High honour gives a relation boost, meaning that since I haven't attacked too many people for a while, my vassals are more content with things.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Showing developer posts only. Show all posts in this thread.
High honour gives a relation boost, meaning that since I haven't attacked too many people for a while, my vassals are more content with things.
but wouldnt that change the moment you attack Uesigi (sp?)
I am not sure if I will lose the bonus but I will definately not pick up the low honour relation penalty which is a bugger.
Yup, one of the Uesugi clan members decided to leave the Uesugi clan and start his own clan. I forsee a bright future for him
what a mess.. clan borders look horrible (except Nanbu), so many exclaves.. AI still got no sense of aesthetics...
but that attack went good. but you have money problems, is there some way of taking money in peace deals? kidnapping and selling back hostages? is there a chance to capture enemy general in the battle? then sell it back?
so many questions
Some are his vassals and some are his. With no concepts like military access proximity isn't really a factor for the AI since it doesn't matter. It more a matter of realtive strength.
No way to gain money in peace deals, all you can do is take land and then offer peace.
Of coruse it can, might makes right. If you want to stop them declare war.
New clans are at peace with everyone except thier master. Who is given the choice to either let them go or get a free war against them.
The AI doesn't care, but you have a lower support limit in non friendly provinces so moving large armies accross Japan is not really that practical.
If you have troops inside someone's land or on route to thier land when you declare war you will pay a much higher honour cost for using such dishonourable tactics. So seeing a potential attacker march through your lands isn't bad in fact it is quite a good thing, because you are ironically safer.
And this actually helps the AI. Players rarely have trouble with military access in say EUIII, but the AI often has. Here the AI will come after you...
No. The kokujin titles in a kuni are not directly linked to the daimyo title in that way. So if I as a clan leader hand out a daimyo title to a one-province kokujin, he will now be a daimyo with one province and no vassals. But getting the title means that he can have vassals from now on. Which is important when he expands, otherwise he would be locked at no more than five provinces (his personal demesne).
The historical provinces belonging to a kuni only matters when it comes to getting or losing the daimyo title in war. To get the title, you and your clan must conquer all provinces connected to it, but whoever holds it will only lose it when he and his clan lose their last province connected to it.
In that sense, all of our games (and many other games) end arbitrary. We could of course set the end date to 1800 but that would mean we release a game promising game-play up to that date and the game does not feature that. The game mechanics devised for this game fit the era that we chose. However, should you personally want to play a longer game, it's very easy to do, just change one date in the settings file.
This game of course has a more focused gameplay (and a more concrete goal) compared to say EUIII, but there will still be a difference playing Yamana, Ashikaga, So or Uesugi, just as it is a diffenrence in playing France, Bremen, Ulm or Poland. You can also decide to play as clan leader, daimyo or as a one-province kokujin.
Building building reduces tax income in the province while they are building. Other actions raise revolt risk. With me needing to throw every soldier I can to the front I don't want revolts back home.
No the objective here is for you to do as least as well as the historical figures did to win the game. The victory condition is set that way. This is not a sand box game, there is a clear victory condition and you have a set time to do it. Otherwise you don't win it is that simple. The whole point of the game is to win it inside the time limit we have given you.
Nope no Sanada clan.
No it wouldn't. Ending it in 1620 is just as arbitrary as ending HoI in 1948 but to have WWII drag on until the year 2000 or Sengoku till 1800 without reflecting any changes in technology etc is in my mind worse. Having an end date also adds to the challenge of this game: you have 153 years to capture 180 provinces, claim the Shogun title and hold out against all enemmies for three years. But lets not derail this AAR comments thread too much.
I'm not at work so I can't say for sure, but from searching the beta forum I couldn't find them so odds are they're not in the game at start. They might however be on the list of clan names available when brekaing lose and forming a new clan.
Having spent the better part of my Weekend in the pub watching rugby (Scotland won btw) I now have an update for you.
We have discussed this stament at length in the office and decided it is simply not true.