Now I know how long it takes to drive from Port Harcourt to Calabar via highway.
- 2
Thanks, I will keep this in my notes and as I have done some research on this area, it will indeed be among the first releases.It's ahistorical, but the 'western Igbo' now refer to themselves as 'Anioma,' so a potential replacement for c_west_igbo. The latter is obviously even more ahistorical (well to the extent its a geographic description more than anything used by the people who live there), so if I had to choose one I think Anioma is better at least is a reference to the collective Igbo of that region, even if it is a 20thC identity.
Unfortunately in CK3 a more granular conception of a 'county' is not possible, so often these type of designations come in and are necessary as 'better than what we have' type arrangements- it's the same with culture names, Nupe and Jukun are both heterogenous identities used in the present with historical roots that suggest something of a multicultural melting pot. Nupe is in the game as a culture, though 'Nupe' did not exist prior to the 15th century as an identity or kingdom (rather it was a collection of small sub-cultures). Jukun is however not in the game as a culture, despite possibly predating Nupe kingdom (i'm researching the Nupe at the moment to update my cultural title list). Anyway, just random thoughts lol.
Do you have any necessary changes there in mind? I am pretty satisfied with the way they are now, so they certainly aren't on my priority list now. As far as I checked my sources on Ifriqiya, I don't think I can go into deeper detail than the map is now, apart from very few baronies.Are you going to work on Tunisia and Egypt?
The first historical accounts about the people of the area come from the 16th century. There are some archaeological data about those areas, but since those areas are in the state of turmoil and armed conflict for the last 50 or so years, there even aren't any recent archaeological studies, like even in tha case of Western Sahel.So I was looking at the ck3 map and I started thinking about the Wadai-Darfur region. It seems that this corridors shape is pretty similar between ck2 ck3 and eu4. What exactly informs this shape? I figured this was the best place to ask and maybe see if you've done anything differently.
Is it a lack of data on the people south of there?
Thanks so much for the answer! So I take it the existing corridor was designed with the idea of 'We know there's a corridor around here connecting people in these two parts of africa' and they then we scrounged all the info possible to make as historical of a corridor as possible? It's really too bad because it's my feeling that the people in the real region wouldn't have felt limited in living or fighting or moving around just south of the corridor and I think I'd love to see that area have playable and accessible provinces. It's too bad that we just really don't have a clear or easy source to just fill it all up. One of the greatest reasons I love and studied african history is because of how cutting edge and open the field still is, unfortunately largely due to racism and lack of access, plus the historical lack of tools to work with history outside of written sources.The first historical accounts about the people of the area come from the 16th century. There are some archaeological data about those areas, but since those areas are in the state of turmoil and armed conflict for the last 50 or so years, there even aren't any recent archaeological studies, like even in tha case of Western Sahel.
That said - yes, there is very little data to base it on.
Searching for historical data relevant to CK period in Darfur was one of the most desperate works I have done in the last few years. It was actually easier to find data about the Guinean jungle than about medieval Darfur.
As for Egypt - it could have some more baronies being added to those provinces, but I'm affraid it would make them too small. Egypt already is one of the densest areas on the map when it comes to baronies... and even if baronies could have been added I certainly don't want to add more counties there.
There is no doubt that the corridor was used - there are numerous traces of communication/ trade between Lake Chad area and Ethiopia/Somalia/Arabia region and it is highly unlikely it would all go through Egypt.Thanks so much for the answer! So I take it the existing corridor was designed with the idea of 'We know there's a corridor around here connecting people in these two parts of africa' and they then we scrounged all the info possible to make as historical of a corridor as possible? It's really too bad because it's my feeling that the people in the real region wouldn't have felt limited in living or fighting or moving around just south of the corridor and I think I'd love to see that area have playable and accessible provinces. It's too bad that we just really don't have a clear or easy source to just fill it all up. One of the greatest reasons I love and studied african history is because of how cutting edge and open the field still is, unfortunately largely due to racism and lack of access, plus the historical lack of tools to work with history outside of written sources.
It sounds like you've already bashed your head against the text books for this region but I'll always be looking excitedly for any new changes or info there.I really really hope for lasting peace and stability in south sudan, and africa in general. Primarily for the people of course but also in this case for all the new information we might be able to access and learn in the area. I've always been enamoured by the fact that great cultures and empires rose and fell in africa that we still don't even know about, whereas european and asian history has been mostly known and static for a longer while and require us to reach much deeper to find the big unknowns!
I'm going to try and look more into it myself. I really hope to see new info arising in african history through the use of ground penetrating radar to help with archeology. It seems to have already been a huge revolution in the anthropology in the americas so maybe we'll be finding the lost settlements of these vast lands in the next few decades.
Keep up the great work on your mod! I already love the ck3 map and it's so full I've been struggling to imagine improvements. Seeing what you've been doing is really helping me see all the little things that can still be done!
As you know, religions aren't the area of concern of this mod, so I won't add a religion neither for the Jukun, nor the Kanumbe/Kanuri people, although I agree with you that they do deserve one and just like you, I'd like to break the large Bori blob.Re Jukun they actually sort of set up in the game history files with # notes (tho set all as nupe). So finding the characters to switch to jukun culture was very easy. I have a name list (tho could def add more), a list of names to be used for dynasties, mercenary name list, and a religion- Bashoism. All set up in my game already.
One thing I wanted to ask is if anyone has any info re Kanuri or Kanembu religion? I.e. pre islamic Kanem Bornu religion.The Bori blob must go!
Bori of course refers to a specific rite or practice of traditional Hausa spirituality, not the belief system itself. It also shouldn't cover the entirety of central Africa as it does now and esp not Kanem which was a more sophisticated and unified polity than Hausaland. The problem im having is there's no info on traditional religion in central Africa covered by Sao and Kanem in game at present.
Yep,I ran into that same thought when adding provinces. Like it's easy to just add a ton of baronies to each county but for gameplay purposes it looks and plays badly if a county is a bunch of tiny baronies that barely can fit all the map objects without you shrinking them into hard to click objects and does ruin some of the strategic play.
Not a scholar but I had the same idea about creating a new Islamic Faith for the Sahel. Muwalladi exists so why not? The variety of Islam that permeated the region was mainly Sunni Islam so the new Faith would be under this group. It would see African Faiths as Astray and be seen as Astray by them at the cost of being hostile to fellow Sunni who see them as heretical.Yes Elvain I know you're not interested in including religions in your mod, I just ask coz i was hoping either you or a fan of the mod might know something as I can not find much at all. Maybe enough to make a meme religion?
That said I did read a these recently about traditional zaghawa religion which has allowed me to add this to the game. One thing that does confuse me though is the relationship between kanuri and Zaghawa in 9th and 11th centuries. Do you think it would make sense for the kanem bornu bori rulers and and counties to share this religion?
Obviously bori is mostly concerned with hausa. But at present it covers both sao and kanuri rulers and counties. After converting all the zaghawa territory I've broken up large parts of the bori blob but not sure how far to go with this. Theres also parts of darfur that have zaghawa rulers but daju pop. Is this intended? Ditto for zaghawa provinces that have butr rulers or kanuri rulers.
Where you involved in these decisions and if so can you explain these choices to me? I'm tempted to align these provinces religions with the rulers religions (mostly the zaghawa religion), as the lines on the map indicating religion incongruence are an eye sore
Another issue, I feel like Islam did not really penetrate to the provinces as much as is reflected in provinces religion in game. I'm tempted to create a new Muslim faith that is a meld of traditional belief and Islam or a pagan faith with Islam syncretism to reflect this. Interested in your thoughts? Also as to what Islamic school this would be? Ashari is Sunni afaik, should it not be khajirite or Ibadi for most west and central Africa? I'm not as well read on Islamic schools.
Finally zaghawa is in Berber culture group. But afaik they are Black not Berber. Muslim scholars referred to them as Black nomads in their earliest sources afaik, and today they are Black though like many in the region have mixed with Arabs over the years. Thoughts? I assume this choice is perhaps driven by their nomadic lifestyle and perhaps some similarities with Berber ppl in history, but I feel like central African is a more logical choice for them given they are Black Africans and not Berber or Arabs.
Cheers
Just to make things clear. It's not that I'm not interested. It's rather a compatibility thing.Yes Elvain I know you're not interested in including religions in your mod,
I think that what we know about the Kanem and Zaghawa religious traditions is actually the same or in some aspects even slightly more than what we know about traditions which led to creation of religions such as the Kushite, so I don't see a problem.I just ask coz i was hoping either you or a fan of the mod might know something as I can not find much at all. Maybe enough to make a meme religion?
As much as I know, the Kanuri are a result of mixing of the Zaghawa with the original populations of Kanem and Bornu. In the case of Kanem we don't know who they were, in the case of Bornu those were probably some Sao or Sao-related people.That said I did read a these recently about traditional zaghawa religion which has allowed me to add this to the game. One thing that does confuse me though is the relationship between kanuri and Zaghawa in 9th and 11th centuries. Do you think it would make sense for the kanem bornu bori rulers and and counties to share this religion?
The Zaghawa cover much larger territory than they historically did.Obviously bori is mostly concerned with hausa. But at present it covers both sao and kanuri rulers and counties. After converting all the zaghawa territory I've broken up large parts of the bori blob but not sure how far to go with this. Theres also parts of darfur that have zaghawa rulers but daju pop. Is this intended? Ditto for zaghawa provinces that have butr rulers or kanuri rulers.
