Taurica Part II : Middle Ages (450 AD - 1300 AD)

[kakom]

Why is it that China always seems to collapse in Paradox games, instead of staying united?

I don't know why China is usually fragmented in paradox games. This state prevailed for a long time until the arrival of the Mongols.

Thank you for these further adventures of Satyros. He must have an amazing intellect and be quite skilled with linguistics given his success in these travels and his spy missions.

I am starting to think Satyros is one of the world's greatest travelers and adventurers ever. What a life! Thanks for the new chapter and congratulations on having this AAR recognized in the Weekly AAR Showcase.

He is astonishingly well travelled, and kept an actual journal throughout. He is going to be one of the most famous and important historical sources of all time.

I tried to travel as much of the world as possible during the life of one character. In any case, the last chapter VI will be the last one concerning the adventures of Satyros Satyrion, after that I returned to regular chapters concerning the successive rulers of the Tauric Empire.

 

[kakom]

Travels of Satyros Satyrion (1079–1089) - Part VI (The end)​

Travel Diary of Satyros: Years 1079 – 1080 AD

​

In the early weeks of the year 1079 AD, our ship docked on the shores of the Iberian Peninsula, and our first stop was the capital of the Kingdom of Urbiaca.

It was a place full of contrasts—Phoenician influences were evident everywhere, interwoven with remnants of Roman heritage and Christianity, a fundamental element of identity in these lands. The reception at the court of Milcherem II, the ruler of this kingdom, was formal yet cordial. Though we had seen much in our travels, I felt we had arrived in a land steeped in history and political tensions.

​

One of the first tasks assigned to us by Milcherem II was to ensure the safe journey of his vassal, Damona, as she traveled to the court of Faustus II, the ruler of Tarraconesis. The journey from Urbiaca to Zaragoza, the capital of Tarraconesis, was not only a duty but also an opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the Iberian Peninsula.

​

After several weeks of travel, we reached Zaragoza, a bustling city where the magnificent Roman architecture blended with emerging Christian influences. Once Damona was entrusted to the court of Faustus II, our mission was complete. We spent several weeks in Zaragoza, attending celebrations and engaging with the local nobility.

​

In the latter half of 1079 AD, after completing our mission in Tarraconesis, we traveled westward to the neighboring Kingdom of Tritium. The journey took about two weeks, passing through picturesque yet challenging routes. This land, known for its dense forests and fortified towns, left an impression with its rugged yet majestic atmosphere.

​

Our destination was Pampeluna, the kingdom’s capital, where Queen Aldonza I resided. The meeting with the queen was brief but intense—she presented us with an unusual task that would test both our creativity and courage.

​

Queen Aldonza I tasked us with abducting her adversary, a man named Felipe, who posed a significant threat to her rule. This mission was entirely different from our usual undertakings, but honor and the prospect of future collaboration with the queen compelled me to accept the challenge.

​

Tracking Felipe proved complex—he was a cunning man hiding on the outskirts of Tritium’s controlled lands. After several days of searching, using local intelligence and support from the queen’s people, we managed to capture him.

​

Despite numerous attempts at bribery and persuasion, Felipe was delivered to the queen in Pampeluna. The task was challenging and demanding, but its success earned us recognition in Aldonza I’s court. The queen was deeply pleased with our effectiveness and rewarded us generously for our efforts.

We spent a few more days in Pampeluna, enjoying the tranquility and hospitality of the queen’s court, before beginning to plan the next steps in our great journey. This was another reminder of the diverse challenges fate could present during such distant travels. With the arrival of 1080 AD, we set out westward, aiming for the capital of the Kingdom of Tapolia.


Travel Diary of Satyros: 1080 AD

In early March of 1080 AD, we arrived in Porto, the capital of Tapolia, where we decided to spend most of the year. The city, vibrant and rich in tradition, captivated us with its charm—bustling port markets thrived with trade, and the local nobility was open to collaboration.

During this time, I developed a close friendship with Baroness Senica of Salamanca, whose warmth and intellect left a deep impression on me. Her stories of the region’s history and culture strengthened our bond.

We also worked with Countess Veliba of Castelo Branco, undertaking a discreet mission to gather confidential information. The task required subtlety and cunning, but it ended successfully, enhancing our reputation.

In the second half of the year, after concluding our mission in Porto, we journeyed eastward. The route led through the picturesque lands of Tapolia, filled with vineyards and small villages, until we reached the border with the Kingdom of Asturias.

We visited Oviedo, Asturias’ capital, in late autumn, where its hospitality left a lasting impression. The city, full of splendid buildings and proud inhabitants, was a place where we could rest and replenish supplies before continuing our journey. The Asturian nobility was kind, though the rulers seemed to engage in constant disputes with neighboring kingdoms.

At the end of 1080 AD, we crossed the Pyrenees. This stage of the journey was exhausting, but the breathtaking views of mountain passes and awe-inspiring landscapes compensated for the hardship. The Pyrenees marked a symbolic boundary—crossing them signified entering the region of Gaul.


Travel Diary of Satyros: 1081 AD

​

The early months of 1081 AD were spent traversing the enchanting lands of Gaul, where we stayed in the estates of local nobility, offering our services.

For Duke Gato Rodrigiz of Berry, we supervised the construction of a new church, a project requiring both precision and patience. This collaboration allowed us to gain deeper insight into Gaul’s religious life and architecture.

Shortly after, we traveled to Bourbon, where the great Mayor Eponi tasked us with conducting a financial audit of his city. For several weeks, we delved into account ledgers, uncovering both oversights and misappropriations. Our work was highly praised, and the mayor’s gratitude opened doors to further assignments.

​

In the summer of that year, we reached the Kingdom of Armorica, where we were received at the court of King Lodewijk. Known for his fascination with rare artifacts, the king entrusted me with a new challenge—a quest to find an object worthy of his royal treasury.

​

For this purpose, I once again ventured south, crossing the sea to reach North Africa. The search proved fruitful—I discovered an extraordinary artifact known as the "Wishing Branch," carefully secured deep within a desert cave. I returned with this treasure to Armorica, and Lodewijk was delighted with my find.

​

Meanwhile, I received news of the flourishing city of Tingi, which I had founded years earlier in Africa. The joy of this success was immense—Tingi had developed into a significant trade hub, reinforcing my confidence in the decisions I had made in the past. This also reminded me of the far-reaching impact my actions had on the distant corners of the continent.

By the end of 1081 AD, we began preparations for the next stage of our journey, this time heading north toward the British Isles.

Travel Diary of Satyros: 1082 AD

​

The year 1082 AD was spent in the southern regions of the British Isles, in the kingdoms of Pritania and Levonbrinta.

​

These Celtic lands, rich in history and ancient traditions, received us with mixed emotions. However, the rulers of these realms quickly recognized the value of our skills.

King Iestyn II of Pritania entrusted me with a task of distinctly political nature—the organization of a campaign aimed at improving his image among his subjects. Over several months, we arranged festivals, public speeches, and the distribution of royal favors, yielding positive results that strengthened the monarch's position.

​

After completing our duties in Pritania, we moved to Levonbrinta, where King Padnoff I tasked us with overseeing the construction of a new royal residence. This ambitious and demanding project progressed smoothly due to our expertise in managing such endeavors. The residence was intended not only as a symbol of the kingdom's power but also as a venue for hosting foreign dignitaries.

During my stay on the islands, I also undertook the transcription of two valuable manuscripts. The first, belonging to Prince Brwyn II of Hwicce, contained the chronicles of his lineage. The second, owned by Count Zalelsan of Ynys Mon, was a collection of religious writings.

​

This work, though time-consuming, allowed me to delve into the history and spirituality of these lands. Both assignments were completed to great acclaim, earning me respect and new connections among the local elite.

At the beginning of 1083 AD, we decided it was time to leave the British Isles and head toward Scandinavia. Our goal was to reach the northern realms before embarking on the journey back to the Empire. We departed from the Celtic kingdoms with a sense of accomplishment, enriched by new experiences and relationships. From the southern coasts of Britain, we set sail northward across turbulent waters, ready to face new challenges awaiting us in the cold lands of Scandinavia.

Travel Diary of Satyros: Years 1083–1084 AD

​

In the early months of 1084 AD, we arrived in the kingdom of Norway, which was to be the final stop on our grand journey. Norway, with its harsh climate and majestic landscapes, greeted us with a cool reception, but the rulers of these lands soon recognized the value of my skills.

​

King Orvar Egillsson, known for his determination to strengthen his kingdom, tasked me with training his warriors. Working with Norwegian warriors was a challenge, as they were accustomed to their own traditional methods of combat. However, through collaboration, we successfully combined their experience with my knowledge, resulting in new skills within his army.

​

Simultaneously, Prince Gunnar II Gunnarrsson of Upplond sought my assistance in organizing training for his warriors. Although shorter, this commission was equally rewarding. Gunnar, young and ambitious, proved to be an attentive student and leader eager to seize every opportunity to strengthen his position in the region. My efforts were met with his full appreciation, and our farewell was filled with gratitude and promises of mutual support in the future. By mid-1084 AD, we left Norway, bidding farewell to the rugged northern lands, and set course southward toward the Tauric Empire.

After a long journey, we reached the lands of Strategos Menedemos II of Budini. His court was a bastion of culture and knowledge, and my transcription skills were once again in demand. Under his commission, I worked on restoring several ancient manuscripts of great historical and philosophical value.

Upon completing my work for Menedemos, we embarked on the final leg of our journey, heading toward the capital of the Empire, Satyria. With every mile, I felt my long-held dream of returning home materialize, enriched by countless experiences, adventures, and treasures gathered from the farthest reaches of the world.

Travel Diary of Satyros: Years 1084–1089 AD

​

In late 1084 AD, after nearly five decades of travels and countless adventures, I once again beheld the walls of Satyria, the capital of the Tauric Empire. The city I had left as a young man had grown and transformed, yet it still radiated the same majesty and power. Returning to my homeland was a moment of deep reflection and emotion. Walking through familiar streets, I felt memories come alive—it was here that my journey had begun, and it was here that it would end.

Emperor Hieronymos IV, the son of my late brother Prytanis IV, who passed in 1066 AD, now occupied the throne. Though a stern ruler, my nephew welcomed me with due respect and curiosity. I presented him with gifts I had brought from the farthest corners of the world—a fragment of the Crown of Thorns of Jesus. These gifts left a profound impression on both Hieronymos IV and his court, inspiring the Emperor to honor me for my years of devoted service to the family and the Empire.

