I know this sounds like 4D chess but perhaps they didn't have time to stream 5 games over 5 weeks...
Last edited:
It's not like CK3 is a major new launch as opposed to a game that was launched an age ago to largely negative reviews.Promoting CK3 instead of I:R is a big LOL.
Lost Eagle.All of this discourse comes out of an anxiety from the fanbase over the lack of communication from the dev team largely since 2.0's release. Anxiety I feel too, frankly.
Perhaps it might be in the best interest of the community to hear *something* out of the devs, to at least not feel like we're looking at another March of Eagles situation.
We're not. That was just the inspiration for the IP. Now you know - we can stop whispering.Rome 3? I never figured out if we're counting EU:Rome ot not.
I haven't seen it since 2.0 either. The image is from a Google search.I've not seen that event since 2.0, I was wondering where that went.
... But then I realized I've played Rome all of once since 2.0 too, so you know.
It's unknown.Plot twist:
The "New Grand Strategy Game" is actually Imperator 2.
Rome 3? I never figured out if we're counting EU:Rome ot not.
I haven't seen it since 2.0 either. The image is from a Google search.
It's not like CK3 is a major new launch as opposed to a game that was launched an age ago to largely negative reviews.
I agree. I would definitely promote the latter over the former. If I had gone to an American business school, that is. Because otherwise I wouldn't have had half my brain forcibly removed in the first semester.
Trust me, if it was something we were working on, I wouldn't talk about it here.
Viki 3 confirmed.Trust me, if it was something we were working on, I wouldn't talk about it here.
Viki 3 confirmed.
But you don’t mention Victoria 3. Victoria 3 confirmed!Ah yes, the rhetoric mastermind who starts every counter-argument with "weak argument", to make sure that his opponent knows that he is wrong. Genius move right there.
Between the end of Imperator and the start of CK3:
And these are just off the top of my head. It simply doesn't make sense to jump 900 years into the future, and pretend everything would be the same.
- Two gigantic faiths (see Christianity and Islam) have taken place of the old faiths.
- Western Roman Empire has fallen apart and crumbled.
- All of Europe has culturally shifted, after the significant migrations that has happened.
- The Pope has popped up as a religious leader in Rome, for large swathes of Europe.
- HRE through Charlemagne has come into existence.
Trust me, if it was something we were working on, I wouldn't talk about it here.
EvW double confirmation! Nuke + Greek letter in ad consistent with Alpha Omega bomb from 1960's Planet of the Apes movie.You also don’t mention the Cold War. EvW Remastered confirmed!
it is the same, you are spot on!EvW double confirmation! Nuke + Greek letter in ad consistent with Alpha Omega bomb from 1960's Planet of the Apes movie.
.View attachment 704170
I hadn't seen that image. The dull, greyed out nuke from the incomplete, cancelled game contrasts well with the robust version in the PDXCON ad as well! Looks like it's on!!!
from discord: " through all four grand strategy games""Join the teams of Crusader Kings III, Europa Universalis IV, Hearts of Iron IV and Stellaris for the largest event this side of PDXCON Remixed. In a tale that takes us from 867A.D to the distant future, you, the Paradox Community, will have a deciding say on events that unfold!"
Why no Imperator?
Yes, now the objections come to the timeline.
But they are also interrupted in the 4 games between EU4 1822 to HOI4 1936 and 1949 to 2200 Stellaris.
You could of course have played a world region in Imperator, on almost the same map as CK3.
That Pdx doesn't do this speaks for itself.