-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
For a Red Star, he really is a rather Dwarfy one
An M dwarf larger than a G main sequence? Okay...
(I'm guessing that's supposed to be a red giant, not a dwarf.)
I mean the other two Red Star are the Giant and Super Giant.
Of all the unrealistic things in Stellaris, how hard would it be to get proper star models for each type? It's not on the same level as, say, orbital mechanics after all; it's just the relative sizes of stars! Anyway, that's just been a personal gripe of mine.
An M dwarf larger than a G main sequence? Okay...
(I'm guessing that's supposed to be a red giant, not a dwarf.)
Are those models unrealistic?
You seem to asume that a Red Dwarf has to be smaler then a G-class star. Star Classes are not remotely that well organized.
Also stuff like a Blue giant would have to be insane.
How... wouldn't it be? Red dwarves are defined by being, well, dwarves.
And Atoms are by definition no divisible.
Please tell that to Neutrons, Electrons and Protons. Also Nuclear Fission.
Also everyone else still using Atom for it's original meaning:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomicity
Somebody named them Red Dwarves once. The name stuck. It will stick, even if it no longer fits.
Red dwarves and G-class stars are both on the main sequence, so the relationships between radius, mass, lifetime, and luminosity actually does tend to make sense. He's right to assume they are smaller. But yea, it isn't strictly a standard definition IIRC, however it looks to me like the OP correctly marked it as strange (given that the tooltip says "M" class). If you have something showing an M class that is larger than other main sequence stars, I'd (honestly) love to know the details.
So your argument is "Some words change meaning, therefore this word has also definitely 100% changed its meaning too"? You see the problem here, right?
Also I have literally not once seen anyone use Atom as 'indivisible' except in the sentence "Back then the word atomos was used to mean indivisible".
To be fair, it's a pretty understandable error. Somebody just typed "pc_m_star" instead of "pc_m_giant_star" in the star classes file.
I imagine they'll get to it once they finally fix Duuk's bug.
The largest red dwarves we know of (and we know of a lot), are only about half the size of the sun. Any larger, and they're no longer m-type, now they're classed as orange type (k-type) stars. Those can be about the size of the sun, but less massive, and dimmer... and orange obviously (technically, all stars appear white when there's no atmosphere, but that's boring for the game). The only m-type stars larger than the sun are red giants.
While I'd like the relative sizes to be correct, they don't need to make their actual size correct. Otherwise, yeah, you'd end up with systems where the star takes up most of the solar system. Interesting, but then you wouldn't be able to see your starbase in the center
Nope. That is why I asked:
Given the sizes of Stars, I can see why they are not quite up to scale:
If we did them to Size, Aldebaran would literally fill the System view.
Or Sol would have a unclickable Sun. Nevermind the Planets in sol.
For a Bunch of Exterminators, these guys sure like to make more of themselves.
Their planets are pretty much Junkyards. The garbage moves, sure, but garbage all the same.
They have ironically been the most pacifistic empire in this playthrough.
So in 314 years or 3768 months they build 900+ robots or about 4 months per robot... that is either an insane growth rate or they for some odd reason really stacked their core planets and lost where ever those bots were originally build, or it is just a modded game with some odd values gone wrong.
Of course they do. They are about exterminating other species.
For a Bunch of Exterminators, these guys sure like to make more of themselves.
Just report it as the bug it is. Nothing strange about any bug.
Their planets are pretty much Junkyards. The garbage moves, sure, but garbage all the same.
First they were pacifist., because everyone as allied against them.
They have ironically been the most pacifistic empire in this playthrough.
Then they were pasifist, because of above bug.
Again, nothing "strange" going on here.
I got the Shadow Play modifier on Mars of all places. I think we would have noticed that by now.
I got the Shadow Play modifier on Mars of all places. I think we would have noticed that by now.
That's nothing, back in the Apocalypse days I discovered an anomaly from Guilli's Planet Modifers suggesting Venus was shifted out of time!
Well, that explains Venus's retrograde rotation...That's nothing, back in the Apocalypse days I discovered an anomaly from Guilli's Planet Modifers suggesting Venus was shifted out of time!
Unfortunately I cannot look back at my anomaly logs so I cannot say ... but maybe.
By the way, this is an ironman save, therefore no mods should have any effect on this.
By the way, this is an ironman save, therefore no mods should have any effect on this.