​

In recognition of my achievements, Hieronymos IV granted me a status and lands befitting my name. This was the fulfillment of my ambitions and dreams to restore the prominence of the Satyros family. Alongside my new status, I pledged to continue serving the Empire by sharing the knowledge, experience, and wealth I had accumulated during my journey.

​

The return to Satyria was not merely the conclusion of a grand expedition but the beginning of a new chapter—a time for my story to become part of the Empire's history.

​

After returning to Satyra in 1084 AD, my life settled into a calmer rhythm. After years of travels and adventures, I decided to write down everything I had seen, experienced, and learned. In my chamber, surrounded by maps, manuscripts, and gifts from distant lands, I began work on the masterpiece of my life. I wanted my story to be more than a mere account of my journeys—it was meant to be a collection of lessons that could serve future generations.

​

Writing my memoirs took nearly four years. In my records, I included stories of distant kingdoms, exotic cultures, remarkable treasures, and great individuals I encountered along the way. I documented languages, customs, beliefs, and systems of governance. I endeavored to faithfully capture what I had seen and learned, hoping that my knowledge would enrich not only the Empire but also the history of the world.

​

My travels had taught me humility in the face of the world's diversity. I came to know languages and cultures I had never imagined before. I understood how much separates people, but also how much unites them. These reflections on human nature and humanity's place in the world became an important part of my work. I often found myself reminiscing about the places I had visited—ruined temples in Nubia, bustling markets in Iberia, and the tranquil steppes of Asia.

By 1088 AD, my work was complete. As I looked at the volumes of written pages, I felt both pride and relief. It was not just the story of my travels but also a tribute to the world I had the honor of exploring. I donated a copy of the manuscript to the imperial library, ensuring it would become part of the legacy of the Satyros family and an inspiration for future explorers.

​

I spent the remaining years of my life in reflection. I often strolled through the streets of Satyria, recalling what my life had been like before venturing into the world. Observing the daily life of my city, I felt that my travels, no matter how distant, always led me back here. Ultimately, peace and quiet found me in my home, where I could proudly reflect on the fruits of my labor and experiences, knowing I had left a legacy that would endure through the ages.

 

[TheButterflyComposer]

What a legend.

 

[Chac1]

Thank you for this tour of adventure through a modded CK3. This really makes the game appealing. Thanks for taking this detour from your usual path. Now, back to the tales of the brother of Satyrus and the nephew of Satyrus too?

 

[kakom]

Thank you for this tour of adventure through a modded CK3. This really makes the game appealing. Thanks for taking this detour from your usual path. Now, back to the tales of the brother of Satyrus and the nephew of Satyrus too?

Yes, we are returning to describing the successive rulers of the Empire. The plan for now is to describe the successive emperors to the year 1200 AD, a description of the world in the year 1200 divided into three parts, and a separate chapter on the Empire in the year 1200 AD.

Honestly, if someone wanted to, they could create an entire AAR on the adventurer traveler theme. I omitted the entire camp relationships and characters recruited as underlings.

 

[kakom]

Prytanis IV (1039 AD – 1066 AD)

​

Prytanis IV, the eldest son of Sosthenes II, ascended to the throne of the Tauric Empire in 1039 AD at the age of forty. His rise to power occurred during a time of stability, allowing him to continue the policies of his father. He was a man of extraordinary ambition, striving to strengthen imperial authority and develop the state.

With deep respect for tradition, he simultaneously introduced reforms aimed at modernizing the administration and consolidating central authority. His intelligence and solid education in philosophy and theology earned him a reputation as a wise and farsighted ruler, who treated both his advisors and subjects with respect.

Deeply connected to the official faith of the Tauric Empire, Prytanis IV made religion a central pillar of his reign. He organized numerous religious ceremonies and sponsored the construction of temples. His profound piety inspired his subjects while reinforcing the legitimacy of his rule. Thanks to his theological knowledge, he skillfully navigated spiritual matters, earning the admiration of both the clergy and the populace.

​

Like his predecessors, Prytanis IV could not ignore the demands of the Varangian Guard, whose loyalty was crucial to maintaining power. He permitted the ceremonial removal of treasures from the imperial treasury, fulfilling the traditional rite honoring this elite formation.

However, aware of the potential risks of overreliance on the Guard, Prytanis IV ensured that the most valuable artifacts and relics were relocated to a secure location beforehand. His foresight ensured that treasures of greatest importance to the empire remained intact, hidden in a mysterious location known only to the emperor's inner circle.

​

A few months after assuming full power, Emperor Prytanis IV organized magnificent chariot races at the Hippodrome in the heart of Satyria to celebrate his ascension to the throne and win the favor of the people. This event became a symbol of imperial glory, attracting residents of the capital and delegations from the most distant provinces. The emperor personally presided over the opening ceremony, clad in purple robes symbolizing his authority.

The races, filled with tension and excitement, drew massive crowds, and the competition between the factions—the Greens, Blues, Whites, and Reds—became the talk of the city.

​

The winner of the race was Heracon, a remarkably talented charioteer representing the Reds, who triumphed over his rivals in spectacular fashion. The stands erupted in cheers as his chariot crossed the finish line first.

Emperor Prytanis IV, impressed by Heracon's exceptional skills, awarded him a golden wreath and granted him an honorary seat in the imperial box at the banquet following the event. This lavish and thrilling occasion became one of the most memorable events of the early years of Prytanis IV's reign, symbolizing his ability to unite the people and highlight the importance of culture and tradition in the empire's life.

​

Known for his love of learning and philosophy, Prytanis IV visited the University of Theodosia in November 1040 AD, seeking to broaden his intellectual horizons and gain wisdom from its distinguished scholars. Despite high expectations, the visit yielded disappointing results.

Although the emperor attended lectures and discussions, he quickly realized that many scholars were more focused on theoretical disputes than on practical issues that could aid in governing the empire. Disheartened but enriched by the experience, Prytanis IV left the university convinced that true wisdom lies not only in books but also in popular knowledge and the lessons drawn from the daily challenges of ruling.

​

At the beginning of 1040 AD, Prytanis IV faced one of the first serious challenges of his reign—conspiracies threatening his authority. Strategos Milon of Tahent, master of spies, informed the emperor of two separate threats.

On one hand, rumors suggested that someone was attempting to undermine his legitimacy as a rightful ruler by exploiting allegations of irregularities in succession. On the other, even more troubling reports emerged about an individual claiming rights to the imperial throne, indicating a potential coup attempt.

​

The investigation revealed that the pretender to the throne was Neaechmos, a cousin of Prytanis IV and governor of the province of Colchis. Neaechmos, leveraging his regional influence and the dissatisfaction of certain aristocrats, sought to gather support for his claims. Prytanis IV, demonstrating prudence and decisiveness, acted swiftly.

Through carefully orchestrated diplomatic and military actions, he managed to quash the conspiracy in its infancy. Neaechmos was arrested and brought before the imperial court, which strengthened the emperor's authority and showed that Prytanis IV would not tolerate any attempts to undermine his power.

​

Prytanis IV pursued a thoughtful and multifaceted dynastic policy aimed at strengthening the Tauric Empire both internally and on the international stage. A key element of his strategy was arranging marriages to cement alliances with influential families and rulers of neighboring states. His daughter, Aristylla, was betrothed to Eustachios, son of Strategos Exodoxos of Neuria, to reinforce the loyalty of local military elites to the imperial throne. Prytanis IV understood that the loyalty of the army and its commanders was the foundation of imperial stability.

​

On the international front, Prytanis IV sought closer ties with Egypt, a key player in the region's political landscape. The betrothal of his son Eumeleos to Aspasia, daughter of the Egyptian King Stilpon, was made possible by the past deeds of Satyros, the emperor's brother, who had saved the Egyptian ruler's life during his travels. This gesture not only strengthened ties between the two states but also enhanced the prestige of the Hyrcanis dynasty in the eyes of its neighbors.

​

Another of Prytanis' sons, Spartakos, was engaged to Serafima, daughter of Valassios I, ruler of Bjarmaland. This move aimed to neutralize potential threats from northern neighbors and secure an alliance in the face of possible border conflicts.

​

Further proposals for dynastic marriages came from prominent courts in Europe and Asia. Emperor Brincazis of the Carpathian Empire, the Tauric Empire's southern neighbor, proposed a marriage between Hieroclea, a relative of Prytanis IV, and himself to strengthen relations between the two empires.

​

Similarly, King Knud, ruler of the Varangians of the North Sea, sent a proposal for a marriage between Demetria, another relative of the emperor, and himself.

​

The final element of this extensive policy was the betrothal of Prytanis IV's youngest son, Hieronymos, to Burcin, daughter of Tughril, the conqueror of Persia. This maneuver was of great significance, aiming to secure the empire's interests on its southeastern borders and establish new channels of cooperation with the powerful Persian Empire.

​

Through these actions, Prytanis IV demonstrated mastery in dynastic policy, focusing on internal stability and the expansion of influence abroad.

​

In November 1044 AD, Emperor Prytanis IV made a strategic decision to invade the Kingdom of Bithynia to secure the Tauric Empire's interests in Anatolia and resolve escalating conflicts with the local ruler. King Sabas I of Bithynia, known for his hostility towards imperial authority, regularly incited the local population against imperial vassals, leading to regional destabilization.

Prytanis IV viewed this step not only as a response to breaches of order but also as an opportunity to reclaim the former imperial glory in Anatolia, a region historically tied to the Empire.

​

The campaign began in early winter of 1044 AD and was conducted with remarkable precision. The imperial legions, personally led by experienced strategists, swiftly captured key fortifications along the coastline, forcing the Bithynian forces to retreat inland. The decisive confrontation occurred at the Battle of Karateia, where the imperial forces defeated the Bithynian army. The victory was the result of both tactical superiority and exceptional leadership, which not only neutralized the opposing forces but also broke the spirit of resistance in Bithynia.

​

Following the victory and the fall of the Bithynian capital, the region was formally annexed into the Taurian Empire. Prytanis IV triumphantly proclaimed the return of the imperial legions to Anatolia after nearly seven centuries, a symbolic revival of former glory. The annexation of Bithynia fortified the empire’s borders, enhanced regional stability, and reinforced Prytanis IV's position as a ruler capable of both defending and expanding imperial interests.

