Good to know the map editor is coming, I'm generally happy with the game, but I do like to come up with my own maps in the first game.
- 2
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Yes. I want to know why people are convinced without even seeing a waterfront zone that "redefining" your coastline doesn't include sand.
- 4
I want to know why you are inferring information that is NOT THERE
You seriously think they wouldn’t announce an entire new texture theme?
It’s pretty obvious that it is a zoning type and the rest is typical marketing language.
If I am wrong, I will “redefine” my hat by eating it
- 13
- 1
- 1
Giving CO the benefit of the doubt, perhaps? Not wanting to condemn them sight unseen?
- 14
- 3
- 1
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
*Deep breathe*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Yeah, they have earned the benefit of the doubt, for sure
- 19
- 5
- 1
- 1
Well, they could just read the answer to their WotW and say, "Yes, there will be sand; here is a screenshot." I know they are very busy, but that feels doable (and something most PDX dev teams would do on their dev diary).
- 11
Well, there's a beach in the wallpaper. Would be disingenuous if that wasn't possible, but I suppose that wouldn't be the first time either.
- 6
Look at the wallpaper. It is nothing like what the game looks like. Now, go watch the reveal trailer. It is nothing what the game looks like. This is called “marketing”
- 9
- 1
I do read them, yes, I just, as the button suggests, respectfully disagree.
I'm assuming you're talking about this one?
Unfortunately I can't react twice. So in regards to your first statement, I agree. But you're second statement is in comparison longer, and with that one, I disagree. I don't think console release is around the corner. But I could be wrong.
And in case you're curios why I disagree with your other posts, It's because I don't think Zoning is = Beaches. In a Beach Theme DLC I would assume you could add Beaches even without Zoning, otherwise you're forced to always zone buildings to it (unless you can zone Beaches without buildings? But in that case that wasn't really well communicated in the Teaser / Post)
So, don't worry, I don't have a grudge against you from our last conversation. Hope you neither. At the end we both wanna see CS II to succeed
Hope this made sense.
Best!
Last edited:
- 5
They never said it's supposed to be a 1:1? It's Game Art. Every Game has that.
- 1
"Disagreeing" with something you agree with and I'm supposed to be good with that. I know I'm getting bad faith disagreements from certain parties, now I have to be a mind reader as well. Give me a break.I do read them, yes, I just, as the button suggests, respectfully disagree.
I'm assuming you're talking about this one?
Unfortunately I can't react twice. So in regards to your first statement, I agree. But you're second statement is in comparison longer, and with that one, I disagree. I don't think console release is around the corner. But I could be wrong.
And in case you're curios why I disagree with you're other posts, It's because I don't think Zoning is = Beaches. In a Beach Theme DLC I would assume you could add Beaches even without Zoning, otherwise you're forced to always zone buildings to it (unless you can zone Beaches without buildings? But in that case that wasn't really well communicated in the Teaser / Post)
So, don't worry, I don't have a grudge against you from our last conversation. Hope you neither. At the end we both wanna see CS II to succeed
Hope this made sense.
Best!
- 7
- 1
If you’re so affected by a red emoji on a forum, maybe take a step away from the forum
- 4
- 2
- 2
Why are you making this a bigger thing than it has to be?
No, you don't have to be a mind reader. But if you're curious why I disagree with a post of yours, than why don't you just politely ask instead of coming with such a message:
- 6
- 1
- 1
It's obvious why to someone posting in good faith. My answer and your answer to the question, "why was the expansion pushed back" were fundamentally the same: CO was rightly prioritising patches, performance and modding (aka "fixing the base game"). Yet you red crossed it and now you want me to believe it was about my very modest speculation about the implications for consoles. I simply don't believe you're interacting with me in good faith.
Last edited:
- 7
- 1
You don't have to believe me. Just tried to answer your question.
- 1
- 1
Sure!
Here you are buddy.
edit: Spent a minute cleaning up obvious artifacts. (More there in foliage if you really want to clean the rest)
Last edited:
- 15
- 3
- 1