To be honest Admin empires seem to be quite stable from what I've seen, before so all my player empires tend to struggle in stability a generation or two after founding.
- 1
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I also noticed that administrative ones are more stable than feudal empires.
- 1
Prytanis III (987 AD – 1010 AD)
Prytanis III (987 AD – 1010 AD)
Prytanis III, who ascended the throne in 987 AD after his father's death, began his reign at age 29, equipped with a solid education and experience gained under Hyrcanus IV. He was seen as a just and courageous ruler with a desire to shape his own legacy while respecting his father’s heritage.
Under Hyrcanus' guidance, he received a thorough education in administration and governance, preparing him to manage the empire's affairs and make sound strategic decisions. As the emperor’s son, Prytanis was trained from an early age to rule, combining care for citizens' welfare with the defense of the Tauric Empire’s integrity and glory.
Earlier, Prytanis served as strategos of the Hyrcania province, where he proved himself as a talented administrator, adept at solving complex issues. His governance of this critical province honed his organizational and political skills, earning him the respect of local leaders and citizens alike.
Upon taking the throne in 988 AD, Prytanis III sought to win over the capital’s residents and the entire empire by organizing grand chariot races at the hippodrome, marking a significant event in Satyria’s history. This spectacle was meant not only to celebrate his ascension but also to demonstrate his closeness to the people and revive traditions that had united the empire for centuries.
The festivities were meticulously planned—days before the race, Satyria’s streets were adorned with decorations, colorful banners, and preparations that involved both the highest-ranking citizens and humble artisans.
On the day of the races, a crowd gathered at the hippodrome, their anticipation mounting. Chariots, representing various factions, were decorated in their patrons' colors, and the fierce competition fueled the excitement of both participants and spectators. Prytanis III, seated on a special imperial balcony, observed the events with pride, capturing the crowd’s attention as they cheered for him.
For many, it was a chance to see the young emperor in person, and his involvement left a profound impression. After the race, which saw victory for the team in imperial colors, Prytanis III addressed the audience, delivering a speech filled with gratitude and promises for Satyria’s future.
In 989 AD, the Tauric Empire faced an unexpected tragedy when a terrifying disease, known as “Bendidorus Boils,” began spreading through coastal settlements along the Black Sea. This was the first pandemic since the turmoil of the 8th century, and its impact was immediately devastating.
The first cases appeared in port cities, where infected individuals displayed symptoms of painful, fast-appearing boils, fever, and extreme weakness. The disease quickly reached Satyria, spreading through trade routes and ports, the lifeblood of regional commerce.
When the pandemic reached the Crimean Peninsula, Emperor Prytanis III, still new to his rule, faced a challenge to his authority. Acting swiftly, he convened his council of physicians and provincial governors, striving to understand the nature of Bendidorus Boils and prevent its spread.
Medical posts were established in cities, and temples and markets were regularly sanitized under the direction of court scholars, hoping to curb the infection’s advance. Prytanis III issued edicts for quarantine and the closure of ports and cities affected by the pandemic, which, while weakening trade, strengthened control over the encroaching epidemic.
Despite these efforts, the disease spread throughout much of the coastline and further inland, causing devastation and fear among the population. Streets were lined with abandoned homes, as grieving families moved away from city centers in hopes of escape. The pandemic continued almost until 991 AD, when the last recorded deaths were noted.
In February 992 AD, the Tauric Empire’s heir, Sosthenes, eldest son of Emperor Prytanis III, reached adulthood, marking the symbolic beginning of his journey toward future rule. Until then, the young prince had been educated by his aunt, Princess Antiochis, and his mother, Empress Masa, who oversaw his studies in history, culture, and political strategy.
Emperor Prytanis III, valuing the principles instilled in his son, decided to take on his further education, focusing on practical matters of state governance and administration of the vast empire. Prytanis knew that only firsthand experience in state matters would make Sosthenes a competent ruler, so he invited him to participate in daily governing duties.
The young prince, gaining exposure to administration and political planning, learned the difficult decisions demanded by imperial governance and negotiation techniques his father had mastered. Through daily lessons, Sosthenes quickly developed a solid foundation in finance, military affairs, legislation, and international relations, becoming an active participant in Satyria’s political life.
In mid-992 AD, Prytanis III decided to continue the expansionist policies of his father, Hyrcanus IV, who had previously conquered the Kingdom of Colchis, opening the Tauric Empire’s path to the South Caucasus. Prytanis III’s ambitions now focused on the neighboring Kingdom of Kurus, a strategic target due to its location and trade potential.
With the security of the southern borders and control over crucial trade routes in mind, Prytanis III deemed that absorbing Kurus into the empire would solidify his position in the region and guarantee stability for the Caucasian provinces.
The Battle of Ambrolauri in mid-993 AD proved a decisive confrontation in Prytanis III’s campaign against the Kingdom of Kurus. Leading a 6,000-strong army, Prytanis III organized his forces masterfully and displayed strategic insight, putting the enemy forces at a disadvantage early in the battle.
With a significant numerical advantage, the Tauric emperor concentrated his assault on the enemy’s flank, gradually encircling and weakening the ranks of Kurus’s forces. Arsen II, commanding a 3,000-strong army from Kurus, fought bravely but could not withstand the imperial forces' numerical and technical superiority.
Despite the courageous stance of his warriors, Arsen eventually had to retreat, and his troops were forced to surrender. Prytanis III, appreciating Arsen II’s bravery, ordered the remaining enemy soldiers to be surrounded and spared their lives. The victory at Ambrolauri opened the path for the Empire to fully control Kurus, and Prytanis III strengthened his reputation as a skilled commander and ruler, further expanding the empire's borders.
At the end of 993 AD, Prytanis III returned to the capital as a victor, and his triumphant procession through Satyria was a testament to his successes in the southern Caucasus. The day drew crowds that filled the streets, watching the emperor in golden armor, riding at the forefront on horseback alongside devoted legionaries and commanders who had conquered Kurus. Behind them trailed wagons full of spoils: bars of gold and silver, chests of jewels, exotic fabrics, and trophies from the conquered lands, glittering in the sunlight, evoking awe and admiration among the citizens.
At the hippodrome, where the parade concluded, Prytanis III organized a grand ceremony. A platform was erected in the center of the square, from which the emperor personally distributed part of the spoils to the most distinguished commanders and city representatives, demonstrating his generosity toward his loyal subjects. The emperor delivered a speech, praising the bravery of his troops and the loyalty of the citizens, and reminding them of the growing glory of the Tauric Empire. The wealth bestowed upon the assembled crowd was meant not only as evidence of his triumph but also as a symbol of the promise of continued prosperity and the strengthening power of the empire under his rule.
This celebration was also a display of Prytanis III's political acumen. Distributing wealth and jointly celebrating the victory reinforced the bond between the emperor and the people, underscoring the stability of his rule. In the triumphant atmosphere, the citizens felt part of a great empire, their loyalty to the ruler deepened, and the memory of Prytanis's military successes would linger long in the capital and beyond.
At the start of 994 AD, the Tauric Empire was plunged into mourning over the death of Prytanis III's youngest son, Andronikos. The young prince, only a few years old, passed away due to severe pneumonia, which had unexpectedly weakened his fragile health. Prytanis III and his family were profoundly affected by the loss of their beloved son, whose life ended before it truly began. Feelings of sadness and grief filled the court, and news of the prince’s death stirred compassion and sorrow throughout the empire, which felt a shared bond with its grieving ruler.
In early spring of 994 AD, Pope Leo announced a crusade against the lands of Saxony, under the rule of the Kingdom of Sweden, which was in a close alliance with the Tauric Empire. The pope, seeking to strengthen his authority and spread Christianity in northern territories, saw the Saxons' resistance to Christianization as a threat to the Church.
As a result, papal envoys called upon Christians from across Europe to participate in the holy war, offering absolution of sins and spiritual rewards for their involvement. The crusade quickly garnered support among princes and warriors from various regions, and the threat of a large army descending upon Saxony grew increasingly imminent.
In the Tauric Empire, news of the crusade sparked outrage, both at the court of Emperor Prytanis III and among his subjects. The empire viewed the Kingdom of Sweden as a close and valuable ally, as well as a key political partner, bound to it not only by alliances but also by family ties.
In the middle of 994 AD, an envoy from King Clearchus of Sweden arrived in Satyria, urgently requesting military and political support in the face of the Christian crusade against his lands. The Swedish envoys described the dire situation: crusaders were setting out for Saxony, threatening the kingdom where Onomarchism—a belief system rooted in the empire—was flourishing.
The mutual ties between the Kingdom of Sweden and the Tauric Empire, strengthened by marriages and alliances, had cemented political cooperation, while shared faith reinforced a sense of unity against the rising threat posed by the Christian crusaders.