​

The return of the armies to the capital after the victorious conquest of Bithynia was marked by an event full of majesty and symbolism. The emperor decided to celebrate the triumph in a way that would remain in the memory of his subjects for years to come.

The ceremony took place at the Hippodrome in Satyrium, where thousands of citizens gathered to witness their ruler in his glory. Prytanis IV, clad in a golden tunic and a purple cloak, entered the hippodrome on a chariot adorned with imperial emblems. Accompanying him were the generals and soldiers who had participated in the campaign. Crowds on both sides of the stands cheered, waving olive branches and shouting praises to the emperor.

During the ceremony, Prytanis IV ensured the display of captured spoils and symbols of victory, such as Bithynian banners and captured aristocrats, who were paraded into the arena. The ruler delivered a solemn speech emphasizing the significance of unity and the strength of the empire, promising further actions for its glory. The triumph aimed not only to celebrate the victory but also to consolidate Prytanis IV’s authority, reminding his subjects of the emperor's power.

​

Between 1044 and 1046 AD, Prytanis IV embarked on a pilgrimage to a sacred site in Western Europe, journeying to the cave of La Marche in distant Gaul. This spiritual expedition was motivated by the emperor’s deep faith and his desire to strengthen ties with the empire’s religious heritage.

The pilgrimage was meticulously organized, with Prytanis IV accompanied by a large retinue of courtiers, clergy, and guards, ensuring both safety and the dignity befitting imperial majesty.

​

The voyage aboard the imperial galley from the Taurian Peninsula to southern Gaul was a particularly memorable moment. Prytanis, known for his knowledge of herbs, used his skills to ease the suffering of a fellow traveler afflicted with seasickness. This act revealed the emperor not only as a ruler but also as a compassionate individual toward his subjects.

Upon reaching Gaul, Prytanis IV traveled inland to reach the cave of La Marche, renowned for miraculous apparitions and sacred rituals. There, in an atmosphere of reverence and humility, the emperor paid homage and participated in religious ceremonies. His presence drew the attention of local leaders, who welcomed him with honors, emphasizing their respect for the ruler of a great empire. During his stay, Prytanis balanced his role as emperor with that of a humble pilgrim.

​

The return journey, though lengthy, proceeded without major difficulties. In 1046 AD, Prytanis IV returned to Satyrium, bringing back not only memories of his spiritual experience but also numerous relics and blessings intended to strengthen the religious bond between the throne and the faith. The pilgrimage was seen as a symbol of the emperor’s spiritual leadership and his commitment to religious affairs, further solidifying his authority among the faithful of the Taurian Empire.

​

The years 1044–1047 AD were a period of profound reflection and painful experiences for Prytanis IV. Upon his return from the pilgrimage to the cave of La Marche, the emperor was struck by the tragic news of the death of his eldest son and heir, Andronikos. Serving as Strategos of Thyssangeti, Andronikos succumbed to a sudden illness, plunging the imperial family and court into mourning.

Prytanis IV was particularly affected by the loss, having seen in Andronikos the future of the empire—a well-educated and capable young man destined to continue the dynasty and maintain the stability of the realm. His death left a void in the emperor’s heart and raised concerns about succession.

​

Unfortunately, the tragedy did not end there. Soon after, Prytanis IV received news of the death of his third son, Spartokos, who served as Strategos of Tanais. Spartokos had long suffered from a chronic illness—leprosy—that gradually debilitated his body. Despite his suffering, Spartokos faithfully carried out his duties until the end.

The deaths of two sons in such a short time dealt Prytanis IV a nearly unbearable blow. Known for his strong character, the emperor focused on strengthening family ties and spiritual contemplation, seeking solace in faith and the responsibilities of his reign. These difficult years became a period of trial that left a lasting mark on his rule and personal life.

​

The years 1047–1050 AD brought a period of relative peace and stability to the Empire, yet they also brought Prytanis IV further family tragedies. Following a series of earlier losses, the emperor focused on governance and the development of his lands, striving to fortify the borders and stabilize internal administration. This period also saw the organization of numerous festivals and competitions aimed at boosting public morale and strengthening the bond between the ruler and his subjects.

However, during one such event, a tragic accident shook the court and the populace. During a grand tournament in the capital, Satyrium, held in honor of the imperial family, a stand where Empress Metrodora and her ladies-in-waiting were seated collapsed. The structure could not bear the weight, and the fall from a great height proved fatal for the empress.

​

Prytanis IV, participating in archery contests at the time, witnessed the tragedy. The sight of his beloved wife’s death in such brutal circumstances deeply shook the emperor. Following the event, he withdrew from public life for a time, dedicating himself to mourning and reflection.

​

In 1049 AD, yet another painful loss struck—the death of Eumelos, one of the emperor's sons. The circumstances of his death were difficult to ascertain and sparked much speculation. It was unclear whether his demise resulted from an accident, illness, or possibly an assassination.

Prytanis IV, shaken by yet another blow, commissioned a thorough investigation, but the results provided no definitive answers. These events, though tragic, solidified the image of Prytanis IV as a ruler grappling with personal suffering that did not diminish his determination in service to the empire.

​

Despite the personal tragedies that befell Prytanis IV, the emperor undertook a monumental project to reaffirm the spiritual and cultural heritage of the Taurian Empire. In 1051 AD, he initiated the construction of a grand new temple in Phanagoria, intended to become one of the most significant sites of worship in the empire.

The temple was designed with great ambition, incorporating modern architectural techniques and ornamentation, with its centerpiece being an impressive sanctuary dedicated to Omono. This construction aimed not only to honor the divine but also to emphasize the strength and unity of the empire in the face of time’s challenges.

Most of the building materials were sourced from the ruins of The Spire of Hermonassa, the last great architectural monument of the ancient Taurican era. This decision carried both practical and symbolic significance—the new temple was to serve as a bridge between the empire’s glorious past and its dynamic present. Stones and columns that had adorned The Spire for centuries were carefully relocated and transformed to embellish the new complex.

​

From 1051 to 1059 AD, Prytanis IV’s reign took on a more contemplative character. The emperor, moved by personal losses and the responsibility for the empire’s future, devoted much time to theological reflection and scholarly pursuits. During his studies, he discovered a forgotten theological treatise in the depths of the imperial library, shedding new light on the doctrines of the Taurian faith. The text, dated to the early years after the establishment of the state religion, contained reflections by early philosophers on the relationship between power and divine providence.

​

During this period, Prytanis IV also revealed his artistic talent, composing a theatrical play inspired by both ancient tragedies and his own life experiences. The work, titled Paths of Light, depicted the conflict between a ruler’s duties and personal aspirations, which many regarded as an allegory of the emperor himself.

​

The emperor’s youngest son, Hieronymos, serving as Strategos of Tanais and Grand Master of Spies, proved his loyalty and effectiveness. His efforts were crucial in protecting Prytanis IV from numerous threats. Thanks to an extensive intelligence network, Hieronymos thwarted several assassination attempts on the emperor’s life and uncovered plots by usurpers seeking to seize power.

​

In November 1059, Prytanis IV decided to launch another campaign of expansion, this time against the Kingdom of Asiae. His goal was to secure full control of the Anatolian coast of the Black Sea for the Tauric Empire, a region of critical importance for both trade and border defense.

The conflict, although brief, was conducted with precision and determination. The emperor personally oversaw the mobilization of the legions, dispatching them to swiftly capture key cities and fortresses in Khaldia. The imperial forces, well-trained and superior in numbers, quickly overcame resistance and forced the rulers of Asiae to capitulate.

​

After two years of warfare, on October 24, 1061, an agreement was signed, formally annexing the Duchy of Khaldia and its surrounding territories into the Tauric Empire.

This annexation was a significant political and military achievement for Prytanis IV, securing control over the coast and strengthening the empire's position in the region. Control of these lands opened new trade and strategic opportunities, solidifying Tauric dominance over the Black Sea.

​

Following the victorious campaign against the Kingdom of Asiae, Prytanis IV decided to celebrate the success of the legions and give thanks for divine providence in their triumph. In the Great Temple of Omono in Satyrium, the holiest site in the empire, the emperor personally offered rich gifts at the altar.

Among the offerings were golden figurines depicting triumphant legionnaires, intricately adorned chalices made of precious stones, and war spoils captured during the campaign. This ceremony reinforced his image as a pious and just ruler who recognized the spiritual support guiding the empire to glory.

​

In 1063 AD, the empire was shaken by the tragic death of Prytanis the Younger, the grandson of Emperor Prytanis IV and the son of the late Andronikos. The young Prytanis was brutally murdered, and the circumstances of the crime remained unclear. Despite intensive intelligence efforts led by Hieronymos, the perpetrators and their motives could not be identified.

This tragedy deeply affected the emperor, who had seen in his grandson a potential heir to uphold the dynasty's values. Although Prytanis IV strove to maintain stoic composure, the loss of his grandson was yet another painful blow, serving as a stark reminder of the fragility of life and the political dangers surrounding the dynasty.

​

At the end of 1065 AD, Prytanis IV, known for his profound faith and spiritual determination, decided to undertake another pilgrimage to the sanctuary at La Marche. Unlike his previous journey, however, the emperor traveled under more modest circumstances, accompanied only by a small group of trusted courtiers and guards.

​

Tragically, this journey ended in disaster. Near Grandmont, while traversing wild, forested terrain, the imperial party was suddenly attacked by an enraged bear. The animal, seemingly agitated by the group's presence on its territory, charged at the caravan.

Although the guards immediately sprang into action, the chaos and surprise left Prytanis IV vulnerable. Despite the heroic efforts of his companions, the emperor sustained severe injuries. His wounds proved fatal, and after several hours of suffering, Prytanis IV passed away, leaving his followers in shock and mourning.

​

The death of Prytanis IV under such dramatic circumstances shook the Tauric Empire. News of his fate reached the capital, stirring a wave of grief and uncertainty among his subjects. Prytanis IV, known for his numerous political and military successes, ended his life in a manner many considered symbolic—during a pilgrimage, devoted to the faith that was the cornerstone of his reign.

His body was eventually brought back to Satyria with great effort, where it was interred in the imperial mausoleum. The death of Prytanis IV left behind the legacy of a strong and pious ruler, along with questions about the empire's future under his successor. The throne passed to the emperor's youngest son, Hieronymos IV.

 

[TrocaNero]

Damn, a successful reign but a tragic life. He outlived his wife, most of his children and a grandson, all of whom died in tragic manners. As I was reading I hoped he at least would have a peaceful death but that was not the case...

