Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries
Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Stellaris 53084 Bug Reports 34467 Console edition 1306 Suggestions 21142 Tech Support 3148 Multiplayer 391 User Mods 4770 Stellaris AAR (After Action Reports)
Previous dev diary Next dev diary
Show only dev responses
Sort by date Sort by reaction score
Greyhound_Gen. said:
The only thing I'm a little disappointed by is the fact that the endgame perks are mutually exclusive. I'd really like to create a species that uses both advanced gene-modding and cybernetics (even if it means they would be unable to master either as well as a species that had focused on one branch exclusively).
Click to expand...
Yes, I'd greatly prefer this as well. Not only would it allow a greater level of customization and sensible narrative choice, it would also lead to greater diversity among "endgame empires".

If Ascension Paths have two levels, why not allow a culture to combine any two level 1's, at the expense of locking the level 2?
  • Psi+Psi: Psionic Ascension
  • Psi+Cyber: Mass Effect
  • Cyber+Cyber: Brain Uploads
  • Cyber+Gene: Cyberpunk
  • Gene+Gene: X-Men
  • Gene+Psi: Stranger Things
 
Last edited:
  • 31
  • 4
Reactions:
Rubido said:
Can it be, that this whole eating pops thing can eventually lead to parasite/symbiosis mechanics?
Click to expand...
He tweeted about the consumption and nutering of pops over twitter, which I found amusing. I suspect it'll be more related to managing enslavement and purging per species rather than anything like that. That would be cool though!
 
  • 7
Reactions:
Rubido said:
Just thinking



Can it be, that this whole eating pops thing can eventually lead to parasite/symbiosis mechanics?
Click to expand...
From what we know from the twitter-based teasers, there are at least two mechanisms for eating POP units- one "processes" them ala a Purge. I'm hoping the other is more like "domestication" and lets you farm them long-term.
 
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
You are really coming through on this update -- I don't think I'm alone in saying that this is exactly in line with a lot of suggestions on the list, combining more endgame goals, more civ unique aspects, and pop alteration changes.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Wiz said:
Because without paid expansions we will not be able to continue developing Stellaris.
Click to expand...

OK, deal. Give us paid expansions, cosmetic DLCs, history packs or whatever you want, but make this game the better you can. There are very good mods out there and a good community to support this new "franchise" and that´s a really important task, isn´t it?. You made that awesome rome mod back in the day, so you know what I am talking, right? (just tried Reign of the Ancients these christmas holidays). And I think these new steps (ascension perks, unity, factions,... ) are pointing into a really good direction. And horizon signal and leviathans/war in heaven were also reeeeally good features, by the way.

Just one more thing. This is Banks. We could have orbitals, ascension, etc. Thats right. But Stellaris also needs a bit of Azad. ;)
 
Wiz said:
You're not required to go down any of these paths, nor will every AI-controlled empire do so.
Click to expand...
Well, you are not required to upgrade to advanced government form as well, because game does not force you to do so. But that doesn't mean that every player would not do that.
We can easily end in a Blizzard's situation, when they constantly tried to make people to use Swarm Hosts and Battlecruisers in Starcraft 2. For now they try to buff them but in worse case we could end like Relic, while it was still alive, and balancing Dawn of War. People spammed Possessed Marines and Obliterators, so they started to limit their numbers per game. Each time some unit or strategy showed to be very effective, they axed or forced people to stop using it in the most crude way - forbid, limit, deny etc. Parado faced same story with EUIV where everyone took Quantity and Administrative ideas.
 
  • 3
  • 1
Reactions:
Pyramid_Head said:
Well, you are not required to upgrade to advanced government form as well, because game does not force you to do so. But that doesn't mean that every player would not do that.
We can easily end in a Blizzard's situation, when they constantly tried to make people to use Swarm Hosts and Battlecruisers in Starcraft 2. For now they try to buff them but in worse case we could end like Relic, while it was still alive, and balancing Dawn of War. People spammed Possessed Marines and Obliterators, so they started to limit their numbers per game. Each time some unit or strategy showed to be very effective, they axed or forced people to stop using it in the most crude way - forbid, limit, deny etc. Parado faced same story with EUIV where everyone took Quantity and Administrative ideas.
Click to expand...

Seeing as you don't transform on a click of button and it is followed by many events, going for ascension is a risky move. Not to mention that it may come with its own downsides.
Additionally, they did say that they will be adding more ascension perks and there is a limit to how many Perks you can have. It's also possible that you'd want these other perks besides ascension ones. By abandoning to focus on ascension, one could possibly have a stronger overall Empire.

