• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Tinto Maps #10 - 12th of July 2024 - Syrian Levant & Egypt

Hello everyone, and welcome to another Tinto Maps! We’re back after celebrating the most important victories over Germany and France since the 30 Years War a hard week of work, and we’re ready to share with you the region of the Syrian Levant & Egypt (actually, we’re revealing a bit more of what those regions would be, to cover the complete extension of the Mamlūk Sultanate). Let’s go!

Countries:
Countries.png

The Mamlūk Sultanate is the main power of the region, a situation achieved after the defeat of the Mongols at the Battles of Ain Jalut and Marj al-Saffar, and the fall of Acre, the last stronghold of the Crusader states in Outremer. The latter's legacy is still handled by the Kingdom of Cyprus, ruled by Hugues IV of Lusignan. Apart from that, we can see the realm of Candia, a subject governed by the Serene Republic of Venice, and some Arabic tribes, such as the Hutaym and the Anizah. Oh, and also, to the south-west, you might have noticed some oases ruled by either the Mamluks, or Fezzan; I opted for not coloring the wastelands, as usual, but also the corridors, a type of terrain present in other GSGs, that we have in Project Caesar. I’ll talk more about them under the ‘Locations’ section of the DD, but I just want to note one more thing: the connection down the Nile is a regular one, with a border existing between the Mamluks and Makuria (the country that controls the small chunk of land at the very south of the image).

Dynasties:
Dynasties.png

The Bahri Mamluks have ruled the Sultanate since they deposed the Ayyubids, almost a century before the start of the game. It could maybe be a bit more accurate to depict Sultan al-Nasir Muhammad as an ibn Qalawun (‘of the lineage of Qalawun’), but the dynastical dynamics of the Mamluk rulers are not so easy to portray, so we opted for the moment to better use Bahriyya. Apart from that, you may also see the neighboring dynasties, such as the already-mentioned House of Lusignan, or the Hethumian of Cilicia.

Locations:
Locations 1.png

Locations 2.png

Locations 3.png

Locations 4.png
Here you can see the locations of the entire region, and also closer chunks behind the ‘Spoiler’ button. The most interesting feature to talk about is that of the corridors, something that some of you might remember from ‘Imperator: Rome’, but also something new to the rest. The corridors are empty locations, with no population or resources, but that allows connection between the locations at their sides, for some mechanics that we’ve already mentioned (market access, control), and some others that we haven’t (army movement). This is the way that we’ve chosen to portray the Saharan corridors, that allow for a connection between the Maghreb and the Mashreq, and Western and Central Africa. There are also some regular locations over those corridors, with population, resources, etc., that can be controlled by countries, which portray the desert oases that made for important outposts in the different Saharan routes. Not all the connections are throughout corridors, though; outside of the image, the Nile River valley allows for regular locations all the way down from Egypt to Nubia, the last location held by the Mamluks being that of Aswan, while the first held by Makuria, not shown in the screenshot, being Qasr Ibrim. We will talk more about Nubia and Ethiopia in a future Tinto Maps.

Provinces:
Provinces.png

Usual provinces mapmode; please let us know of any spelling or naming suggestions that come to your mind.

Areas:
Areas.png

A new mapmode that has been requested in previous Tinto Maps, and that we’re now incorporating.

Terrain:
Climate.png

Topography.png

Vegetation.png

The climate is dominated by a mix of Mediterranean, Arid, and Cold Arid. The topography of the region is quite flat, with some hills and mountains on Mount Lebanon and Anti-Lebanon, Mount Sinai, and the verge of the Arabian plateau; and some marshland over the Nile Delta, of course. Regarding the vegetation, desert and sparse vegetation dominate most of the region, with some woods and forests over Levant, and the Nile fertile farmlands, the bread basket of the Eastern Mediterranean.