 

[TheButterflyComposer]

The Empire itself seems to be in rude health. The only improvement would be full control over the Straits for shipping, and further expansions into Anatolia for more defendable borders...although that does risk moving further beyond the protection and power of the Black Sea.

 

[kakom]

Hieronymos IV (1066 AD – 1096 AD)

​

The ascension of Hieronymos IV to the throne in 1066 AD occurred under the shadow of his father Prytanis IV’s tragic death. The new Emperor, shaped by years amidst court intrigues, proved to be a figure of stark contradictions. Ambition and cruelty intertwined with a marked inconsistency in his decisions.

Though the hierarchy of the dynasty and earlier tragedies, such as the deaths of his older brothers and Prytanis the Younger, paved his way to the throne, the truth of his involvement in the latter’s assassination cast a dark shadow over the beginning of his reign. Fully aware of the risks posed by this grim secret, Hieronymos began his rule burdened by guilt and fear of exposure.

​

The mercenaries Hieronymos had hired to assassinate Prytanis the Younger quickly realized the leverage they held over the emperor. Led by a charismatic leader named Malyaka, the mercenaries decided to exploit their knowledge against the new ruler. They blackmailed Hieronymos into paying an enormous sum of gold in exchange for their silence and departure from the empire’s borders.

This situation immediately exposed the fragility of the emperor’s position, forcing him to acquiesce to their demands. Although the mercenaries did indeed leave the empire, the tension surrounding the possible revelation of the secret never entirely disappeared.

​

In the early years of his reign, Hieronymos IV focused on consolidating his position through actions aimed at garnering support from both the populace and the empire’s elites. In 1067 AD, he organized grand chariot races at the Hippodrome in Satyria, intended to entertain the capital’s citizens and divert attention from the unsettling start of his reign.

The meticulously prepared and lavishly orchestrated games drew massive crowds. Hieronymos made a personal appearance, presenting himself as a ruler close to his people. While the event was a success, critics accused the emperor of attempting to mask his political vulnerabilities through spectacles of entertainment.

​

To gain favor among intellectuals and demonstrate his commitment to the cultural and scientific development of the empire, Hieronymos visited the renowned University of Theodosia. He sought to present himself as a successor to the legacy of his father, Prytanis IV, who was known for his theological and philosophical interests.

The visit received significant publicity, with the emperor delivering a speech emphasizing the importance of knowledge and education for the empire’s future. While some appreciated the gesture, others viewed it as a performative act aimed more at image-building than genuine engagement with the pursuit of knowledge.

​

Hieronymos IV also leveraged the memory of his father to legitimize his rule and strengthen his position. He ordered the dissemination of stories about miracles allegedly performed through the intercession of Prytanis IV. Portraying his father as a pious ruler close to the god Omono was intended to bolster Hieronymos IV’s spiritual authority. These efforts were effective in creating a mystique around the dynasty.

​

In 1070 AD, Strategos Euhemeros of Gelts, leader of the noble faction within the empire, issued an ultimatum to the emperor. Dissatisfied with the authoritarian governance of the empire, this faction demanded that Hieronymos IV abdicate in favor of Strategos Hieronymos of Volna, who was perceived as a more moderate and capable leader. In reality, the nobles sought to use him to weaken central authority within the empire.

​

Hieronymos IV categorically rejected this proposal, considering it a direct threat to his reign, which led to the outbreak of a civil war. Known later as the "War of the Two Hieronymoi," this conflict became one of the most devastating wars in the history of the Tauric Empire. The four-year conflict, lasting from 1070 to 1074 AD, engulfed the entire empire.

​

The fighting divided the empire into two warring factions. The forces loyal to Hieronymos IV clashed with the rebel troops, who had garnered significant support in the empire's western provinces. The conflict was marked by brutal sieges, mass desertions, and widespread plundering, which severely weakened the economy.

The emperor leveraged his dynastic connections to seek aid from his father-in-law Tughril, the Turkish conqueror of Persia, who sent a small contingent of his cavalry to assist.

​

The war ultimately ended in 1074 AD after the bloody Battle of Tahent, which decisively determined the conflict's outcome. Strategos Hieronymos of Volna, abandoned by part of his commanders and surrounded by imperial forces, was forced to surrender.

Following his victory over the rebels, Hieronymos IV sought to consolidate his power by organizing a series of public executions intended to intimidate any potential opponents. The rebel leaders, including Strategos Euhemeros of Gelts, were captured and brought to the capital, where the emperor ordered their public execution.

​

After the executions, Hieronymos IV held a triumph in the Great Temple of Satyria to emphasize his victory and restore the authority of the throne. A grand procession paraded through the streets of the city, with legionaries displaying captured banners and loot taken from the rebels. At the head of the procession, the remains of the emperor’s most despised enemies, bound in chains, were carried and later offered as sacrifices in the temple.

Hieronymos IV entered the temple accompanied by priests and high-ranking officials, offering thanks to the gods for the restoration of peace. The triumph also served as propaganda to rebuild public faith in the stability of the empire and the emperor's divine mandate.

​

Determined to demonstrate his ruthlessness towards the rebels, Hieronymos IV ordered public executions to be carried out with shocking brutality. In the squares of Satyria, rows of stakes were erected on which both the leaders of the rebellion and their families were impaled.

Thousands were forced to witness this macabre spectacle, which was intended not only as a punishment but also as a warning to others. Hieronymos IV personally oversaw the executions, showcasing his mercilessness and determination to defend imperial authority.

​

While the severity of the executions and the grandeur of the triumph inspired admiration in some quarters, others began to view Hieronymos IV as a tyrant. The massacre of rebel families, including women and children, caused shock and condemnation among certain elites.

​

Following the civil war, the reign of Hieronymos IV became synonymous with the relentless elimination of both actual and potential threats to his rule.

To maintain his power, he initiated a campaign of systematic purges across the court and provinces, targeting individuals who could jeopardize his position. Political assassinations became routine, with each carried out under orders from the emperor or his loyal agents.

Even members of his own family were not spared if he perceived them as threats. Two close relatives of the emperor, Satyros Hyrcanis the Elder and the Younger, who had potential claims to the throne, were both secretly murdered under suspicious circumstances.

​

Between 1076 and 1078 AD, Hieronymos IV responded to a request from Tughril, his father-in-law and ruler of the powerful Persian Empire, for support in his ambitious campaigns of conquest. Remembering Tughril’s assistance during the civil war, the emperor honored their informal alliance.

He dispatched a small but elite military contingent of legionnaires and cavalry, along with a significant sum of gold to fund the campaign. While the military support was not decisive in terms of numbers, its quality and symbolic importance highlighted the alliance between the two rulers.

​

The campaign concluded with Tughril's victory, extending his empire into new territories toward India. The Tauric troops played a key role in securing strategic points, earning praise from local commanders and Tughril himself. Following the campaign, Tughril expressed his gratitude by sending luxurious gifts to Satyria and affirming the continued strengthening of their political and familial ties.

​

The dynastic policy of Hieronymos IV continued the traditions of the Tauric Empire, emphasizing strategic marriages to strengthen political and diplomatic ties with other powers. Early in his reign, Hieronymos IV received numerous delegations from the West, East, and North seeking to forge alliances with the Tauric Empire through unions with members of the imperial dynasty.

The ruler of Italia, Emperor Amulius, made several marriage proposals in hopes of forming an alliance with the Tauric Empire. Initially, he proposed a betrothal between his sister Marca and Aeacudes, a cousin of Hieronymos IV.

​

A few years later, after Marca's death, Amulius sent another proposal, suggesting a union between his daughter Publia and Demochares, a more distant relative of the emperor. Though these ties were not closely connected to Hieronymos IV himself, they aimed to strengthen relations with western neighbors and secure the imperial family's position on the international stage.

​

In the East, Hieronymos IV faced more complex dynastic arrangements, particularly in relations with the Persian Empire. His father-in-law, Tughril, following the death of his wife, proposed marriage to Melissa Proctid, a distant relative of the emperor and a member of a cadet branch of the imperial family. This union sought not only to bolster Tughril's position but also to maintain close cooperation between the two empires.

​

Although Tughril died in 1081 AD, his relations with Hieronymos IV paved the way for subsequent agreements. The emperor arranged the marriage of his daughter Theodote to Mete I, Tughril's grandson and the new ruler of Persia, further solidifying dynastic and political ties between the two states.

​

Between 1080 and 1088 AD, Hieronymos IV conducted two critical territorial expansions that strengthened the Tauric Empire's strategic position and secured its regional dominance. The first of these wars, fought against the Kingdom of Kolchia, aimed to capture Thracian lands and the city of Byzantium. This short conflict, lasting only a year, held immense geopolitical significance.

Gaining control over the Bosporus Strait allowed the empire to dominate a key maritime route connecting the Black Sea to the Mediterranean. This campaign not only elevated Hieronymos IV's standing on the international stage but also provided the empire with strategic trade and military advantages.

​

The second war, conducted from 1086 to 1088 AD, targeted the Kingdom of Asiae over lands that had once belonged to the ancient Kingdom of Bithynia but remained under Asian rule. The war ended in victory for Hieronymos IV’s legions, which integrated these territories into the empire.

This campaign not only reclaimed vital lands but also secured greater control over Anatolia, enhancing the territorial and political unity of the state. Both wars demonstrated the military genius of Hieronymos IV and his determination to maintain the empire's dominance in the region.

​

In 1091 AD, a conspiracy that could have endangered the life of Hieronymos IV was uncovered at the imperial court. The plot was orchestrated by Philetaeros Hyrcanis, the emperor's nephew, who planned an assassination. Philetaeros, though a relative of Hieronymos IV, was ambitious and sought to exploit the dissatisfaction of certain nobles with the emperor's autocratic policies to seize the throne.

Thanks to the efficiency of the spymaster Strategos Urbilvakasyape of Androphagia, the conspiracy was discovered in time. Strategos's network of informants successfully tracked the traitors’ activities, and key evidence led to their capture before they could execute their plans.

Hieronymos IV, known for his harshness toward traitors, made an uncharacteristic decision regarding Philetaeros. Recalling his mother, Aphrodice, the emperor's beloved sister, softened the verdict. Instead of execution, Hieronymos ordered the castration and exile of his nephew from the empire.

