I would like defense in depth, but I'm not sure we have the resources. It requires maintenance parts to have them running, so we can't just leave old ones be, plus they'd end up obsolete fast anyway. Ideally I'd have a minefield at each jp, but as mines are bugged that won't happen.Interesting that a member of a forum full of wargamers prefers a crust defense over defense in depth. Jmo, ymmv
So it's from being real: I think it'd be a resource waste to do defense in depth with stationary fortresses. Rather having various squadrons stationed here and there for quick response while fleet amasses seems better.
For the inner systems the real danger is hidden JPs. And those a fortress won't defend against anyway. In case a foe gets far inland, they likely have beat our navy anyway, and then there's not much we could have done with fortresses anyway.
Fortresses lead to static warfare, as opposed to maneuver warfare. We don't need a Maginot, but rather the ability for pincers.
- 1
- 1
- 1