In other words, it all depends on other perks and how they will be balanced. If there are enough good ones (like building a ringworld and other mega structures), it will be a good alternative to these three ascensions.
 
  • 3
Reactions:
Pyramid_Head said:
Well, you are not required to upgrade to advanced government form as well, because game does not force you to do so. But that doesn't mean that every player would not do that.
We can easily end in a Blizzard's situation, when they constantly tried to make people to use Swarm Hosts and Battlecruisers in Starcraft 2. For now they try to buff them but in worse case we could end like Relic, while it was still alive, and balancing Dawn of War. People spammed Possessed Marines and Obliterators, so they started to limit their numbers per game. Each time some unit or strategy showed to be very effective, they axed or forced people to stop using it in the most crude way - forbid, limit, deny etc. Parado faced same story with EUIV where everyone took Quantity and Administrative ideas.
Click to expand...
Considering there'll be more than 20 ascension perks, perhaps it'll end up being that having the species perks will not be the best idea for everyone. More likely it'll be that the benefits in other places will be more tantalizing than the species-specific perks.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Nyrael said:
Seeing as you don't transform on a click of button and it is followed by many events, going for ascension is a risky move. Not to mention that it may come with its own downsides.
Additionally, they did say that they will be adding more ascension perks and there is a limit to how many Perks you can have. It's also possible that you'd want these other perks besides ascension ones. By abandoning to focus on ascension, one could possibly have a stronger overall Empire.

In other words, it all depends on other perks and how they will be balanced. If there are enough good ones (like building a ringworld and other mega structures), it will be a good alternative to these three ascensions.
Click to expand...
EUIIV had westernization with ONLY negative effects for years. It never stopped anyone from doing it. With time people will just know for what they will prepare. If there will be uprisings then everyone ill just build more armies as countermeasure etc.
 
  • 6
Reactions:
Wiz said:
The paths are mutually exclusive, and once you start heading down one of them, the other two are locked off.
Click to expand...
I don't like this at all. Everything else is fantastic but all the mutually exclusive stuff is kind of silly. The psychic side maybe, but there doesn't seem any logical reason that cybernetics wouldn't be available to everyone and much earlier in the tech tree. I've always wanted leader portraits where higher tech civs get progressively more enhanced...
 
  • 2
Reactions:
Czaristan said:
I don't like this at all. Everything else is fantastic but all the mutually exclusive stuff is kind of silly. The psychic side maybe, but there doesn't seem any logical reason that cybernetics wouldn't be available to everyone and much earlier in the tech tree. I've always wanted leader portraits where higher tech civs get progressively more enhanced...
Click to expand...

Thinking about it, there may be mileage in this argument. I can see why you wouldn't want people to get the highest level of any two trees, but why not let us roleplay our desires and let us take ONLY two from the three trees? That would probably expand on our ability to roleplay our species even further.
 
  • 3
Reactions:
I like what I've been reading about the Banks update so-far. Seems like it will be te start of Stellaris hitting its true potential. Also, I'm fine with the DLC being paid. Seems like a lot of work will be going into this update, and I pay for quality.

I hope the portraits change based on the paths you choose do go down. And I hope that your multi-species empire (if you chose to go down that path) will have some instability because many will disagree with that choice (unless you converted them with ethics divergence).
 
  • 4
Reactions:
Pyramid_Head said:
EUIIV had westernization with ONLY negative effects for years. It never stopped anyone from doing it. With time people will just know for what they will prepare. If there will be uprisings then everyone ill just build more armies as countermeasure etc.
Click to expand...

Westernization was a beneficial thing and it had no actual alternative, nor did it lock anything that's cool. Strategically it may not be the best idea, but strategy doesn't matter that much to being cool. If there was something like Modernization, then people would be split between those.

Here your alternative might be "Ability to build Ringworlds", "Ability to mind-control half of the Galaxy", etc. Going for ascension will lock some out cool things, things you yourself might prefer.

scaper12123 said:
Thinking about it, there may be mileage in this argument. I can see why you wouldn't want people to get the highest level of any two trees, but why not let us roleplay our desires and let us take ONLY two from the three trees? That would probably expand on our ability to roleplay our species even further.
Click to expand...

I think I already know what the Devs will say: it's easy to mod, so mod it. It will lock out achievements, but since this makes the game easier that would be as desired.
 
  • 4
Reactions:
The Psionic Path focuses on developing the psionic potential of your population. The first level unlocks new psionic technologies and benefits, while the second level allows your empire to reach a higher level of existance and communicate with the beings present there.
Click to expand...

This makes me wonder: instead of turning into an (full-pledged) Unbidden, are Psionics getting an ability to summon them as allies instead?
 
  • 4
Reactions:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back