• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
The Road to Hell – 1345-1373

1652304881936.png

The death of Peroz II, the first Babakid Shahanshah, sent Persia on the path to another decade of civil war in a period of internal strife that rivalled only the twelfth century Mazdaki Wars in its prolonged and destructive nature. Much like the conflict that had seen Peroz rise to power in the 1320s, this was pitched a variety of different factions against one another.

The largest rebel faction, and the one that triggered the war, was a traditionalist princely revolt aimed at restoring Zoroastrian Orthodoxy, and receiving the backing the High Priesthood. This Orthodox faction rallied around the claim of the Satrap of Yazd Darius Vali – who had a connection to the fallen Bavandid dynasty as a grandson of Shahanshah Sina through his second daughter Leila. His supporters were scattered around the empire – in Yazd itself, Kerman, Fars, southern Iraq, Syria, Azerbaijan and among the Turkmen. From the start the Valids were met with difficulties. The powerful Koohdashtids of Khorosan and Transoxiania had initially conspired to join Darius’ revolt, but relented in favour of pursuing their own claim to the imperial crown – attacking the Turkmen before they could deploy their forces south to assist the wider Orthodox rebellion.

The second rebellion, with a powerbase in the central Persian Jibal region, did not coaless until the second year of the civil war as these lands were ravaged by the rampaging Babakid and Valid armies. It began as a peasants revolt, but soon received the backing of the local lords who sought to capture this popular energy for their own ends. It centred around the pretender Bakhtiar – who descended from the Alborz mountains south of Mazandaran in the aftermath of Peroz II’s death and claimed to be a lost Bavandid Prince who had spent the past decades in hiding. His messianic arrival electified the masses who saw in him a figure who would end the petty squables of the elite and return Persia to good order, true religion and greatness.

Alongside the three claimants to the imperial throne, major religious unrest broke out on either side of the empire – with Christians rising in Palestine and Manicheans in Khorosan. These revolts would act to paralyse the ability of the Syrian lords to take part in the early exchanges of the civil war while they sent their forces south, and equally limited the Khoodashtids capacity to project their power while they addressed their own religious threat.

1652304914104.png

In the opening stages of the war the Babakids were the first to take aggressive action. From his core territories around Mosul, Shahanshah Amin struck southwards towards Baghdad, gaining many new recruits from the local Arab Muslim population to place the great city under siege. However, after an unsuccessful attempt to storm the city, Amin was forced to settle into a lengthy siege. To the east, his brother Vahhab had led a second Babakid army, including the feared Mazandarani Mongol contingent, into the Jibal where he had engaged Darius in a number of battles. The dramatic outbreak of Bakhtiar’s revolt in the region then forced him to flee as the lost Prince’s massed swarms overwhelmed the Babakids.

1652305182738.png

With the Babakids on the backfoot, soldiers loyal to Darius descended from Azerbaijan to capture Tabriz – the largest city that had remained loyal to Amin. With a large population of Armenians and Kurds, Darius’s men massacred many thousands following their victory – viewing these non-Persian groups a Babakid fifth columnists. Following this, after fighting some brief skirmishes against Bakhtiar’s forces, the two Orthodox rebel armies agreed to cooperate against their common foe – directing all their energies against the Babakids and Mosul. Fearing the loss of his capital, Amin broke of his siege of Baghdad to confront the enemy at the battles of Mosul and Babek – scattering them from the field. With the Babakids now on the offensive once more, Amin moved north to subdue Azerbaijan and the Caucuses before returning south in 1348, already three years into the war.

1652304819144.png

While war raged in the heart of the empire, Palestine was ablaze. Early in the civil war an ageing Christian knight, Kozma, had led a rising of the Christians of the Holy Land against their Zoroastrian overlords. Kozma met with great success, capturing Jerusalem and proclaiming himself Duke. As he called for support from the Greeks, Bulgarians and Kozarians, his Orthodox Christian kin, none would agree to march to war but each provided aid that would allow him to keep the Persian lords of Syria at bay and its independence intact for years. However, in late 1347, not long after the battle of Babek, a Babakid army under the command of the Armenian general Thoros marched into Syria and crushed the rebellious Satraps in a short campaign of great brutality. He moved to uproot many of the existing ruling families of the region and replace them with loyal followers of the Babakids, and their Mazdakite wing of the Zoroastrian Church – turning the regional elites away from their history as a bastion of religious Orthodoxy. Thoros continued his campaign southwards – defeating Kozma and recapturing Jerusalem. By the summer of 1349, all of the western provinces had been safely secured by the Babakids.

