Jesus Christ some of you guys sound so entitled, it comes across as really cringe. Look, even if your write a 5000 word essay on why your proposal is more historically accurate, it doesn't mean the devs should unconditionally add it, because someone else can come in and write a 7000 word essay on why you are wrong. The simple fact is that we simply don't have much accurate data for this region and most of the map setup decisions have to be based on informed guesses. Yes, maybe there's a 80% chance your proposal is right, but for most of these decisions the devs have already made their choices, and going back and making changes costs dev time, dev time that can be spent on making other parts of the game much deeper.
Similarly, can you stop guilt tripping the devs for not implementing feedback from this thread yet? We still have 3 whole continents (Asia & the Americas) that haven't had their first batch of review, and the Balkans are clearly muuuch more detailed than those regions right now. The devs will come back to this feedback once it makes sense logistically.
It made me sick seeing these posts with sarcastic jabs at the devs for not respecting your feedback with several likes. If anything, I admire the devs for not locking this thread already based on how toxic it got, just so we can keep suggesting our ideas, even this late into development.
At the end of the day, you chose to spent this much time writing feedback, you weren't hired / payed by Paradox and they don't owe you anything. Some of your comments here sound like you expect the devs to bow to you and kiss your feet for your work. Remember that having a dev team that respects our feedback this much is a privilege, not a right. And them ignoring your feedback isn't an insult to your work, it's just a respectful "sorry, our visions don't align here".