• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
it appears that Leofric had opted to be more forward-thinking in his economic strategies—albeit at the cost of neglecting the development of the north.
And so a very long and much honoured English tradition starts, investing in the part of the country where you see a return at the cost of ignoring the money pit elsewhere. I'm sure this wont' cause upset in the future.

As others have said Leofric is unlikely to be well remembered, but at least in this work he is appreciated for doing the unexciting but vital work of building future strength. Unlike his son who charged into a crusade without really looking and has now come back with his tail between his legs, he was lucky that Viking raid turned up after he had returned, if the Norse had raided while he was mucking around in Spain he would have been in real trouble.

I wonder how Æthelred will react to this? He could double down on the military, throw himself into training and study to become a better leader and warrior. Or he could look to the example of his father and focus on the other aspects of kingship. I feel like the latter, he is described as pious and humble so he may come to see jumping into the crusade as an arrogant mistake made while chasing 'glory'. But you could easily argue it the other way, he was insufficiently pious and failed to carry out the duty from God. Depends how he views the Pope I suppose, is a papal instruction the word of God or is it one's personal faith that is more important? Bit early for Protestantism but earlier revelations/truths/heresies are available.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
And so a very long and much honoured English tradition starts, investing in the part of the country where you see a return at the cost of ignoring the money pit elsewhere. I'm sure this wont' cause upset in the future.
Indeed -- Leofric is the first (that we've talked about) to start this beautiful English pastime -- here's to more, future northern neglect! :p

As others have said Leofric is unlikely to be well remembered, but at least in this work he is appreciated for doing the unexciting but vital work of building future strength.
Indeed -- Leofric, and perhaps even Aethelred will be very niche monarchs as time relentlessly marches on -- future monarchs most certainly take the spotlight in terms of conflict, especially towards the end of the 11th century.​

Unlike his son who charged into a crusade without really looking and has now come back with his tail between his legs, he was lucky that Viking raid turned up after he had returned, if the Norse had raided while he was mucking around in Spain he would have been in real trouble.
Before I'd looked at the notes and screenshots I had on Aethelred, I'd viewed him quite favourably as a pious and saintly English king, but as I was writing the chapter, I quickly realised how brash his decision-making was, especially in the early years of his reign. This isn't the first time Aethelred had run into the frenzy of battle, with his Northumbrian army handily defeated by Hrodberht's allies during the 1025-1032 rebellion, and recent defeat at Montanejos only reinforced his perceived military incompetence -- perhaps owing to the fact that he hadn't really received a formal military education.​

I wonder how Æthelred will react to this? He could double down on the military, throw himself into training and study to become a better leader and warrior. Or he could look to the example of his father and focus on the other aspects of kingship. I feel like the latter, he is described as pious and humble so he may come to see jumping into the crusade as an arrogant mistake made while chasing 'glory'. But you could easily argue it the other way, he was insufficiently pious and failed to carry out the duty from God. Depends how he views the Pope I suppose, is a papal instruction the word of God or is it one's personal faith that is more important? Bit early for Protestantism but earlier revelations/truths/heresies are available.
With the perspective of his failure in the Cordovan Crusade and his actions during his tenure as Ealdorman, one would think he'd choose the latter, but there's always the possibility of a complete 180 after such a disaster. While I probably won't commit it to writing -- seeing as I don't usually go into the thoughts of the incumbent monarch -- Aethelred, later in his life, sorely regrets his tactical missteps, especially during Hrodberht's rebellion. Assumedly, the same could be said for his experience in Spain.​
 
Last edited:
  • 3
Reactions:
Well, unfortunately, my CK3 save file has finally kicked the bucket—it crashes whenever I try to load it up. This is not to say that The Legacy of Edmund is over, far from it; just expect less character screenshots and more use of artwork (as has been happening already), accompanied with less frequent and more awkward maps of Europe and the wider world.

Regardless, expect the next chapter to release on the 2nd of January, with my Moria AAR's next update releasing the following day.

God bless you, and Merry Christmas!​

Chelsea-flight-orv939ipqt4ub4h03o1vpi090qs3q61lwd5lzea9hk.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
  • 1Love
Reactions:
Merry Christmas to you @Koweth . Likely that day has already arrived for you down under.