1652304755593.png

In the east, tensions between the declining power of Zoroastrianism and the rising star of Manichaeanism had been growing for the better part of a century by the outbreak of civil war in 1345. Shahab II Koohdashtid had attempted to maintain a balancing act in his increasingly divided realm, yet this would soon be disrupted by the war. In the opening phase of the conflict, Shahab had sent his armies to subdue the Turkmen, who had pledged loyalty to Darius. Under the command of the Manichean general Mashad Dizaid, the Khorosani armies met with tremendous success against their foes. With great prestige, and having little interest in the dynastic struggle in the west, Mashad proclaimed himself the rightful Shah of Khorosan, to the delight of his co-religionists.

As Shahab unleashed a purge of Manicheans within his administration in Khiva who he feared would side with Mashad, and a spare of pogroms against Manichean civilians throughout his realm, Khorosan fell into a bloody civil war. For much of this conflict, the Koohdashtids held the upper hand against the lowborn Mashad, largely shunned by the nobility and regional elites. The decisive engagement came in 1350 at Herat, the hear of the rebellion. Shahab had been besieging the city for over a year, with Mashad and his inner circle trapped inside. However, a large peasant army drawn from the wider region surrounded Shahab’s own army. As Mashad sallied forth from the city, Shahab was trapped in a pincer and was killed on the field of battle. Shortly later Shahab’s brother, Shahrokh, made peace with the Manicheans – giving them control over Herat as the first Persian Manichean state in the faith's long history.

1652304726676.png

Back in the west, from 1349 Shahanshah Amin set his sights on the lands east of the Zagros. Here, since the twin victories at Mosul and Babek, the brief unity of the two Orthodox factions had fallen away – with Bakhtiar consolidating most of Persian heartland and forcing Darius to withdraw to Baghdad. Amin’s initial attempts to push into these territories proved disastrous. Faced with an implacably hostile local population and a motivated enemy, the Babakid army was almost completely destroyed by Bakhtiar. In Iraq, Amin’s brother Vahhab met with greater success – starving Baghdad into submission in 1350 and capturing Darius – killing him and ending his rebellion. With Iraq secured, Amin made a second attempt to cross the mountains in 1351. He met with some limited success – capturing the great city of Isfahan. Yet, such was the cost of this campaign his forces were far too depleted to push on and finally quash the prince from the mountains.

1652304640340.png

The deadlock was broken by an unexpected emissary who arrived at the court of Shahrokh Koohdashtid in Khiva from the Shahanshah later in 1351. The Khorosanis had been nominally at war with the emperor since 1345, although with their own civil war having only recently concluded their involvement had been extremely minor. The Babakids offered to recognise Shahrokh’s independence from Mosul in exchange for him joining their war effort and attacking Bakhtiar from the east. When Shahrokh agreed, the fate of the war was effectively sealed. Through the next two years the Khorosanis and Babakids made great progress – pursuing Bakhtiar back towards the Alborz mountains from where he had first appears. In 1353, after eight years of war, he was captured near Qom – forced to renounce his claims to imperial lineage, revealing himself as the son of shepards, not kings, and finally lay down his arms. Having hoped for mercy, the pretender was duly flayed until dead by the victorious Babakids and his body displayed publicly in Tehran for all to see.

1652304612256.png

Having won a second near-decade long civil war in the space of two generations, the Babakids had secured their power once more. Yet the empire had been badly broken by the exhaustions of the conflict and her eastern provinces had definitively slipped from her grasp.

1652304591099.png

Although victorious in war, nefarious drama never lurked far from Persian royalty. The Shahanshah and his brother Vahhab and worked together closely to defend their father’s legacy during the recent civil war. Nonetheless, the pair despised one another. Beyond the inevitability of brotherly rivalry and jealousies, the pair had competed with one another for the affection of their cousin Aryana. Shortly after his ascension to the throne, Amin had ended this contest by taking Aryana as his wife. Yet Vahhab continued to care deeply for her, and was despondent at her poor treatment at the hands of his brother – who regularly beat her severely, often in public. Following one of his rages against his wife in 1355, Amin killed Aryana with his bare hands. Filled with rage, Vahhab confronted his brother in the gardens of the imperial Babakid palace in Mosul and, as a scuffle ensued, stabbed his brother to death. Having committed a fratricidal act of regicide, Vahhab had to move quickly to seize power lest he face the consequences of his bloody actions – installing his nephew Peroz III on the throne and establishing himself as regent. With the support of the Babakid military, loyal following his service in the civil war, and with most opponents of the crown still yet to recover from their defeats in war, Vahhab was secure.