Prytanis III wasted no time in responding—he gathered his advisors and publicly declared full support for his ally. He regarded the defense of Onomarchist believers as a matter of honor, as well as the protection of the cultural and religious heritage of the Tauric Empire. Prytanis ordered the mobilization of part of the army and instructed the preparation of ships that could support Clearchus both logistically and militarily.
In announcing his decision, Prytanis III called for the unity of Onomarchist followers, justifying the support as the protection of co-religionists and the peaceful coexistence of the two nations, which, in the emperor’s view, served as a foundation for stability in the northern lands.
In the spring of 995 AD, Emperor Prytanis III led the imperial legions north to Saxony to support his allies and confront the Crusader armies that had already ravaged the borderlands. The Tauric army’s march concluded near Homburg, where the Christian Crusader forces, commanded by papal legates and knights from several European kingdoms, prepared for confrontation.
The imperial army, consisting of nearly 12,000 soldiers, arrived at the battlefield well-prepared, strengthened by discipline and the strategic experience of their leader. The Crusader forces, though smaller with around 8,000 soldiers, were composed primarily of heavily armored knights and infantry units.
The Battle of Homburg began with an intense clash in the center, where the Tauric legion collided with the Christian knights. The Tauric flanks executed an encircling maneuver, weakening the Crusader forces and preventing them from reorganizing freely. The appearance of Tauric cavalry at the rear of the Crusader forces sowed chaos in their ranks, and the advantage in numbers, coupled with effective tactics, led to the breakdown of most papal units. The battle ended in a decisive victory for the imperial forces, forcing the Crusader troops into retreat.
In the years following the victory at Homburg, Prytanis III continued the struggle against the Crusaders, determined to protect allied Sweden and secure his northern border against the aggression of the Christian knights. One of the key moments of the campaign was the Battle of Lipe, where imperial forces clashed with a Crusader order equipped with heavily armored units and battle-hardened knights. Prytanis faced one of the order’s commanders, the renowned knight Conan.
During an intense duel, the emperor used his combat skills and agility to break through the knight's defense and ultimately defeat him. Although the victory in the duel strengthened the emperor’s moral standing, Prytanis sustained a severe wound, which affected his ability to command directly. Despite his injuries, Prytanis continued the campaign.
Another significant engagement was the Battle of Hanover, which proved to be one of the most dramatic events of the war. The Tauric legionnaires were ambushed by Crusader forces, who utilized natural obstacles and terrain advantages. Despite the surprise, the emperor demonstrated remarkable determination and, in the early phases of the battle, took command, refusing to allow the legions to retreat.
In the midst of the fight, Prytanis nearly lost his life—when his protective guard was overwhelmed, he found himself face-to-face with the knights of the Crusader orders. Only at the last moment did cavalry forces break through to the battle’s center and rescue the emperor from the surrounding circle.
The Battle of Hanover ultimately concluded in success for the imperial forces, though it was a Pyrrhic victory. Heavy losses and the army's exhaustion forced Prytanis to reconsider his further participation on the battlefield. The injuries and dangers he encountered during this campaign led the emperor to decide to reduce his personal involvement in combat. Recognizing that the empire needed stability and that his life was essential for maintaining peace, Prytanis entrusted command to his most trusted generals and strategoi.
The Crusade declared by Pope Leo ended in 1004 AD when the Christian Crusader armies, exhausted by years of battles and ongoing logistical difficulties, suffered final and irreversible losses. Numerous battlefield defeats, including painful setbacks at Homburg and Hanover, weakened the Crusaders' morale and their ability to continue the campaign effectively.
The assembled forces, worn out and fragmented, could no longer withstand the strategic defense and counterattacks led by Prytanis III and his allies, who demonstrated immense determination and excellent leadership. Many knights who had answered the pope's call from various regions of Europe were forced to retreat, with their units filled with wounded and weakened soldiers. Additionally, internal disputes and supply shortages further hindered Crusader efforts.
Rumors increasingly spread of discord among the leaders of various Crusader factions, as well as waning public support for the Crusade, which began to be viewed as a failed endeavor. Pope Leo, realizing the slim chance of ultimate victory and under pressure from nobles and clergy demanding an end to the draining campaign, issued a final decree ending the Crusade.
The end of the conflict brought immense relief to both Christian populations and states that had suffered due to the war. In the Tauric Empire, the triumph of Prytanis III was widely celebrated, and his position as an effective leader and defender of the faith was further solidified. For Sweden, the end of the Crusade signified the cessation of threats to their independence and religious autonomy, and the alliance with the Tauric Empire, cemented in blood, became a lasting foundation of cooperation between the two states.
In 1006 AD, imperial astronomers at the emperor’s court observed an extraordinarily bright light that appeared in the sky, unlike any known phenomena. Initially thought to be a comet or other unusual occurrence, the brilliance of the new star was so intense it was visible even during the day. The scholars quickly informed Prytanis III of this exceptional sighting, believing that the star’s appearance might hold significant astrological, symbolic, or even prophetic meaning for the empire’s fate. Encouraged by astronomers and philosophers, the emperor commissioned a manuscript to describe this star’s appearance in detail, including its position in the sky, along with precise brightness measurements.
The manuscript, developed by the most eminent scholars of Satyrius, became, over the centuries, one of the most valuable scientific sources documenting the appearance of a supernova. Future generations of astronomers and historians regarded this document as reliable evidence of a remarkable event, becoming one of the best-documented cases of a supernova's appearance. The care and precision of the descriptions in the manuscript ensured it was studied by successive generations as proof of cosmic observation and a pioneering achievement by the imperial court astronomers.
At the end of 1007 AD, a scandal erupted at the imperial court when the spymaster, strategos Thrasycles, uncovered a plot against Emperor Prytanis III’s life. In a shocking twist, it was revealed that the emperor’s younger sister, Glycera, was allegedly involved in a scheme to assassinate her brother, either to seize the throne or secure influence for herself.
The evidence presented by Thrasycles was indisputable—spy reports and intercepted correspondence clearly indicated Glycera’s involvement in the conspiracy. The news of betrayal within the emperor’s family quickly spread, causing unease and outrage among the elites and the people of Satyrius alike.
Despite the weight of the evidence and the advisors’ insistence on harsh punishment, Prytanis III chose to show mercy. He believed that severe punishment of his own family could undermine the stability of the dynasty and damage the imperial family’s image, especially in the eyes of his subjects. The emperor’s decision demonstrated his thoughtful and measured approach to governance, though it also raised concerns about his resolve in the face of internal threats.
As a result of his lenient decision, Glycera was sentenced only to house arrest, and after several months in isolation, she formally renounced any claims to the imperial throne, sealing her future as someone removed from state affairs.
Following her public renouncement of succession rights, Glycera was released, though she was required to leave the capital and settle in one of the imperial family’s distant estates. In this way, Prytanis III displayed his sense of justice and magnanimity, as well as a deep desire to preserve peace within his family. Nevertheless, the event cast a shadow over the imperial family, strengthening his determination to protect the dynasty’s stability, even at the cost of trust among siblings.
On February 12, 1010 AD, Prytanis III passed away. In the last years of his life, despite deteriorating health, he remained active in state affairs, continuously working to consolidate power and unify various parts of the empire. His sudden passing due to severe pneumonia brought deep sorrow to the court and the empire’s citizens, who appreciated his dedication.
The throne passed to his eldest son, Sosthenes II, an educated prince who had been prepared for the role of emperor by his father and other family members. Taking power, Sosthenes II faced the challenge of continuing Prytanis III's legacy and maintaining stability in the empire
- 2
- 1
The Empire is prospering, but internal affairs could weaken it. Sosthenes will do well to keep his family from tearing each other apart.
- 1
To be honest the empire seems to be in such a good condition that they seem to have the medieval era locked down.
For now I'm curious about how the empire will march into the Renaissance and Early Modern Era given it's relatively stable governance and cultural/religious makeup. The thing that worries me the most for it's stability is a string of disasters weakening the power of the Emperor and leaving the Empire in a HRE position of largely independent vassals paying homage to the Emperor but otherwise not caring about the empire as a whole.
Unless I'm wrong and just can't remember the Empire doesn't have anything like a senate either does it not? So despite being administrative it still lacks a large portion of representation for it's citizens which might cause friction as the Empire's weaker neighbors begin to fall to more social ideals.
For now I'm curious about how the empire will march into the Renaissance and Early Modern Era given it's relatively stable governance and cultural/religious makeup. The thing that worries me the most for it's stability is a string of disasters weakening the power of the Emperor and leaving the Empire in a HRE position of largely independent vassals paying homage to the Emperor but otherwise not caring about the empire as a whole.
Unless I'm wrong and just can't remember the Empire doesn't have anything like a senate either does it not? So despite being administrative it still lacks a large portion of representation for it's citizens which might cause friction as the Empire's weaker neighbors begin to fall to more social ideals.
