Yes, the main problems are:
1) Our RADARs are all AWACS vessels and therefore can be knocked out by long-range missiles, leaving us blind.
2) Without an airfield, we can only launch from hangars and carriers, which again are vulnerable to enemy missiles.
3) Both the majority of our Fighters and most of our missiles are slower than the enemy. So they are most useful against an opponent who is closing in on us.
4) Many of those 300+ Fighters (and many of the missiles) are up to 50 years old.
I would much prefer to ambush the enemy at close range... but that would require surviving thousands (?) of enemy long-range missiles first.
1) Our RADARs are all AWACS vessels and therefore can be knocked out by long-range missiles, leaving us blind.
2) Without an airfield, we can only launch from hangars and carriers, which again are vulnerable to enemy missiles.
3) Both the majority of our Fighters and most of our missiles are slower than the enemy. So they are most useful against an opponent who is closing in on us.
4) Many of those 300+ Fighters (and many of the missiles) are up to 50 years old.
I would much prefer to ambush the enemy at close range... but that would require surviving thousands (?) of enemy long-range missiles first.
- 2
- 1
- 1