1652304562319.png

With imperial power having fallen into his hands, Vahhab moved early in his regency to make use of it for his own ends. In 1357 his led his armies northwards against the Kozarians in a struggle for control over eastern Armenia. The Persian army captured Yerevan and then, in their first major engagement with the Kozarians, secured an even more valuable prize – the Kozarian crown prince Vachagan. Despite having more than enough resources to continue to fight, the Caucasians chose to cut an early truce in order to ensure the safe return of their prince – surrendering the army over to Mosul’s authority. Hailed for his rapid victory by the military, Vahhab proceeded to claim the title Shah of Armenia for himself.

1652304488942.png

Persian authority on her western frontier was seriously threatened during the late 1360s by an intimidating Neo-Byzantine revolt that was sparked by the arrival of a descendant of the last reigning Basileus in Cilicia with a band of soldiers. The Byzantine rebels found mass support among the native Greek and Armenian peoples of Cilicia and Eastern Anatolia – and significant aid from the neighbouring Greek states and the Kozarians. The rebellion proved difficult to contain, with the Greeks and Armenians answering the call of the Roman banner of old in their tens of thousands – overwhelming the armies of the Syrian lords, and ransacking their lands and forcing them to call on Mosul for aid. Even after the arrival of imperial aid, it would take more than three bloody years of fighting for order to be restored through all of Cilicia and the rebellion to finally be quashed.

The Persian nobility of Syria had been utterly devastated by the rebellion – with dozens of lords and Satraps slain. Furthermore, the experiences of the conflict had brought attention to the weakness of the western frontier – which had been unable to defend itself without the aid of Mosul. Vahhab therefore sought to consolidate the western territories into the Syrian Shahdom that stretched from Cilicia in the north to Palestine in the south, under the rule of Mashad Ayeshahid in Aleppo. Mashad was a closely ally of Vahhab, and like him a strong believer in the Mazdakite reformation of the Zoroastrian Church.

1652304432880.png

While in Iran, Persia’s elites focussed on their internal struggles and its regent Vahhab grew ever more comfortable in his power, a figure was rising in the east that would soon make the very mountains of the earth shake. Timur. The Iron Khan.
 
Last edited:
  • 1Love
Reactions:
Poor Persia, a second intense civil war in a single lifetime, and a regicidal regent dominating the state - with the our lands in the east now lost. And then ... he has arrived.

Hold up. As in Victoria 2?

Well then, it pleases me to hear we've got oursevles a megacampaign!

As long as there are people interested in reading and the story is fun to write, we do indeed! :D

He tried for Strength in Diversity.

But got more diversity perhaps at the expense of central institutional strength.

An actual accident or ‘under suspicious circumstanes’? ;) Another civil war? A grand Persian tradition!

As ever, a chaotic melting pot of rival military powers, religions and cultures. No wonder the rulers find it so hard to keep it all under control.

Huzzah!

Sewed the wind, reaping the whirlwind.

If the Babakids had hoped their new approach would create a more peaceable realm, they have certainly not succeeded in that regard - with this most recent civil war if anything worse than the one that brought them to power.

Persia was certainly a much more stable empire prior to the Mongol invasions - when there was unity around a single faith, dynasty and idea of the state that looks a long, long way away now. That said, the empire is simply much too large now to easily govern from a single point - with huge distances, diversities and populations to contend with. And unhappy age!

Tamerlan is definitely going to be licking his fingers as he proceeds to turn us to dust.

Prescient indeed! In game I actually had to go in manually to trigger the events to make appear and go on his adventure as he didn't seem to appear on his own. In game the way it works is Timur appears in a random Turkic or Mongol court with incredible stats, sits around for a while and then gets an 'adventure' CB and a bunch of event troops. He then gets special conquest CBs similar to the Mongols and free reign to go out on a path of conquest. Let's see how Persia fairs!

Crusader Kings, by design, is very Holy Roman. Hopefully CK3 could do something about a glaring lack of a bureaucracy.