- 1
The biggest problem is and always has been geography. It's always going to be at the end of a long sea route, rather than right on the coast of a major ocean. Owning the Eastern Med and the Bosporus is great in pre-Columbian exchange Afro-Eurasia with no reliable deep ocean travel, but its enclosed in and certain to be outcompeted by colonial powers when it comes to early modern and industrial times.
But if it can expand to be Russian sized, it can at least become a gigantic land power with a ton of potential for industry and military later on. If it can't, then its going to be really vulnerable to invasion, to the first empire that does manage to become huge in the Steppe and eastern Europe, and to the big naval powers.
- 1
For now I plan to expand south into Anatolia and Greece which were lost at the end of the Imperator.
A little info; I will present three chapters concerning the state of the world in the year 1000 AD. Then the reign of Sosthenes II, and 3-4 chapters concerning the travels of his youngest son Satyros.
- 1
Not gonna lie something I've never seen but would be interesting is Taurica going all out on colonial adventures after failing to reach Russia-Size and following the rise of a colonial state into a world power carrying on the legacy of old Taurica.
- 1
I forgot to answer but the Empire has no parliamentary tradition, it has always been an almost absolute monarchy. Colonization will probably be impossible due to the position on the map. For now I will slowly describe the events up to the year 1300 - 1350 AD, and I will want to switch to tintno or rather eu5 when it comes out next year.
- 1
The Known World – 1000 AD (Part I)
The Known World – 1000 AD (Part I)
North Africa – 1000 AD
In the year 1000 AD, the North African Carthaginian Empire had lost its dominant position, once the leading power in the western Mediterranean. Carthage, which once held hegemony over the region, had been struggling for two centuries with internal and external challenges that significantly weakened it. Conflicts with neighbors and internal tensions led to a gradual loss of control over key territories. A turning point came with the wars against the Kingdom of Sardinia in the 9th century, which brought catastrophic consequences to Carthage, including the loss of its capital.
The Kingdom of Sardinia exploited Carthage’s weaknesses, launching an aggressive campaign that resulted in the seizure of territories in northwestern Africa and the conquest of Carthage itself. This event shook both the political elite and the society of the empire, undermining the authority of the Carthaginian rulers. The Carthaginians were forced to relocate their administrative center to less significant areas, while Sardinia secured a strategic and symbolic victory, establishing itself as a regional power.
Currently, Carthage is engulfed in a civil war, dividing the remnants of the empire into competing factions. The political scene is dominated by three main groups: traditionalists aiming to restore past glory and reclaim Carthage, pragmatists seeking peace and cooperation with neighboring states, and a military faction that sees an opportunity in further expansion into other areas of North Africa. Tensions between these factions lead to brutal clashes, crippling the economy and further weakening the state’s structures.
The last territories under Carthaginian control now face the serious threat of collapse. Ongoing conflicts destabilize the region, while resource shortages and population migrations increase pressure on the empire's borders. Former Carthaginian satellites and independent African kingdoms are watching this chaos, ready to seize the abandoned territories. As a result, Carthage stands on the brink of dissolution, its legacy, though still present in the region’s culture, at significant risk of extinction.
Iberian Peninsula – 1000 AD
In the year 1000 AD, the Iberian Peninsula remains a turbulent region where numerous kingdoms struggle for influence and territory. Over the past two centuries, this area has been a battleground of constant conflict, especially devastating for the Punic southern kingdoms of Urbiaca and Baestani. These former powers were particularly affected by wars in which they lost a significant portion of their lands to the ambitious and expanding Kingdom of Tarraconesis. The conquest of former Urbiac lands and parts of Baestani consolidated Tarraconesis as a new force on the peninsula, reshaping the regional political landscape.
In contrast to these warring states, Tapolia and Tritium have avoided engaging in armed conflicts, remaining neutral and stable. This cautious policy allowed them to survive the period of turmoil without significant territorial or political losses. Consequently, Tapolia and Tritium have become relatively stable kingdoms, whose populations and economies have been spared the exhausting toll of warfare that affected the rest of the peninsula. This has also strengthened their positions as centers of trade and culture.
The Kingdom of Asturias, however, underwent an unexpected change when its throne was inherited by Saxon rulers. The union of these two kingdoms has led to cultural exchange and increased Saxon influence on the Iberian Peninsula. Saxon presence in Asturias has also shifted the balance of power, creating an alliance that could potentially challenge the dominant influence of Tarraconesis. Though relatively new on the peninsula, the Saxon dynasty is rapidly solidifying its position and building up its military strength, preparing for potential future conflicts.
Meanwhile, the Kingdom of Conuei and a weakened Baestania are fiercely fighting for control over border territories, further destabilizing the southern regions of the peninsula. This conflict, driven by historical claims and ambitions of both kingdoms, focuses on strategically important lands that offer access to resources and control over trade routes. Although Baestania is weakened after losing land to Tarraconesis, its forces are determined to resist the growing power of Conuei. As a result, the southern part of the Iberian Peninsula is plunged into yet another war, further complicating an already unstable political situation across the region.
British Isles – 1000 AD
In the year 1000 AD, the British Isles are a region torn by conflicts, marked by two centuries of Viking invasions and conquests. Three major kingdoms — Ivernia, Prytania, and Levonbrintia — are engaged in a struggle for power and survival in a landscape vastly changed from the former Celtic dominance of the islands. The Vikings, who began their raids in the early 9th century, initially confined themselves to looting but eventually sought to settle and subjugate the local kingdoms. Their influence proved not only lasting but also profoundly transformative to the power structures in the region.
Ivernia and Prytania fell into the hands of Scandinavian rulers who defeated the old Celtic elites and established new dynasties. Ivernia, encompassing mainly the western islands and coasts, became a center of Scandinavian power and culture, attracting new settlers and traders from the north. Prytania, more centrally located on the islands, gradually transformed into a kind of Viking stronghold, though internal disputes weakened it, leading to civil war. Rivalry between Scandinavian factions in Prytania further destabilizes the region and weakens Scandinavian control, making the kingdom more vulnerable to attacks from Levonbrintia.
Levonbrintia, as the last bastion of native Celts, is determined to resist the Vikings and regain control over the islands. Unlike Ivernia and Prytania, Levonbrintia remains in the hands of Celtic rulers who have withstood years of raids through strong defense of their lands and fortifications. Currently, Levonbrintia is waging war against Prytania, hoping to capitalize on the kingdom’s internal conflicts and using the moment of destabilization to reclaim lost territories and influence. Their forces, though not as numerous as the Viking armies, are highly skilled in guerrilla warfare and adept at using the terrain to their advantage.
The situation on the islands remains tense, with rival kingdoms seemingly locked in an endless state of conflict. Despite being dominated by Scandinavian rulers, Ivernia and Prytania must confront various challenges, including Levonbrintia’s growing aspirations and internal strife in Prytania. As the struggle for power and control over the islands continues, it remains unclear whether the Scandinavian rulers will maintain their positions or if the native Celts of Levonbrintia will succeed in restoring the old order.
Gaul – 1000 AD
In the year 1000 AD, Gaul is a region dominated by two significant kingdoms — Iveria and Narbonesis, which control most of southern Gaul. These are the strongest states in the region, characterized by a well-developed administration and centralized authority, enabling them to effectively fend off external threats and manage diverse territories.
Iveria, with its capital inland, has strong Germanic roots but has adopted many elements of Roman culture, lending a certain level of sophistication and stability to its structure. Narbonesis, on the other hand, benefits from its proximity to the Mediterranean coast and trade routes, which provide it with economic prosperity and connections to other regions in Europe and Africa.
While southern Gaul remains relatively stable, the coastal lands of Gaul have been plagued by Viking invasions over the past two centuries. Northwestern areas like Frisia, Armorica, and Balgea have come under the dominance of Scandinavian invaders who eventually settled permanently. They established their rule, often blending local traditions with Scandinavian customs and introducing new governance structures. The Vikings in these regions created semi-autonomous enclaves that enjoyed a degree of autonomy, though they maintained tense relations with neighboring kingdoms. These new Nordic-style states sought expansion, leading to frequent border conflicts within Gaul.
Meanwhile, the Celtic kingdom of Levonbryntia expanded its influence by skillful marriages and dynastic alliances, absorbing the land of Bryttani. This political union strengthened Levonbryntia as a power on Gaul’s northern edges, granting it access to new resources and territories. Through effective family politics, the rulers of Levonbryntia managed to maintain stability and loyalty among local noble houses. This adept maneuvering among various population groups made Levonbryntia a hub of trade and culture, impacting neighboring northern Gaul territories.
The kingdom of Tritium, originating from the Iberian Peninsula, also began gaining influence in Gaul. Through shrewd alliances and marriages, Tritium took control of much of central Gaul, leading to conflict with the kingdom of Alameann. The dispute with Alameann, stemming from contested lands in central Gaul, became one of the region’s main political issues. Tritium, striving to expand its realm, faced resistance from Alameann, which sought to retain its sovereignty and control over its lands. Tensions between these kingdoms are steadily increasing, and border skirmishes have become frequent, drawing in other neighboring states as they seek to protect their own interests.