As it is that special time of year, everyone is invited to the bAAR where a virtual holiday party seems to be still going, although simmering a bit. Join us if you wish.
 
  • 1Love
Reactions:
Merry Christmas to you @Koweth . Likely that day has already arrived for you down under.

As it is that special time of year, everyone is invited to the bAAR where a virtual holiday party seems to be still going, although simmering a bit. Join us if you wish.
Thank you, @Chac1! Indeed it has, and it has been nothing short of a wonderful Christmas (thankfully on the cooler side).

As for the bAAR, I am grateful for the invite, but I must admit to being intimidated by roleplaying in-character--it's a bit of situation where if I'd want to do it, I'd seldom know what to do, or where to start! o_O

Again, Merry Christmas to you. :D
 
Thank you, @Chac1! Indeed it has, and it has been nothing short of a wonderful Christmas (thankfully on the cooler side).

As for the bAAR, I am grateful for the invite, but I must admit to being intimidated by roleplaying in-character--it's a bit of situation where if I'd want to do it, I'd seldom know what to do, or where to start! o_O

Again, Merry Christmas to you. :D
Hope your holidays are everything you want @Koweth .

Please don't be intimidated by the bAAR as I think more than half of everyone who shows up is NOT in character. I'd also say those who do come in character mostly carry that part pretty lightly. It is more low key than you might think from the first post, and I am heartened that the holiday celebration has carried on through Christmas. Come join us but only if you wish. No pressure at all. That would truly be counter-productive. Cheers!
 
  • 1
  • 1Love
Reactions:
A shame your save file has died, but excellent news that you will carry on without it. I hope you enjoyed your Christmas and will have an excellent New Year's Eve, I look forward to the next chapter in 2025!
 
  • 1Love
  • 1
Reactions:
Seems like Leofric was the ideal transitional ruler, took the brunt of the consequences of his predecessors' actions, and in stride at that. The fruit of his labor will surely be sweet for his descendants.

Meanwhile, his son has the potential to be an important figure, but he showed his lack of a strategic mind during the Cordovan Campaign, both in Montanejo and by dedicating so many men to the war in the first place (As El Pip remarked, if the Norse had decided to raid England any earlier, the damage to both the land and the king's reputation would be significant, I don't imagine any vassal would be content to have a king too preoccupied with a war on the other side of the continent to actually protect their land). Only time will tell whether he will shape into a better king or stick with his flaws.

Well, unfortunately, my CK3 save file has finally kicked the bucket—it crashes whenever I try to load it up. This is not to say that The Legacy of Edmund is over, far from it; just expect less character screenshots and more use of artwork (as has been happening already), accompanied with less frequent and more awkward maps of Europe and the wider world.

Oh, that's sad, but I am glad this doesn't mean the end of this story. If you don't mind me asking, how far have you played? How do you plan to continue it after you reach that point (If you do plan to continue it after that)?
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Seems like Leofric was the ideal transitional ruler, took the brunt of the consequences of his predecessors' actions, and in stride at that. The fruit of his labor will surely be sweet for his descendants.

Meanwhile, his son has the potential to be an important figure, but he showed his lack of a strategic mind during the Cordovan Campaign, both in Montanejo and by dedicating so many men to the war in the first place (As El Pip remarked, if the Norse had decided to raid England any earlier, the damage to both the land and the king's reputation would be significant, I don't imagine any vassal would be content to have a king too preoccupied with a war on the other side of the continent to actually protect their land). Only time will tell whether he will shape into a better king or stick with his flaws.
Æthelred certainly has the potential to be a great ruler, but his lack of strategic knowledge and forward-looking attitude really prevents him from being a good king (currently). Though, to be fair to Æthelred, these are the early days, so maybe he'll redeem himself in the future, despite the stain on his reputation following his accession.

A shame your save file has died, but excellent news that you will carry on without it. I hope you enjoyed your Christmas and will have an excellent New Year's Eve, I look forward to the next chapter in 2025!
Oh, that's sad, but I am glad this doesn't mean the end of this story. If you don't mind me asking, how far have you played? How do you plan to continue it after you reach that point (If you do plan to continue it after that)?
Thankfully, I've played all the way to 1431, and have successfully converted the save to EU4; so the story of Edmund's descendants continues into the Age of Exploration, but I've seldom played to not get too far ahead of where we're at in the story currently.
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Æthelred certainly has the potential to be a great ruler, but his lack of strategic knowledge and forward-looking attitude really prevents him from being a good king (currently). Though, to be fair to Æthelred, these are the early days, so maybe he'll redeem himself in the future, despite the stain on his reputation following his accession.

