• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Nope. I started this run on 1.3 version of PoD. However I did start it before the herd automation update.
Also it's not that there are different distortions. it's that there IS one always on for some reason. For example I can go to barbershop and make her look like a nosferatu. Barbershop has a line for "monster face". The issue is that its always on for some reason.
Could it be that you just noticed Clan Tzimisce? Tzimisce (or potentially an vampire with Vicissitude) if they do not have the beauty trait may have some random monstrous facial feature they have added. This happens more with the randomly created Tzimisce than the canon characters.

But speaking of Helena specifically there's weird issue with her that once I create a kingdom she goes bald.
I think it's becasue her default hairstyle is bald, and her "hair" is actually part of the "jeweled top" headgear (or whatever it's called). Which gets changed once she "crowns up".
I was able to replicate this and will fix it in the next update.

The issue isn't that most randoes aren't significantly worse. It's that Special persons aren't actually the cream of the crop.
Who'd wanna pay 50g/150p for inviting [inset name] and risking masquerade consequences when one short trip to the character finder and one arranged marriage can get us same or even better results?
Yeah, sure there's a lot of worse options... down at the bottom of the character finder, where no one will ever look at them. So what?

So imho they should be just SLIGHTLY better than the random lucky Joe.

OH and, just to be clear, I'm only talking about mortals here.
Cannon vamps are a different matter and I don't think I'm properly qualified to evaluate it quite yet.
The stats of great persons vary a lot. They are also not equally spread around the world. But they do offer a nice little bit of history and are often worth the gold and masquerade risk. Though "all great persons stats should be buffed" is maybe not the best approach. Maybe you can note which ones you find particularly underpowered. Finding good champions, councilors, heirs and herd is a pretty key part of PoD. So definitely there could be some tweaks made.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of cannon characters, are there plans to give more characters special mechanics/decisions than just the featured ones? Perhaps some of the characters more central to the Anarch Revolt?

Also what are the requirements to get Shreckt? I’ve been testing to see what characters get him and am having trouble figuring it out. (Giant Nos Schrekt courtesy of Absalon was fun and a terrifying thought).

Speaking of Absalon, if he’s based of the historical Archbishop of Lund named Absalon he’s *way* too old. He should be just over a century if mapping exactly to the real guy, or at least younger than the christianization of Denmark, which should shave off a century or two.
 
Last edited:
The regional event that involves Karl Schreckt pops for any character playing on what PDX calls "Greater Germany area" which is mostly modern Germany, Austria, Benelux and Holstein.

Absalon is faking it. He is not the real Absalon :

1616523110513.png


For more special content... maybe? Per the survey, many players play custom characters, so they wouldn't enjoy the special content. And the bookmark is an easy way of seeing which characters are special. Perhaps if we make "sub bookmark" like PDX does.
 
The regional event that involves Karl Schreckt pops for any character playing on what PDX calls "Greater Germany area" which is mostly modern Germany, Austria, Benelux and Holstein.

Absalon is faking it. He is not the real Absalon :

View attachment 696656

For more special content... maybe? Per the survey, many players play custom characters, so they wouldn't enjoy the special content. And the bookmark is an easy way of seeing which characters are special. Perhaps if we make "sub bookmark" like PDX does.
Thanks for the answers, I suspected as much regarding Schrekt and Absalon, but it’s good to have confirmation. I do hope we get something to spice up the canon characters, though I understand if that puts me in the minority. Or even just more decisions/events in general, possibly giving regional ones to separate say, the Scottish Toreador from the French Toreador.
 
We add regional content somewhat often (each major region has at least a regional event, similar to the Shcreckt one now) and some objectives are also regional. The Polish Tzimisce got an objective recently for example.

It's an ongoing, and probably neverending, effort really.
 
Is it possible to somehow completely eliminate vanilla contract negotiations? The reason I ask is this:
20210324092849_1.jpg

This fool keeps pressing on to my council and because she is a vassal I "inherited" from Mithras, I never had any say in it. She is too good a knight to simply destroy and I cannot even see the vanilla contract she is forcing her way with.
 
because of diablerie, you naughty vampire
Nonsense! That's half the fun of this mod. ;P
If you have taken blood from a victim (but did not kill them) they get a blood loss negative health modifier. This will likely decrease the intensity of the resonance. Eventually that blood loss modifier will expire, and their resonance will be recalculated based on their improved health. There is still some randomness in that calculation. Maybe too much! Its a definitely an arguable design decision to have resonance be dynamic vs. static.
Could you make a rule about it or something?
Because I wouldn't go anywhere near to dynamic if I could.

Let's look at things pragmatically.
The only reason from Player's perspective to have a specified herd is to cherry-pick them and enjoy the results.
Otherwise we'd be better off having a non-personalised menu emulating the hunt for random people that basically gives you blood and XP per month. (same way as the game doesn't spawn a specific animal when you hunt for animals)
But with this random recalculation running rampant the cherry-picking just doesn't work.
I hunt a mortal, get "intense resonance". I herd that same mortal, and even though he's back at full health by the time I succeed, he's suddenly fleeting, and of the wrong type to boot.

