Varyar said:
I don't know. I've grown accustomed to spending my sunday evenings with you guys, and I really enjoy playing CK MP. But it feels like this game has lost a lot of its 'fun' appeal now, and I'm not sure I want to spend so much time on it.
Well...Sterkarm and me felt the same way, but I admit I waivered for a moment to just throw the towel. But, hey...we got 300 years left. Fun? We have no namecalling, no bitching, no nothing. So far this game has been very civil I must say. Sure not so great as certain EU2MP games, but good enough.
Oh, I must write something about the war from a "biased" strategist. The alliance, both its western (England, Naples, France and Leon) and eastern (Kiev and Pronsk) parts, failed because four things, some more important then the others.
Eastern parts failed to see that Poland was going to release Hungery. Maybe not NOW, but someday. Which means that Poland would be weaker, which means Kiev and Pronsk would have easier time in the war versus Poland. They didn't, because of lack of patiance.
- Atleast one of the Eastern parts failed to see the golden opportinity here. If one would have been loyal to Piast, what would have happened? Simple, after the defeat of the other, the loyal would have been granted the rivals titles. Easypeasy, and after a couple of years, maybe 80 years of loyal servitude, Poland might have granted the loyal duchy a kingtitle, if not, they would have been in a better spot to overthrow Poland. Once again, they didn't have patiance, failed to see the scope and fluidity of CK.
- The western parts did a big miss here, mostly by labeling Germany as a "lapdog" of Poland. It might have looked that way, but since certain realms tried to convince Germany to DoW Poland, when Poland was already grossly outnumbered, not so wise, since such things might trigger a "love for the underdog". Furthermore, by not DoWing Poland, who was the main antagonist, and only Germany, you missed to whole thing about the war. A diplomatic blunder.
- When the eastern parts failed, mostly because lack of patiance, the western part did a really big blunder. They took land from Germany. Big mistake, know why? Since you lost a potential ally. Sure, Germany supported Poland in THIS war, but next one, not that sure. You could have argued that Piast was no good catholic, and Germany might have aided, or atleast be neutral. But now? You have driven Germany firmly into the camp of Poland. Why? Lack of patiance. When the eastern war was lost, you wanted something out of it. So you took land from Germany, as a concellation price.
Oh, and the peacing was silly, I couldn't reject, and yet you were not agree to what to take from me. Big mistake, to go into a war without primary and secondary goals, PLANNING! is everything. So you bickered, about really silly things like a broke Germany would pay Leon 900 ducats, with what money? And England demanding that not only they would be given Netherlands, but also that Germany would give up any right to have that land in vassalage, permanently. Total bollocks. Fine that you beat me into a pulp, but if I will go trough yet another peace situation that happened, I'm out. If you beat me, take what you want, since I am in no position to say anything else, according to the rules.
Now Germany is broken, but I have patiance. I know that England, France and Naples will sooner or later have a rough spot, and then I will reclaim what is rightfully a part of Germany.