Cultures:
Cultures.png

Here starts the fun… Those countries ruling over the Middle East will face the challenge of managing several different cultural minorities. Libyan, Egyptian, Sa'idi, Bedouin, Ḥijāzī, Najidi (the green one to their right), Levantine, and Iraqi (the light blue at the top right of the picture) are all different regional cultures of Arabic-speaking people. Something interesting is that most of Bedouin pops are tribesmen, instead of peasants, portraying their traditional social organization. Coming to important minority groups, Coptic people are quite important in Egypt, accounting for about 10% of the population of the Mamlūk Sultanate. The other important minority are the Syriacs, as they also account for another 10% of the population, and are a cultural majority in a few locations. Apart from those, there are also Armenians, Kurds, and Turkomans on the divide between Anatolia, Syria, and Jazira, Alawites Shiites in Syria, Mizrahi Jews all over the region, Samaritans in Palestine, and Greeks in Crete, Cyprus, and some in Alexandria. Oh, also the Saharan cultures of the Eastern Berbers and the Toubou over some of the Saharan oases.

Religions:
Religion.png

More fun. In this region, we have:
  • Sunni Muslims
  • Miaphysite Christians
  • Orthodox Christians
  • Shia Muslims
  • Catholic Christians
  • Druzes
  • Jews
  • Nestorian Christians (the ‘label’ we’re using to depict the Church of the East)
  • Samaritans
  • Yazidi

Relating these religions to the previous cultures, we can tell you most of the Arabic-speaking cultures are Sunni Muslims, with some Shia Muslims in Syria and Lebanon. Most of the Coptic are Miaphysite, adhering to the Patriarchate of Alexandria, although some of there still follow the Orthodoxy of Constantinople. The Syriacs are also religiously divided, with some being Nestorians (the current name we have to cover the confessions related to the Church of the East), some Miaphysites, some Orthodox, and even some Catholics in Lebanon. And then we have some cultural-religious minorities, such as the Alawite Shiites, the Druzes (which are of Levantine culture), the Mizrahi Jews, the Samaritans, and the Yazidi (which are of Kurd culture).


Raw Materials:
Raw Materials.png

There are some materials that are more unique to this region, such as the Dates in the arid fringes. The Nile Valley and Delta are incredibly fertile, having plenty of different crops: Wheat, Rice, Legumes, Sugar, Cotton, Fiber Crops (=Linen), etc. Livestock, Wool, and Horses are also important resources for the people across the region. There are also some metals present in the region, such as Copper in Cyprus and around the Red Sea, Iron, Tin, some Lead, and some interesting sources of Alum.

Markets:
Markets.png

The main market centers of the region are Alexandria (yeah, it’s there! I’ve already reported its weird name-wrapping and one of our programmers is going to take a look at it) for the Mashreq, Damascus for the Syrian Levant and Mecca for the Hejaz.

Country and Location Population:
Country Population .png

Location Population 1.png

Location Population 2.png

Location Population 3.png
The population of the region points to Egypt being its powerhouse, with several million people being supported being the Nile Valley and Delta. Apart from that, the Syrian Levant has a very decent population, making the Mamlūk Sultanate a dreadful rival to have in 1337. The arid fringes make for a way more difficult food production and population sustainability, making them more of strategic value, by their position, resources, etc.

And that’s all for today! Next week @Johan will show you Scandinavia, the very first map that was crafted for Project Caesar! Cheers!
 
  • 174Like
  • 54Love
  • 7
  • 4
  • 4
  • 1Haha
Reactions:
Was doing a quick skimming of an article on Lebanon which had this lovely map:
1732657450012.png

If we were to use this for the basis of some locations, it'd look like this:
1732658912935.png

1 is Kisrawan, belonging to the progenitors of the Banu Assaf Turkmen:
1732658970443.png

1732658979748.png

1732659606154.png

2 is Beirut. Might be a bit small.
3 is Jird
4 is Gharb or Garb, ruled by the Buhturids:
1732659638409.png

While technically there were others, they weren't relevant by 1337:
1732659708059.png

5 is Shuf or Chouf
6 doesn't really seem to have a name on that map

Now, I'm not necessarily attached to this map. However, I would like at at least see Gharb and Kisrawan, so that those two vassals of the Mamluks can be represented.