In game, as your empire gets to a certain size the weight of vassals to liege territory always gets to the point where the central power is very hard to maintain unless you are willing to be consistently tyrannical and keep all your strongest vassals in prison or as your best friend. Anything else and you usually end up with lots of very powerful magnates as they consolidate large territories themselves. This is especially true when they can expand externally without your say so and you aren't hemmed in by big neighbours (this was how my Koohdashtids became so powerful in the east - they started off with a single Satrapy).

Oh dang another civil war huh? What a damn shame that one, and I think everything Peroz 2 built might come tumbling down amidst the chaos, coupled with a potential Crusade to retake the Holy Land by the Catholic world, and Timur's eventual arrival, it seems the Persians are in for another round of troubled times. By the way are you looking to do a world update? Would be nice to see how the rest of the world is fairing during this ongoing crisis.

We are yet to face a Crusade yet, but the Orthodox Christians have already made a bid to reclaim the Holy Land. We shall if the Catholics make a bid from here. The most immediate danger is in the east, with unknown threat of Timur. We don't know how large his army will be, where he will target first and whether he will head for Persia or elsewhere. But we know this century of crisis is far from over.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
There comes the subject that we were all waiting for, perhaps it would not hurt to crush Persia and genocide its population so that they learn to be united and not follow in the footsteps of Sassanids.
 
  • 1Haha
Reactions:
The east is lost, which gives Timur a target before Persia. Still, Timur will target Persia.

Zoroastrianism is becoming increasingly like Orthodoxy instead of Catholicism - more decentralized and subject to temporal rulers.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Out of the frying pan, into the fire. The Babakids have scarcely secured their position as rulers of Persia, when another Mongol warlord comes thundering out of the steppes. This is shaping up to be quite the chaotic century indeed...
 
  • 2
Reactions:
And there he is, Timur's shadow looms over a battered and broken Persia that just recently crushed all its opposition at a terrible price. A great conflict is about to begin no doubt. And I fear it's gonna be a bloody affair.
 
  • 2
Reactions:
Khorosan fell into a bloody civil war
A civil war within a civil war. Very Persian!
As Mashad sallied forth from the city, Shahab was trapped in a pincer and was killed on the field of battle. Shortly later Shahab’s brother, Shahrokh, made peace with the Manicheans – giving them control over Herat as the first Persian Manichean state in the faith's long history.
Kudos to the Manichaeans, establishing their own a Persian state after all that time.
The deadlock was broken by an unexpected emissary who arrived at the court of Shahrokh Koohdashtid in Khiva from the Shahanshah later in 1351. The Khorosanis had been nominally at war with the emperor since 1345, although with their own civil war having only recently concluded their involvement had been extremely minor.
A turn up for the books, but wise cooperation given the circumstances.
Having hoped for mercy, the pretender was duly flayed until dead by the victorious Babakids and his body displayed publicly in Tehran for all to see.
Wel, that was a vain hope: death to traitors!
Although victorious in war, nefarious drama never lurked far from Persian royalty.
Of course it did. :D
Following one of his rages against his wife in 1355, Amin killed Aryana with his bare hands. Filled with rage, Vahhab confronted his brother in the gardens of the imperial Babakid palace in Mosul and, as a scuffle ensued, stabbed his brother to death.
A violent and dramatic end. Seems like he may have got what he deserved.
While in Iran, Persia’s elites focussed on their internal struggles and its regent Vahhab grew ever more comfortable in his power, a figure was rising in the east that would soon make the very mountains of the earth shake. Timur. The Iron Khan.
Here we go again. The Persians will be wanting time to recover and consolidate before the next onslaught. Something they probably won’t get!
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Rise of the Iron Khan 1373-1381
Rise of the Iron Khan 1373-1381

1652536548409.png

Timur was born in 1341 into a humble Turco-Mongol Manichean background, with a Khiva Mongol father and Karluk mother in what was still the easternmost frontier of the Persian empire in the Khoodashtid Khorosan Shahdom. As a young child Timur and his family were sent into flight after the armies of Shahab II of Khorosan destroyed their native village not far from Bukkhara and sought to slaughter all the Manicheans they could find – leaving the young Timur with a lifelong hatred for Zoroastrian Orthodoxy. Arriving near Afghan-ruled Samarqand, there, after failing to find any opportunity among a swathe of fellow refugees, Timur’s father took to banditry – abandoning Timur and his mother. From a young age, Timur therefore took to thieving - – whether from the pockets of the rich in Samarqand, the caravans that criss-crossed the Silk Road or the cattle and horse herds in the countryside – to sustain himself. At the age of fourteen he was badly injured, leaving him lame in his right arm. Shortly later, he fled the region entirely after a blood feud with a clan of Karluks escalated into a cycle of violence with which he could not compete.

