Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

[RELEASE] A Game of Thrones v0.9

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Crusader Kings II 69928 Bug Reports 19715 User Modifications 10601 Suggestions 5969 Tech Support 6373 After Action Reports
Show only dev responses
ZeroFighterR said:
Idk why he was removed, He was there in lore, just as a kingsguard member instead of lord commander.
Click to expand...
At some point in the 300 years of Targaryen rule, but we don't know when (he's mentioned, but not given a date). The worldbook gives all the original members of the King's Guard, and he isn't one of them:

LC Corlys Velaryon
Richard Roote
Addison Hill (bastard of Cornfield)
Gregory Goode
Griffith Goode
Humfrey the Mummer
Robin Darklyn

I'm more annoyed that Harren the Black still has his daughter, despite being explicitly stated to be daughterless.
 
We're doing the history one region at a time. Minus the obvious Targaryen/Post conquest stuff. The Iron isles hasn't been looked properly yet. (I.e. the Volmark being descended from Harwyn Hardhands sister. Harren's grand-aunt). Lannister kings are still Loren rather than Loreon for instance. While theres only 4 Durran's at the minute. (Not 24 :O ).
 
CJMoore said:
We're doing the history one region at a time. Minus the obvious Targaryen/Post conquest stuff. The Iron isles hasn't been looked properly yet. (I.e. the Volmark being descended from Harwyn Hardhands sister. Harren's grand-aunt). Lannister kings are still Loren rather than Loreon for instance. While theres only 4 Durran's at the minute. (Not 24 :O ).
Click to expand...

Will Houses such as House Tully now get members going back to when we now know they were around?
Also, will things such as the Royces being High Kings of the Vale (or at least Robar II) be shown? Useless trivia, I know, but still.
 
keeps crashing when I call the banners aand also can't play as Jon in the feast for crows scenario. Just to let you know, so glad you got an update out.
 
TMSaxon said:
Will Houses such as House Tully now get members going back to when we now know they were around?
Also, will things such as the Royces being High Kings of the Vale (or at least Robar II) be shown? Useless trivia, I know, but still.
Click to expand...

Yep, pretty much. Having all the regnal numbers correct for the kingdoms, makes it all the more 'canon' and lore friendly.
 
CJMoore said:
We're doing the history one region at a time. Minus the obvious Targaryen/Post conquest stuff. The Iron isles hasn't been looked properly yet. (I.e. the Volmark being descended from Harwyn Hardhands sister. Harren's grand-aunt). Lannister kings are still Loren rather than Loreon for instance. While theres only 4 Durran's at the minute. (Not 24 :O ).
Click to expand...
Fair enough. I was just confused by the line about Hoare-Volmark marriages in the change log. I know it's a ton of material, and assume you wanted to get a compatch out in a reasonable time.
 
Anyone know if the new borders submod was removed with latest release? I've been playing with that since forever but I actually prefer this look with thicker borders and all, it looks better.
 
How to avoid rebelions as wilding?
Every but every version has it... even if player hold 2 regions, there will be constantly rebellion in second (not capital) prov every 2-3 months.

Also, there is some FAQ aboud Dothraki? Playing as them is even worse, and informations from manual aren't enough. Basically, how improve basic building?
 
You can't avoid rebellions as a wildling, they are event spawned and intended to represent the way a kingdom beyond the wall needs to be actively held together rather than passively existing like a southern one.

Dothraki improve the size of their horde though events based on your Khal's prestige. The more famous you are the more warriors will flock to your khalasar.
 
Ok, Dothraki seems fine.
But Wildings are unplayable with this way. Only viable option is winning rebelions -> selling rebels leaders as slaves -> thanks to it having a lot of gold -> always having some merc band. If the only way to play them is gamey one, then it's bad imho. Imho it should be dependant on the king lord/king itself, if they're "weak" rulers, rebelions should spawn, otherwise not.
 
Personally I think it works, because it makes the only viable strategy for the KbtW to try and make it south as fast as possible and abandon the far north. Which is fairly accurate to history.

I will grant you it is very annoying though.
 
Whahah said:
The Nights Watch isn't playable at the AFFC start date, with the explanation 'Not allowed to play Republics', despite having the required DLC.
Click to expand...

Same thing happens to me.
 
Harren The Red creates House Whent, Vulture King House Dayne and some Galloway dude founds House Lothston if they win against IT. WAD?
 
It was said several times that it was only to make it working with the newest version and change some things because of the worldbook.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back