What we know:
Ironhead claims Jacksonian Missionary is resistance. Thus if Jacksonian is a spy, so is Ironhead, but the reverse is not necessarily true.
Falc claims Audren is resistance. Thus if Audren is a spy, so is Falc, but the reverse is not necessarily true.
At least one of Ironhead, Jacksonian, Audren, and Falc is a spy. Combined with above, we know at least one of Ironhead and Falc must be a spy.
At least one of Audren, Jacksonian, Deathbywombat, and Panzer is a spy. Ironhead claims Audren did not sabotage, so either A) Audren is resistance and Ironhead is telling the truth, B) Audren is a spy and Ironhead is lying, meaning he's a spy as well, or C)Audren is a spy and Ironhead is telling the truth, meaning there's another spy on the team. Both A and C lead us to the conclusion that at least one of Jacksonian, Deathbywombat, and Panzer is a spy.
Audren claims Daffius is a spy, so at least one of them is a spy.
What does this mean?
I'm going to run with two possibilities here, one where Audren is a spy, and the other where he is resistance. Having been on every team, and having three claim interactions with other players, he is the lynchpin of this game.
If we assume Audren is a spy, then first we know Falc is also a spy. This explains the first sabotaged team, but the second becomes troublesome. Either Audren sabotaged it, and thus we know Ironhead is lying and his spymate, or Audren did not sabotage it and there was another spy on the team. For Jacksonian to be a spy in this scenario, Ironhead would have to be one too, and I find the likelihood of all the spies checking each other day 1 to be implausible, so I'll assume he's resistance in this scenario. Thus if we assume Spy Audren did not sabotage, his spymate would have to be Deathbywombat or Panzer. Mission 1 Audren gave Panzer Take Responsibility, and on Mission 2 Deathbywombat rejected the sabotaged mission. I'm thus more inclined to say Panzer fits better as a potential spymate for Spy Audren. So the spy team with assuming Audren as a spy would be Audren-Falc-Ironhead-Unknown or Audren-Falc-Panzer-Unknown. However there's one thing that bothers me here. Daffius, AvatarofKhaine, Ironhead, and Panzer all changed from rejecting my team to approving Deathbywombat's team, with the only change being taking me out for Panzer. Because of this, I am more inclined to believe that Panzer is a spy, and one of the other inexplicable switches is the final spy. Even though Audren is claiming Daffius is a spy, I don't think it is at all impossible for them to both be spies. In fact, assuming Panzer and audren are spymates, Daffius fits in perfectly. They've set up a situation where we'll inevitably trust one of them, so whatever happens mission 4, they'll have a spy on mission 5. Audren-Falc-Panzer-Daffius thus seems the most likely spy team if we assume Audren is resistance.
Actually I'm really unsure about this. If Audren was a spy and already on the team, then why would Panzer getting added to the team gain so many approvals? My objective reaction would be to say a spy was switched off to avoid a double sabotage, but I know I'm not a spy. My knee-jerk reaction has been to assume Panzer must be a spy for getting all those vote switches, without anything to indicate him as a likely resistance member. But if we're assuming Audren is a spy, that doesn't make sense. Why would Daffius, Avatar, and Ironhead switch like that? The former two have even admitted they didn't think it through right. Perhaps there is nothing there? I had been assuming Ironhide was merely a stupid resistance member, Lord knows we've had too many of those over the years, but his card distribution for mission three, and his proposal both look quite bad if we assume Audren is a spy. He give opinion maker to Panzer and Ironhead, which hurts them, and NC to Falc, who we know is a spy in this scenario. His proposal was rejected by everyone but himself. If he's a spy, then his team had at least three spies on the team, which the spies definitely wouldn't want. Would he have gone all out and put a fourth spy on the team (deathbywombat)? So rethinking it, perhaps the spy team if Audren is a spy is Audren-Falc-Ironhide-Deathbywombat. Really shaky on the last one, but it has to be one of him, Panzer, and Ironhead, and Ironhide hurt both of them by giving them Opinion makers. Though perhaps he didn't realize that? I think I'll get nowhere trying to work that out.
If we assume Audren is resistance on the other hand, we know Daffius is a spy. We thus also know that at least one of Ironhead and Falc is a spy, and that at least one of Jacksonian, DeathbyWombat, and Panzer is also a spy. In this scenario we know a spy was among those who switched their vote when Panzer was added to a team instead of me, so Panzer seems a likely spy. Since Ironhead also switched his vote, he seems more likely to be the spy between Falc and Ironhead. I want to say Avatar would be the last spy in this case, but that seems far too easy. Really not sure who'd be the last spy though. If Jacksonian or Deathbywombat were a spy, we're back at the scenario of "Why would switching me out for Panzer get so many switches" except this time we know a spy was in the switch. Ironhide's a possibility once again, but his distribution makes absolutely no sense in this case. Both Falc and Ironhead being spies seems unlikely. I really want to say Avatar is the spy here, but that's just too easy and convenient.
Perhaps Ironhead is resistance, and just for some reason switched with a spy when a spy got added to a team? Then Falc would be a spy instead, and Ironhide fits better as the last spy, though there are still problems. Daffius-Panzer-Falc-Ironhide?
Why do all my possibilities indicate Daffius and Panzer are actually on the same side? And that Panzer isn't on the same side as Audren? Am I giving too much weight to the votes that were switched when i was replaced with Panzer? Ugh, I feel like this has all been a waste. Whatever, I'm posting it anyways. Maybe I'll think more clearly later.
.png){kind=avatar}
