-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Ligeramente 
es la tónica de siempre. Forofeo inicial para acto seguido comer la carne de los programadores.
es la tónica de siempre. Forofeo inicial para acto seguido comer la carne de los programadores.
Estais a favor de esto?
No me gusta mucho que se pierda asi porque si italia en el SIR
No me gusta mucho que se pierda asi porque si italia en el SIR
¿Podrías decirme como bloquean los fuertes el movimiento?. Yo no lo tengo nada claro, solo se que a veces no puedo mover a mis tropas por haber un fuerte cerca.
Estais a favor de esto?
No me gusta mucho que se pierda asi porque si italia en el SIR
Traducciendo el evento lo he leido esta mañana. Pues me gusta bastante. Estas cosas en una MP van a dar muchísimo juego.
Aprovecho mi momento de tiempo libre para comentar cosas sobre el parche tras mi primer partida como los Estados Papales:
-Fuertes; mi posición en cuanto a los fuertes no puede ser mas que neutra, todavía lo he jugao poco y no he podido experimentar profundamente si los cambios son visibles o no. Unica cosa que no me gusta del todo de ellos, en cuanto se te produce un alzamiento rebeldes te toman casi todas las provincias de manera instantane,aunque he de admitir que no me desagrada del todo (Que los rebeldes se alcen en armas y ni una ciudad controlen siempre mosquea). Ademas queda el que no sea siempre compensible el como bloquean los fuertes, pero todo es aprenderlo con la practica.
-Nuevo mapa; genial, un buen avance en cuanto a provincias, noto algo mas lento el juego, pero nada que impida jugar.
-Cuestión italia; me gusta y mucho, si eres Austria te obliga a que no te olvides de Italia y si eres un minor italiano (como yo con el Papado) te da algo de libertad para maniobrar de 1500 en adelante.
-Desarrollo; pense que mejorar el desarrollo via puntos vendria con el parche, pero no, viene con el DLC. En parte es un punto en contra, noto que aun inviertiendo muchisimo en barracones me encuentro con un manpower ridiculo para tener Italia unificada. Sin desarrollar el manpower de las provincias veo que voy a seguir así el resto de la partida.
De momento eso, a ver que tal sigue.
-Fuertes; mi posición en cuanto a los fuertes no puede ser mas que neutra, todavía lo he jugao poco y no he podido experimentar profundamente si los cambios son visibles o no. Unica cosa que no me gusta del todo de ellos, en cuanto se te produce un alzamiento rebeldes te toman casi todas las provincias de manera instantane,aunque he de admitir que no me desagrada del todo (Que los rebeldes se alcen en armas y ni una ciudad controlen siempre mosquea). Ademas queda el que no sea siempre compensible el como bloquean los fuertes, pero todo es aprenderlo con la practica.
-Nuevo mapa; genial, un buen avance en cuanto a provincias, noto algo mas lento el juego, pero nada que impida jugar.
-Cuestión italia; me gusta y mucho, si eres Austria te obliga a que no te olvides de Italia y si eres un minor italiano (como yo con el Papado) te da algo de libertad para maniobrar de 1500 en adelante.
-Desarrollo; pense que mejorar el desarrollo via puntos vendria con el parche, pero no, viene con el DLC. En parte es un punto en contra, noto que aun inviertiendo muchisimo en barracones me encuentro con un manpower ridiculo para tener Italia unificada. Sin desarrollar el manpower de las provincias veo que voy a seguir así el resto de la partida.
De momento eso, a ver que tal sigue.
lo del desarrollo lo veo para aquellos que naden en puntos tecnologicos porque eso que se encarezcan cada vez mas... yo creo que deberia enfocarse mas en otra cosa no se.. digo yo que a mayor poblacion mas manpower y mas producion
Los fuertes tienen un área de control/influencia/acción, sea como fuere, dicha zona es a cada provincia colindante, su función es no permitir el paso de los ejércitos enemigos a través de esa zona. Es decir, tú puedes entrar a esa provincia y asediarla, perfecto, pero no podrás cruzar más allá si no asedias el fuerte. Esa provincia asediada a la que salgas volverá a liberarse por acción del fortín. Puedes neutralizar la capacidad de auto-liberar provincias de un fortín asediándolo, pero seguirás sin poder cruzar.
Eso, es lo que he deducido jugando, no sé si hay excepciones para con los fuertes de alto nivel... si hacen algo más que tener más guarnición o si afectan de alguna manera a la defensa por desembarcos o estrechos o ríos. Un minitutorial de Paradox iría bien, es una mecánica muy importante ahora mismo.