Germania, Venedia – 1000 AD
In the year 1000 AD, the territories of Germania and Venedia are divided among numerous kingdoms and duchies, the largest and most powerful of which are the kingdoms of Rhaetia and Vistulia. Rhaetia, located in the south, controls strategically important border areas and boasts a well-developed economy based on trade and agriculture. Vistulia, situated east of Rhaetia, extends to the lands of the Tauric Empire and represents a significant political force in the region due to its developed ties with neighboring realms and key trade routes.
Both kingdoms are currently embroiled in internal conflicts, weakening their power and leaving them vulnerable to external threats. Rhaetia is dealing with growing tensions among its local rulers, who increasingly seek independence from the king’s central authority. Wealthy noble families, especially on the southern borders, are rebelling against the king, leading to opposition factions and a series of local uprisings. This internal division provides an opportunity for neighboring duchies and kingdoms to expand their influence at the expense of a weakened Rhaetia, which is trying to suppress the revolts and restore unity within its borders.
Vistulia is also not free from troubles, with rival aristocratic families undermining the kingdom’s central power. In particular, Vistulia’s northern provinces are embroiled in succession disputes, and local chieftains are beginning to challenge the royal authority, leading to outbreaks of unrest and tension. Amid these crises, Vistulia must not only contend with internal divisions but also defend its borders against growing threats from northern duchies and the potential invasion from the Tauric Empire. The rulers of Vistulia are striving to consolidate their power, but their position is threatened by external forces that may exploit the situation to their advantage.
In northern Germania and Venedia, near the Baltic Sea coast, a mosaic of smaller duchies competes for influence and control over trade routes. Part of northern Germania, once part of the Saxon kingdom, is now under Swedish control. A crusade organized by Pope Leo took place between 994 and 1004, but it ended in failure.
In light of internal conflicts in Rhaetia and Vistulia and Swedish expansion, the Germania and Venedia region remains unstable, with a fragile balance of power. Rival kingdoms, duchies, and external players, such as Sweden, are vying for power and influence, creating a dynamic and tense political landscape. Local noble families, duchies, and competing kingdoms are constantly maneuvering to increase their influence, and the future of these lands will depend on the rulers’ ability to establish internal order and effectively confront external threats.
Italia – 1000 AD
The Empire of Italy pursues an intensive policy of strengthening its position, drawing inspiration from Rome’s former glory and aspiring to complete domination over the Italian Peninsula. Rome, though geographically within the territory of the Empire of Italy, remains under the direct control of the Papal States. The Popes, as the spiritual leaders of Western Christianity, wield considerable religious and political power, extending their influence across Western Europe. From Rome, the Popes conduct diplomatic missions, organize alliances, and initiate crusades that impact the political balance of power throughout the region. Their independence from the Empire of Italy is a source of tension and disputes, as the rulers of Italy wish to subjugate the spiritual capital of Christianity, which would allow them to realize their dream of unifying the entire Italian Peninsula.
In the south of the peninsula lies a fragmented system of duchies, the most important of which are Calabria, Capua, and Macva. These duchies, compared to the power of the Empire of Italy, have limited resources and military strength, and their policies focus primarily on maintaining autonomy and local alliances. Calabria and Capua have a long tradition of rivalry, both with each other and with Macedonia, which claims rights to parts of the southern lands and sections of Sicily.
Sicily, due to its strategic location and natural wealth, has long been coveted by neighboring states and has become an arena of numerous conflicts between the southern Italian duchies and the kingdom of Macedonia, which controls the eastern part of the island. The presence of Macedonia in Sicily is a source of tension in the region, particularly in relations with the Duchy of Capua, which also holds influence over the island. The rivalry over Sicily weakens the southern duchies, which, instead of presenting a united front against external forces, remain mired in conflicts over land and influence. The complex political power structure in the south, combined with the dominance of the Empire of Italy in the north and the independence of Rome, creates a dynamic but unstable image of the Italian Peninsula.
Scandinavia, Baltic Coast – 1000 AD
In the year 1000 AD, Scandinavia is divided among four significant kingdoms: Norway, Jutland, Sweden, and Finland, which are key centers of power on the Scandinavian Peninsula and adjacent territories.
Norway and Jutland control the western part of the region, and their rivalry for dominance over the North Sea and trade routes in this part of Europe creates a dynamic balance of power. Norway, with its long coastline and sizable fleet, has mastered navigation techniques, enabling it to conduct trade and distant expeditions. Jutland, located in southern Scandinavia, serves as a gateway connecting Scandinavian countries with the rest of Europe, giving it strategic economic and political importance.
The Kingdom of Sweden is not only a strong player within Scandinavia but has also extended its influence over territories to the east. Swedish control over Courland and Estonia has strengthened its influence on the Baltic Sea, opening access to rich trade routes and allowing interaction and exchange with the peoples inhabiting these areas. Through conquests and colonization in the east, Sweden has become one of the region’s most powerful states, connecting its traditional lands with overseas territories and subordinating local communities, which often serve as strategic trade points and ports.
In the far north, in Karelia, there exists an independent confederation of Ugro-Finnish tribes that maintain their autonomy due to inaccessible, densely forested, and harsh terrain. In the east, in areas that were once the scene of Scandinavian raids, two post-Viking kingdoms have emerged: Novgorod and Bjarmaland. Organized around former Viking settlements, Novgorod and Bjarmaland have become significant trade centers, attracting merchants and settlers from various parts of Europe. These kingdoms, although influenced by Scandinavian culture, have developed their own political identity and serve as a bridge between Ugro-Finnish, Slavic, and Scandinavian cultures.
Last edited:
- 2
- 1
It's amusing to see Saxony move to Iberia, especially as it seems to be landlocked and doomed in Saxony proper. A Saxon Iberia would be quite something.
They've got the best land, the largest cities, probably the biggest population...the Celts should win this, especially if they can hold on and develop an army to match the temporary strength of the Viking realms.
Interesting how there is a unified Celtic/Breton kingdom, with a good shot at taking over the British isles as well.
Taurica's main mission aside from getting a nice stable and secure border in the south is to kick Sweden from the Baltics and destroy Novgorod. They've actually done better than I thought at moving into eastern Europe, securing a sea link and blocking the Germanic expansion eastwards. Now they just have to deal with their northern neighbours in order to become too large to truly destroy.
- 1
So much bordergore, although that is bound to happen in Paradox games.
- 1
The Known World – 1000 AD (Part II)
The Known World – 1000 AD (Part II)
Balkans – 1000 AD
In the year 1000 AD, the Balkans are dominated by the powerful Carpathian Empire, which emerged from the conquests of Eptenis I, an ambitious ruler of Dacia, in the latter half of the 10th century. This empire, encompassing vast territories in the region, is the strongest state in the Balkans, thanks to its well-developed administration and formidable army that effectively defends its borders. Its core consists of the lands of former Dacia, serving as the economic and demographic foundation of the empire. The rulers of the Carpathian Empire continue the expansionist policies of their predecessors, striving to maintain control over the region and the balance of power in the Balkans.
To the west, the Carpathian Empire borders the Carpathian and Carinthian Kingdoms, which, though smaller, are well-organized and determined to maintain their independence. These kingdoms act as buffers between the Carpathian Empire and Western Europe, making them key players in the region. Their policies focus on alliances and border defense, though their military strength is insufficient to challenge the power of the Carpathian Empire.
In the southwestern Balkans, two kingdoms, Colochia and Illyria, vie for dominance. These states have long been locked in a struggle for control over disputed border territories, which weakens their economic and political potential. Despite their internal difficulties, both kingdoms strive to remain independent from the Carpathian Empire's influence.
In the southern Balkans, the Greek lands are fragmented and weakened after the fall of the Macedonian Kingdom's hegemony, which was lost due to a series of devastating civil wars. Out of its ruins, the independent kingdoms of Epirus and Hellas have emerged, grappling with numerous internal challenges, including a lack of political unity and difficulties in maintaining stable governance. Once a center of culture and power, the region now struggles with chaos and political fragmentation. These Greek kingdoms face not only internal rivalry but also potential threats from neighboring powers.
Anatolia – 1000 AD
In the year 1000 AD, Anatolia remains a region of relatively stable political structure, with its primary pillar being the powerful Kingdom of Asia. This state, drawing on its Hellenistic heritage, maintains a dominant position due to its well-developed administration and strong cultural and economic influence. Leveraging Anatolia's strategic location as a bridge between Europe and the Middle East, the Kingdom of Asia upholds an extensive trade and diplomatic network, securing an advantage over neighboring states. Its rulers aim to preserve the region's unity and strengthen their position as heirs to the glory of Hellenistic monarchies.
In northern Anatolia, two rival kingdoms, Mesopotamia and Bithynia, compete primarily for control over crucial trade routes and strategic ports on the Black Sea. Although both kingdoms are smaller than the Kingdom of Asia, their location on the region's periphery enables them to maintain independent ties with external powers, strengthening their positions. The conflicts between Mesopotamia and Bithynia often draw in neighboring powers, making northern Anatolia a volatile yet crucial area for maintaining the regional balance of power.
In the Middle East, the past two centuries have seen significant consolidation of power. The Kingdom of Syria, taking advantage of the weakening of former rivals, has conquered Palestine and Assyria, creating a powerful and unified state in the region. Controlling the majority of trade routes leading to Mesopotamia and southward to the Arabian Peninsula, Syria has become a major player capable of exerting pressure on neighboring states, including Anatolia.
In the southern Caucasus, the situation has changed dramatically over the past century. Formerly independent kingdoms such as Colchis and Kurus have been conquered and absorbed by the Tauric Empire, which has expanded its borders and solidified its control over the region. The growing power of the Tauric Empire poses a significant threat to neighboring Anatolian kingdoms, which fear further expansion by this aggressive state. The southern Caucasus, once a mosaic of independent states, is now under a single authority, reshaping the region's power dynamics.
On the Mediterranean, Crete and Cyprus have become independent principalities following the decline of the Macedonian Kingdom's hegemony. Taking advantage of their geographical isolation, these states have developed their own political and economic systems, with their fleets playing a vital role in maritime trade. These island states effectively leverage their independence, becoming key players in Mediterranean trade. However, their strategic locations make them potential targets for larger powers such as the Kingdom of Asia, the Tauric Empire, or the Kingdom of Syria.
Egypt – 1000 AD
In the year 1000 AD, Egypt remains a strong and independent kingdom with roots in both Hellenistic and Coptic traditions. As a powerful state in the Nile Valley, Egypt has long benefited from its natural wealth and strategic location, enabling it to control trade between Africa, the Middle East, and the Mediterranean. Ruled by Hellenistic elites, the kingdom nurtures its distinct culture and religion, grounded in Coptic Christianity, which serves as the foundation of social unity and identity. These traditions make Egypt one of the most stable states in the region.
In the 9th century, Egypt faced a significant threat from the powerful Zafrid Caliphate, which sought to expand its influence into the Nile Valley. After a series of intense defensive wars, Egypt successfully repelled the Zafrid forces, weakening the caliphate and leading to its gradual fragmentation. This victory was pivotal for Egypt, preserving its independence and establishing its reputation as a state capable of effectively repelling external threats. The destruction of the Zafrid Caliphate's military potential prevented further Arab invasions into Egypt and other Coptic kingdoms in the region, allowing for continued development.
As one of several Coptic kingdoms, Egypt enjoys regional dominance and collaborates with neighboring states that also resisted Islamic invasions. The shared experience of facing a common threat has strengthened trade and political ties between these Coptic states, which aim to maintain independence from Middle Eastern powers. Egypt and its Coptic neighbors continue to enjoy relative peace and stability.
Arabian Peninsula – 1000 AD
In the year 1000 AD, the Arabian Peninsula, once unified under the might of the Zafrid Caliphate, is fractured into numerous competing principalities and emirates. This fragmentation was a direct result of wars with the Coptic kingdoms of Egypt and Nubia in the 9th century. A series of defeats inflicted by Egypt, which effectively defended its territories, significantly weakened the caliphate both militarily and politically. With the central authority of the caliphate dismantled, the Arabian Peninsula descended into chaos, as local emirs and warlords vied for power and influence in the region.
This turmoil was exploited by the newly established Ajuuraan Empire in southern Somalia. Dhidhin I, the founder of this pagan state, proved to be an exceptionally talented leader and ambitious conqueror. Taking advantage of the fractured caliphate, he launched a series of campaigns that led to the conquest of the southwestern regions of the Arabian Peninsula, including the holy cities of Mecca and Medina. Ajuuraan's domination of these areas significantly altered the regional balance of power, introducing a new pagan state into a world previously dominated by Islamic and Coptic powers. The Ajuuraan Empire not only solidified its position in the south but also established trade routes connecting the Arabian Peninsula with East Africa.
Despite Ajuuraan's successes, the northeastern part of the Arabian Peninsula remained politically fragmented. Rival principalities and local leaders struggled to control the remnants of the former caliphate, but their efforts were hampered by a lack of unity and internal conflicts. The region, once regarded as the center of Islamic power, had lost its prominence as the leading force in the Middle East. Nonetheless, the Arabian Peninsula continues to serve as a critical trade hub where African, Middle Eastern, and Indian influences converge.
Nubia and the Horn of Africa – 1000 AD
In the year 1000 AD, the northern Nubian region remains under the strong influence of two powerful Coptic kingdoms: Nubia and Blemmyia. Both states, sharing a common religious and cultural heritage, survived the challenging period of Islamic invasions during the 9th century AD. The Kingdom of Nubia, which has long controlled the fertile Nile Valley, serves as the foundation of stability in the region. Blemmyia, formed following a civil war in the former Kingdom of Punt, has gained significance due to its strategic location and well-developed trade connections. While these two kingdoms are allies against external threats, they occasionally compete for influence in border areas, leading to tensions.
Further south, three Coptic kingdoms—Syrbotia, Punt, and Axum—hold sway. Despite their shared religious roots, they differ in structure and political ambitions. Syrbotia controls key trade routes leading to the Nile Valley, making it an essential partner for its northern neighbors. Punt, having overcome previous internal wars, maintains stability through natural wealth and maritime trade.
At the southern edges of the region, the Ajuuraan Empire dominates. This powerful and expansive pagan state controls most of Somalia and is governed by strong rulers like Dhidhin I. The Ajuuraan Empire benefits from rich natural resources and strategic positioning, allowing it to dominate trade across the Indian Ocean. Its expansion brings it into direct contact with the Coptic kingdoms, leading to tensions but also occasional trade collaboration.
Between the Coptic powers and Ajuuraan lies the Sultanate of Adal, the last Islamic stronghold in the region. Located on the Red Sea coast, Adal acts as a buffer between the rival civilizations. Although smaller than its neighbors, the sultanate plays a crucial role in trade and diplomacy. Its ports serve as significant hubs for merchants traveling between Africa, the Middle East, and India. Despite limited resources, Adal effectively defends its independence through alliances and its strategic location.
Persia – 1000 AD
In 1000 AD, Persia is a region of chaos and political fragmentation. Numerous principalities and emirs vie for control of the lands of the former empire, leading to constant conflicts and border changes. The Hellenized Afrasiabid dynasty, which had long dominated Persia and professed Manichaeism, fell from power in a violent Zoroastrian revolt that broke out in the Daylam region in the early 10th century. Zoroastrianism, an ancient Persian religion, regained popularity as an expression of rebellion against the rule of the Afrasiabids, some of whose elites identified with Greek influences. This rebellion not only ended the rule of the Afrasiabids but also created a new Zoroastrian state that briefly unified part of the region.
In the second half of the 10th century, another ambitious conqueror emerged – Sebuktigin, who came from a Turanian family and, thanks to his military talents, founded a new dynasty that encompassed much of Persia. His conquests were aimed at restoring stability to the region, and his rule contributed to some consolidation of the fragmented lands. Sebuktigin managed to unite the quarreling principalities and emirates for a short time, but after his death Persia fell back into chaos, and his dynasty quickly disintegrated due to the lack of effective successors and numerous internal disputes. The fall of Sebuktigin's dynasty left Persia politically weakened and exposed to external threats.
Persia in 1000 AD remains a patchwork of independent and rival states, vying for both regional dominance and survival. While brief unifications such as Sebuktigin's reign offered hope for stability, the lack of a permanent central authority and numerous religious conflicts mean that Persia remains a volatile territory. Many principalities form alliances or wage war, and the Zoroastrian state of Daylam struggles to maintain its independence against a growing number of new claimants to power. This fraught environment sets the stage for future changes that could either reunite the region or further fragment it.
Indian Peninsula - 1000 AD
In 1000 AD, the Indian subcontinent is the scene of intense rivalries between powerful states seeking to dominate the region. In the western and northern part of the subcontinent lies the once-powerful Taraxano Empire, which at its height controlled vast areas of northern India. However, the last two centuries have seen the decline of this power as civil wars and rebellions weakened the central authority, fragmenting the empire. Today, Taraxano is a shadow of its former glory, forced to fight for survival in the face of rival states that gained independence in its wake.