I'll leave it to others to carve up a better map that doesn't leave Beirut too small but adequately represents the Buhturids and the eventual Banu Assaf.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
I think this belongs here, as it seems that Crete is part of this feedback-thread (original post in the first Balkans thread):

View attachment 1162905
The Kingdom of Candia:
- Even though it has a smaller population than Cyprus (65k compared to 186k), and a smaller surface (8336 km2 compared to 9250 km2), it still has more locations (8 compared to 7).
View attachment 1162906
- You can see the early administrative divisions of Crete on this map; The sestieri. All of them named after the sestieri of Venice itself, so not after towns or fortresses of Crete.
- That means that Hagios Pavlos is the wrong name for such a location, as there wasn't a village with that name there (there was one named that way somewhere in the sestieri of Stavros or Castello, but that's beside the point). The other Cretan locations aren't named after these sestieri, either. I'd suggest to either remove it, and merge it with Chania and/or Rethymnon, or to rename it to (Chora) Sfakia, which was a village in this location renowned for its resistance against central authority. The first option has my preference, as Crete already has lots of locations compared to other islands. Chora Sfakia wasn't very big, either. But if density is okay in the eyes of the devs, then Chora Sfakia is definitely the best option.
- Elounda is basically uninhabited at this point in time, and will be for quite a while. I'd suggest renaming it to either Kritsa (one of the biggest villages around this time) or Ierapetra (a small port-town located around Elounda's/Siteia's southern coast), which may have to result in some revised borders.
- Gergeri and Anno Viános existed, yes, and I'm fine with their current inclusion. If density is too high, though, then they could always be merged. As long as Chania, Candia, Réthymno and Siteía are there. Just like the later administrative divisions of Crete:
View attachment 1162908
 
  • 6Like
Reactions:
Still we are skipping 3 diaries now, even though I know it's because they have already finished these ones
Only 1 (Britain), as the HRE and Scandinavia came after the Levant, if I'm not mistaken.
 
Hopefully they improve the look of the saharan wastelands...not a huge fan of how Egypt currently look with the wastelands coloured in...
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
1733766703120.png

Let's have some fun in Jordan, shall we?

1733766735343.png

1733766879962.png

Important conclusion there: Al Mira should not own Irbid. Irbid is roughly corresponding to 'Ajlun; if it's a Mamluk administrative center, it should belong to them directly.
1733767064537.png

1733767121313.png

1733767148866.png

1733767182490.png

1733767228114.png

1733767255638.png

1733767300326.png

1733767322064.png

1733769939951.png

1733770010299.png

1733770081938.png

1733770103647.png
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
And for fun, a map!
1733771726605.png

I think, with everything that I posted (plus this map), that maybe the Transjordan region (Irbid, Amman, Karak) could use some more locations.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
No feedback yet means I can keep making suggestions until the devs set me to "ignore".

This time, from State and Rural Society in Medieval Islam: Sultans, Muqtaʻs, and Fallahun:
1733870248106.png

1733870267740.png

1733870376170.png

And one from A Turning Point in Mamluk History:
1733871345162.png

1733871376055.png

And from The Tribes of Syria in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries:
1733871511888.png

As well as the full text of The Rise of Provincial Arab Ruling Families in Mamluk Egypt and The Population Distribution of the Arab Tribes in Egypt in the Mamluk Era.

Unfortunately I cannot read that last paper (it being in Arabic, a language I speak not a word of), so in the meantime while I humbly request someone come by who can translate the thing, here's what I was able to come up with:
1733878544212.png

  1. Tha'laba, another offshoot of the Tayy. Assuming that the Banu Jarm are a branchof the Tha'laba and leaving them unified because otherwise their territorial description makes no sense (and the text supports this).
  2. Al-A'id, whose influence will grow with time until they're in control over all of Sinai and the Eastern Delta.
  3. Sunbis, another offshoot of the Tayy.
  4. 'Arak, a subject tribe to the Mamluks that will ultimately try to take over Upper Egypt, lose, and then be granted tax responsibilities anyway.
  5. Banu Hilal, in service to the Mamluks and defending Upper Egypt. Against 'Arak they do so terribly that the Mamluks dispose of them before even finishing putting down the rebellion.
  6. Banu Kanz. They're the same tribe for which the current rulers of Makuria originate from (since the Mamluks deposed the king of Makuria and replaced them with a member of this tribe).Disregard; they aren't in Aswan yet.
I can't say I'm totally happy with this map, but we'll see if I can get that translation which paints a better picture.
 
Last edited:
  • 4Like
  • 2Love
Reactions:
A quick and humble request to @Pavía:

When you take the pictures for the location maps for the Syria/Levant feedback thread next week, could you include a location picture of Upper Egypt and Nubia? It'll do me wonders.

