Supporting Appendix C: The Education of Iron Ore.
Supporting Appendix C: The Education of Iron Ore.
To understand the various challenges and crises in the period of this work it is not strictly necessary to understand the difference between high and low grade iron ore and how both were turned into steel. Therefore when those subjects arise the technical background is kept to a minimum in order to keep the main points of the chapter clearer, however this may be unsatisfactory for those who desire more detail or wish to understand why certain problems were so serious or why some solutions were not, or could not be, adopted. It is the purpose of this appendix to provide a more detailed overview of the challenges and technology of the time in order to illuminate such matters.
As with steel making itself we begin with iron ore, at the time it was divided into two broad types; low grade and high grade. A high grade ore would be one that contained 60% or more iron content by weight, whereas a low grade ore could be as little as 20% though more typically was around 30%. One problem with low grade should be immediately apparent, twice as much had to be mined and processed per ton of iron produced compared to a high grade ore. This was a consideration certainly but had to be set against one of the problem of high grade ores; they were comparatively rare. In this period it was only Sweden, French and Spanish North Africa, Chile and British Malaya that exported significant quantities of high grade ore and a select few others, notably the USA and USSR, mined large quantities for their own use. In contrast low grade iron ores such as ironstones and ironsands could be found almost everywhere in large quantities, so the savings in transport and import costs often more than offset the need to use larger quantities, to say nothing of the strategic advantages of have a secure domestic supply. Once you had your source of iron ore it was necessary to mine and transport it to your works, so a brief discussion on location is important. Ideally of course your site would be close to coal, iron and good transport links but geological process being what they are such sites were incredibly rare. Therefore when forced to pick the correct choice in the period was to be close to the iron ore; if you were using low grade ore than a typical works could use four times as much iron ore as coking coal, even with higher grades it would still need two tonnes of iron ore for each ton of coke. For transportation water remained viable and several large works were associated with canal extensions, notably the Reichswerke Herman Goering, but rail connections were generally preferred. Having mined and transported your ore and coal to your works it was then necessary to produce pig iron.

The tapping of a blast furnace to produce pig iron at the start of the 20th Century. The blast furnace is the large structure in the centre of the picture, a hole is opened (tapped) at the bottom and molten iron comes out. It runs along the central channel and into the bays at the side, the layout somewhat resembling piglet suckling on a mother pig and hence the product being named pig iron. While the technology for tapping and collecting pig iron had changed, in many cases it as transferred as molten liquid straight into the steel works, the name had stuck even for material not produced via a blast furnace
Broadly speaking there were two ways to produce pig iron, in a blast furnace and in a rotary kiln. Of those two the blast furnace was by far the more popular at something like 95% of all production because it was simpler, more reliable, cheaper to build and in practice cheaper to run. That kilns kept being tried was because theoretically they could be far cheaper to run in terms of fuel use, the problem was they never quite lived up to that promise when built. The blast furnace was conceptually very simple; iron ore, coking coal and limestone were poured into the top and ignited, hot air was then forced through the furnace. A redox reaction then took place in which the iron oxides in the ore were reduced and the carbon in the coke oxidised, resulting in pure molten iron was tapped off at the bottom as pig iron, while most of the impurities reacted with the limestone to form a slag which floated to the top. A rotary kiln was broadly similar, except it was horizontal not vertical and the rotation was claimed to give great advantages in mixing the material and controlling the reaction and therefore producing the cost savings. Both process produced the same product, a typical pig iron was 90 to 95% pure iron with the balance being the impurities that had not reacted in the blast furnace, however even this relatively small residual was enough to make pig iron a brittle and unreliable material, one that that needed further processing to be useful. Depending on the works the pig iron could be diverted elsewhere, much of it ended up in everything from grey cast iron for water pipes to wrought iron for a decorative gate or forge iron for a car engine foundry. For that which was intended to become steel it was transferred to the next stage, because all the processes involved extreme heat this was the advantage to an integrated iron and steel works; the pig iron could be moved as liquid metal by ladle straight to the steel plant, saving the fuel cost of re-melting it.

Krupp Renn type rotary kilns at an integrated iron and steel works. The kilns are the long tubes running from the large chimney and plant at the rear to the front, they are installed at a slight slope with the input end being higher than the output. All of the various types of rotary kiln operated on the same basis, the iron ore was ground up and poured into one end of the kiln and then heated, as the material moved down the kiln the oxygen and other impurities were driven off. In a standard kiln the material emerged as a range of powders which were passed through a magnetic separator and then sent for sintering to produce material ready for the next step in the process. The Krupp Renn types were more ambitious types and claimed to be capable of lumps of iron ready for being fed into a furnace for steel making, this added capability came at the cost of added complexity and, in practice, severely reduced reliability.
With your pig iron obtained it was necessary to select which steel making process to use and this would depend upon what impurities were in your ore and therefore in your pig iron. It was a two part choice first selecting a process (converter or hearth) and then a lining type (acid or basic), the combination would depend on what pig iron you have made and what quality of steel you wish to produce. The process were conceptually similar, using blasts of air through or over the molten pig iron to oxidise any remaining impurities and remove any excess carbon left over from the blast furnace. In a converter the air was forced in from the bottom and passed through the molten pig iron, the heat of the oxidisation reactions being such that the material remained molten without any external heat and the entire process could take half an hour or less for a 25 tonne charge. In an open hearth furnace the pig iron was placed on the hearth and externally heated hot air was instead passed over the top of the pig iron to achieve the same effect. While the capacities could be larger, anything from 200 to 600 tonnes, the times were longer and 10 to 14hours was typical. With the hearths being slower and requiring additional fuel the question should be why was anyone using it? The answer was control, a converter was too quick for the analysis techniques of the period, so it was impossible to know what grade of steel you would get until you had the final product. The slower hearth process allowed time for analysis and adjustments to be made, it also allowed more control so a more homogenous material could be produced. Broadly speaking then for average quality steel in bulk, for structural or naval usage for instance, converter steel was good enough and so generally dominated due to it's lower cost. Where higher quality or a more homogenous product was required, in tooling steel or armour plate, then open hearth steel was preferred. An open hearth process could also make much better use of scrap and this could close much of the cost gap with converter steel when prices were scrap prices were reasonable.