This punishment served both as retribution and a warning to potential conspirators, showcasing that Hieronymos IV, despite his ruthlessness, could be guided by familial loyalty, even if it risked tarnishing his reputation as an unyielding ruler.

​

From 1090 to 1092 AD, the Tauric Empire was struck by a terrible epidemic known as the Sarysyn boils, which spread to the capital and surrounding regions, including Maeotia and Tanais. The disease caused painful, festering boils, fever, and weakness, often leading to agonizing deaths.

The epidemic sparked panic among the population, with crowds fleeing afflicted areas, ironically aiding the disease’s spread. Chaos in the capital and key cities disrupted administration and paralyzed the economy.

Despite his reputation for brutality, Hieronymos IV took measures to address the crisis. He ordered the isolation of infected settlements and the construction of lazarettos outside city walls to curb the disease's spread. On his command, medics from distant lands, as well as alchemists and priests, were summoned to aid in combating the plague through medicine and rituals. Despite these efforts, the death toll was staggering, and growing public discontent undermined the emperor's authority and sowed fear among his subjects.

​

In late 1092 and early 1093 AD, the Tauric Empire began receiving reports of Turkish migrations increasingly evident in Asia Minor and the Caucasus. These nomadic tribes, originating from the distant steppes of Central Asia, were known for their mobility and adaptability to new territories.

Following Tughril’s conquest of Persia, Turkish migration accelerated as new political conditions created opportunities for westward expansion. Some Turks began settling on the fringes of the empire’s territories, causing unease among local populations and administrators.

This migration posed a significant strategic challenge for Hieronymos IV and his advisors. While initially disorganized, the Turks began demonstrating the capacity for inter-tribal cooperation and organization, making them a potential threat to regional stability.

The empire sought to monitor the situation, with Hieronymos IV considering various strategies, including military intervention or using the Turks as a buffer against other enemies. Although no direct conflict occurred during these years, the growing Turkish presence foreshadowed long-term geopolitical shifts in Asia Minor and the Caucasus.

​

In 1094 AD, during an imperial audience, Hieronymos IV received an intriguing proposal from Dizazelpis, an influential courtier and imperial advisor. Dizazelpis presented a vision for constructing a modern school in the capital to train future administrators of the imperial bureaucracy.

He emphasized that while recent monumental projects, such as the expansion of the palace and temples, had earned admiration both locally and abroad, investing in education would yield long-term benefits for state stability and governance. Dizazelpis argued that well-trained bureaucrats would enhance administrative efficiency and strengthen loyalty to the throne.

The emperor, known for his pragmatic approach to governance, listened attentively to the proposal. Hieronymos IV recognized the potential advantages of such an initiative, viewing it as an opportunity to further consolidate control over the empire's vast territories. Though he did not immediately decide, the emperor tasked his advisors with analyzing the project's details, including costs and potential sites for the school.

​

Hieronymos IV ended his tumultuous and ruthless reign on March 1, 1096 AD, passing away at the age of 59. His death, though natural, brought relief to many inhabitants of the Tauric Empire, who had lived under the shadow of his harsh rule, elimination of opponents, and constant political tensions.

Hieronymos IV, while effective in consolidating power, left a legacy filled with contradictions: he was a ruler who expanded the empire’s borders but was also known for his brutal methods and bloody purges. Following his death, the throne passed to his eldest son, Theodoros II, who had long been groomed for the role of emperor.

 

[TrocaNero]

Typical "good guy who tries but gets fucked over by the universe gets followed by a complete sociopath" succession.

 

[StrategyGameEnthusiast]

Theodoros II may be in for a bumpy ride following his father's reign of terror...

 

[kakom]

Theodoros II (1096 AD – 1100 AD)

​

Theodoros II ascended to the throne of the Tauric Empire in 1096 AD, inheriting both the glory and the burden of the legacy left by his father, Hieronymos IV. As a ruler, he was known for his ability to resolve disputes fairly and for his respect toward his subjects, which earned him the favor of many social strata.

However, his fiery temper and capacity for sudden outbursts of anger commanded both respect and, at times, fear. Unlike his predecessors, he stood out for his virtuous and devoted attitude toward his wife, Aegyptia Hyrcanis-Nicopsia, a distant relative of the imperial family. By the time Theodoros II took the throne, the imperial couple already had four children—two sons, Theodotos and Kephistodotos, and two daughters, Cellanthis and Philotera.

One of the greatest challenges Theodoros II faced was distancing himself from the infamy of his father. Hieronymos IV had left behind a legacy of violence, intrigue, and brutal executions that deeply tarnished the empire's image. From the very beginning of his reign, the new emperor sought to establish a more balanced policy, focused on reconciliation and stability. He aimed for his rule to be associated with rebuilding trust between the throne and its subjects, as well as implementing reforms to strengthen the empire.

​

The issue of the Varangian Guard, loyal Scandinavian mercenaries, posed a particularly difficult problem. Under Hieronymos IV, they had served as the emperor’s personal bodyguard and an instrument of his brutal purges. Seeking to maintain their loyalty, Theodoros II allowed them, in accordance with tradition, to take a share of the treasures stored in the imperial treasury. At the same time, he reduced their influence over the day-to-day functioning of the court, striking a delicate balance between appeasing them and curtailing their political power.

​

In 1097, just a year after Theodoros II’s ascension, the lands of the Tauric Empire were attacked by Turkish nomads. The Gyurgesh clan, led by their chief Kuntuvdi, appeared on the empire’s borders in the Caucasus region. Seeking a place to settle, the nomads demanded that imperial officials allow them to establish themselves within the empire’s territory.

They claimed their people desired a peaceful agricultural life within the empire's borders, but their demands were met with suspicion and reluctance by the local administration. News of these demands quickly reached the capital, where Theodoros II saw the situation as an opportunity to assert his position as the empire’s defender.

​

The emperor decisively rejected the Gyurgesh clan’s demands, prompting an immediate response from Kuntuvdi. The Turkish nomad chief took the refusal as an insult and launched raids on the frontier. Determined to demonstrate his strength and resolve, Theodoros II swiftly mobilized the imperial army and dispatched it to the Caucasus. The campaign’s objective was not only to repel the nomadic incursions but also to solidify the emperor’s image as a steadfast defender of the Tauric Empire’s lands. This decision earned him widespread approval among his subjects.

​

In the spring of 1097, Theodoros II personally led a 14,000-strong imperial army to confront the Turkish nomads of the Gyurgesh clan on the southeastern frontier. Reports of the Turkish raids and their refusal to submit to imperial authority demanded a swift and decisive response. Known for his fiery yet just character, Theodoros sought to prove his worth as a commander and protector of the empire. His army, composed of heavily armed legionnaires, archers, and cataphract cavalry, marched toward Langarkan, where the nomads had set up camp.

The Battle of Langarkan, fought on April 12, 1097, became a pivotal moment in the conflict with the Turkish invaders. Theodoros II personally commanded his forces with remarkable skill and precision. He used the natural terrain to force the enemy into difficult ground, neutralizing their advantage in mobility. During the battle, the Turkish cavalry attempted to flank the imperial army but was thwarted by the cataphracts, while the imperial infantry inflicted heavy losses on the Turkish warriors. After several hours of fierce fighting, the Gyurgesh clan was defeated, and their leader Kuntuvdi was forced to retreat.

​

At Langarkan, Theodoros II not only demonstrated exceptional leadership but also personally engaged in combat, showcasing his prowess as a warrior. Clad in ornate imperial armor and wielding a heavy sword, the emperor fought on the front lines at a critical moment in the battle. His courage and strength inspired his soldiers, who witnessed their ruler personally striking down several Turkish warriors. This not only boosted the army’s morale but also cemented Theodoros II’s reputation as a true leader, willing to fight for his empire as both a strategist and a warrior.

​

The victory at Langarkan solidified Theodoros II’s authority both within the empire and among his soldiers. The emperor not only secured the eastern borders but also proved himself a capable commander and protector of the realm. The battle became a symbol of the new ruler’s determination and strength, demonstrating that he would not tolerate any threats to the integrity of his state.

​

In the latter half of 1097, an open court audience was held in the capital of the Tauric Empire, during which Theodoros II once again showcased his power and influence. The event attracted not only local dignitaries and aristocrats but also delegations from distant lands.

At the center of attention was Chichayka, leader of the Vladimir tribe, who came to officially acknowledge the emperor’s suzerainty. During the audience, Chichayka, dressed in the traditional attire of his people, knelt before the emperor’s throne and pledged loyalty to the imperial authority.

Theodoros II accepted the homage with dignity, emphasizing the mutual obligations between a ruler and a vassal. He presented Chichayka with valuable gifts, including an elaborately decorated sword symbolizing both the emperor’s protection and the chieftain’s obligation to remain loyal and support the empire when needed. This event held significant political importance, as it demonstrated the growing prestige and influence of the Tauric Empire on its frontiers, while also strengthening Theodoros II’s position as an effective ruler and enforcer of imperial order.

​

By the end of 1098 AD, a delegation from the distant Ajurann Empire arrived in the capital of the Tauric Empire, drawing great interest from both the court and the populace. The ruler of Ajurann, Bopor Aul, had sent his emissaries with a proposal to arrange a betrothal between his grandson and Euthalia, a cousin of Emperor Theodoros II.

The Ajurann delegation, adorned in exotic attire and bearing gifts symbolizing the wealth and culture of their homeland, was received with due honors during a grand audience. In their address, the representatives of Ajurann emphasized the benefits of this dynastic union, which was intended to strengthen relations between their empire and the Tauric Empire.

Theodoros II welcomed the proposal for a marital alliance, recognizing it as an opportunity to enhance the prestige of his dynasty and expand the empire’s political influence. The emperor’s agreement to the engagement demonstrated the strength and significance of the imperial family, both to his subjects and to neighboring rulers.

Preparations for the engagement ceremony began almost immediately, and Euthalia, known for her grace and education, became a symbol of this diplomatic unity. The alliance with a distant realm like Ajurann underscored the international stature of the Tauric Empire, further solidifying Theodoros II’s reputation as a skilled ruler and diplomat.

​

During the reign of Theodoros II, the emperor had to confront attempts at usurping power and treacherous conspiracies that posed a threat to the stability of the Tauric Empire. A key figure in thwarting these dangers was Uzur of the House of Zhetysu, a Turkish master of spies and Strategos, whose loyalty and skills had been recognized during the reign of Hieronymos IV. Utilizing his extensive espionage network and expertise in intrigue, Uzur twice uncovered conspiracies aimed at overthrowing Theodoros II.

The first plot was discovered in 1097 AD when Lord Aclimus of the House of Helladid, an influential aristocrat, planned to seize power. Discontented with the emperor’s policies, Aclimus sought to gather a faction of supporters to back his claim to the throne. Uzur, through his vigilance, uncovered the scheme at an early stage, enabling Theodoros II to intervene decisively. Following an investigation, Aclimus was arrested along with his family and co-conspirators. In a bid to present himself as a just and merciful ruler, the emperor stripped Aclimus of his titles and estates and subsequently exiled him.

​

The second conspiracy, uncovered in 1099 AD, involved Strategos Chares of Vistula, an ambitious commander who sought to garner support among the military and provincial elites. Chares used his influence to undermine the emperor’s authority, but his actions were swiftly detected by Uzur and his agents. The investigation revealed plans to destabilize the state and win over key garrisons. Like Aclimus, Chares and his family were exiled after being stripped of all titles and positions.

Theodoros II’s actions in these instances exemplified his approach to consolidating power and fostering loyalty among his subjects. His decision to show clemency toward the conspirators was intended to portray him as a merciful and prudent ruler who refrained from resorting to harsh reprisals. The political pragmatism of Theodoros II, bolstered by Uzur’s capabilities, effectively safeguarded the empire from internal turmoil.

​

The death of Theodoros II at the end of 1099 AD shocked the Tauric Empire and was recorded in chronicles as a tragic and unexpected conclusion to his reign. The emperor, known for his impulsiveness and fiery temper, met his end during a hunting expedition—one of the favored pastimes of the empire's rulers.

In a moment of rage and lack of caution, he decided to personally confront a great wolf that had resisted the hunters that day. The emperor's first spear thrust failed to be fatal, and the wounded, enraged beast attacked Theodoros II, resulting in his tragic death on the spot.

​

News of the emperor’s death spread quickly throughout the empire, eliciting both shock and grief. Theodoros II was regarded as a just, though stern, ruler who had endeavored to restore the imperial family’s reputation following the controversial reign of his father, Hieronymos IV.

His sudden demise left the state in a precarious position, as the throne was inherited by his eldest son, the thirteen-year-old Theodotos VI. The young emperor’s lack of experience and tender age meant that actual power fell into the hands of a regent and the court's inner circle, paving the way for potential political tensions and power struggles.

​

The ascension of Theodotos VI marked the beginning of a new and uncertain chapter in the empire's history. The court took swift measures to ensure stability by appointing the new emperor’s mother, Aegyptia, as regent. During this period, aristocratic houses and high-ranking imperial officials began to compete for influence over the young emperor and the empire’s policies. The death of Theodoros II during a hunting expedition, while a tragic consequence of his impulsive nature, also became a symbol of the uncertainty and challenges that awaited the empire in the years to come.

 

[StrategyGameEnthusiast]

In a moment of rage and lack of caution, he decided to personally confront a great wolf that had resisted the hunters that day. The emperor's first spear thrust failed to be fatal, and the wounded, enraged beast attacked Theodoros II, resulting in his tragic death on the spot.

​

He could not outsmart Hades... Or a wolf... I know wolves aren't stupid, but some "sharp intellect"...

 

[TrocaNero]

Darn. An early death like that at the time of Turkic migrations could be very problematic. Theodoros II seemed like a "what if?" Emperor. He could probably have done very well (and not be as brutal as his father) if he had a longer reign. Seems like he should have stuck to feasts as a social gathering event, rather than hunts.

 

[NarcomancerPL]

At this point House Hyrcanis' greatest adversary is the nature itself first a bear, now wolf :d

 

[kakom]

Damn, a successful reign but a tragic life. He outlived his wife, most of his children and a grandson, all of whom died in tragic manners. As I was reading I hoped he at least would have a peaceful death but that was not the case...

Typical "good guy who tries but gets fucked over by the universe gets followed by a complete sociopath" succession.

Darn. An early death like that at the time of Turkic migrations could be very problematic. Theodoros II seemed like a "what if?" Emperor. He could probably have done very well (and not be as brutal as his father) if he had a longer reign. Seems like he should have stuck to feasts as a social gathering event, rather than hunts.

The last three rulers of the Huracanis dynasty had varying degrees of success and character, but that is how it is with rulers.

The Empire itself seems to be in rude health. The only improvement would be full control over the Straits for shipping, and further expansions into Anatolia for more defendable borders...although that does risk moving further beyond the protection and power of the Black Sea.

The Empire will now try to regain control of Anatolia and Greece.

He could not outsmart Hades... Or a wolf... I know wolves aren't stupid, but some "sharp intellect"...

At this point House Hyrcanis' greatest adversary is the nature itself first a bear, now wolf :d

Both of these cases were the result of two different situations, Prytanis IV died during a pilgrimage and Theodoros II during a hunt. But the irony remains.


Now a little info. We are entering the beginning of the 12th century, I have played the game up to the year 1300 AD. And I intend to describe the next rulers up to the year 1200 AD, then a description of the world divided into 3 parts, and a separate one about the empire in the year 1200 AD. And finally the last 100 years after that, I don't know and I don't think there are any plans for other additional chapters.

Currently working on the conversion to EU4, I have a question, can someone refer me to a source about creating your own cultural group?

 

[TrocaNero]

The last three rulers of the Huracanis dynasty had varying degrees of success and character, but that is how it is with rulers.



The Empire will now try to regain control of Anatolia and Greece.




Both of these cases were the result of two different situations, Prytanis IV died during a pilgrimage and Theodoros II during a hunt. But the irony remains.


Now a little info. We are entering the beginning of the 12th century, I have played the game up to the year 1300 AD. And I intend to describe the next rulers up to the year 1200 AD, then a description of the world divided into 3 parts, and a separate one about the empire in the year 1200 AD. And finally the last 100 years after that, I don't know and I don't think there are any plans for other additional chapters.

Currently working on the conversion to EU4, I have a question, can someone refer me to a source about creating your own cultural group?

So converting to EU4 at 1300? Will EU4's chapters still be based on the monarch's reign?

 

[kakom]

So converting to EU4 at 1300? Will EU4's chapters still be based on the monarch's reign?

For now I am slowly transforming the 1300 ck3 save. It is rather a form of experimentation. Breaking cultural blobs and nightmarish borders between countries. I do it in CK3 with the help of the console and convert with the help of a converter to see the effects in EU4. I don't know when Paradox will release EU5, so this is a form of preliminary preparation of the save for the final conversion.

As for the further form of this AAR, I would like to keep the same style in the next part. Only in Victoria would I start describing smaller time periods.
I have learned from my previous mega-campaigns that too much fragmentation can lead to them not being completed, an example of this is my translation of my second mega-campaign concerning Mazovia. Part one has 70 standard chapters plus additional ones. Part two in EU4 also has about 70 chapters and here I have reached with the description to about the second half of the 18th century. Due to the closure of my old forum and other life reasons that AAR was not finished, here I will probably write a special chapter covering the time period up to Victoria after I reach the last chapter.

 

[kakom]

Theodotos VI (1100 AD - 1145 AD)

​

The ascension of thirteen-year-old Theodotos VI to the throne in 1100 AD marked a period of great tension and uncertainty in the Tauric Empire. Despite his youth, the young emperor displayed qualities that hinted at his future greatness as a ruler: ambition, a sense of justice, and determination.

However, his inexperience and tender age placed him in a precarious position, leaving the burden of safeguarding the empire to his mother, Aegyptia, who assumed the role of regent. Renowned for her intelligence and diplomatic skills, Aegyptia took decisive measures to protect her son and maintain stability in the empire during this challenging time.

​

Just weeks after Theodotos VI’s coronation, a dangerous conspiracy aimed at toppling the young emperor was uncovered. Strategos Cratevas, a distant relative of the imperial family, sought to exploit the perceived chaos surrounding the boy emperor’s reign to stage a coup. The masterful work of Uzur, the empire’s spymaster, proved instrumental in neutralizing the threat.

Captured and disgraced, Cratevas was mutilated and exiled from the empire. The decision to banish rather than execute him was a strategic move by the regent, who aimed to avoid escalating tensions and to project an image of justice, thereby strengthening the young emperor’s authority.

​

Despite this success, the era was fraught with growing instability. Local elites, particularly the Strategoi, began demanding greater autonomy, perceiving a weakness in the central government. A notable event was the rebellion of Menelaos, Strategos of Styr, who demanded that the province of Colchis be placed entirely under the control of Strategos Kephisodoros.

Such demands threatened the empire’s unity and challenged the authority of the young emperor. Aegyptia and her advisors firmly rejected these claims, but their decision led to an escalation of tensions, culminating in a civil war.

​

The civil war, which erupted in 1102 AD, presented the first major test for Theodotos VI’s reign. At the same time, the empire faced external threats from Turkic nomads invading the Anatolian territories, particularly the Armeniac duchy along the Black Sea coast. These raids were orchestrated by Bars, leader of the Uzur clan, who exploited the empire’s internal turmoil to plunder the wealthy coastal regions.

The civil war, lasting from 1102 to 1105 AD, ended in victory for the imperial forces. Despite his youth, Theodotos VI’s armies, led by experienced and loyal commanders such as Strategos Pelops of Abkhazia, successfully crushed the rebel forces.

Pelops, showcasing strategic brilliance, employed flanking maneuvers and made effective use of natural obstacles, ensuring the empire’s triumph. The rebel leaders were punished under the direction of Regent Aegyptia, restoring imperial authority and bringing an end to the period of uncertainty.

​

Simultaneously, the empire dealt with the Turkic invasions. A decisive confrontation occurred in 1104 AD when a 12,000-strong imperial army, again led by Strategos Pelops, engaged the Turkic forces in a critical battle. Pelops’ leadership and the discipline of the imperial troops resulted in a resounding victory, forcing the nomads to retreat. While Bars’ defeat curbed the immediate threat, the nomadic incursions remained a persistent challenge.

​

After the civil war and the repulsion of the Turkic invaders, Empress-Regent Aegyptia and her son sought to reward the loyal Strategoi who had played crucial roles in preserving the empire’s integrity. Some were granted greater autonomy, receiving control over entire governorships as a gesture of gratitude and to secure their allegiance to the throne.

Although the empire was officially under the rule of the regent and her son, Theodotos VI began to play a more active role in governance during this period. Aegyptia used the relative stability after the civil war to strengthen the imperial dynasty’s position on the international stage through carefully arranged marriages for her younger children.

​

Cellanthis was betrothed to young King Nalka I of the northern Volga-Ural Empire, reinforcing ties with this powerful neighbor.

​

The second daughter, Philotera, was engaged to Cocaeus I, the young king of Kolochia, ensuring an alliance with this strategically important kingdom.

​

Meanwhile, Theodotos VI’s younger brother, Kephisodotos, was promised to Pythias, the daughter of Argaeus I, ruler of Egypt, cementing relations with one of the empire’s oldest and most vital trade partners. These marital alliances not only strengthened political bonds but also underscored the imperial dynasty’s prestige on the global stage.

​

During this time, Theodotos VI, under the guidance of Witiknd Pattensen, a Varangian guardsman and seasoned battlefield veteran, honed his skills as a warrior. Pattensen mentored the young emperor in military tactics, leadership, and swordsmanship, personally overseeing his training.

​

In 1103 AD, a pivotal year for Theodotos VI, the emperor turned sixteen, symbolically entering adulthood and signaling his readiness to assume full authority. Under the tutelage of his kinsman Demochares Hyrcanis, Theodotos received intensive training in administration and statecraft.

Despite the educator’s efforts, the emperor’s aptitude in this domain remained modest, raising concerns among the court, though it was hoped that time and experience would compensate for his shortcomings.

​

A month later, Theodotos VI married Dilber, the cousin of the ruler of the Persian Turkic Empire, strengthening ties between the two powerful dynasties. This marriage was part of a long-term dynastic policy aimed at stabilizing the empire’s southeastern borders and laying the groundwork for future collaboration with Persia.

​

In 1104 AD, the imperial couple celebrated the birth of a son, named Theodoros in honor of the young emperor’s late father, symbolizing a continuation of tradition and respect for their lineage.

Regent Aegyptia’s tenure ended in late 1106 AD when Theodotos VI came of age and formally assumed full control of the empire. The empress-regent had earned a reputation as a wise and effective steward of the throne, guiding the empire through years of internal crises and external threats. By relinquishing her regency, Aegyptia left her son a strong and relatively stable empire, prepared to face the challenges of the coming decades.

​

November 1106 AD brought new challenges to the empire as a result of its earlier dynastic policies. Freshly assuming full authority, Theodotos VI faced a growing crisis in the Volga-Ural Empire. Nalka I, its ruler and the future husband of Theodotos’ sister Cellanthis, sent a diplomatic mission to the Tauric capital requesting assistance in suppressing a rebellion.

Queen Mel’shay of Volga, one of Nalka’s vassals, had revolted against him, seeking to secede from his empire. Theodotos VI was confronted with a difficult decision: intervening could secure his brother-in-law’s position but also risk entangling the Tauric Empire in a protracted conflict far from its borders.

​

Just days after the Volga-Ural envoys arrived, the Tauric Empire’s political situation grew even more precarious. Mete I, ruler of the Turkic Empire and cousin of Theodotos VI’s wife Dilber, unexpectedly declared war on the Tauric Empire, breaking previous alliances and familial bonds.

Mete’s forces launched an attack on the province of Kurus, an integral part of the empire, aiming to expand his dominion. This invasion shattered the fragile peace along the southern borders and compelled Theodotos VI to take immediate action.

Faced with two simultaneous conflicts, Theodotos VI had to make difficult decisions regarding the priorities of the empire. The civil war in the Volga-Ural Empire, though significant for dynastic reasons, was deemed less urgent compared to the Turkish aggression in the south.

​

The emperor decided to send limited assistance—small, elite detachments from border garrisons—to support Nalka I in his fight against the Mel’shay rebellion in the Volga. As a result, this conflict dragged on for two years, from 1106 to 1108 AD, with the empire left to watch its progress from a distance.

Ultimately, despite the prolonged warfare, Nalka I emerged victorious, maintaining his hold over the Volga-Ural Empire. However, this success came at a cost—the war drained the empire's resources, and the Mel’shay rebellion exposed the Volga's vulnerability to internal divisions.

For Theodotos VI, the decision to provide limited aid was a prudent compromise: the empire avoided overcommitment to a distant conflict, preserving its strength for the defense of the southern borders.

​

The war with Mete I and the powerful Turkish Empire was one of the most challenging trials faced by the Tauric Empire under the reign of Theodotos VI. The conflict, lasting from 1106 to 1110 AD, consumed vast resources and required the mobilization of a 30,000-strong imperial army.

The Turks, led by Mete I, launched brutal raids on the lands of the Kurus province, leaving a trail of scorched earth and devastation. Despite these hardships, the imperial army, commanded by experienced Strategoi, managed to organize an effective defense, which eventually turned into counteroffensives aimed at repelling the enemy.

​

Decisive victories were achieved in the battles of Ardabil and Marand. In the first engagement, a 16,000-strong imperial army defeated a larger 18,000-strong Turkish force, inflicting significant losses.

​

In the second battle, which proved crucial for the morale of both sides, Strategos Pelops captured the personal standard of Mete I. The loss of his banner was not only a military defeat but also a severe blow to Mete I’s prestige.

​

Thanks to these victories, the empire secured its borders and forced Mete I to agree to a peace treaty on favorable terms, although the destruction caused by the war left deep scars in the southern Kurus province.

​

After the victorious battles of Ardabil and Marand, Theodotos VI used his position as a triumphant to secure a lasting peace with the Turkish Empire. During peace negotiations, he demanded that Mete I not only withdraw from imperial lands but also pay a one-time tribute in gold and valuables to compensate for the war's devastation.

​

Additionally, the emperor requested that one of Mete I’s daughters, Princess Ilknur, be sent to the empire as a hostage. This diplomatic gesture was intended to ensure Mete I's loyalty while symbolically highlighting the empire's triumph over the Turkish Empire.

Weakened by his armies’ defeats and facing internal destabilization, Mete I agreed to these demands. The one-time tribute significantly bolstered the imperial treasury, enabling the reconstruction of the ravaged southern regions.

​

Princess Ilknur, received with due honors, was settled at the imperial court in the capital, where her presence became both a guarantee of peace and a tool in the empire's political maneuvering. This decision demonstrated that Theodotos VI was not only an effective commander but also a skilled diplomat capable of securing his state’s long-term interests.

​

In 1109 AD, Satyria, the capital of the Empire, became the site of a grand celebration of the victory over the Turks. On the orders of Theodotos VI, a massive tournament was organized to highlight the empire’s triumph and boost the morale of its subjects.

The event attracted participants and spectators from across the state, as well as delegations from other countries. The tournament featured archery competitions, poetry contests, and a fencing tournament. The atmosphere was filled with enthusiasm and pride in the achievements of the emperor and his army.

Theodotos VI personally participated in all the competitions, showcasing his versatility and extraordinary skills. In the archery contest, the emperor demonstrated remarkable accuracy, hitting the center of the target with every shot. In the poetry competition, his poem, praising the strength, wisdom, and unity of the empire, earned acclaim from both the judges and the audience.

The highlight of the tournament was the fencing competition, where the emperor defeated all opponents, displaying exceptional dexterity and composure. His victories in every event were not only proof of his talents but also a manifestation of royal glory, further solidifying his authority as a ruler.

​

Between 1109 and 1111 AD, the Empire, under the rule of Theodotos VI, embarked on an ambitious military campaign against the Thracian Kingdom. The goal of the conflict was the annexation of the strategically vital lands of the Strymon duchy, which provided access to the Adriatic coast and control over key trade routes.

Theodotos VI personally commanded the military operations, utilizing his tactical knowledge and the loyalty of experienced Strategoi. After a series of battles that exhausted the Thracian forces, the duchy of Strymon was incorporated into the empire's borders, strengthening imperial influence in the Balkans and emphasizing the military prowess of the young emperor.

​

At the same time, in the east, the Empire once again faced raids by nomadic Turks on the lands of Anatolia. The regions of the Armeniac duchy, located along the Black Sea coast, became the target of intense attacks by Turkish clans.

Aware of the importance of these lands for border security and trade, Theodotos VI sent a well-organized army under the command of Strategos Pelops, who had already proven his effectiveness. Thanks to his skills in battles and strategic defense, the Turks were ultimately expelled from the region, securing the empire's borders.

​

However, the threats were not limited to external wars. At the heart of the empire, Theodotos VI had to contend with a potential conspiracy by the master of spies, Strategos Democleides. Democleides, a key figure in the empire's intelligence, sought to use his position to create false claims to the throne.

​

When the plot was uncovered, the emperor acted with caution, aware of the sensitivity of the situation. Knowing Democleides’ extravagant lifestyle and numerous affairs, Theodotos VI used this information to blackmail him into resigning from his position.

​

In 1114 AD, Theodotos VI decided to support his son-in-law, King Cocaeus of Kolochia, who was at war with the Kingdom of Italy. The conflict centered on the strategically located county of Leibach. A delegation from Kolochia, arriving in Satyria, presented the dire situation of their kingdom, and Theodotos VI, eager to strengthen alliances and demonstrate the empire's strength, decided to act.

The emperor organized an army of 18,000 soldiers, composed of heavy cavalry, infantry, and elite Varangian guards. This was the most powerful deployment of Tauric troops to Italy since ancient times, making it a highly symbolic event.

After landing on the Italian coast, the imperial army swiftly advanced north, reaching the strategic city of Cagli. There, a key battle with the Italian army, which was smaller but well-prepared for defense, took place.

​

The battle of Cagli ended in a spectacular imperial victory. Thanks to numerical superiority, excellent leadership, and flanking tactics, the Tauric forces crushed the Italian army. Italian losses were immense.

This victory not only resolved the conflict in Kolochia favor but also demonstrated that the Empire remained a force to be reckoned with in Europe. It was both a military and political triumph, solidifying Theodotos VI’s position as one of the most powerful rulers of his era.

​

The period between 1110 and 1115 AD was not only a time of intense involvement in international conflicts for Theodotos VI but also a moment of focus on educating his son and heir, Theodoros. The emperor sought to ensure that his son would not only grow into the role of a ruler but also surpass him in skills and knowledge.

​

As part of his dynastic plans, Theodotos VI arranged the betrothal of Theodoros to Fremosilli, the sister of Irmgard, the Queen of Saxony. This was a well-thought-out political move that strengthened the alliance with the powerful Kingdom of Saxony while securing the dynasty's future.

