bolton letting his wife to drink Moontea? Or Tywin Lannister? Or Randyll Tarly? Sure, perhaps they would never find out. But what if they found out? And would their wives try to do it, even if they hate them?
I think Ramsay Bolton would be comply to his wife getting drink moon tea, if she became mistress of harsh King/Lord Paramount. Bolton aren't suicidal - well, at least Roose wasn't. And I imagine that if e.g. Brandon Stark (brother, not son of Eddard) would inherit North, such forced moon tea would be in quite popular.

Of course, I don't say about their natural children.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.