1. Garhwal - My home, so obviously
2. Ottos
3. Some nation in Tibet
4. A bank
5. Portugal
2. Ottos
3. Some nation in Tibet
4. A bank
5. Portugal
- 3
Curious how you would do that as Ethiopia?This is my top 10 nations that I am looking forward to playing. What's yours?
- Ethiopia
- Want to push into Yemen and revive Old South Arabian
Condensed overview of all opinions shared up until this point:
View attachment 1284456
- This distribution is based on a weighted scale with people listing their #1 receiving ten points and their #10 receiving one point with all the other ones in between (#2 = nine points, #3 = eight points, etc).
- All Tags under ten points are not shown.
- Answers with a slash (ex: Venice/Genoa) had only the first one chosen, as it is assumed that you would play them for the same reason and I don’t want to clutter this already cluttered graph.
- Scope answers (ex: an irish minor) were dealt with in a variety of ways. Some I gave their own answers (Ireland, Japan, Netherlands, Mayans, etc), others were left out because they were too broad (a place TFs will make me love), others I replaced with tags that existed because the tag they said does not exist in 1337 but will emerge later (Ming, but not Qing -> Yuan), and others were tied into a specific tag (Nepal -> Garhwal, Daimyo -> Japan).
- Unordered lists were retroactively reordered to fit with this model, going from first listed to tenth listed.
- There are probably typos in the graph. I did throw this together in like 30 minutes so...
So, we can see you guys like the Byzantines, with a point total of 328 as compared to second place Ottomans total of 187, with England’s 168 and Japan’s 165 not too far behind. After that you can see what happens, with a steady trickle from Yuan’s 148 to Florence’s 100, and ultimately it's a steady slope down to Tlaxcala on 11 points. Also, only one mention of Ulm netting 3 points, shameful.
If you want any specific point tallies, just ask. I probably won't update this, ever.
I just did it manually in google sheets by copying every single list, ordering them and grouping them accordingly, duplicating each instance the amount of points it was supposed to get based on what position it was in, and then control f and wrote how many showed up. It's certainly not the best option, but I don't trust AI to do anything well ever. This is a cleaned up version of it.How did you do that? Some time ago I tried both ChatGPT and Grok do all the work with counting (after I tried doing it manually and giving up) but they both couldn't do it properly, returning obviously wrong answers.
And, of course, I'm not at all surprised by the winner here.
I'm afraid you're both late and in violation of the duplicate rule. So even then it would only be ten points to Hungary. Should've tried -32 points to get 7.896296e+13 points.1. Hungary
2. Hungary
3. Hungary
4. Hungary
5. Hungary
6. Hungary
7. Hungary
8. Hungary
9. Hungary
10. Hungary
That's 55 points forGryffindorHungary. Please update your tally accordingly, so we can win the house cup.
AfterThe Byzantines, Ottomans, and England being in the top 3 sounds about right to me, I'm just surprised that France isn't higher. I'm glad to see that there are some others who also want to play as the Baduspanids and Tlaxcala!
For the Haudenosaunee, were the votes on them before or after they were revealed to be settled tags? Not that it matters too much, just curious about whether most of the votes were when they were seemingly excluded or after they were confirmed to be added.
That's just mean towards anybody who mains any one of the tagsin violation of the duplicate rule
I'm surprised Tenochtitlan doesn't even make the list when Cusco is so high, since they are a bit similar (small native american countries that historically would grow into empires)Condensed overview of all opinions shared up until this point:
View attachment 1284456
- This distribution is based on a weighted scale with people listing their #1 receiving ten points and their #10 receiving one point with all the other ones in between (#2 = nine points, #3 = eight points, etc).
- All Tags under ten points are not shown.
- Answers with a slash (ex: Venice/Genoa) had only the first one chosen, as it is assumed that you would play them for the same reason and I don’t want to clutter this already cluttered graph.
- Scope answers (ex: an irish minor) were dealt with in a variety of ways. Some I gave their own answers (Ireland, Japan, Netherlands, Mayans, etc), others were left out because they were too broad (a place TFs will make me love), others I replaced with tags that existed because the tag they said does not exist in 1337 but will emerge later (Ming, but not Qing -> Yuan), and others were tied into a specific tag (Nepal -> Garhwal, Daimyo -> Japan).
- Unordered lists were retroactively reordered to fit with this model, going from first listed to tenth listed.
- There are probably typos in the graph. I did throw this together in like 30 minutes so...
- Duplicate submissions (ex: #1 France, #2 France) were treated as one submission with the higher value being the one that was added.
So, we can see you guys like the Byzantines, with a point total of 328 as compared to second place Ottomans total of 187, with England’s 168 and Japan’s 165 not too far behind. After that you can see what happens, with a steady trickle from Yuan’s 148 to Florence’s 100, and ultimately it's a steady slope down to Tlaxcala on 11 points. Also, only one mention of Ulm netting 3 points, shameful.
If you want any specific point tallies, look at the link in the post two below. I probably won't update this, ever.