Where you involved in these decisions and if so can you explain these choices to me? I'm tempted to align these provinces religions with the rulers religions (mostly the zaghawa religion), as the lines on the map indicating religion incongruence are an eye sore
Thoughts?Finally zaghawa is in Berber culture group. But afaik they are Black not Berber. Muslim scholars referred to them as Black nomads in their earliest sources afaik, and today they are Black though like many in the region have mixed with Arabs over the years. Thoughts? I assume this choice is perhaps driven by their nomadic lifestyle and perhaps some similarities with Berber ppl in history, but I feel like central African is a more logical choice for them given they are Black Africans and not Berber or Arabs.
There are two things.Another issue, I feel like Islam did not really penetrate to the provinces as much as is reflected in provinces religion in game. I'm tempted to create a new Muslim faith that is a meld of traditional belief and Islam or a pagan faith with Islam syncretism to reflect this. Interested in your thoughts? Also as to what Islamic school this would be? Ashari is Sunni afaik, should it not be khajirite or Ibadi for most west and central Africa? I'm not as well read on Islamic schools.
I don't know about the sub-Saharan areas, but seeing how Muslim gamers themselves say that Islam is overrepresented in Egyptian and Middle-Eastern provinces, I'd tend to believe that's the case in other areas as well.First - where do you think Islam is penetrated more than it should? In general I don't quite agree that it does, but in some parts it might, but for that I'd need to know what areas do you have in mind.
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree.I don't know about the sub-Saharan areas, but seeing how Muslim gamers themselves say that Islam is overrepresented in Egyptian and Middle-Eastern provinces, I'd tend to believe that's the case in other areas as well.
Oh, this. yes, he's a PhD student and from what I was able to listen, he does have some amazing knowledge, indeed. But I wouldn't take everything he says as 100% true. He did make some good points, but from perspective of somebody, who has studied and worked with history of Islam for roughly twice as long as he does (assuming he's a good student), I'm sorry, but from the very little I have listened he's often looking at things from somehow narrow perspective. But I do admit I am biased. Perhaps strongly biased against him.I don't really have any specific areas in mind, the research is not mine but @AdmiralPrice 's whose vids I've watched.
![]()
As a PhD student of Islam I reviewed Islam in CK3. Now, I'm bringing a wishlist for an Islam themed DLC
Hey All! Some of you shared my videos (867, 1066) here reviewing Islam in CK3 (big thanks for that!), and a lot of you seemed to enjoy this. I don't want to be in full "critique" mode forever (no one likes a chronic complainer), though, and this...forum.paradoxplaza.com
PhD Student Reviews Islam in Crusader Kings 3
I found this on youtube: I am in no position to judge the information presented in this video but it's very interesting! EDIT 01.20.2020: Islam in 1066 | Crusader Kings 3 Historical Accuracy Reviewforum.paradoxplaza.com
May I ask what you mean? I don't really understand this. The Nupe names certainly are not a Jukun names. There's just a Jukun mentioned as a dynasty at the top of the Nupe dynasty names, that's all.Re Jukun they actually sort of set up in the game history files with # notes (tho set all as nupe). So finding the characters to switch to jukun culture was very easy. I have a name list (tho could def add more), a list of names to be used for dynasties, mercenary name list, and a religion- Bashoism. All set up in my game already.
May I ask what you mean? I don't really understand this. The Nupe names certainly are not a Jukun names. There's just a Jukun mentioned as a dynasty at the top of the Nupe dynasty names, that's all.
Any better idea for Jukun names?
Heh, yes I know that the Jukun rulers are identified in character files as Jukun chiefs. But there was no issue about where should the Jukun be placed. We already talked about this at several other places and you knew that there was no problem with this. Also among other things, from our discussions I think it shouldn't be hard for you to guess who put those #marks into those files. I know about those #marks and I also know that the names those characters bear are taken from the name list used for the Nupe.I'll clarify because you have misunderstood me. I simply saying the dynasties and territories that would logically be assigned to a Jukun culture ruler is already flagged as such in the games history files, as such once you have created a jukun culture its very easy to identify in the files without evening looking closely in game to see which dynasties and counties need to have jukum culture set.
I think that some of the name lists for other cultures are quite brief, so I believe that if the list has more than 20/10 names for male and female characters, it should be sufficent. I guess I know the thesis as I checked it for other info... but if you have already made the list, would you be willing to share it? As I said, compiling this sort of lists is one of the most annoying things for me, so it would be greatly appreciated, if you could save me the annoyanceThe name list i have generated from a thesis I read about traditional Jukun family, social and religious customs in the Wukari area. Its by no means a definitive list but sufficient for our purposes at this point.