​

Theodotos VI placed great importance on his son’s education. He ensured that Theodoros received a well-rounded education that combined theory and practice. The emperor’s son studied history, administration, military strategy, and philosophy under the guidance of the empire’s finest teachers and advisors.

A key aspect of his education was mastering the art of swordsmanship, taught by the emperor's personal champion, Aschild Geroldian. Known for his exceptional combat skills and battlefield experience, Aschild instilled in the young heir not only fighting techniques but also a sense of discipline and honor that would become the cornerstone of his future reign.

​

Thanks to Theodotos VI's efforts, Theodoros matured into an exceptional leader in both theory and practice. Even as a young man, he demonstrated remarkable strategic talent, which was evident during his successful maneuvers in simulated battles organized at the imperial court. Under the watchful eyes of his father and mentors, he gained the experience needed to become confident and prepared to assume the reins of power in the future.

​

Empress Dilber, the wife of Theodotos VI, was an influential figure at the imperial court despite the challenging times in which she lived. Although the war between the Tauric Empire and the Persian Empire of the Turks posed a threat to her position, Dilber managed to maintain her status and authority through her intelligence, cunning, and role as the mother of the heir to the throne. Her presence at court was invaluable, both as a mediator and an advisor, making her indispensable to the daily functioning of the imperial court.

One of the empress’s greatest achievements was persuading a local Strategos, Ctesicles, to abandon the faction of magnates seeking to limit the emperor's authority. Through personal negotiations and diplomatic efforts, she secured the loyalty of this key commander. Her intervention averted another internal threat to the empire, contributing to the maintenance of order and stability in the region.

​

Dilber also played a crucial role in resolving a conflict between the Emperor and Strategos Anaximander, whose personal feud with Theodotos VI endangered harmony among the empire’s highest-ranking commanders. Using her charm and mediatory skills, the empress convinced both sides to end their dispute peacefully. Her efforts not only prevented the escalation of the conflict but also enhanced the court’s image as a place of wisdom and prudence, where disputes were resolved through dialogue rather than violence.

​

The empress’s influence extended beyond behind-the-scenes actions. Her impact was also felt within formal structures of power, such as the imperial council. Dilber not only participated in its sessions but actively supported its operations, often sharing her knowledge and offering valuable advice to its members. Her involvement in state affairs made her a symbol of unity and authority, as well as an example for women at court, who admired her intelligence, determination, and dedication to the empire's cause.

​

The years 1115–1125 AD were marked by intense military conflicts and significant territorial expansion of the Tauric Empire under the rule of Theodotos VI. The most significant event of this period was the war with the Kingdom of Macedonia, which Theodotos VI decided to invade as part of his plan to restore full control over Hellas. The campaign, lasting from 1118 to 1120 AD, was meticulously planned and swiftly executed thanks to the emperor’s decisive leadership and the expertise of his Strategoi.

The Tauric armies, numbering nearly 25,000 troops, crushed the Macedonian forces in a series of decisive battles, and the imperial administration quickly annexed the conquered territories. Thessaly, as a key strategic and economic region, was incorporated into the empire, strengthening the Tauric position in the Balkans.

​

Simultaneously with the Macedonian campaign, the empire was involved in conflicts in northern Europe, supporting Queen Irmgard of Saxony, who was Theodotos VI’s sister-in-law. The first of the Saxon wars, lasting from 1118 to 1121, was in response to a request for assistance in expanding the Kingdom of Saxony's neighboring territories.

To strengthen his dynasty and influence in the region, Theodotos VI provided substantial financial resources and a contingent of approximately 10,000 soldiers. The Tauric support played a crucial role in incorporating new territories into Saxony, significantly strengthening the alliance between the two states.

​

The second conflict, lasting from 1122 to 1125, was equally demanding, as Irmgard faced internal struggles within her kingdom. This time, Theodotos VI limited his support to sending a contingent of around 10,000 soldiers without financial aid.

Both conflicts solidified the political and military ties between the empire and Saxony, while Theodotos VI gained recognition as a steadfast defender of his allies, enhancing the prestige of the Tauric Empire.

​

The years 1125–1130 AD provided the Tauric Empire with a respite from wars and intense military activities, allowing Theodotos VI to focus on consolidating newly acquired territories in the Balkans. The emperor introduced administrative reforms aimed at standardizing governance in the region while gaining the favor of local elites through land grants and privileges.

This was also a period when distant rumors from the steppes caused unease at the imperial court. Stories circulated about Dezong Yelu, a new great conqueror gaining fame for his campaigns on the eastern steppes. News of his ambitions and power aroused interest and concern, reminding the Tauric elites of potential threats from regions beyond the empire's borders.

​

In 1131, an envoy from Mete II, the new ruler of the Persian Empire and the younger brother of Empress Dilber, arrived in the Tauric capital of Satyria. Facing a significant threat from Taraxano, a powerful Indian state, Mete II sought military assistance from Theodotos VI to defend his borders.

Theodotos VI, seeing this as an opportunity to strengthen the empire’s position and influence over its southern neighbor, agreed on the condition that Mete II pay additional tribute. Deciding to personally lead the military expedition, the emperor set out at the head of an impressive 40,000-strong army, ready to confront the new threat and demonstrate the empire's might.

The war with Taraxano, lasting from 1131 to 1138 AD, was an unprecedented undertaking that entered history as the first instance of Tauric legions crossing the Hindu Kush. Guided by ambition and a vision, Theodotos VI led his army deep into the Indian subcontinent.

During the arduous journey through Persian territories and the harsh mountain range of the Hindu Kush, the emperor frequently referred to a book authored by Satyros Satyrion, which provided not only geographical knowledge but also inspiration in the face of challenges.

​

The first engagement occurred in 1134 AD, in the mountainous region of Kalam, where the imperial army of 40,000 soldiers clashed with a 23,000-strong force of Indian warriors. The battle, fought in challenging terrain, showcased Theodotos VI’s strategic brilliance, as he leveraged his numerical advantage and the experience of his legions.

This victory not only broke Taraxano's resistance in the mountains but also opened the way for the legions to advance into the Indian subcontinent, evoking both admiration and fear among local rulers.

​

Amid the chaos of battle, the emperor personally demonstrated courage by engaging in single combat with an Indian warrior named Jamyang, renowned for his strength and combat skills. The duel ended with Theodotos VI’s victory, which boosted the morale of his soldiers and proved that he was not only an exceptional strategist but also a capable warrior.

​

This event became a legend, emphasizing the emperor's charisma and determination as he led his troops with unwavering confidence toward further triumphs on Indian soil.

​

The further course of the war with Taraxano from 1134 to 1138 AD was marked by an intense military campaign in which the imperial forces systematically devastated the northern regions of India.

Under the command of Theodotos VI, the legions conducted operations that included seizing fortresses, burning villages, and plundering cities, aiming to weaken Taraxano's economic base and force its rulers into capitulation. This campaign, though brutal, proved effective, deeply shaking the structure of the Indian state, which was unprepared for a prolonged conflict with Tauric forces.

​

The culmination of this war was the Battle of Rahon, fought in 1138 AD. The imperial army, numbering 15,000 troops, faced off against a 13,000-strong Taraxano force. Despite evenly matched numbers, the tactical advantage and experience of the imperial legions tipped the scales in favor of Theodotos VI.

The battle was dynamic and bloody, but the emperor's strategic genius and the discipline of his soldiers ensured victory. Defeating Taraxano's main forces forced its rulers into peace negotiations, ending the conflict on terms favorable to the Tauric-Persian alliance.

​

After the conclusion of hostilities, Theodotos VI decided to celebrate his success with a symbolic gesture. On his way back to the Empire, he visited Isfahan, the capital of Persia, where he was received with honors by Mete II. Mete II, expressing his gratitude for the support and emphasizing his loyalty to the Tauric ally, presented the emperor with a significant tribute, including gold, exotic goods, and valuable textiles, which bolstered the imperial treasury and underscored the prestige of his reign.

The return of Theodotos VI to Satyria was a triumphant one. The emperor, hailed as a conqueror and defender of allies, solidified his position both on the international stage and in the eyes of his subjects.

The war with Taraxano, despite its challenges and high costs, brought glory to the Empire and proved that under the leadership of Theodotos VI, it had become one of the most powerful forces in Eurasia. This campaign entered history as a testament to the emperor’s determination, courage, and military-diplomatic prowess.

The final years of Theodotos VI’s reign (1138–1145 AD) were a period of relative peace and consolidation within the Tauric Empire. After the war with Taraxano, the emperor focused on strengthening the internal structures of the Empire and fostering relations with key allies.

It was a time of stabilization but also new challenges that required diplomatic finesse and strategic engagement. Although Theodotos VI refrained from direct conflicts threatening the Empire, his influence over the fate of Europe and the Middle East remained significant.

The first conflict in which the Empire was involved during this period was a war on behalf of Queen Irmgar of Saxony from 1139 to 1141 AD. Irmgar, aspiring to expand her kingdom through the annexation of Ostfalen lands, sought assistance from her powerful ally.

Theodotos VI, aiming to strengthen Tauric influence in Central Europe, provided financial support and military contingents that played a crucial role in the success of the campaign. This victory not only elevated Irmgar’s prestige but also reaffirmed the strength and reliability of the Tauric emperor as a protector of his allies.

​

The second conflict, lasting from 1142 to 1144 AD, involved the invasion of Illyrian lands by the Kingdom of Kolochia, ruled by Cocaeus I. Once again, Theodotos VI supported his brother-in-law, this time by providing armed units and resources that enabled a successful campaign.

The victory in this war significantly bolstered Kolochia position in the Balkans and confirmed the Tauric Empire’s status as a reliable political and military leader in the region. The actions of Theodotos VI in these two conflicts contributed to solidifying his image as a powerful and proud ruler.

​

By the end of his life in 1144, Theodotos VI enjoyed widespread recognition both within the Empire and beyond its borders. He was increasingly referred to as “The Proud” for his achievements in warfare, diplomacy, and administration.

​

Unfortunately, the emperor had long been battling a debilitating illness, which ultimately led to his death in early 1145 AD. The throne passed to his eldest son, Theodoros III, who was to carry on his father’s legacy, building upon the foundations of stability and prestige that Theodotos VI had established during his nearly forty-year reign.

 

[StrategyGameEnthusiast]

What was Mete (the first one) thinking, declaring war on his ally Taurica?