Like...
1733894486682.png

The western half of that, as location maps, kinda all-together. Lower Nubia and Upper Egypt, along with the Red Sea.
 
Last edited:
  • 3Like
Reactions:
No feedback yet means I can keep making suggestions until the devs set me to "ignore".

This time, from State and Rural Society in Medieval Islam: Sultans, Muqtaʻs, and Fallahun:
View attachment 1228928
View attachment 1228929
View attachment 1228930
And one from A Turning Point in Mamluk History:
View attachment 1228937
View attachment 1228938
And from The Tribes of Syria in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries:
View attachment 1228940
As well as the full text of The Rise of Provincial Arab Ruling Families in Mamluk Egypt and The Population Distribution of the Arab Tribes in Egypt in the Mamluk Era.

Unfortunately I cannot read that last paper (it being in Arabic, a language I speak not a word of), so in the meantime while I humbly request someone come by who can translate the thing, here's what I was able to come up with:
View attachment 1228993
  1. Tha'laba, another offshoot of the Tayy. Assuming that the Banu Jarm are a branchof the Tha'laba and leaving them unified because otherwise their territorial description makes no sense (and the text supports this).
  2. Al-A'id, whose influence will grow with time until they're in control over all of Sinai and the Eastern Delta.
  3. Sunbis, another offshoot of the Tayy.
  4. 'Arak, a subject tribe to the Mamluks that will ultimately try to take over Upper Egypt, lose, and then be granted tax responsibilities anyway.
  5. Banu Hilal, in service to the Mamluks and defending Upper Egypt. Against 'Arak they do so terribly that the Mamluks dispose of them before even finishing putting down the rebellion.
  6. Banu Kanz. They're the same tribe for which the current rulers of Makuria originate from (since the Mamluks deposed the king of Makuria and replaced them with a member of this tribe).Disregard; they aren't in Aswan yet.
I can't say I'm totally happy with this map, but we'll see if I can get that translation which paints a better picture.
To revise my suggestion, only 1 and 2 should be implemented. The others are better represented by putting in a lot of tribesmen-type pops of Arab/Berber culture in Upper Egypt and the oases, with a good number in Middle Egypt as well. The ones actually in Lower Egypt are better represented as proper subjects.

That way the rebellion in question is better handled as a tribal estate revolt.

I would also have an option at some point for the Mamluks to grant some land in Upper Egypt to the tribes in the area (could call it Hawwara) which would then rapidly take control of all of Upper Egypt outright. So... lots of unruly Arab/Berber tribes in Upper Egypt/desert oases, less in Middle Egypt but still there, the ones in Lower Egypt mostly represented with proper countries (subjects to the Mamluks), with a decision for the Mamluks to "give up on ruling the unruly tribes" and cede Upper Egypt to the Hawwara.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Some bits of (very late) feedback regarding Syria:
- First of all, well done. Some of its locations are very obscure, so I commend all the work that has gone into this region. I saw some very high-quality suggestions on the regions of Lebanon and Jordan, etc. But contemporary Syria didn't get as much attention, in terms of feedback. So, I took a quick look at it.
- Idlib was established later on during Project Caesar's timeline, like some other locations, but there's a better alternative close to it: Jisr as-Shughur, an important stopping point on the Levant's trading routes.
- Afrin/Ifrin was also established late in Project Ceasar's timeline, but was presumably inhabited. Though I also couldn't find a better substitute.
- Madinat al-Far might be the contemporary name for the archaelogical site of Hisn Maslama, which seems to be a better name for the location: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hisn_Maslama
- Al Hasakah is also a bit more 'modern', though the location was inhabited. Couldn't find an older name for the town, though. Same for Al Tabqah.
- Al Busayrah should probably be renamed into Al-Qarqisiya (the Arabic name for Circesium). As Al Busayrah is the more modern village created nearby the older ruins. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circesium
- Abu Kemal also seems to be the more modern name for Qashla, but I'm not 100% sure. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Kamal
- Salkhad seems to be misspelled (it's called Sakhad now). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salkhad
- Also, the space for the new Iskenderun/Alexandretta location is minimal; The city is barely within the location's confines.

Curious how things will look tomorrow!
 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions: