The same circular game, the progress like one of those German carousel clocks. With the spring about to break.
- 1
It is indeed true that it is (and was) a back and forth thing. Those who have studied the WOTR know that it was not all out war for 30 years, but those that have not do sometimes think that once the spark was lit it went right into kill or be killed. Instead, it was much more of a slow progress towards the first clash as neither "side" really wanted to come to blows.The same circular game, the progress like one of those German carousel clocks. With the spring about to break.
I may have been too on the nose with it, but as I've studied Humphrey Stafford, Duke of Buckingham he was very much of a peace negotiator rather than an agitator. The question is, how long will he be able to successfully do that?At least Buckingham was able to talk some sense to York. If he be wise enough, then let Somerset hang himself at king last.
I cannot really say too much for fear of spoiling things too much though those that know the history well will surely see what is coming. I will have more to say about it when we get there, but hopefully I am created a realistic path towards that eventuality. The next scene really is a part II of this previous one to open the chapter. It just got too long so I split it into two. It will fill in more blanks, to be sure.A sense of the King becoming confused in that update, combine that with Buckingham's news and you have a worrying combination for the future. The King declining, the Court Faction growing in power, dark times. Slightly naive of York to ever expect Margaret to change, she will remain a cancer at the heart of the realm until she is removed. Alas I fear she will do quite catastrophic damage before that occurs, not least because she blames York for the crimes of others (and her own crimes) and is still holding a grudge about it.
To use a mildly anachronistic term there is an unstable powder keg feel to things, too many personal grudges, personal retinues and ex-soldiers looking for work. No doubt there is a mostly bloodless route through all this but the story title does quite heavily suggests the kegs will indeed explode violently. That said Cecily does seem clear eyed and competent, perhaps she will arrange a tragic accident to occur to the Queen while she is in residence and so avert disaster? I will not be holding me breath on that one!![]()
Ah, possibly worried that the York household is plentiful, strong and rich whilst his own stock is all dried up and barren, or so frosty as to be untouchable.Yet he once more seemed to take an odd mood when baby Dickon was again presented near the end of the feast as the nurse was to put him to bed.
A very good idea, considering how wealthy the Dukes are going to become, and their vital role in serving as a buffer between the HRE and France.“We had hoped for a stronger alliance with Burgundy,”
The Queen has the potential to be a tragic figure, who is loyal to a kingdom that may very well, in game, cease to exist within the century (EUIV is merciless when it comes to early french collapses). However, she is exceedingly unlikable, fantastically anti-English, petty, vindictive and, in the worst case, sinfully stupid. Thus far, she has irritated or ostracized everyone on either side of the political divide aside from Somerset, whom most also dislike/hate.A sad read, the malevolent spirit of Margaret hovering over it and poisoning the relationship despite Richard making frankly heroic efforts to make it work. Henry is so close to realising his wife is an evil traitor, but alas I fear he will decline further before he has a chance to realise the truth.
As has been said, the terrible marriage plan has Margarets paws all over it. Doubtless she knew it would be unacceptable which is why she bullied Henry into making the offer, because even he must realise the offer is offensive. Strangely I find myself somewhat sympathetic to Buckingham, not that much obviously as he's picked his side and must deal with the consequences, but it is one thing to be in the faction around an easily led King, quite another to find that King is but a puppet for a Queen who's only loyalties are France, herself and whoever she is currently trying to bed.
But of course the issue is that France can’t just suddenly cease existing as a de jure entity. Even collapsing de facto is a shock to Europe that makes the loss of Constantinople look minuscule in comparison. You cannot just say the single-most important kingdom in the whole of Christendom is no more and that a large chunk of Western Europe is now anarchic wasteland.That being said, I am still intrigued by an England which does not really lose the 100 years war (in that they are not not kicked out of Europe, and France ceases to exist) nor have a War of the Roses situation happen, just a very uneasy peace. This is good news for the common folk, who will get rich and happy in the peacetime, and either very good news or very bad news for Scotland, Wales and Ireland (England is either going to spend that time doing nothing, or expand into them as English lords try to boost their own land and power).
I will touch on the "marriage" offer below, but you hit on exactly where I was going with Henry's oddness about baby Richard. That has to be a hard pill to swallow with what he's already gone through and is still going through.Ah, possibly worried that the York household is plentiful, strong and rich whilst his own stock is all dried up and barren, or so frosty as to be untouchable.