Tengo ganas de que se actualicen los mods, no me gusta nada el mapa vanilla, pero hay que decir que tras este parche el HRE e Italia se ven muy bonitos. Sueño con varios de los mods que usan y sus terrenos infranqueables en los Alpes o los Pirineos, harán a los fuertes el doble de toca pelotas xD
Por cierto, estaba intentando el logro de Holy Trinity (http://www.eu4wiki.com/Holy_Trinity) debía avasallar a la Orden Livona (o como se diga en castellano) la cuestión es que parece ser que sus cores se han volitizado ¿No hay manera de volver a traerla a la vida? Me reventaría mucho despues de lo que me costo unificar Italia.
Nuevo Fix del juego. Versión 1.12.1. Parece que han arreglado lo más importante.
Buenas a todos! Acabamos de comprar unos amigos y yo el EU IV Collection en steam y nos es imposible unirnos a partidas ya empezadas creadas por nosotros mismos. La opción 'hotjoin' está activada tanto antes de crear la partida como después mediante el menú normal de opciones. Lo hemos intentado mediante steam y mediante id del host y no hay manera. Los 3 tenemos exactamente la misma versión, los mismos dlcs y ningún mod instalado. He estado buscando información por aquí y por google en general y veo que hay gente que tiene problemas parecidos pero ninguna solución y gente a la que le funciona perfectamente, al menos con versiones anteriores.
¿Estamos haciendo algo mal o está roto el multiplayer?
Saludos!
¿Estamos haciendo algo mal o está roto el multiplayer?
Saludos!
Que version juegas? porque no tengo ni idea si funciona el MP con la 1.12
Comprueba si os va en la 1.11.4 y sino pues habra que esperar un hotfix
Nuevo "DD" , no entiendo lo de los nuevos Dev Diary , nuevos hotfix?
Hello and welcome to another inter-expansion development diary for Europa Universalis 4. While I've been out sick for a few days, the team has been hard at work tracking down and fixing the various technical issues resulting from the engine upgrade we did in 1.12. We now believe we have the majority of issues resolved and aim to release hotfix 1.12.2 later today if testing goes well.
So while QA does their job, I thought I'd dig a bit into the past and talk about old mistakes. Specifically, features that didn't end up as we'd intended them to, why they ended up the way they did, and what we're planning to do about it. Note that this is not an exhaustive list, I just picked the ones I most wanted to discuss for one reason or another.
Random New World
There is of course, no talking about old features that didn't work out as planned without bringing up Random New World. Random New World was perhaps my personal single most anticipated feature in EU4, but ultimately ended up a disappointment. It's not that the feature is broken - it works according to the design specifications, and besides a few quirks is a fully playable feature that does what it says on the tin. Rather, the problem with Random New World is that it feels wrong. The landmasses it generates don't look quite right, and you always have the sense that something is just off about it. Contrary to what some people believe, the reason for this is not that we spent too little time on RNW (more work went into it than any other feature for EU4, Custom Nations included) or that it was badly coded. Rather, the problem for this feature is that the original design specifications were impossible to achieve.
The design for Random New World set out three goals: It should not require pre-generation, it should generate quickly enough that players don't sit around for 10 minutes waiting for the game to start, and it should look and feel good. It was only after weeks of work that we realized that we could not have all three: We could have a good-looking world that took a long time to generate (either through pre-generation or having to wait a long time in-game) or we could have a not so good-looking world was quicker to generate. At that point picking the former option would have required throwing out nearly all the work we'd done up to that point and starting over, so it was decided to press on with what we had and try to do the best we could with it.
Ever since taking over as Project Lead, it's been a personal ambition of mine to improve the Random New World feature. The problem, of course, is that I am still left with the same choice and limitations that we had back then: With the implementation we have, there is very much a limit to how good-looking we can make random map generation without having the player wait 10-15 minutes each time they start a new game or load a save. As such, the only possible path to improvement is to throw out what we have and start anew with a different implementation. Given that the feature does work, and given the massive time investment that would be involved in redoing it from the ground up, you can perhaps understand why that ambition has yet to be fulfilled. Nonetheless, something *may* be happening on this front in the not too distant future. No promises, though.
Hotjoin
Similarly, I feel that I have to bring up Hotjoin, as it'd be strange to leave it out of this dev diary. Yes, we're aware Hotjoin is still broken. Yes, we're still aiming to fix it. We've actually been fixing issues with it in each major patch since 1.8, but there's still a good deal more to fix. We probably shouldn't have let it get this broken in the first place, but we still have to prioritize fixes to new features over old ones. We'll get there though.
High Altitude Lakes
Perhaps this doesn't quite qualify as a 'feature', but I don't think it's escaped the attention of anyone who's played the game for a while that there are a few... odd looking lakes in the game, Siling Lake and Lake Titicaca being the prime examples. This is because EU4 was supposed to launch with the ability for the artists to create high altitude lakes, but this was cut for time and we ended up with all lakes using the global water level, resulting in what we internally dubbed 'Mt. Doom' in Tibet. As of a few days ago this has now been fixed, and come late June, Sauron will have to find a new place to live.
This is how high altitude lakes used to look:
This is how they look now:
I had intended this dev diary to be a bit longer, but I'm going to have to stop here for lack of time. Perhaps I'll continue it next week, or perhaps we'll talk about something else. For now, I leave you with this fun fact of the day:
Fun Fact of the Day!
Did you know that the most popular player nation (measured by number of campaigns started) in EU4 is to play a Custom Nation? It is closely followed by England, France and Castile. Of the top 10 played nations, the only (non-custom) one that isn't in the 'Interesting Nations' in 1444 is Brandenburg. It appears that our Byzantine fans have nothing on the lovers of Prussia.
Hello and welcome to another inter-expansion development diary for Europa Universalis 4. While I've been out sick for a few days, the team has been hard at work tracking down and fixing the various technical issues resulting from the engine upgrade we did in 1.12. We now believe we have the majority of issues resolved and aim to release hotfix 1.12.2 later today if testing goes well.
So while QA does their job, I thought I'd dig a bit into the past and talk about old mistakes. Specifically, features that didn't end up as we'd intended them to, why they ended up the way they did, and what we're planning to do about it. Note that this is not an exhaustive list, I just picked the ones I most wanted to discuss for one reason or another.
Random New World
There is of course, no talking about old features that didn't work out as planned without bringing up Random New World. Random New World was perhaps my personal single most anticipated feature in EU4, but ultimately ended up a disappointment. It's not that the feature is broken - it works according to the design specifications, and besides a few quirks is a fully playable feature that does what it says on the tin. Rather, the problem with Random New World is that it feels wrong. The landmasses it generates don't look quite right, and you always have the sense that something is just off about it. Contrary to what some people believe, the reason for this is not that we spent too little time on RNW (more work went into it than any other feature for EU4, Custom Nations included) or that it was badly coded. Rather, the problem for this feature is that the original design specifications were impossible to achieve.
The design for Random New World set out three goals: It should not require pre-generation, it should generate quickly enough that players don't sit around for 10 minutes waiting for the game to start, and it should look and feel good. It was only after weeks of work that we realized that we could not have all three: We could have a good-looking world that took a long time to generate (either through pre-generation or having to wait a long time in-game) or we could have a not so good-looking world was quicker to generate. At that point picking the former option would have required throwing out nearly all the work we'd done up to that point and starting over, so it was decided to press on with what we had and try to do the best we could with it.
Ever since taking over as Project Lead, it's been a personal ambition of mine to improve the Random New World feature. The problem, of course, is that I am still left with the same choice and limitations that we had back then: With the implementation we have, there is very much a limit to how good-looking we can make random map generation without having the player wait 10-15 minutes each time they start a new game or load a save. As such, the only possible path to improvement is to throw out what we have and start anew with a different implementation. Given that the feature does work, and given the massive time investment that would be involved in redoing it from the ground up, you can perhaps understand why that ambition has yet to be fulfilled. Nonetheless, something *may* be happening on this front in the not too distant future. No promises, though.
Hotjoin
Similarly, I feel that I have to bring up Hotjoin, as it'd be strange to leave it out of this dev diary. Yes, we're aware Hotjoin is still broken. Yes, we're still aiming to fix it. We've actually been fixing issues with it in each major patch since 1.8, but there's still a good deal more to fix. We probably shouldn't have let it get this broken in the first place, but we still have to prioritize fixes to new features over old ones. We'll get there though.
High Altitude Lakes
Perhaps this doesn't quite qualify as a 'feature', but I don't think it's escaped the attention of anyone who's played the game for a while that there are a few... odd looking lakes in the game, Siling Lake and Lake Titicaca being the prime examples. This is because EU4 was supposed to launch with the ability for the artists to create high altitude lakes, but this was cut for time and we ended up with all lakes using the global water level, resulting in what we internally dubbed 'Mt. Doom' in Tibet. As of a few days ago this has now been fixed, and come late June, Sauron will have to find a new place to live.
This is how high altitude lakes used to look:
This is how they look now:
I had intended this dev diary to be a bit longer, but I'm going to have to stop here for lack of time. Perhaps I'll continue it next week, or perhaps we'll talk about something else. For now, I leave you with this fun fact of the day:
Fun Fact of the Day!
Did you know that the most popular player nation (measured by number of campaigns started) in EU4 is to play a Custom Nation? It is closely followed by England, France and Castile. Of the top 10 played nations, the only (non-custom) one that isn't in the 'Interesting Nations' in 1444 is Brandenburg. It appears that our Byzantine fans have nothing on the lovers of Prussia.
Pos oye, ni me habia dado cuenta de lo de los lagos Ahora, si intentan mejorar la generación de "Nuevos Mundos" aleatorios si que se lo agradecere.
Ahora, si intentan mejorar la generación de "Nuevos Mundos" aleatorios si que se lo agradecere.