1652536681014.png

Timur would travel west, to the Persian province of Mazandaran, to enter into the service of a Mongol chieftan named Konchek. The Mazandarani Mongols regularly sought to refresh their soldier corps with new recruits from the east, and happily took on the young bandit and turned him into a warrior. Timur spent the next decade and a half of his life in Konchek’s service. Blooded in battle against the Kozars in 1357, still just sixteen, he soon proved himself ferocious on the field and a startling genius in command. By his early twenties he was already Konchek’s most trusted general, and aided him in establishing himself as the ruler of the entire Alborz range – from Gorgon in the east to Ardahan in the west and pressurising Vahhab into recognising him as the Satrap of Mazandaran.

1652536821668.png

Timur’s call to greatness would come from upheavals in his homeland in the east. Few parts of the Iranian world were as unstable as Central Asia in the second half of the fourteenth century – a remarkable feet considering the troubles afflicted the entire region. The region around Samarqand and the Fergana Valley was already overpopulated following an influx of Manicheans and other refugees from Khorosan during the Persian civil war of the late 1340s. However, two decades later its fragile stability would start to crack following the Panjabi conquest of Kabul from the Afghans – which triggered a migration of Pashtuns from their traditional homelands northwards.

This triggered conflict between the Manichean Karluk natives and the mostly Zoroastrian Pashtun incomers. With the Manichean Yamag Imonbek openly supporting the re-establishment of a Karluk Khanate, the Turkic rebels slaughtered thousands of Pashtun incomers but were ultimately overcome by the superior organisation of the Afghan Shah. Victorious, the Afghans showed now mercy – ransacking Samarqand, destroying its great Manichean temples and burning the Yamag at the stake in 1371.

News of these events drove Timur into a blind rage and he asked permission from his liege to go east to avenge his co-religionists. Konchek, a Khurmatza with little sympathy for the Orthodox Zoroastrians, granted this request and allowed Timur to take several hundred of his veteran warriors with him as he rode east.

1652536902015.png

Arriving in Transoxiania with his modest force, Timur defeated an Afghan army five times his number in battle and stormed into Samarqand. He then unleashed a campaign of incredible brutality the entire Pashtun population of the region around the city – killing tens of thousands, men, women and children alike. With the area secure, in 1373 the new Yamag in Samarqand anointed the lowborn son of a bandit as Khan and named him the leader of the Army of Light – the defender of the Manichean faithful. This unity between faith and military power would make the Timurid hordes a magnet for Manichean warriors, not only from the Persianate lands of Transoxiania and Khorosan – but also the vicious Steppe to the north.

The nature of Manichean philosophy played a significant role in shaping both Timur and his horde. A contradictory faith that could be both incredibly gentle and stark. Its priestly cast believed in absolute non-violence that extended to a vegetarian diet so strict that they were themselves forbidden from preparing food themselves lest they arm the life-force of the plants. Yet, much like Zoroastrianism, it was a dualistic religion – with an even sharper focus on the black and white divide between good and evil, light and dark. For the Timurids, their enemies were undoubtedly of pure darkness, for whom the only salvation from complete submission to Mani’s godly truth.

1652536928220.png

Samarqand was only the beginning as over the next four years the Iron Khan unleashed a blistering campaign to unify Khorosan and Transoxiania under his banner. He destroyed the pathetic remnants of the Koohdashtid Shahdom – seizing Khiva. He then made war against the Persian-aligned Turkmen – forcing them to switch allegiance to him and warding off the timid Iranians from daring to intervene to stop him. In the east, he pursued his bitter campaign against the Afghans by purging them from the Fergana Valley and committed similar genocidal massacres as he had around Samarqand – wiping any trace of the Pashtuns from Karluk soil. To the south, Timur capture Kabul from Punjabis and allowed his men to wantonly sack the city for an entire month – killing and enslaving the entire population of what was once one of the great cities of the east, completely his revenge for the outrages against Samarqand. Meanwhile, the Dizaids, despite their shared faith, were initially circumspect about Timur and his barbarity, but quietly agreed to join him as a vassal after he sent twenty thousand riders to camp outside Herat.