A very good idea, considering how wealthy the Dukes are going to become, and their vital role in serving as a buffer between the HRE and France.
This business with Henry's 'peace offer' seems a deliberate attempt to sideline the closest heir to the throne aside from his own nonexistent issue. I sense Margery's hand in this, and therefore view it with great suspicion. At this point, whilst Henry has my sympathies, I am very much in the Yorkist camp. The south needs to be...cleansed, just a little.
I'm pleased that Richard came off that way because as much as I had him holding back, it was all I could do not to refute as well. It was not easy for either of us.A sad read, the malevolent spirit of Margaret hovering over it and poisoning the relationship despite Richard making frankly heroic efforts to make it work. Henry is so close to realising his wife is an evil traitor, but alas I fear he will decline further before he has a chance to realise the truth.
As has been said, the terrible marriage plan has Margarets paws all over it. Doubtless she knew it would be unacceptable which is why she bullied Henry into making the offer, because even he must realise the offer is offensive. Strangely I find myself somewhat sympathetic to Buckingham, not that much obviously as he's picked his side and must deal with the consequences, but it is one thing to be in the faction around an easily led King, quite another to find that King is but a puppet for a Queen who's only loyalties are France, herself and whoever she is currently trying to bed.
Richard of York certainly accepts you as liegeman! He needs all the help he can get.The Queen has the potential to be a tragic figure, who is loyal to a kingdom that may very well, in game, cease to exist within the century (EUIV is merciless when it comes to early french collapses). However, she is exceedingly unlikable, fantastically anti-English, petty, vindictive and, in the worst case, sinfully stupid. Thus far, she has irritated or ostracized everyone on either side of the political divide aside from Somerset, whom most also dislike/hate.
No matter what else happens, it is only a matter of time before she is brought to heel by someone.
I'm also seriously starting to contemplate switching sides and backing the Yorkists, because then at least England will have the strongest and wealthiest noble line and family in power, and an untouchable power base in the north to work with. They are capable and perfectly willing to go to war with the southern lords and with France to get their kingdom back up to where it was at the height of the 100 years war, and even better than that.
That being said, I am still intrigued by an England which does not really lose the 100 years war (in that they are not not kicked out of Europe, and France ceases to exist) nor have a War of the Roses situation happen, just a very uneasy peace. This is good news for the common folk, who will get rich and happy in the peacetime, and either very good news or very bad news for Scotland, Wales and Ireland (England is either going to spend that time doing nothing, or expand into them as English lords try to boost their own land and power).
On a gameplay level, much of that is true (as is what TBC says above about Burgundy being a nice buffer between what is left of France and the HRE.) I will say that at this date, Charles (who will become the Bold) is still just Count. Philip the Good is still alive and running this particular show. So just in terms of who might possibly inherit, it is Philip with that particular claim. And do not forget the Dauphine Louis. He is still a player in the French game. That said, it would be prudent for Margaret to see to her advantage as a possible Queen of England AND France. But that would require her to be forward thinking. Thus far, we've not seen that too much. She is reactionary. It is her nature.But of course the issue is that France can’t just suddenly cease existing as a de jure entity. Even collapsing de facto is a shock to Europe that makes the loss of Constantinople look minuscule in comparison. You cannot just say the single-most important kingdom in the whole of Christendom is no more and that a large chunk of Western Europe is now anarchic wasteland.
Someone needs to be crowned King of France, and with Charles VII having clearly lost all legitimacy and divine favor (I don’t know how you explain this in universe - maybe the wrath of God for hanging Joan of Arc out to die?), there’s three candidates: King Henry, Duke Charles of Burgundy, and Duke Charles of Orleans (who we can effectively ignore as right now he’s a Burgundian pawn). Obviously Henry’s got a stronger claim, but Charles has control of the ground, so likely Charles… except EUIV has been all but hard-coded at this point for the OTL crisis of the Burgundian Succession to fire, which means Charles might not be as appetizing a candidate, and there’s the issue of who the hell Marie of Burgundy marries and by extension inherits their claims (I’ve literally seen Oldenburg get it in one particularly cursed playthrough).
