We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
There needs to be a new thread, no one actually gets to see any of the posts we make... there's just too frickin' many.
I was chastised for starting a new thread under a similar heading but seriously... who actually has the time to sift through even a small portion of its pages?
Users complain about "bumping" so I fail to see the necessity in continuing a odd-year long thread that only a fraction of its newer posts are viewed. For those of us who actually spend time cropping/pasting/converting screenshots into posts, insisting on a never-ending thread to "save space" or prevent "redundancy" on the forums seems silly if not snobbishly condescending. In other words, we don't post with the mindset that "I don't care whether or not someone reads my post - I just want to put it out there." We post with the idea we believe our posts to be amusing and hope other forum users feel likewise thus this thread needs to be restarted.
I see all new posts because I'm subscribed to the thread. It's the posts ~200 pages ago that are under viewed. I'd say the first and last pages of a thread are the most viewed by at least me.
I see all new posts because I'm subscribed to the thread. It's the posts ~200 pages ago that are under viewed. I'd say the first and last pages of a thread are the most viewed by at least me.
There you go, you're the perfect man(woman) to start a new thread. I would but I'm rather despised by many veteran forum readers. Therefore I must acquiesce to better men(women) for the job. Apologies if the "(woman/women)" inserts appear inappropriate, I'm trying my best to be politically correct.
You're nitpicking under a false assumption. A lack of replies regarding your strange screenshot =/= a lack of views of it. You've assumed that a good post is automatically worthy of a good reply.
Besides, if you're telling me you haven't been high and spent four hours scrolling through the first/last 200 pages, I question your dedication.
I view all ther posts being made here, but after a few hundred hours it really takes something truly unique to catch my attention, like an AI formed Vlach Wallachia
Why not just declare a revolt against the tyranny of a ruler? Picking a fight for a claimant who is in fact heir to an middle-aged ruler seems rather moot.
This is similar to the times I've seen heirs to kingdoms start civil wars to lower CA many times. Why would you do that if you're the heir to the throne?
Amusing is when the AI picks a fights with an entire dynasty.
The war-score is right after the mass "call to arms."
I already posted this in the bug forum, but I feel like this is strange enough to be here as well.
I thought it was just a normal, Norse adventurer.. I was a huge Messalian Empire. Zoroastrianism had been completely wiped out..
Or had it?
Behold, the great Valdemar, truly destined to restore Zoroastrianism's greatness, bringing the light to these Messalian infidels! :rofl:
He might just be claiming he is the Saoshyant to get the Persian Support in the Region. You know how it is with Politician Warriors, they can't get anything accomplished with just their own core.
Don't adventurers need claims to attack you? The only other persons that have claims on my land are my brothers, no one else (as this is only my second character). I play my Slavic duke of Weligrad in Pomerania while I got this message about a random Catholic Catalan courtier (with a claim on the dutchy of Barcelona) is going to attack me. Is this a bug & instead of Barcelona he is attacking me? Or working as intended & I should expect another random attack from a random Indian/Greek/Irish (or whatever random courtier)?