First off, El Pip Voting Opportunity
The next update is likely to contain explicit aero-engineering and scenes of extreme civil service politics some readers may find disturbing. As part of this I will be banding around phrases such as "Air cooled X-24", "Twin-row radial" and "Ethylene glycol cooled V12". It did occur to me that the meaning of these may not be immediately apparent so I should stick in some words explaining this. However I then considered that if you had got this far without understanding such things, then you may not be that fussed. To settle this debate please vote for one of the following options;
1. Please include some overly-detailed explanation on 1930s aero-engine types and how they were cooled, it will be informing and edifying
2. I am already aware of all I need to know on this subject, so you can just get on with the actual point of the next chapter.
Deadline for voting is the end of Sunday 14th. Tennessee election rules this time, so you can only vote once and should you attempt to vote twice your first vote will be declared null and void.
HOI4 stuff has been read and nodded at sagely. It still appears to be a game I can live without.
The problem will be the rest of the Monarchist coalition, Franco may be dead but the "Rebuild a purer, unified Spain" ideas didn't come from him and so won't die with him. The Falange hated separatists and that is not going to change, as they are both numerous and the route for German arms and advice they cannot be ignored.
France does need to work out what it's overall policy is. The preferred option, of the British forgetting about the whole Abyssinian War non-joining incident and signing a new Entente, is not happening. The current plan of strengthening the Little Entente is all well and good, but no-one really thinks a collection of Eastern European states is a real replacement for the British Empire. Just assuming Germany will be good from now on may well work in London but no-one in Paris is buying it, so there does need to be a plan, but what?
The next update is likely to contain explicit aero-engineering and scenes of extreme civil service politics some readers may find disturbing. As part of this I will be banding around phrases such as "Air cooled X-24", "Twin-row radial" and "Ethylene glycol cooled V12". It did occur to me that the meaning of these may not be immediately apparent so I should stick in some words explaining this. However I then considered that if you had got this far without understanding such things, then you may not be that fussed. To settle this debate please vote for one of the following options;
1. Please include some overly-detailed explanation on 1930s aero-engine types and how they were cooled, it will be informing and edifying
2. I am already aware of all I need to know on this subject, so you can just get on with the actual point of the next chapter.
Deadline for voting is the end of Sunday 14th. Tennessee election rules this time, so you can only vote once and should you attempt to vote twice your first vote will be declared null and void.
Well, the medium stuff will arrive in '38. Don't want to come on too strong, too soon and get a slap around the face.The hard stuff to be sent in 1938!?Ooh, Matron!
![]()
HOI4 stuff has been read and nodded at sagely. It still appears to be a game I can live without.
Heathen. Any tank-destroyer that has a fixed rear-pointing gun has a certain charm about it. While I am forced to concede the world would be a more functional and better place if the Archer never existed, it would be a less eccentrically interesting place.I trully hope that, never mind what happens in Spain, the Brits never, ever, are going to build the Archer.
It appears HOI4 has at least modelled that bit correctly; there was no real advantage for Italy in getting involved in the OTL Spanish Civil War either.In HOI4 there is pretty much no reason to get involved as italy that i can see aside from getting the bealaric islands back. I think i might try to avoid the war ebtirely for a bit and just focus on the balkans and africa. Thr axis and allies can go stuff themsevles.
Trouble is, much like RL, y9iu need one of them or both to fight the comintern at some point.
My understanding had been that the military leadership that briefed the cabinet was very carefully selected by the civil service, with the implicit agreement of first Baldwin and then Chamberlain, to achieve precisely this.To be fair to the British Cabinet pre-WWII, the military always put together their briefings based on the worst-case scenarios and (it appears) never really let anyone in Cabinet know that that was how they were constructing their assessments
An excellent summary of all the ways the Basque are in trouble. The Entente is pretty much dead at this point, but not to the point France feels threatened by Britain, just a realisation that they cannot count on Britain automatically backing France in any future conflict. (Naturally this is all the fault of Perfidious Albion and nothing at all to do with Paris declining to get involved in the Abyssinian War.) So the French backing independent Catalans and Basque is not as unlikely as 0.1%, but it's still very much a long shot.Yep, they're screwed unless they can hold out long enough to be viable when the Republic falls (highly unlikely, given the balance of forces in that case), or they negotiate a separate peace with the Monarchists (the Carlists did always draw tremendous support from the Basque Country, so it's not impossible),or they back the right horse in the Republican power struggle (ie: not the Stalinists, because that's just going to end badly for everyone not committed to centralization) or the French decide to supply them because the Republic does fall to the Stalinists and they need some sort of buffer state (I could see France, in extremis, recognizing Catalan and Basque independence from a failing Republic, but only if they really feel a) threatened by the Monarchists and b) that the Entente is dead, but that seems like a 0.1% chance at best).
Basically, failing an arrangement with some power that has an interest in splitting up Spain, or a truly astonishing string of successes, they're in a pickle.
They also have the problem that they insist on wanting to claim bits of all the surrounding countries. The Kurds want bits of Iran and Turkey, who are the two regional powers most likely to back any separatists for their own strategic reasons, but neither will want to support them because they know that would just store up future problems. That said the Kurdish autonomus region on Iraq seems to be doing well (by the low standards of Iraq) so maybe there is some hope. All the Basque need to do is find some oil and things may start looking up for them.Sounds like the Basque (both TTL and OTL) and the Kurds (OTL) have similar problems: they just cause headaches that no one else wants to help them deal with.
Small states are nice and easy to herd and control. Maybe a bit more stable as well, if you draw the boundaries correctly. Or of course you go full Yes Minister and deliberately draw bad boundaries, hoping to make the local too busy fighting themselves to cause problems elsewhere.Cos in the end, other countries are only really good for trade and defence. Small regional ones tend to be crap at both compared to big centralised ones you can twist around. Unless the small realm has to exist for some reason and you really don't want them to get any bigger, like the vatican i guess.
France may want that buffer. It seems to be what they go in for all their other european problems right now
The Carlists might go for it if the Basque accepted the King of Spain was also the King of the Basque, everything else being filed under Basque Home Rule. It sort-of worked before so could do again.well, considering the Basque support for the Carlists, they could after enough fighting, and managing to survive in their own pocket long enough, or if they see that Monarchist victory is imminent, to try to call for self rule under Monarchist protection or something akin to that. After all, it most likely would be the best thing the Basque country can ask for.
The problem will be the rest of the Monarchist coalition, Franco may be dead but the "Rebuild a purer, unified Spain" ideas didn't come from him and so won't die with him. The Falange hated separatists and that is not going to change, as they are both numerous and the route for German arms and advice they cannot be ignored.
There is the French Basque country I suppose, but Wiki claims this was less of a problem after WW1 as there was a degree of 'French' identity forged in the trenches, and the language had started to die out. I'm not sure if the Spanish Basque would happily give up their French Brethren, but as a desperate measure they probably would.France has the advantage that the creation of an independent Euskadi does not threaten her own borders, and ensures the Basques will align with Paris as their bulwark against Madrid. If Spain itself is already hostile to Paris, propping up a Basque nation to weaken it makes actually a lot of sense. If France can afford Britain's potential ire, that is.
France does need to work out what it's overall policy is. The preferred option, of the British forgetting about the whole Abyssinian War non-joining incident and signing a new Entente, is not happening. The current plan of strengthening the Little Entente is all well and good, but no-one really thinks a collection of Eastern European states is a real replacement for the British Empire. Just assuming Germany will be good from now on may well work in London but no-one in Paris is buying it, so there does need to be a plan, but what?
- 1