An electric arc furnace being opened up ready to receive the next charge of material, the furnace being the large cylinder in the top centre with the gouts of flame emerging. As one would guess the electric arc furnace generated it's heat via electrical arcing, large electrodes were mounted in the lid of the furnace and the electricity arced between them and the metal in the furnace, generating intense heat and melting the metal. Very much a low capacity niche endeavour it was the most controllable process and the only one capable of running entirely on scrap, which again allowed finer control of the final steel alloy. As such the few steelworks that used electric arc furnaces tended towards specialist alloys, for instance the Brymbo works in North Wales supplied Rolls Royce with many of the high performance alloys needed for their aero-engines. The technology itself also found use in other industries, the furnaces used to produce calcium carbonate used essentially the same sort of reactors.
The choice of lining type reflected what particular impurity you were most concerned with, if you had mostly silica then you could go with an acidic lining (typically sand or clay) and if you combined that with a converter then you had the moderately well known Bessemer converter. Unfortunately many iron ores regardless of grade were associated with relatively large amounts of phosphorous and thus required a flux material to remove them from the pig iron. If you added a flux, such as limestone, to a Bessemer converter you would end up with a basic slag, which by simple chemistry would react with the acidic lining and not only damage the converter but also release the phosphorous back in the molten pig iron. The obvious solution would be to use a basic lining to the convert, this was done and was the basic Bessemer convert or the Thomas converter after it's inventor. Bessemer had however preferred an acidic lining for a reason and the basic process had slightly higher iron losses and needed re-lining more frequently, so an acidic process was used if possible. It was broadly similar for the open hearth, save for the problem that even with a basic lining the process struggled to remove significant amounts of phosphorous. Thus in the period there was something of a divide between continental steel works (which had been built on the basis of French phosphoric iron ores from Lorraine) that used the basic Bessemer process and the British works which preferred the more controllable open hearth process and generally had low phosphorous ores so could use acidic linings. Of course there were exceptions on both sides, the process used by an ironworks was adjusted to suit certain ores and so every permutation found a use somewhere to deal with a particular ore to produce a certain type of steel.
To come back around to iron ore all of these processes, furnaces and plants assumed a certain maximum level of silicate. There were some impurities no amount of processing could remove, or at least not reliably or economically, and so were deemed just impractical for steel making or in extreme cases even iron making. This is why the Corby Process was so widely noticed, the Northamptonshire ores it used had long been deemed unsuitable for iron making let along steel. They were high in alumina and so required a very temperature furnace (which was expensive in coal), aggressive character (so the refractory linings needed replacing) and had a high silica content which could not easily be driven off. Technically a works could just about make cast iron out of it, but it was expensive and the product highly variable making it a poor commercial proposition, while the residual silica content was too high to even think about making steel. The Corby Process solved all of these problems by adding a moderate amount of Soda Ash to the blast furnace, this changed the characteristics of the slag formed to be both thinner (so not requiring the extreme heat) and to be more attractive to silica (making the final product viable for steel). The savings in time and cost were considerable, but the main advantage was the reliability and consistency of the output. While the exact Corby Process was somewhat unique to the Northamptonshire ores it dealt with, it's influence was more in showing that high silica, low grade iron ores could produce high grade steel and do so efficiently.
---
Notes:
Honestly this is far too dry, however I did promise to explain the Corby Process so here we are. In recompense I am double tapping, so onwards to the next chapter which has actual plot.
As I've come this far I will just add that much of the discussion about 'low grade' changed spectacularly in the late 20th century. Ironstones and ironsands just stopped being mined and everyone imported high grade ores from Australia, Brazil, Canada, etc. Hence in modern terms low grade ore now means 50% to 55% Fe content mined in India or Iran, and it's basically unsellable to anyone bar domestic customers because no-one wants the bother.
As has been mentioned in the thread, post WW2 cheap pure oxygen became a thing and so Basic Oxygen Steelmaking became the dominant tech. Interestingly Bessemer wanted to use that but couldn't find anyway to get enough pure oxygen in the 19th century, so modern BOS is basically a modified Bessemer converter. The blast furnace however remains unchanged, fundamentally you need to turn a lot of iron oxide into iron and no-one has found a better economic reducing agent so far.
- 3
- 2
- 1