It'd be ok if there was some specific rule that makes them ill suited for repeated "learning". But just having them loose all value at random? No way, that defeats the point of the whole system, imho.

Speaking off... could we get automation of animal hunting as well?

I'm not sure what your issue is here. We allow for some mentors to pick up a vampire discipline trait through the power of friendship. We also let vampires train their ghouls in disciplines they know. The vampire spends their own resonance XP to do so. If your issue with description of a concept that is in vanilla CK3, that is beyond the scope of the modders.
There is no issue with me and mentors. Just trying to clear my confusion. Well, more like trying to explain the source of the confusion. It's been cleared by now.

Also...

Can you spend whole perks that way as well? That Helena run of mine I kept getting tons of phlegmatic XP (3 whole perks in less time than it took me to get one sanguine perk) and she starts with that whole tree maxed. So I just get 3 perk points sitting there and annoying me.

Could it be that you just noticed Clan Tzimisce? Tzimisce (or potentially an vampire with Vicissitude) if they do not have the beauty trait may have some random monstrous facial feature they have added. This happens more with the randomly created Tzimisce than the canon characters.
But Helena is a torri! And so are her "children". Yet all of them (both starting ones and player-embraced) had a permanent "shrivelled grandma and starving vampire had a baby" look on their faces.
And no, I've seen Clam Tzimisce before, theirs is a different kind of ugly.

My current run (dropped Helena and went custom gen13 caitiff from Venice) seems free of this bug thus far.

The stats of great persons vary a lot. They are also not equally spread around the world. But they do offer a nice little bit of history and are often worth the gold and masquerade risk. Though "all great persons stats should be buffed" is maybe not the best approach. Maybe you can note which ones you find particularly underpowered. Finding good champions, councilors, heirs and herd is a pretty key part of PoD. So definitely there could be some tweaks made.
Anthony Padua - 16/4/10/0/21/3
Beatrix of Assisi - 9/7/10/5/17/5
Leonardo Fibonacci (the vanilla one, not your version) - 8/9/10/9/22/0
Court chaplan I picked at random and married into my court for free at the start of the game - 2/2/3/6/21/6 (hmm... I should probably go nab vanilla Fibonacci while he's alive, I wonder why I forgot about him at the start of this run)

IIRC your version of Fibonacci had 29 learning. And that's probably something I WOULD pay 150p or 50g and some masquerade for. But that's only if I needed to.
Nothing stops me from pressing "ignore" and then hooking such a person into the court normally.
Kinda sucks, but you might have to resort to "take him now or he vanishes" method that the game normally uses for generated people if you want recruitment costs to actually be paid by players.
 
The vassal contract doesn't seem to do anything, liege is demanding conversion and converting my provinces even with religious protection, vassals create offspring/ghouls even when banned, same with masquarade (they dont bother covering it up, camarilla or not) and if im liege i cant even punish them for it , at least i dont see an option/imprisonment reason) anywhere.

Also in my game i became 2nd generation after diablerizing some low age vamp (of much lower generation) (me being a young third already).
Might have something to do with my diablerizing 2 other slayers of the gods - they had low generation though, only the modifier (PLEASE make it a trait so i dont have to identify them from their prowess' btw one of them had 12 before slayer modifier so .... HOW??) - a few years earlier though.

Also after the automation patch feeding from my herd gives me 0-2 points in foci ^^ (probably i shouldn't continue the game from old save). But it feels fair, after all im son of Caine XD.
 
Also after the automation patch feeding from my herd gives me 0-2 points in foci ^^ (probably i shouldn't continue the game from old save). But it feels fair, after all im son of Caine XD.
that is just what you get now apparently even from great persons.
 
Some vassal contracts don't do anything, they will be looked at in the future.

Your other issue (2nd gen) is due to a bug that was fixed in the latest Steam update.

Resonance has been rebalanced with auto herd numbers in mind, yes.
 
Any chance auto sipping will be on from the start in the future? My herd list is growing rather long :D so it is a bit of a chore having to find the right guy among 5 named Alexandr.
 
But Helena is a torri! And so are her "children". Yet all of them (both starting ones and player-embraced) had a permanent "shrivelled grandma and starving vampire had a baby" look on their faces.
And no, I've seen Clam Tzimisce before, theirs is a different kind of ugly.
I'm going to need a picture. If they become a wight, they look something like that. Like the picture of Camille in the Inquisition update loading screen.
At present, I can not replicate hideous Helena bug.
 
Do I need to have my capital in Russia or Europe to participate in the hunt for Absimiliard?
 
Not really. You only need to be eligible for the Anarch Revolt main event. Which is available to every vampire except those in India and in Africa.
Guess I will have to postpone relocating the shadow curtain to Mali then :D