One of the most important successors to the former Taraxano Empire is the Chandela dynasty, which has managed to gain control over much of its lands. The Chandela built their state on solid administrative and military foundations that allowed them to dominate the northwestern part of the subcontinent. Their strategic location and ability to exploit Taraxano's weaknesses make them one of the most important players in the region. Despite this, Chandela faces numerous challenges, including conflicts with the remnants of Taraxano and rival neighbors.
To the north-east is the Brahampalid Empire, which was founded on the ruins of the former Goshwami Empire. Although the Goshwami had been competing with Taraxano for control of the northern subcontinent for decades, a civil war in the 10th century saw a new dynasty take power in the country. The Brahampalids maintained political and military stability, allowing them to consolidate their influence in the eastern regions of the subcontinent. Their power, while strong, required constant maintenance through alliances with local rulers and a permanent military presence in key regions.
The southern part of the subcontinent, although less centralized, remains a key area of political and economic rivalry. The region is divided into a number of kingdoms, the most important of which are the Tamilkam, Trilinga, and Krishn. Tamilkam, with its developed maritime trade and culture, dominated the southern coast of the subcontinent, playing a key role in trade with the Indian Ocean regions. Trilinga and Krishn, located further inland, controlled important trade routes and served as political and military centers.
The rivalry between the northern and southern states, as well as the internal conflicts within each of these kingdoms, made the Indian subcontinent a dynamic but unstable region. The rulers of individual states use their local resources, religion, and diplomacy to build coalitions and gain an advantage over their opponents.
Tibet, Fergana – 1000 AD
In 1000 AD, the Tibetan and Fergana regions are in a state of political fragmentation and chaos, following the fall of the Hellenistic state of Tayuan. Tayuan, which dates back to the conquests of Alexander the Great, had for centuries existed as a cultural and political stronghold of Hellenism in the Fergana Valley. It reached its peak between the 5th and 7th centuries, when it controlled both Fergana and Tibet, creating a vast empire. However, internal tensions, Tibetan rebellions, and invasions by nomadic peoples from Central Asia led to the slow disintegration of the state. The final fall of Tayuan in the early 10th century left the region in chaos and division.
A remnant of Tayuan power is the principality of Khotan, the last bastion of the old Fergano-Hellenistic elite. Khotan, although small, retains a strong cultural identity, being a place where Hellenistic traditions are still alive, especially in the realms of art, religion and administration. The principality struggles to survive in the face of external pressure from neighbouring khanates and kingdoms, as well as internal concerns about maintaining stability. However, it is an important trading centre, benefiting from its strategic location on the trade routes connecting Central Asia, Tibet and China.
Three major kingdoms have emerged in Tibet over the last two centuries: Guge, U and Kham. These states emerged from the rivalry between the states that emerged after the Tibetan rebellions against Tayuan, when local elites gained power and exploited the weakness of the central government. Each of these kingdoms has its own unique cultural and political characteristics, although they share a common religious heritage, with Yasenism being a key part of their identity. Guge controls western Tibet. U, with central Tibet within its borders, is the most populous of these regions, while Kham, located in the east, is known for its belligerence and looser political organization.
The northern parts of Tibet and Ferghana were dominated by the Turkic Khanate of Qocho, which was formed by the migration and conquest of nomadic steppe peoples. Qocho is a typical nomadic khanate, relying on mobile hordes and control of trade routes. Their dominance of the region is unstable, however, as they are bordered by rival states such as Khotan and the Tibetan kingdoms, and have to deal with internal power struggles. The Khanate of Qocho, although militarily powerful, has not been able to fully subjugate the region, leaving Tibet and Ferghana in a state of constant tension and conflict.
- 1
The Known World – 1000 AD (Part III)
The Known World – 1000 AD (Part III)
Sub-Saharan Africa – 1000 AD
In the year 1000 AD, Sub-Saharan Africa is dominated by the powerful and extensive Akan kingdom, which controls much of the Ivory Coast region. The Akan state has emerged as the primary political and economic force in the area, drawing its wealth from trade in gold, salt, and ivory. Its power structure is based on a strong monarchy and a developed network of alliances with local tribal leaders, enabling it to maintain stability in the region. Animistic religion and ancestor worship are central to Akan society, deeply influencing its political and ceremonial structures.
To the west of Akan's borders lies the Kingdom of Mali, which is also beginning to emerge as a regional power, building its position through control of trade routes and the development of irrigation systems. Mali arose from the collapse of the Kingdom of Ghana, which had been the strongest state in the region until the early 10th century.
To the east lies the Kingdom of Borgu, known for its warrior culture and dynamic interactions with its neighbors. Between Mali and Borgu stretches a mosaic of smaller tribal states seeking their place amid these rising powers. These minor states often serve as buffer zones or areas of commercial and political rivalry.
Further east, around Lake Chad, small kingdoms fiercely compete for dominance in the region. Although these states are small, they hold strategic importance due to their control of local trade routes, especially those leading to North Africa and the Middle East. Despite the political fragmentation and instability in this area, the kingdoms benefit from the natural wealth of Lake Chad and the surrounding agricultural lands. The lands to the east of Lake Chad are similarly a patchwork of dispersed tribal groups and small principalities, reflecting the overall political fragmentation in this part of Sub-Saharan Africa.
Central Asia – 1000 AD
In the year 1000 AD, Central Asia, east of the borders of the Tauric Empire, is a region of political chaos, division, and rivalry among various powers. The most significant influence on the region's political landscape in previous centuries was the Kumano-Kipchak Khanate, which at its peak controlled vast territories stretching from the eastern borders of Taurica to Mongolia. This khanate had emerged as a powerful confederation of nomadic tribes, dominating trade, migration, and warfare in Central Asia. However, key military defeats in wars against the Tauric Empire in the latter half of the 10th century weakened its structure, and internal conflicts ultimately led to the khanate's collapse by the end of the century.
After the dissolution of the Kumano-Kipchak Khanate, the region fractured into numerous smaller khanates, the strongest of which are Kush-Murun and Kopulid. The Kush-Murun Khanate controls strategic territories along major trade routes connecting Central Asia with the Middle East, giving it economic and political advantages. Meanwhile, the Kopulid Khanate, located further east, is known for its warrior traditions and ability to mobilize large nomadic armies, enabling it to maintain influence in the struggle for regional dominance. Both khanates remain locked in constant conflict with each other and with smaller nomadic groups attempting to retain their autonomy.
To the south, near the Aral Sea, the powerful Oghuz Il Khanate dominates. This state, rooted in the traditions of Turkic tribes settled on the southern steppes of Central Asia, controls important trade routes and strategic mountain passes, making it a key player in the region. The Oghuz Il Khanate is also known for its efforts to consolidate tribes under its rule and its frequent raids on neighbors, including the southern kingdoms of Iran and northern areas of Central Asia. Its geopolitical position allows it to maintain relative stability and influence despite the overall fragmentation of the region.
North of these areas lie territories inhabited by Finno-Ugric peoples, who have formed their own states over the centuries. The strongest of these is the Volga-Ural Empire, which borders the Tauric Empire to the north. Despite its "barbaric" nature, the Volga-Ural Empire has developed a well-organized administration and an effective defense system against invaders. It serves as an important hub for the trade of furs, salt, and metals, as well as a point of exchange between the nomadic and sedentary civilizations to the south. The Kingdom of Ob, on the other hand, emerged from the collapse of the old Siberian Empire and dominates the northern steppes. This state is less centralized than its neighboring empire but remains significant due to its control of the region's rich natural resources.
Siberia – 1000 AD
In the year 1000 AD, the areas of Mongolia are marked by political fragmentation and the dominance of nomadic structures that arose following the collapse of former regional powers. By the late 9th century, the existing khanates of Urungu, Sono, Ovorkhsngai, and Qsar-Qurug, which had built strong political structures and dominated surrounding tribes, fell apart. The reasons for this collapse included internal conflicts, external pressures from other nomadic forces, and changes in trade routes that weakened the economic foundations of these states.
In their place, smaller political entities have emerged, with the three most powerful being the Khanates of Namai, Kopti, and Asli. The Namai Khanate, located in the north, is known for its military strength and ability to unite tribes in the face of threats. The Kopti Khanate, situated in central Mongolia, controls key pastures and migration routes, giving it an economic edge in the region. The Asli Khanate, further to the west, benefits from its proximity to former trade routes leading to Western Asia, though its influence is limited by competition with other khanates. These three states remain in constant rivalry, resulting in shifting borders and political instability.
Further east, from the Aral Sea to Manchuria, a chaotic mosaic of small khanates and tribes competes for influence and territory. These smaller political structures are characterized by short-lived stability and frequent changes in alliances. While competition is fierce, limited resources and the absence of a dominant player prevent any of these forces from establishing a lasting empire. This area, though filled with tensions, remains strategically significant as a transitional zone between the steppe regions of Central Asia and the richer lands of Manchuria and China, making it a site of dynamic political and social change.