If Richard, Henry, Margaret, and Somerset could all just stop sniping at each other long enough, they could literally crown Henry and Margaret as king and queen of France at Rheims inside two years… but that requires them to not be the people they are.
I wonder if there’s any mileage though in convincing Margaret to support her husband’s claim to France so that her father and uncle get to keep some ducal lands and titles in the Anglo-French empire rather than lose everything to the conquering Burgundians…
Boooo. Just imagine Margaret's face when her beloved France disappears. And that's without considering the many other considerable benefits of a world without France.I will go ahead and say that I do not allow France to be totally wiped out.
Technically no, but only because the bar for that is so very low. Just on a consanguinity basis the Habsburgs had many worse matches and of course there are disasters like Margaret of Valois and Henry of Navarre.Also...would it really be the worst match in the world?
Maddening indeed. If I were playing this straight up, I would definitely take advantage. But then...I caused some of it (probably most of it) so I don't want to pile on. And as I say...it works for the story.The Burgundians Dukes were really rather clever chaps, so I find it far more historically likely that they would plunder the crap out of France, then do a deal with whoever ended up usurping the French monarchy. Technically, their lands and feaulty are split between the Holy Roman Emperor and the king of France's. If they can make it so they have their own (at the time, much wealthier and stabler) realm apart from France and the empire, they would take it (that is exactly what they end up doing OTL when they obliterate the French army later on).
So the Burgundians are looters, opportunists (they'll certainly nick as much of the Low Countries and northern coastline as they can while France is down) but not looking to take the crown of France. That leaves the monarchs of England, and the Oreleans. This is bascially win win for Burgundy. One is a puppet now and probably will sign over whatever's they want in return for the throne. The other is a slightly more distantly ruler who will be pulled in all sorts of directions. Either way, Burgundy gets what's it wants (de Jure as well as de facto independence, a weaker but stable France, and the entire OTL burgundian Low Countries, as well as a massive pile of French loot and favours ).
England really should be prepping for a full on invasion and regime change in France...but they can't, because the king is ineptly, the queen is inept and they are both without issue. Maddening!
To your first point, I would not say that.Boooo. Just imagine Margaret's face when her beloved France disappears. And that's without considering the many other considerable benefits of a world without France.
Technically no, but only because the bar for that is so very low. Just on a consanguinity basis the Habsburgs had many worse matches and of course there are disasters like Margaret of Valois and Henry of Navarre.
As for the match itself, if it was part of a wider settlement then I suppose it could play a part. Just a stand alone marriage as you've said it helps Henry and does nothing at all for Richard, arguably weakens him if anything. But if Richard was named heir and given some appropriate rank on the council so he could over-rule Somerset (but also agreed he would tolerate him remaining on the council), then sealing that with a marriage pact could be appropriate. It would all be on the understanding that Henry actually keeps his promise and doesn't boot Richard out or change his mind on heir, because if he did the marriage would be off. I could never see Margaret accepting that sort of deal though.
You must know it will not be so simple as that.Oh thank god for that. A proper, impossible to get out of reason to arrest and kill both of them.
Things are dire when I really feel for Somerset in a scene.
First off...absolutely correct me if I'm using the French incorrectly. I've never been fluent even though I can speak a little from what I learned in high school. I did indeed mean "good sir" so I will fix that. I hope the rest was correct. I will use French with her from time to time for verisimilitude so I always hope it done correctly.I just caught up, I was about a month late.
I really love how you manage to combine gameplay elements and real history. I can read it like a great book, I want to see what will happen at the next page.
Margaret and Somerset just cross the line. At last, I could say.
Her life was clearly hard (alone, in a foreign country with an instable husband and lots of people who saw her as an enemy) but she had that talent to complicate everything for her (so many bad choices, it's hard to have empathy).
Just a note, and absolutely not important, you had Margaret tell Pierre de Brezé "bien monsieur" (it doesn't seem correct in this phrase). Did you want to say "good sir" ? if that is, it's more "mon bon monsieur" (I'm not sure Margaret spoke so politely to his servant but who knows).
What you mean?You must know it will not be so simple as that.![]()
This is exactly what is going to happen, considering she's already been caught doing far less. She's an idiot, and the Duke is honourable. One of them is going to let something slip., best case scenario fantasizing here: Margaret and Somerset get caught in flagrante and get theirs,