My thought process was that of two candidates with exact cases, the one who wasn't getting votes originally would be more likely to be a baddie than otherwise (think ramius and nepechri in the last big we played). Obviously, with Panzer flipping villager, that calculus was obviously wrong. Regardless, if Matthew is killed and flips baddie, than Alynkio/Agatha are more likely goodies that otherwise (as #1 and #2 voters on Matthew). If Matthew flips goodie, however... they might well be taking the pressure off other frontrunners, of which there were 3 at the time.
Also should note that that is why I dislike CAWZ cases day 1 - important goodies can't defend themselves if they have a major role.
Also, I did see LKs snipe before deadline, and thus felt no need to snipe. Also, would have switched to Panzer with my snipe (although I have no way of proving that) because of a mild Marco day 1 villager read.
Yeah, I noticed this as well. More on this later.
Merely pointing out that he's activated earlier than normal. That's a ... good sign, I guess? Curious to hear about the reasoning behind EURO's hunch, b/c I'm not seeing it here, and I'm usually pretty suspicious of alynkio.
Yeah, spock seems more villagerish to me than otherwise (although in this case I think it's because he's a bit more aggressive towards Yakman, which I generally take as a sign of villagerish activity).
The arky case was to highlight the fact that he got no traction from the village despite being fingered by EURO, who is usually convincing at getting the village to make moves. I thought it curious enough to warrant attention, but unfortunately it came too late to make difference.
Also, currently nonplussed at the case - or more accurately, this particular case - on Agatha at best. We don't know Matthew's role yet, and he would have been a major day 1 case (he already had 3 votes) had I not intervened. I'd want to see Matthew's role before voting Agatha.
.png){kind=avatar}
