-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Aedan said the same thing 
What I might do is give it to someone next to me on the list (Jacksonian or MatthewFW) in case we get an Overheard Conversation. If we do, then they could check me to verify what I've said about Jeray.
What I might do is give it to someone next to me on the list (Jacksonian or MatthewFW) in case we get an Overheard Conversation. If we do, then they could check me to verify what I've said about Jeray.
Aedan said the same thing
What I might do is give it to someone next to me on the list (Jacksonian or MatthewFW) in case we get an Overheard Conversation. If we do, then they could check me to verify what I've said about Jeray.
Mhm, fair enough, I can't argue with that. In general I do think it's a good idea to concentrate info on a group of players who are close in the leader order
Aedan said the same thing
What I might do is give it to someone next to me on the list (Jacksonian or MatthewFW) in case we get an Overheard Conversation. If we do, then they could check me to verify what I've said about Jeray.
This is a good plan, I support it.
The way I see it, one of Tamius and Jeray has to be a spy, although they could also both be. That's a slightly better than 50% chance of Tamius being a spy.
Meanwhile of the remaining 7 players, only 2/7 are spies. I would rather that both Tamius and Jeray be kept off teams for the time being.
The fact that I'm also not on this one means it's quite unlikely to succeed from my POV
Reject
Meanwhile of the remaining 7 players, only 2/7 are spies. I would rather that both Tamius and Jeray be kept off teams for the time being.
The fact that I'm also not on this one means it's quite unlikely to succeed from my POV
Reject
Normally, when I don't have enough information to make an informed decision, I will use RNG to decide my vote, but given that at least one of Tamius and jeray is a spy, I'd prefer they were kept off teams for the time being.
REJECT
REJECT
So much stuff flying around round 1 geez
this is a bit different than the board game I'm used to XD
this is a bit different than the board game I'm used to XD
Since there have been questions on the veracity of my methods when I've used RNG to decide my vote in the past, I will make explicit how I intend to use RNG in this case, if and when I do:
If the sum of all the digits in the proposal's post number (not the number displayed next to the +Quote and Reply buttons, the number in the direct link to the post) is even, I will approve the proposal, else I will reject it.
This should suffice as a method for RNG.
Obviously, I will not be using this method if I have reason to trust or distrust the team provided.
If the sum of all the digits in the proposal's post number (not the number displayed next to the +Quote and Reply buttons, the number in the direct link to the post) is even, I will approve the proposal, else I will reject it.
This should suffice as a method for RNG.
Obviously, I will not be using this method if I have reason to trust or distrust the team provided.
It could also be that you're a spy and trying to smear Jeray, so I agree that neither of you should go on trips for the moment.
Reject
I'm on it, which is good, so normally I'd approve. However, Tamius is on it, and at least one of him and jeray have to be spies. It's a 50-50 choice between them whereas if the third person came from the rest of the players, it's a 3/5 chance it's a resistance member (assuming both prior players are resistance, which I know I am, and statistically Matthew likely is too). So it's safer to keep both Tamius and Jeray off missions until we can secure greater information on them.
Reject
Reject
Tamius' team of:
Tamius, Matthew, aedan
Was rejected 1-8:
Mission 1, Round 2, 4 Rejected Missions to Go:
Jacksonian Missionary needs to propose a team of three players. One sabotage will fail this mission.
Tamius, Matthew, aedan
Was rejected 1-8:
In Favor:
Tamius
Opposed:
Jacksonian Missionary
Panzer Commader
JermanTK
aedan777
jeray2000
Wagonlitz
Hazbot
MatthewFW190
Tamius
Opposed:
Jacksonian Missionary
Panzer Commader
JermanTK
aedan777
jeray2000
Wagonlitz
Hazbot
MatthewFW190
Mission 1, Round 2, 4 Rejected Missions to Go:
Jacksonian Missionary needs to propose a team of three players. One sabotage will fail this mission.
Also, my own mistake for not emphasizing it earlier, but if you are on the mission, don't forget to PM me as to whether you will sabotage or support the mission at the same time you cast your vote in-thread.
If tamius wants to give me overheard conversation before I propose my team that would be helpful.
Tamius gave her other plot card, Passionate Speech, to Matthew.
Open Up was given to jeray2000, who revealed his role to tamius.