Manchuria, Korea, and Japan - 1000 AD
In 1000 AD, Manchuria is a politically fragmented region dominated by numerous nomadic khanates. Among the most powerful are Shanagir, Yauge, and Balhae. Shanagir, located in the northernmost reaches of Manchuria, borders the Siberian wilderness, leveraging its resources while defending its frontiers against northern invasions. Yauge and Balhae, situated closer to the coasts and the Korean Peninsula, control strategic trade routes linking Manchuria with Korea and China. These khanates are in constant conflict for regional dominance, hindering political stabilization in Manchuria.
On the Korean Peninsula, the fall of the mighty Kingdom of Haedong over the past two centuries has shifted the balance of power. In the southern part of the peninsula, the Kingdom of Silla has managed to preserve some of Haedong’s legacy, though its authority is limited to southern regions. Northern Korea is divided among four independent states competing for control over the former Haedong territories.
The Yamato Kingdom in the Japanese Islands has continued its northward expansion on Honshu over the past two centuries, successfully pacifying the indigenous tribes of the region. This has allowed Yamato to consolidate its power over Japan’s main islands, with current ambitions focused on Hokkaido, where it faces resistance from the native Ainu tribes.
China - 1000 AD
In 1000 AD, China is in a state of political chaos, embroiled in a fierce struggle for the Mandate of Heaven. The fall of the Zhou dynasty in the mid-10th century ended centralized rule, leading to the fragmentation of the empire. The once-dominant empire, which held sway over much of China in the 8th century, has been replaced by a series of competing states and warlords.
The most powerful of these are Wu, Qi, and Loudian. Wu, based in the Yangtze River basin, commands a formidable river fleet. Qi controls key territories in the northeast, while Loudian utilizes its mountainous fortresses to defend its borders.
Divided China is an arena of constant wars, alliances, and betrayals, severely limiting the region's economic and trade potential. Each competing state strives to gain recognition as the rightful successor to the Mandate of Heaven, but none have yet gained sufficient dominance to restore imperial unity.
Indochina - 1000 AD
In 1000 AD, the Indochina region is dominated by several powerful kingdoms that have established stable structures along the peninsula’s eastern coasts. The Kingdom of Champa, located along the South China Sea coast, maintains its position through rich trade routes and a developed urban culture. Its southern neighbor, the Kingdom of Kambuja, is equally powerful, benefiting from fertile lands in the Mekong River basin. Despite occasional conflicts over influence, both kingdoms maintain relative political stability compared to other parts of the region.
In northern Indochina, the Kingdom of Laos has collapsed, splintering into smaller political entities. The Kingdom of Isana is mired in a succession war, destabilizing the northern part of the peninsula. Neighboring powers, such as Haripunchai, have exploited the fragmentation, seizing parts of northern Laos. This expansion strengthens Haripunchai’s position as a regional power in the northwest, although its southern borders have been weakened by losses to the rising Kingdom of Lavapura.
Lavapura continues its expansion westward, consolidating its position as a new regional power by annexing territories from Haripunchai. The conflicts between Haripunchai and Lavapura, along with the war in Isana, create a patchwork of tensions in western and northern Indochina. Nonetheless, the region remains a crucial trade hub, with eastern kingdoms such as Champa and Kambuja dominating commerce with China, India, and other parts of Southeast Asia.
Indonesia - 1000 AD
In 1000 AD, Indonesia is a mosaic of independent kingdoms and tribal structures, differing in political and economic development. On the Philippine Islands and New Guinea, tribal communities dominate, retaining their traditional local character. The absence of strong state structures fosters fragmentation, with indigenous hunter-gatherer and small-scale agricultural communities relying on fishing and small trade networks for sustenance.
On Sulawesi, several indigenous kingdoms are emerging as significant regional powers. The Bugis Kingdom, organized around clan structures, stands out as the most influential, engaging in intensive trade and agricultural activities. Smaller kingdoms like Bungku and Sulawesi also play key roles in island politics, competing for control over strategic ports, which drives regional development. Sulawesi serves as an important nexus in trade routes linking Indonesia with the Philippines and Malaya.
On Java, two kingdoms dominate—Sunda and Java. Sunda controls the island's western part, focusing on a rice-based agricultural economy, while Java, centered in the east, is more maritime-oriented, emphasizing trade and craftsmanship. The division of the island between two powerful kingdoms leads to regular tensions, but their position on international trade routes with China, India, and the Middle East ensures prosperity and stability for both.
On Borneo, two kingdoms—Banjar and Tarakan—hold sway. Banjar, in the southern part of the island, is a strong center for the spice trade, timber, and rare minerals, while Tarakan, in the north, is renowned for its fishing and maritime activities. Both kingdoms maintain close ties with the Srivijaya Empire, which, in 1000 AD, remains the region’s greatest power, dominating Sumatra and the Malay Peninsula. Srivijaya controls maritime trade in the Strait of Malacca and exerts immense influence on the politics, culture, and religion of the entire Indonesian archipelago, shaping it into a hub of commerce and exchange between the East and the West.
- 1
- 1
A very divided world, for the most part, this one. Devoid of big powers like Persia and China. I love it.
- 1
So much border gore, but this is a Paradox game, so it is to be expected.
- 1
I didn't mean to reference any parliamentary tradition at all.
Also stranger states have had colonies in the America's and only lost them due to bad luck.
- 1
Vassals conquered territories to the Baltic Sea ai is annoying. When Ai does what he wants.
I will make border corrections when moving this part further to eu4 or eu5. When I look at the map from a distance, I always get disgusted when I see how it looks.
A very divided world, for the most part, this one. Devoid of big powers like Persia and China. I love it.
All the countries I created migrated from to Rajas of Idnia mod, fell apart within 1 century of the game.
I was answering this question.
- 1
Sosthenes II (1010 AD – 1039 AD)
Sosthenes II (1010 AD – 1039 AD)
Sosthenes II ascended to the throne of the Tauric Empire in 1010 AD, succeeding his father, Emperor Prytanis III. Prepared from a young age for rulership, he received an extensive education encompassing both administrative and military disciplines, making him one of the most well-prepared monarchs of his generation. His intelligence and analytical skills allowed him to grasp the complex challenges facing the empire and to develop long-term strategies.
He was a ruler who generously supported culture and the arts, contributing to the development of literature and architecture in the Tauric Empire. Historians often highlight his patience in addressing internal and diplomatic problems, which frequently helped avoid unnecessary conflicts. However, Sosthenes II’s inconsistency proved to be a trait that affected both his court and the political stability of the empire. His impulsiveness and unpredictability sometimes led to inconsistent decisions, weakening his authority.
Upon taking the throne, Sosthenes II sought to secure the loyalty of the Varangian Guard by allowing them a traditional distribution of wealth from the imperial treasury. Although costly, this gesture bolstered his authority among the guards, cementing their loyalty and ensuring stability during the sensitive early days of his reign.
From 1013 to 1015 AD, the Tauric Empire was struck by a devastating smallpox epidemic that originated in Tarnograd, a key port on the Black Sea. The disease spread quickly along the coastlines and reached the Tauric Peninsula and its capital due to the intense maritime trade. Smallpox affected both rural and urban populations, sparing no one, not even the imperial court.
Sosthenes II contracted the disease in mid-1014 but, demonstrating remarkable determination, initially tried to continue managing the empire. However, his condition quickly deteriorated. The court physician, known for his skill and innovative treatments, performed intensive therapy that ultimately saved the emperor's life. While he survived, the illness weakened him physically and forced him to limit public appearances, causing uncertainty among the populace and the court.
The emperor suffered a personal tragedy with the death of his youngest child, Prince Nearchus, who succumbed to smallpox at just a few years old. This loss deeply affected both the emperor and empress, plunging the court into mourning. Despite his own recovery, Sosthenes II ordered the construction of a magnificent tomb for his son in the imperial mausoleum, combining Hellenistic and Tauric architectural elements to symbolize unity in the face of loss.
In early 1016 AD, Sosthenes II made a strategic decision to form an alliance with the Kohestan Khanate by arranging a marriage between his eldest son and heir, Prince Prytanis, and Darima, the daughter of Great Khan Durus. This union was intended not only to strengthen political ties between the Tauric Empire and the khanate but also to secure the empire's eastern borders against potential nomadic raids.
Darima, known for her beauty and education, was seen as an ideal candidate for the future empress, creating a positive atmosphere at court. The engagement ceremony was grand, symbolizing a new chapter in relations between the two states, and Sosthenes II's decision was widely regarded as a wise move in international diplomacy.
The engagement celebrations included spectacular chariot races at the capital’s hippodrome, attracting crowds from across the Tauric Empire. The hippodrome was adorned with imperial colors, and the emperor, along with his family and key court officials, presided over the event. The races captivated the public, but tensions rose when the crowd began demanding the dismissal of Strategos Prytanis, the emperor’s cousin, accusing him of abuses of power and poor management of border provinces.
To defuse the situation, Sosthenes II quickly ordered the distribution of gold coins to the gathered crowd. This generous gesture shifted their attention back to the races and elicited cheers in his honor, averting a potential crisis. Although he did not publicly address the demands concerning his cousin, the emperor decided to consider the matter privately with his trusted advisors.
The races concluded with a victory by Isidora, a young and talented charioteer who captivated the audience. Her triumph became a symbol of unity and overcoming momentary chaos. Sosthenes II personally rewarded her with a golden wreath and a handshake, sparking euphoria among the spectators.
By the end of 1015 AD, Prince Prytanis, the heir to the Tauric throne, reached adulthood, which was celebrated with a series of court ceremonies. Known for his sharp intellect, the young prince had been tutored for years by Peucolaus, the court physician and scholar. Under his guidance, Prytanis delved into classical philosophical works and developed a keen interest in medicine and theories of body-mind harmony. His intellectual prowess bolstered his position at court and inspired hope for a future ruler who would combine wisdom with pragmatism.
In mid-1016 AD, alarming news reached the imperial court: Kassander, a notorious adventurer and rogue who had recently arrived in Satyria, was allegedly planning to steal a valuable artifact from the imperial treasury. Emperor Sosthenes II summoned his spymaster and trusted advisors to confirm the reports and consider possible actions.
Upon verifying Kassander's intentions, the emperor issued a clear decree: the rogue was to leave the empire's borders immediately. A stern warning accompanied the order, stating that any defiance or attempts to carry out his plans would result in imprisonment and likely public execution.
Kassander, realizing he had been exposed, complied and left the capital under military escort. His departure became a widely discussed event, celebrated by some as a triumph of justice and a testament to the efficiency of the imperial intelligence service. To prevent similar incidents, the emperor ordered increased security for the treasury and heightened vigilance at court.
In 1017 AD, driven by a desire to refine his ruling skills, Sosthenes II visited the renowned university in Pantikapaion, one of the Tauric Empire's leading intellectual centers. His arrival was a major event for the academic community. The emperor attended lectures, engaged in discussions with professors and students, and emphasized the importance of education as the foundation of effective governance.
During his stay, Sosthenes II focused on conversations with professors specializing in state management and administrative history. He shared his own experiences while humbly listening to new theories and proposals for improving imperial governance. His visit symbolized his commitment to enlightened rule and inspired many young students to dedicate themselves to public service and scholarship.
The dynastic policy of Sosthenes II during his reign was one of the pillars of stability in the Tauric Empire. Carefully chosen marriages within his family were aimed at strengthening alliances with neighboring states and securing the eastern and northern borders of the empire. The emperor's eldest daughter, Menisce, was married to Valassius I, the young ruler of the kingdom of Bjarmland.
The younger daughter of Sosthenes II, Doris, was betrothed and later married Khan Almish, the ruler of the Sevarid Khanate. This marriage was not only political but also cultural, symbolizing harmony and cooperation between two different traditions.
Further dynastic policy also involved the emperor’s cousin, Patroclea, who married Basileios I, the ruler of the Kingdom of Asia. This marriage was especially significant for maintaining stability on the southeastern border of the empire.
Satyros, the younger son of Sosthenes II, was betrothed and later married Irmgard, the sister of Arnulf I, the King of Raetia, marking another important element of the emperor’s dynastic policy. This marriage aimed to strengthen relations with Raetia, one of the key neighbors of the Tauric Empire to the west.
Between 1018–1020 AD, Emperor Sosthenes II conducted a carefully planned campaign against the Kingdom of Daylam, with the goal of reclaiming lands that historically belonged to the Kingdom of Kurus, a vassal state of the Tauric Empire. Exploiting the internal chaos in Daylam, where succession struggles were underway, Sosthenes led his forces through the mountainous terrain of the region.
After two years of intense warfare, the campaign ended with the signing of a treaty, through which most of Kurus' lands were annexed to the Tauric Empire. Sosthenes II triumphantly returned to the capital.
The years 1020–1030 AD were a period of intense military activity for the Tauric Empire, which, under Sosthenes II, became involved in numerous conflicts to defend its dynastic allies. The first significant event was the involvement of imperial forces in two campaigns on behalf of the Ghaznavid Khanate between 1020–1028 AD.
Faced with threats from rival neighboring khanates, Sosthenes II sent troops to assist. The empire provided both skilled soldiers and logistical resources that enabled the Ghaznavids to win key battles and secure strategic territories. These victories strengthened the ties between the states and reinforced Tauric’s position as a reliable ally.
Between 1023–1025 AD, the empire supported the Kingdom of Bjarmland, ruled by Valassius I, husband of Sosthenes II's eldest daughter, Menisce. The kingdom was under attack by the nomadic Fennic-Ugric tribes. Tauric forces, commanded by distinguished strategists, played a crucial role in the war. This alliance gained additional significance as it strengthened the empire's influence in the northern regions and ensured the safety of trade routes.
Between 1027–1029 AD, Sosthenes II turned his attention to the western borders, supporting the Kingdom of Raetia during a civil war. Irmgard, the wife of the emperor's younger son, Satyros, was the sister of Arnulf I, the King of Raetia, which obligated the emperor to act. Tauric troops, taking part in key battles, helped secure Arnulf’s throne, further strengthening the empire’s influence in this part of Europe.
The success of these interventions made Sosthenes II’s dynastic policy recognized as an effective tool for expanding the prestige and power of the Tauric Empire on the international stage.
In 1021 AD, an exceptionally grand event took place in the capital of the Tauric Empire—the wedding of Prytanis, the heir to the throne, and Darima, the daughter of the great Khan Durus of Kohestan. The ceremony was a testament to the diplomatic skill of Emperor Sosthenes II, who cemented an alliance with the powerful Khanate through this marriage. The capital was adorned with magnificent decorations, and tournaments and displays were held in the hippodrome, attracting crowds from all over the empire.
Darima, known for her beauty and grace, quickly won the affection of both the court and the people. Her arrival brought an exotic touch to the capital—her procession was filled with colorful fabrics, oriental spices, and gifts from her father. The celebrations lasted for several days, including feasts, music, and dancing. While this marriage was strategic, it also showcased the empire’s image as a center of culture and politics, capable of building bridges between different civilizations.
In 1026 AD, as the Tauric Empire engaged in military conflicts, the emperor’s younger son, Satyros, despite his young age, began to attract the attention of the court with his rebellious spirit and thirst for adventure. Raised in the shadow of his older brother Prytanis, Satyros demonstrated exceptional energy and courage, which both fascinated and alarmed those around him. He constantly sought challenges, both in the castle corridors and beyond the walls of the capital, making him a favorite of some courtiers but a source of concern for the emperor’s advisors.
A turning point in young Satyros’ life came with his first independent hunting trip, during which he managed to hunt a steppe bustard. Although the expedition initially seemed risky—Satyros embarked on the hunt almost secretly, without full approval from the elders—it ended in triumph. He returned to camp dirty, tired, but proudly presenting his catch. The bustard, known for its speed and alertness, was a formidable opponent, making Satyros’ success even more impressive. Even the master of the hunt, praised for his experience and high standards, commended the young prince, stating that he had the “spark of a true hunter.”
In 1030 AD, disturbing news began to reach the capital of the Tauric Empire about a new Turkish conqueror who was set to begin rapid conquests in Persia. This leader, leading the Seljuks, had united numerous nomadic tribes that had previously operated more as disorganized raiding groups than a cohesive military force.
Thanks to extraordinary tactical skills and the ability to build loyalty among his warriors, this young leader, known as Tughril, quickly gained fame among both his peers and enemies. News of his victories spread, evoking both admiration and fear—his army moved swiftly, destroying obstacles and taking key cities in the fragmented Persia.
The disjointed Persia, struggling for decades with internal conflicts and instability, proved to be an easy target for the Seljuks. Tughril not only captured numerous territories but also began to build a new political order in the region, seeking to consolidate his power.
The Tauric Empire watched the situation with concern, realizing that the Seljuks might soon pose a threat to their interests in the Kurus region and the empire's eastern borders. Sosthenes II and his advisors began preparing for the possibility that this new player in the Asian political arena would become another challenge to regional stability.
On October 28, 1039 AD, the Tauric Empire plunged into mourning following the death of Sosthenes II, one of the most influential rulers of his era. After nearly three decades of rule, the emperor gained a reputation as a wise, albeit sometimes capricious, strategist who skillfully balanced military power, diplomacy, and internal stability.
After Sosthenes II’s death, the throne of the empire was taken over by his eldest son, Prytanis IV. The new emperor, raised in the spirit of philosophy and statecraft, was well-prepared to rule due to the teachings he received from distinguished scholars.
Last edited:
- 2
- 1
- 1
Why was Kassander plotting to steal an artifact of all things? Who was he and where did he come from?
- 1