All caught up at last and truly it was a reward worthy of the time. What can I say that has not already been said, what praise can I add that has not already been bestowed? Very little, but I will do it anyway as "To comment is divine" and all that.
I am interested by your take on King Henry, an almost unworldly man who knows he is not really up to the job and so mostly ignores it, to his own detriment and that of the Kingdom. His recent discovery of a hint of iron in his back and fire in his soul is indeed a change and a very long overdue one. Had he shown such spirit a few years ago none of this need happen, while the seriousness of the situation may have played a part I do think his wife's blatant and treasonous infidelity is perhaps the bigger cause. A woman who can betray her husband and adopted country in such a base manner is capable of anything, I think this is the reason he is taking the allegations against her more seriously.
While I agree with York's complaints, and feel nothing but bafflement and pity for those misguided souls who attack his motives, he doesn't have the temperament or the patience for this game. As Salisbury said earlier he gave Somerset rope but did not give him enough time to hang himself, which Somerset would inevitably do because he is an arrogant, out of his depth idiot, yet York charged in and squandered the chance. In some ways there is a parallel between York and Henry as both are temperamentally ill suited to the role they find themselves in, yet feel compelled to blunder on regardless as they think it their duty. That said I do believe York doesn't want the throne and that he just wants what is best for the kingdom, the problem is his methods of going about it are catastrophically counter-productive. On which note while I can see why you like writing Cecily, and I certainly enjoy reading about her, she has not advised her husband well in this, he does not need encouragement to push ahead but reassurance that he can afford to wait and that being subtle will bring better results.
I do enjoy seeing the Nevilles in this, Salisbury is one of the very few loyal, decent and competent players in this (many have one or two of those characteristics, few have all three) and I do love a charming schemer so of course I like Warwick showing the hints of why he became the Kingmaker. The Court clique around the Queen I will not waste words on, knaves to a man though admittedly of varying degrees, and I like the interchangeable bishops and York calling them out on that.
Finally I come to the true villain of the piece, an awful piece of work entirely without redeeming character or virtue. Naturally it's Margaret of Anjou. Traitor, strumpet, liar, ill-counsellor and whining idiot are just some of the phrases used to describe her, though others are less kind. And rightly so. Clearly more loyal to France than England and certainly more loyal to herself than anyone or anything else, I can only hope she gets her richly deserved comeuppance sooner rather than later.