1652536997886.png

While a new threat arose in the east, important events were taking place in the heart of imperial Persia. After a long regency, Shahanshah Peroz III had begun to chafe under the supervision of his uncle Vahhab as he entered his maturity in the early 1370s. Having come to power after the murder of his own brother, Vahhab chose to take to the knife once more in order to defend his position – having his nephew murdered in cold blood in 1374 and place the fallen emperor’s two year old daughter Donya on the throne. Vahhab underestimated the level of scorn and revulsion such brutality would provoke – sending Persia on the path to its third major civil war in a single lifetime, with lines being drawn in the land along familiar religiously-based lines.

The fighting was sparked by an unlikely coup, as the Armenian general Thoros – who had fought alongside Vahhab in the previous civil war and led the subjugation of Syria – kidnapped Donya in Mosul in 1375 and defected to the Babakids’ rivals, riding to Baghdad and installing Donya in New Ctesiphon under stewardship of a cabal of Orthodox Zoroastrians. Furious. Vahhab mobilised his armies and marched to war to reclaim the guardianship of his great niece and with her the legitimacy to rule Persia.

The conflict began particularly poorly for Vahhab who was badly defeated in his campaign in souther Iraq aimed at capturing Baghdad and reclaiming custody of Donya. From there, the situation would go from bad to worse as the Orthodox armies counterattacked towards Tabriz, with the aim of linking their armies in the Jibal with those in Azerbaijan. After capturing the city, the bulk of the Orthodox forces moved on Assyria, where Vahhab desperately battled for his life alongside allied forces drawn from Armenia and Syria – leaving the Mazandaranis, who had once again backed the Babakids, isolated to the east.

1652537023179.png

As had been the case in previous Persian civil wars in the past century, this conflict carried with it many acts of religious and ethnic violence. The most consequential of which occurred after the fall of the Mazandarani city of Ardabil on the south western short of the Caspian to the Orthodox Zoroastrians in 1377. Victorious after a long siege, the Orthodox forces unleashed their frustrations against the native population of Khurmatza heretics – killing them in their scores. The worst violence was reserved for the Mazandarani Mongol minority who were targeted for systematic slaughter as the Orthodox Zoroastrians sought to leave none alive. These killings saw one of the sons of Konchek, the Satrap of Mazandaran, and two of his daughters beheaded by the conquerors. With the rest of his territories isolated and his people under existential threat, Konchek sent an envoy to his old commander and friend in Samarqand pleading for aid and protection. Timur responded by occupying Mazandaran, accepting the vassalage of his former liege, and daring the Persians to challenge him.

1652537081321.png

The Timurids were not alone in taking advantage of Persian infighting. To the south east, the Omani Christians of the Hamrid Sultanate had grown wealthy through piracy and trade in the Indian Ocean over the preceding century – establishing one of the most successful Arab states since the Islamic Götterdämmerung of the High Middle Ages. With their powerful neighbour to the north distracted, in 1376 they crossed the Straits of Hormuz – capturing the important port of Bandar Abbas and the wider province of Kerman before turning east to push the Indians out of Baluchistan. In what was a lightly populated and underexploited region, the Omanis would establish a string of colonies along the coastline of their new conquests.

1652537111796.png

Back to the west, the Persian civil war was reaching its conclusion by the end of the decade. In 1379 Mosul fell and Vahhab was captured. Placed in a cage, the regent was taken back to Baghdad where the Moabadan-Moabad Parviz led a public trial of the man who had dominated the empire for so many years for the regicide of two emperors and the proliferation of heresy. Found guilty, Vahhab was then quartered – with parts of his mutilated corpse being sent across the empire. Shortly after Vahhab’s execution, the High Priest’s nephew, Ardahan of the Jibal Satrapy, was married to Empress Donya, still only a child. With this marriage, Ardahan had himself crowned as the new Shahanshah, in close alliance with his uncle.

With Mosul lost and Vahhab slain, and the Babakid faction falling away, the civil war was not yet over. In the Levant, the Ayeshahids had shifted from supporting Vahhab’s war effort to seeking independence from the emerging Orthodox-dominated Persian state. Following a failed effort to push westward towards Aleppo, Baghdad chose to accept this separation – agreeing a truce in 1380 that allowed the Ayeshahids to establish an independent Syrian Shahdom. Within a year of this peace, the Ayeshahids had provoked a schism in the Zoroastrian Church – establishing a Mazdaki Zoroastrian High Priesthood in Aleppo that attracted widespread support not only in their own lands in Syria but across the border in the former Babakid heartlands of Armenia and Assyria.