We are in either for a story of maturing or a tale of hubris and downfall. I can't wait to see which we have in store.

Thankfully, I've played all the way to 1431, and have successfully converted the save to EU4; so the story of Edmund's descendants continues into the Age of Exploration, but I've seldom played to not get too far ahead of where we're at in the story currently.

That's good to hear. I will definitely stick around for the jump into EU4, though I don't know much about the game.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
XVII. Europe in flux (1041–1069)
XVII — EUROPE IN FLUX (1041–1069)

coronation of charlemagne by Friedrich Kaulbach.jpg

Coronation of Charlemagne by Friedrich Kaulbach

Much of Europe in the 11th century experienced significant upheaval following the disastrous 1038 Crusade, chief among these recipients being the Holy Roman Empire, a state of the Carolingians which had, since its formation in Paris in the 10th century, forged an empire which extended from the Bay of Biscay in the west to the banks of the Oder river in the east, with the functioning of the empire reliant on the harmonious cooperation between lord and vassal—only made more difficult with the conquest of Germany sometime in the late-10th century. Following the Cordovan Crusade, the animosity and distrust which many east of the Rhine felt towards their Frankish conquerors only grew; many within Saxony and Bavaria, especially, believed themselves to be the true heirs to Charlemagne's legacy, and had made attempts to shift the geographic centre of the empire eastward, with varying degrees of success since 970. The lack of cooperation between German and French princes in the 1038 Crusade had amplified the level of distrust between the two sides of the state, culminating in a series of revolts by innumerable princes across the peripheries of the empire—Germany and Spain experiencing the most significant turmoil, resulting in the County of Barcelona's formal separation from the Kingdom of France in 1057.

Ironically, the events following the catastrophe of the 1038 Crusade had been important years for the Spanish Reconquista, as the collapse of the Cordovan Emirate's northern client states had given rise to a number of Christian realms—most importantly in Aragon—with the aid of minor expeditions from southern France and Catalonia. With the death of Ramiro, the new Count of Aragon in 1045, Isabella, the Countess of Barcelona had inherited Ramiro's titles via election by a number of Christian barons, and had declared a new Aragonese kingdom the following year, incorporating the County of Barcelona into the Crown of Aragon, and had created the Kingdom of Valencia out of the old Cordovan lands of Sharq al-Andalus in late-1046. In the following decade, the Crown of Aragon—or more specifically, Isabella, had become the main driver of the Reconquista by 1050.
athelred.png

Bottom Left: map of northern Spain, c. 1050

For England, the tumultuous state of Europe in the mid-11th century had little affect on the status quo which had prevailed in Great Britain since 983, with the unification of the Welsh princes. For Æthelred, the concessions that had been made following the disaster of the Cordovan Crusade had been minor, primarily involving the restoration of the Cerdicings' de facto control over much of Wessex in 1044, followed by the appointment of Beorn I—cousin of Æthelred—to the East Anglian Ealdormanry after twelve years of direct administration by the crown. Despite the embarrassment experienced during the 1038 Crusade, support, especially among Mercian and Northumbrian nobles remained secure during the tumult of the mid-11th century. Æthelred also enjoyed the support of the clergy for much of his reign, and upon the appointment of Eadfrith the Good as Archbishop of Canterbury in 1042, had become a significant patron of the Catholic Church in England, and had committed himself to a life of piety and humility. Between 1042 and 1060, Æthelred had contributed to the construction of a number of monastic houses in Essex and Mercia—proof of this being a series of royal charters penned by the king during this period, the most important document among these being a charter granting land to the Diocese of London for the construction of an abbey in Bermondsey in 1044.

In 1048, Æthelred's wife, Benoîte, had passed away, their marriage producing no children. in 1050, Æthelred's cousin and Ealdorman of East Anglia—Beorn—was endorsed to be the next king. Though young, he was charismatic, and had a basic understanding of statecraft. Furthermore, he had a three-year-old son; Beorhtric, ensuring the security of succession should he become the next monarch. During this time of political stability, England had undergone an important period of economic growth. Most notably, the wool trade, which had become an increasingly important English export had seen significant growth between 1030 and 1060, and if it was not the case previously, had become one of the wealthiest industries within England by the 11th century. While many within Wessex still grumbled—the new Lady of Wessex, Ælfthryth, chief among them, much of England's nobility believed Æthelred had proven himself as a capable king—his only shortcoming being the inability to produce an heir—willingly or otherwise.
beorn of east anglia.png

Right: Map of England, 1054 with East Anglia highlighted
Tragically, this period of internal stability would come to an abrupt end following the death of Beorn in 1059 at the age of 30—likely from asphyxiation. For the East Angles, and the Witan, more specifically, there remained an air of uncertainty as to who should become the next king. By this point, Æthelred—nearing 71 by the time of Beorn's passing—had removed himself from the governance of the realm, and had committed himself almost entirely to spiritual matters. While praised by the devout for his piety and saintly demeanour, the 1060s had brought England a king entirely disinterested in the governance of his own kingdom. For the nobility, it had become a scramble for power and favours amongst each other—but more ideally to gain the support of Æthelred. Edward, cousin of the king and Ealdorman of York—a position which had grown to encompass the entirety of Deira, Bernicia and Lindsey—seemed to be the most popular candidate among the Witan. While annual gatherings of the council had become less frequent—largely attributed to the absence of the king in administrative matters—Edward had impressed England's aristocracy with his military competence, having defeated two Viking invasions of Northumbria between 1052 and 1066.

Another, less popular candidate was of the original, ancient line of Cerdic—Ælfthryth—the Lady of Wessex. She was a direct descendant of the last West Saxon king, Sigered, and had staked her claim to the English throne by 1059, citing her royal lineage. However, her reputation suffered due to her involvement in the murder of a key Wessex magnate who had supported Æthelred’s rise to power and intended to do the same for Edward. By 1069, Æthelred, then 79 years old, had fallen gravely ill. The Witenagemot of 1070—held notably without the king’s presence—narrowly elected Edward as the next King of the English.
1735833244632.png

"A Witenagemot" by William Henry Margetson
 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Just managed to post it on the anniversary of this AAR! Hopefully you enjoy this one. Æthelred certainly had a long reign, but when I sat down to write, I was surprised at how few screenshots I'd taken during his time as king. Wasn't a big problem, just a surprise.

How do you think Æthelred went? Was he a good king? I'm curious to see what you think!
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Is England destined to have an 11-century succession crisis in all timelines or what?

It'll be less bloody here, with unbroken centuries of Anglo-Saxon rule, a lot more stability, and the positions and next ruler essentially all agreed long before the old king actually died.

He was a pretty good ruler tbh. Would have been nice if he had an heir, but under this succession system, that's not required for stable transfer of power. And England is far more centralised and stable than the continent, which has all the OTL problems of both France and the HRE, clumped together!
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
athelred.png

Bottom Left: map of northern Spain, c. 1050
How did you manage to separate these images, but still upload them together under one PNG? That's a cool technique!
the death of Beorn in 1059 at the age of 30—likely from asphyxiation.
Does this mean Beorn was murdered? Was it ever discovered who did it? Perhaps Ælfthryth?
How do you think Æthelred went? Was he a good king? I'm curious to see what you think!
He was a good king, minus the Crusade. But that didn't hurt either England or the Catholic position in Iberia too much. The fact that he stepped back from governance for much of his reign means he'll only be mentioned briefly in the history books. The Church should like him though. I wonder, if his descendants ever break from Rome, how his reputation will fare then.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Isn’t this just Northumbria?
Indeed it is, but I've tried to keep the position a little continuous, having named the position 'Ealdorman of York' for a few chapters now—the idea being when the system of Earls is introduced in the 13th century, it's renamed simply to 'Earl of Northumbria.' You're right though, perhaps it would be better, for the sake of brevity, to simply name it Ealdorman of Northumbria, as done previously--with it being quite redundant writing the territories which indeed did historically make up Northumbria. Maybe it's the brain trying to reach a certain word count. :p

How did you manage to separate these images, but still upload them together under one PNG? That's a cool technique!

Does this mean Beorn was murdered? Was it ever discovered who did it? Perhaps Ælfthryth?

