Okaaay.. )
1. "Enemy will surrender when X + Y - Z + 1d10 will give at least 14"
2. "We have 14, enemy had surrender"
3. "But who cares, just continue the fun! Enemy yet has a chance to not surrender"
Thank you
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
1. "Enemy will surrender when X + Y - Z + 1d10 will give at least 14"
2. "We have 14, enemy had surrender"
3. "But who cares, just continue the fun! Enemy yet has a chance to not surrender"
I can not make sense of it figuratively or literally.
So specififying wich of the two it is does not really help.
Somehow that makes even less sense then what you wrote before.
If it consistently requires 15 or more, then it is a "off by one" error.
In either case I can not figure out how that relates to your headcanon of siegers retreating on a 80% capture. When it clearly says "Surrender Chance".
it's been possible for the Stellarite to spawn in brown dwarf systems for a while.
Still is exceptionally weird for a brown dwarf to support a Gaia.
Well not exactly sure what is causing this
But if anyone has any idea on how to fix it, I'd love to hear it. Not like it affects actual gameplay but it makes the title screen look weird.
EDIT: Went through my GeForce Experience and optimized it... Now its fixed wtf
But if anyone has any idea on how to fix it, I'd love to hear it. Not like it affects actual gameplay but it makes the title screen look weird.
EDIT: Went through my GeForce Experience and optimized it... Now its fixed wtf
Last edited:
I'd actually love to see brown dwarves spawn as special systems (like pulsars and neutrons), with a very small chance of having habitable planets.
But yeah, definitely not the kind of place you'd expect to find a Gaia world. Nor would a stellar devourer be likely to take interest in one.
Guess so. Technology, can't live with it and can't live without it.
This one is funny because the stellarite devourer special project specifically says the point of it is to reignite the star, and the star is clearly not ignited.
GeForce was channeling Clippy.
"It looks like you are trying to play a game. Can I help you with that?"
Deposits taht are only supposed to be script-spawned onto habitats sometimes appear on planets at random. Another example is Zro deposits.
Funny exploit - enigmatic cache jumps between 2 of my systems and gives XP everytime. Send my whole and they are fighting without remorse. They aren't even able to retreat or move because of constant bait and switch.
Doing an easygoing achievment run on Cadet (waiting for 2.3.2). Driven Assimilator got vassalized after he lost a war. That game is so weird I was able to get 6 Protectorates from 12 empires total (Medium Galaxy). Half of the map belongs to me without even one war. Is that a bug that Driven Assimilator can be vassalized?
Doing an easygoing achievment run on Cadet (waiting for 2.3.2). Driven Assimilator got vassalized after he lost a war. That game is so weird I was able to get 6 Protectorates from 12 empires total (Medium Galaxy). Half of the map belongs to me without even one war. Is that a bug that Driven Assimilator can be vassalized?
Nope. Assimilators are not genocidal, just very unpopular. Think less Exterminator and more Barbaric Despoiler.
This is a bug in the planet creation. So any fix woulld require a enw savegame once it has happened.
But it should be fixed in 2.3.2 beta:
"* Habitat specific orbital deposits should no longer rarely appear on non-habitats"
