-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
...but it's like Version 0.0.0.0.01, right? Since it seems it's only for working on...
I can bug report for you, later on, when you're ready
I can bug report for you, later on, when you're ready
I'm strong enough, bring it on!!!Originally posted by Hajji Giray I
I can bug report for you, later on, when you're ready
Starting a game as Roman Empire in 0AD. Will report as I continue (this is LIVE: I have EU2 in another window as I type this!).
1. During loading a lot of critical errors come up, including several about "bos.txt"...I took a screeny, will upload later.
2. January 1- Parthia goes on annexation spree immediately
I get an event called Money. The description says:
I also get 2 different Armenian succession events. (Neither of them have a description)
All of a sudden I get the feeling I am not actually supposed to be playing this yet, as I see that the leader files are unchanged as yet...
1. During loading a lot of critical errors come up, including several about "bos.txt"...I took a screeny, will upload later.
2. January 1- Parthia goes on annexation spree immediately
I get an event called Money. The description says:
(+10 ducats)
I also get 2 different Armenian succession events. (Neither of them have a description)
All of a sudden I get the feeling I am not actually supposed to be playing this yet, as I see that the leader files are unchanged as yet...
the thread in the downloads doesn't say: don't expect anything. for nothing.
About that list of revolters/countries: I'd include Greece and Macedonia, under the ATH and GRE tags, though maybe Greece wouldn't be a fitting description. But 20 city states doesn't fit in 1 province.
Macedonia should, I believe, be possible in the provinces Macedonia and Albania, whereas Greece should be in Morea and Athens.
Any other questions, like were Greek culture should be, I would be willing to help with.
About that list of revolters/countries: I'd include Greece and Macedonia, under the ATH and GRE tags, though maybe Greece wouldn't be a fitting description. But 20 city states doesn't fit in 1 province.
Macedonia should, I believe, be possible in the provinces Macedonia and Albania, whereas Greece should be in Morea and Athens.
Any other questions, like were Greek culture should be, I would be willing to help with.
Oh, editing mistake, I used an ) instead of an }
Reason: As I haven't made enough random events, I had to fill in with something and $10 is harmless...
Excuse me... Do you expect a description on all events or what?!
You're completely right...
But I would appreciate if you for instance made a better Parthian ai.file if you feel that their aggressiveness is a problem...
Feel free to contribute...
Ok, I found some things:
First of all, the list with the countries earlier in the thread wasn't all that is in, so my comment isn't really valid.
Second, something with cultures:
province 472(AFAIK, Armenia) has greek culture. Yet my historical Atlas shows no greeks there, only some in the coast of Trabzon (475, which has greek too.).
province 361(Albania) has greek too, though only about half was Greek. I assume this has been considered, but can't be too complete.
744 (Alexandria) has Egyptian culture, while the main city was a hellenic/hellenistic city, allthough there was Egyptian influence.
394 (Apulia) might deserve Greek culture, as there was quite big Greek influence there, and Rome has Greek culture anyway. Same for 395(Messina), though this is more dubious.
Also, some of the greek cultures in Anatolia, like 1609-1610-1611 (Kastamonu, Antalya, Taurus) seem a bit dubious, though I'm not really an expert there.
These are no absolute truths, it's what can be gathered from a map of the greek world before the conquests of Alexander the great, one from around 100 BC (where seleucid seems more appropriate for Taurus, I think) and some knowledge from school, so feel free to comment.
First of all, the list with the countries earlier in the thread wasn't all that is in, so my comment isn't really valid.
Second, something with cultures:
province 472(AFAIK, Armenia) has greek culture. Yet my historical Atlas shows no greeks there, only some in the coast of Trabzon (475, which has greek too.).
province 361(Albania) has greek too, though only about half was Greek. I assume this has been considered, but can't be too complete.
744 (Alexandria) has Egyptian culture, while the main city was a hellenic/hellenistic city, allthough there was Egyptian influence.
394 (Apulia) might deserve Greek culture, as there was quite big Greek influence there, and Rome has Greek culture anyway. Same for 395(Messina), though this is more dubious.
Also, some of the greek cultures in Anatolia, like 1609-1610-1611 (Kastamonu, Antalya, Taurus) seem a bit dubious, though I'm not really an expert there.
These are no absolute truths, it's what can be gathered from a map of the greek world before the conquests of Alexander the great, one from around 100 BC (where seleucid seems more appropriate for Taurus, I think) and some knowledge from school, so feel free to comment.
As i lost internet connection from home, i can't download this mod. Therefore i am leaving this project.
Ok, I guess you're right, but what should the culture be then? Even though the province is Armenia, it won't belong to armenia, so another culture might be more appropriate... The province is used as a base and capital for Iberia, what kind of culture should it be?
If there weren't any problems ruling that province then there shouldn't be an unique culture there (from a gameplay perspective)
Might be reasonable... btw should Rome have egyptian culture? I guess not, but should they have a state cultured province in Alexandria? Perhaps religion should reflect hellenisation...
It might tempt any greek cultured nation to go there (or it might be suicide if Rome controls it). I had it that way in the beginning but changed back (no real reason actually). I guess it's justified with greek Apulia...
Me neither... Do you have a suggestion?
I don't know, I just looked at the culture from a historical perspective, not from the perspective of the game or scenario. At least the province was part of Armenia in 113 BC, and from that map on page 1 it looks like it was in 1 AD too. In that case, Armenian, but I know nothing about Iberia.
Well, it should be either greek or the same as ragusa, but I think Greek will be good enough here, unless game-balance or something dictates otherwise.
Alexandria would not be very hard to rule for the Romans. However, I think the rest of Egypt had some more problems, as the Romans never became local rulers like the Ptolemaeans, but I'm no expert here, either.
I don't think it would be very unhistorical for them to go for Apulia instead of Rome, Naples or Illyria. So I would think to make it Greek wouldn't be very bad, though it shouldn't be top priority either.
Taurus- Seleucid culture, representing Cilicia/Kilikien
Kastamonu- doesn't really need a change, I found a map of the time now. It might be the same culture as the northern inland (Azov, Kouban), but the Romans didn't really have many problems there.
Antalya- Same, doesn't need a change, even less than Kastamonu, actually.
I found Iberia here:
http://www.worldhistorymaps.com/maps/OB0036.htm
And IMHO I think it suits the Armenia province pretty well... however, I guess I should give Daghestan to someone else, perhaps Sarmatae...
This map gives another picture of the Armenian borders:
http://americanhistory.si.edu/csr/nnc/parthia/frames/imapki.htm
Still the Armenia province doesn't seem to be a part of it (Iberia is noted just above Armenia)
I think I'll keep both greek for now...
Both changed...
Taurus is now seleucid...
Should any more provinces be seleucid, as it is now Taurus, Syria, Kirkuk, Iraq and Basrah are seleucid... should Antioch (Aleppo province) be seleucid as well?
Well, THAT stinks...
Okay...I will try to help as much as a non-scripter, non-editor can.
Consider me with you...
What do you think about giving all barbarians and nomads whiteman and also give them tech to make infantry units represent both nomad cavalry and barbarian horde...?
well, it solves the issue of barbarians sailing the seven seas.
And ofcourse tech then has to be adjusted to make them have something like nomad cavalry.
So I think it would be good.
And ofcourse tech then has to be adjusted to make them have something like nomad cavalry.
So I think it would be good.
I've found out a use for the CRC tag... I guess it could be used as judaism... since it will be gone before any of the christian religions comes (the protestant and reformed tag)... and we don't have to waste a complete religion-tag for judaism, but still represent it... and they already have their own culture (this is a somewhat better situation than the sikh in EU2)...