Emerging from civil war diminished and as divided as ever, the long shadow of Timur loomed over Persia.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1Love
Reactions:
May Ahura Mazda save the Persians.

There comes the subject that we were all waiting for, perhaps it would not hurt to crush Persia and genocide its population so that they learn to be united and not follow in the footsteps of Sassanids.

The echoes of 7th century Sassanid Iran are very loud indeed with the way in which the Persians have torn each other apart over the last several decades. Let us hope they can find a way to band together in a united front to hold back the hordes when they come - it is surely our only hope!

The east is lost, which gives Timur a target before Persia. Still, Timur will target Persia.

Zoroastrianism is becoming increasingly like Orthodoxy instead of Catholicism - more decentralized and subject to temporal rulers.

Losing the east perhaps bought us a little time in the end before having to face Timur directly - as he has gobbled up all the petty kingdoms of the region. However, from his new base in Mazandaran, the Timurid hordes are just one hope from the rich cities of the imperial heartland.

We've seen a push back from the traditionalists against the Babakid style of religion - not to mention the resulting schism in the church. All this will surely have significant consequences to how Zoroastrianism develops in the decades to come.

Out of the frying pan, into the fire. The Babakids have scarcely secured their position as rulers of Persia, when another Mongol warlord comes thundering out of the steppes. This is shaping up to be quite the chaotic century indeed...

Yes, we've had several period of really chaos in Persia. The first half of the 12th century had the plague and Mazdaki Wars, the middle of the 13th century had the Mongol Invasions, and now the 14th century has had the Babakid Wars and the impending arrival of Timur and his Manichean hordes.

And there he is, Timur's shadow looms over a battered and broken Persia that just recently crushed all its opposition at a terrible price. A great conflict is about to begin no doubt. And I fear it's gonna be a bloody affair.

We're now just on the precipice of that clash between Timur and the even more broken Persian empire.

A civil war within a civil war. Very Persian!

Kudos to the Manichaeans, establishing their own a Persian state after all that time.

A turn up for the books, but wise cooperation given the circumstances.

Wel, that was a vain hope: death to traitors!

Of course it did. :D

A violent and dramatic end. Seems like he may have got what he deserved.

Here we go again. The Persians will be wanting time to recover and consolidate before the next onslaught. Something they probably won’t get!

And we managed to fit in yet another civil war in! Between 1320 and 1380 Persia has had three major civil wars, lasting neither a quarter of a century. Each has been incredibly gruelling and resulted in the loss of land - the Pashtun east in the first war, then Khorosan, and now Mazandaran, Kerman and the Levant.

As for the Manicheans, that Dizaid state was clearly just the beginning ... :eek:

And you certainly predicted well that Persia wasn't going to allow itself peace to ready itself before the hordes come - instead battering themselves ceaselessly before Timur even as the chance to arrive. We look in a much weaker and more divided position now than we did immediately before the Mongols arrived.

Does the Bavandid dynasty have any living princes of the blood?

There are still a some people about who have a connection to the dynasty through the maternal line. But there are the paternal line, with those baring the Bavandid name, is now extinct.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Again and again, the Persian throne changes hands from one dynasty to another. Shall the Timurids be the next to rule Persia? We shall see.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
And internal fighting leads to Persia's downfall yet again... Does nobody read history? It's repeating an awful lot (not a critique, mind - rulers who think in the short-term were far from uncommon)
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
The foul presence of Angra Mainyu seems to be covering all of Persia in these turbulent times, foolish bickering amidst a great threat that is gathering in Samarqand, and I reckon Timur is about to unleash his wrath anytime soon. All of Persia will be paying a very terrible price.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
The hits, they just keep on raining down. Vahhab and his peers provoke the collapse of another dynasty just in time for the Persians to face another powerful Mongol threat on their doorstep.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
So, bad news everyone. I accidentally deleted all my AAR files - screenshots, images, save games, notes, the beginning of the next update, everything. I tried to recover some or all of the files, but haven’t been able to get anything. Gone for good. Without all this I’m afraid I’ll have to end this AAR here. Really gutted as I was really enjoying this story. I will post here if I start another AAR in the time ahead.