He was a good king, minus the Crusade. But that didn't hurt either England or the Catholic position in Iberia too much. The fact that he stepped back from governance for much of his reign means he'll only be mentioned briefly in the history books. The Church should like him though. I wonder, if his descendants ever break from Rome, how his reputation will fare then.
Thank you! I just snip different screenshots and then neatly compile them together on paint.net. Regarding Beorn, I think it'd be more interesting to keep that a secret. :p

I agree, Aethelred was quite a competent ruler--I'd tried to emphasise his piety and saintly demeanour, seeing as he was a paragon, humble and had committed himself to being celibate, even during his marriage with Benoite. The idea is to sanctify him in the coming centuries, but I'm not sure how to make it relevant in ensuing chapters.

It'll be less bloody here, with unbroken centuries of Anglo-Saxon rule, a lot more stability, and the positions and next ruler essentially all agreed long before the old king actually died.

He was a pretty good ruler tbh. Would have been nice if he had an heir, but under this succession system, that's not required for stable transfer of power. And England is far more centralised and stable than the continent, which has all the OTL problems of both France and the HRE, clumped together!
Is England destined to have an 11-century succession crisis in all timelines or what?

Anyway, Æthelred sure changed. While I doubt the world will remember more than his failed crusade, he still had a good reign with much development and stability.
TBC's hit the nail on the head. Definitively, it's not going to be too bloody--even if there would be conflict--it was just the initial problem that Aethelred had no direct descendants, so the Witan had to go searching for someone who'd be worthy of succeeding him. For Aethelred, he'll probably as known as his father, if not slightly more, if I had to guess--seeing as the three decades of peace following his reign don't really have many exciting things, primarily compared to the two kings which come after him.
 
Last edited:
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Given a 'king' in the political system and time he was in, the guy did pretty well. Kept the peace, no invasions, not many wars except the big one (that no one could have avoided) and left the realm intact, peaceful and prosperous. Pretty much grade As across the board for the vast majority of people in the realm, and most of the lords too. Depending on how you look at it, leaving no heir and so the lords elect the best candidate they can agree on, might also be a good thing. Depends on his reign, of course.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Thanks for the new chapter and happy new year.

Tragically, this period of internal stability would come to an abrupt end following the death of Beorn in 1059 at the age of 30—likely from asphyxiation.
Does this mean Beorn was murdered? Was it ever discovered who did it? Perhaps Ælfthryth?
Regarding Beorn, I think it'd be more interesting to keep that a secret. :p
I had exactly the same reaction. Will this ever be revealed? Will your historian unearth the answer to this mystery?
The Witenagemot of 1070—held notably without the king’s presence—narrowly elected Edward as the next King of the English.
More of a game question here. Is Edward of the same House as Æthelred? I know they are related but of the same House? And if not, how do you manage that in the game? Console commands or just switch rulers after a save? Just curious about the process.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
More of a game question here. Is Edward of the same House as Æthelred? I know they are related but of the same House? And if not, how do you manage that in the game? Console commands or just switch rulers after a save? Just curious about the process.
Edward is indeed of the same House as Aethelred! He's his first cousin, once removed, and descended from Wulfstan via his sixth child, Wulfgar (Edward's grandfather), who was a prominent landowner in Yorkshire.

Here's a rather simple family tree:

simple edward family tree.png


I had exactly the same reaction. Will this ever be revealed? Will your historian unearth the answer to this mystery?
We'll have to see--if I can't include it in the next chapter, I'll certainly provide some closure.

Given a 'king' in the political system and time he was in, the guy did pretty well. Kept the peace, no invasions, not many wars except the big one (that no one could have avoided) and left the realm intact, peaceful and prosperous. Pretty much grade As across the board for the vast majority of people in the realm, and most of the lords too. Depending on how you look at it, leaving no heir and so the lords elect the best candidate they can agree on, might also be a good thing. Depends on his reign, of course.
Certainly. Aethelred had an excellent reign as king. The main thing I'd criticise him for, besides his commitment to the 1038 Crusade would be his withdrawal from administrative matters in the final decade of his reign--though I suppose this could be excused by his advanced age.

Leaving no heir does allow the nobility to elect their favourite, but an interesting trend that's been happening is electing monarchs who're already well past their prime--but I suppose it's his grandfather who'd be more at fault for starting such a precedent.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions: