Rather the point.At this point, the English nobles would be entirely correct to complain. France is wide open for looting and pillaging, and they aren't joining in!
- 1
Rather the point.At this point, the English nobles would be entirely correct to complain. France is wide open for looting and pillaging, and they aren't joining in!
Careful. Your 15th century misogyny card is showingSilly woman.
But forgiven for this wonderful turn of phrase. Well done!...and France lies as unruffled as his own queen.
Now that would be a trick since Elizabeth of York was not born historically for another 14 years. Goodness, her would be father Edward is still only 10. Now if you mean Elizabeth Plantagenet (York and Cecily's 2nd daughter), she is already around and about 8 years old. I suppose that's doable in 1452.Reading about her fear of being replaced, made me stop and listen to Henry The VIII, I Am by Herman's Hermits. A plan for Henry VI, ship Richard of York and Margaret of Anjou to the chopping block and marry Elizabeth of York. Cecily for mother-in-law is not a great plan, but it is a plan. Thank you for the update.
From your lips to York's ears.Well. That settles it. Time to place York on the throne, if only for the survival of the royal house of Plantagenet.
Careful. Your 15th century misogyny card is showing
Pretty much my thought process as well.But forgiven for this wonderful turn of phrase. Well done!
Call up Jabberjock, the filthy little thing. Apparently any type of love scene is within their powersTo all - I must say that love scenes are among the most difficult for me to write. It is not that I'm a prude or any such thing but intimate moments like the above are somewhat uncomfortable to describe because they are, by definition, generally very private and work at their own pace and with their own chemistry. That said, I was really quite proud of the above scene as I thought I captured well enough the kinetic connection between the two parties.
Has anyone heard from Jabberjock lately? Currently, I would recommend @Revan86 or @Peter Ebbesen for your NSFW scenes.Pretty much my thought process as well.
Call up Jabberjock, the filthy little thing. Apparently any type of love scene is within their powers
Given that I write them for comedy and sheer implausibility (don't try this at home), that might not be wise if they are intended to be taken serious.Has anyone heard from Jabberjock lately? Currently, I would recommend @Revan86 or @Peter Ebbesen for your NSFW scenes.
Pretty much my thought process as well.
Call up Jabberjock, the filthy little thing. Apparently any type of love scene is within their powers
I don't think we have see the great @JabberJock14 since mid last year. He did indeed write some corkers and is indeed missed!Has anyone heard from Jabberjock lately? Currently, I would recommend @Revan86 or @Peter Ebbesen for your NSFW scenes.
There is no doubt it gets VERY complicated in this era because apparently naming was not creative AT ALL!I was referring to Elizabeth Plantagenet. But in all fairness, I was using Wikipedia (my source for all things semi-factual) and she is referred to as Elizabeth of York in her mother's entry and her entry is titled Elizabeth of York, Duchess of Suffolk. Any of her sisters would work as a possible replacement for Margaret. For Richard, would King Henry as son-in-law be enough or is anything less than King Richard a non-starter.
I mainly give comment here because I believe this is the first, and only, comment that the amazing @Peter Ebbesen has ever given to one of my many AARs as we have shared these boards over this last 20 years. It is an honor!! I truly mean that, sir. You are a hero!Given that I write them for comedy and sheer implausibility (don't try this at home), that might not be wise if they are intended to be taken serious.
Hence the good J-Jock was my pick. Plausible relations between a brother and sister are not beyond their reach. Multiple times.Given that I write them for comedy and sheer implausibility (don't try this at home), that might not be wise if they are intended to be taken serious.
All it took was 'heh, willies'.I mainly give comment here because I believe this is the first, and only, comment that the amazing @Peter Ebbesen has ever given to one of my many AARs as we have shared these boards over this last 20 years. It is an honor!! I truly mean that, sir. You are a hero!
First of all, York's "army" is not in France. Only a supporter of his rights (Salisbury.) And that force in Calais is lead by Talbot (who was actually a York supporter as well in many ways before his death.) Most of what will come to bear are still in England, York included.A thought occurs. If York's army is in France and Somerset's army is in France, and all their commanders are in France...can't the King just crush their estates at home and kill anyone who objects? You'd think it cruel or abrupt but it is:
A) exactly what the King of France did to save his kingdom at the end of the 100 years war.
B) exactly what Henry Tudor is going to do to end the wars of the roses
C) just plain common sense
Mm. Very much a large civil war on the cards then.Most of what will come to bear are still in England, York included.
I would say the French Lords got a lot richer and more powerful over the course of the century, culminating in finally pushing the English and Burgundian out, securing all the borders of France, making a deal with both the English and Burgundian to stay out and not come back (which worked surprisingly well), and finally annexing Brittany. At the time of Henry 7th, France was strong basically because instead of several thousand feudal lords with limited powers, they had around 100 very rich and powerful lords mostly dedicated to holding the kingdom together. Such a small number holding almost everything not owned by the Church made them ripe for picking by a clever monarch (or clever royal court before then, French Cardinals are the infamous examples of that).A is debatable. While too simplistic, to be sure, the flower of much French nobility was destroyed at Agincourt. It took them some time to rebuild and they were given that time thanks to the minority government of Henry VI and his bickering uncles. However, once they did is what you see to begin this work. I am not sure it is accurate to say that the French King crushed his estates to save his kingdom.
Once they've done consolidating their own lands, they will be coming for Brittany, Aquitaine and Burgundy. Aquitaine is the largest bit, and easiest to take, but the poorest. Brittany removes a military and cultural rival. Burgundy holds the single wealthiest county and duchy in the Medieval world, along with various other holdings that are rightfully split between the HRE and the French Crown.the French lords are quite sovereign on their own, even if they can come together to defeat this English army (which was surprising but not entirely unexpected.)
Henry 7th is one very overlooked monarch. He was very lucky in that every single rival of his was already dead when he took the throne, and the aristocracy was depleted enough he could get away with an awful lot of stuff...but his accomplishments and court are nonetheless remarkable. Before he was even king, he negotiated a treaty with the French, the Bretons and the Burgundians, where all of them basically said they'd recognize his rule, aid him in getting his throne, and provide resources to get England back on its feet.And finally B - Tudor had seen much of the work done for him already by the time he reached the throne as many rivals had already killed each other during the WOTR. There is no doubt that he was ruthless in hunting down anyone else that might threaten, but those were few and far between by the late 1480s.
Didn't actually see the map. Christ, France is in a bad way. Might actually be better to leave and avoid the clusterf*ck coming to that part of Europe as everyone fights over scraps. Instead, take something defensible like Brittany, or attack someone else whilst distracted, like Castille or Scandinavia?Do my eyes deceive me or is that a two-star French General with thirty-thousand high elan troops getting his butt by a one-star in-bred English General with twelve-thousand English troops that are busy fighting each other to get on a boat and sail somewhere, anywhere? Thank you for updating.
You are certainly not wrong about that.Such a small number holding almost everything not owned by the Church made them ripe for picking by a clever monarch (or clever royal court before then, French Cardinals are the infamous examples of that).
Or that, if they can get back to that position.Once they've done consolidating their own lands, they will be coming for Brittany, Aquitaine and Burgundy.
Or that! Miserly and ruthless he was, but we aren't there yet (if we ever do get there.)Henry 7th is one very overlooked monarch. ...
He was an astonishingly successful monarch in most respects, if not very popular.
Great to see you return and see above in regards to Margaret. I really did feel bad about placing her in such a position but it made sense.Well, it seems as if those accusations of Margaret cheating on the King aren't untrue...
The situation in England grows more volatile, but France is in a very dire position.
The screenshot may be deceiving. I suspect that the French morale was already down but they in the end defeated the English there and we were forced a scattered retreat all the way to Castile. I decided to avoid that last bit in the narrative. It was a promising move, but ultimately a failure (which, of course, does work for the narrative.)Do my eyes deceive me or is that a two-star French General with thirty-thousand high elan troops getting his butt by a one-star in-bred English General with twelve-thousand English troops that are busy fighting each other to get on a boat and sail somewhere, anywhere? Thank you for updating.
Yes they are which made the loss in Saintonge all the more disappointing. Was hoping to take at least some advantage there.Didn't actually see the map. Christ, France is in a bad way. Might actually be better to leave and avoid the clusterf*ck coming to that part of Europe as everyone fights over scraps. Instead, take something defensible like Brittany, or attack someone else whilst distracted, like Castille or Scandinavia?