For some closure I thought I’d note down what you missed in brief:

Timur invades Persia and conquers everything east of the Zagros, leaving great destruction in his wake an persecuting Manichaeans. In 1402 the Persians launch a GHW to reclaim the heartland - Timur is killed in battle by an Arab eunuch. His realm falls into civil war between his adopted son Yeke the Wolf (raised by a she-wolf and found in a cave - awesome event tree) and his biological son Iturgen. This allows the Persians to retake the heartland briefly. After a few years campaign in India where he conquers the Indus, Yeke the Wolf invades Persia again and take not only the heartland but all of Iraq - destroying the empire (with Azerbaijan and Armenia going free as Indy Persian states). A major rebellion breaks out under Yeke’s successors in the 1430s that sees the Raremids establish a Zoroastrian state in Persia and Iraq, but the Timurids keep the east.

In the mid 1440s a Quadrarchy of independent Persian Zoroastrian states arises made up of the Raremids, Basrans, Assyrians and Azerbaijanis. The Raremids establish themselves as Shahinshahs - first among equals within the Quadrarchy (who are rivals with Mazdaki Syria and Armenian). The next century or so involves lots of wars with the Timurids which sees most of their lands taken over by Persia, and the Mazdak western Persian states . The Quadrarchy then start to squabble among one another - Persia conquering everyone else except Basra. The Persians persecute minority religions and heresies badly as they seek a solidly Zoroastrian state.

Persia gets involved in big geopolitical struggles against Kozar (who expands in the EU4 period to rule most of Russia), Egypt (who is expanding into the Levant, and Arabia - splitting these regions with us) and a major Indian power. We fare badly - losing a couple of big wars along with a little land and a wrecked economy and having a few stalemates.

From the end of the 16th century we begin dabbling in colonialism in the East Indies - conquering Sulawesi in a series of wars between the 1580s and 1620s. This is partly motivated by the decline of Silk Road trade. This region is a big focus from now on with gradual expansion. We get involved in alliances in India (especially with the Tamils - who provide two queens and a regent and spark a major fashion for all things Indian for a time, including Hindu thought) and try to counter the hegemonic power in India. We largely fail - losing or stalemating the wars we are involved in. Our Tamil allies lose everything in mainland India (retreating to Sri Lanka), and end up ditching us when the royal marriages lapse.

At the end of the century the Raremids are overthrown by a new dynasty. Persia spends the 18th century struggling to catch up (it is way behind in institutions and briefly loses GP status) while have several bouts of unrest, two more changes of dynasty and a few more hugely costly wars - with mixed results. By the end of the EU4 period we hold Syria, some of Armenia, all of Iraq, Azerbaijan, Khorosan and Transixiania (annexing the last of the Timurids on the 1810s).

In V2 our long term Indian rivals fade as every single Indian power is taken over by reactionary rebels - allowing us to build a big tech lead and finally start beating them regularly in wars. We have a long term struggle with Kozar who is at times an example (when westernising), an oppressor (when we are in their sphere) and rival (when we start to compete with then after westernisation). We reach our peak power in the late 19th century - winning some big wars, having lots of spheres countries in the Middle East and India, building Suez, having a big industry etc.

Persian politics is divided between Easterners (Manichaeans and Turco-Mongols), Iranists (conservative Persian Zoroastrians) and Baghdadis (Arabs, Armenians, Assyrians, Jews, Mazdaki and secularists) - the Baghdadis liberals are dominant from early and gradually democratise the empire. Ill fitting Eastern-Iranist alliances are the main alternative until late on the century. Socialism is popular - with grounding in Mazdaki philosophy and they win several elections late on in 19th century. Nationalist and separatist groups start to become big players from the end of the century.

We lose Great War vs Kozars and Germany (with some Greeks and Chinese on our side) and lose a bunch of land in Armenia in 1900s. Persia is very unstable postwar. In 1910s socialists are more radical after the example of Communist revolutions in England and North America. Conservatives allied to the Shah fix an election - socialist led republican revilution. The socialists are gradually more authoritarian and are themselves overthrown by a right wing democratic faction in a civil war in 1920s that also features a fascist faction. Persia is diminished and isolationist to the end of V2 period.

We consolidate total control over the East Indies, Malaya and Sri Lanka during this period. And we industrialise in the late century to be one of the major industrial powers.
 
  • 2Like
  • 2
Reactions:
From the sound of it, many glorious months of stories have been lost. I share in your grief.

And yet talent like yours is an irrepressible sort, so you’re probably already planning the next story, which begs the question: CK2 or CK3 as a starting point?
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Dangit! Tragedy always seems to befall my fave AARs, either through save corruption or other computer-related loss.

Appreciate the summary, though it sounds like there was a less than happy ending for the Persian Empire.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: