• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
In early October 1944, the Conservative Party appeared to have a stranglehold in the national political popularity stakes, belying the far closer position in the Parliament of that time. Labour Party support had seemingly collapsed, with the Leninist Revolutionary Socialist League being the main opposition party of the left. The main opposition voice at the time was coming from the right-wing parties, led by the National Socialists.

I know HOI3 isn't a political simulator, but good job Paradox turning Britain into a one-party state! :(

Shortly following the end of the war and before the Geneva Conference ended, the British Labour Party decided at a meeting in Blackpool on 21 October 1944 to withdraw its support for Winston Churchill's coalition government, though this did not immediately force a national election. The ostensible reason was Churchill’s “obtuse, unreasoned and unreasoning” insistence that India be retained as part of the Empire in defiance of the will of the Geneva Conference.

This definitely needed to happen ASAP.

In November 1944, as the outcomes of the Geneva Conference became known, the perception that Churchill had been ‘done over’ by the Soviets at Geneva became entrenched in the British commentariat.

As indeed he had, and his own intransigence made matters worse than they might otherwise have been.

It was proposed that a convention of prominent Indians from all religious and ethnic groups would meet to draft a new constitution, including whether and (if so) how India should be partitioned.

Here's hoping they make a decent job of it. If not, the League of Nations is more than welcome to its share of the blame.

Whether fair or not, the sense of a British failure in Geneva undermined the dominant position Churchill had held in October, following the liberation of France and his leadership of the Allies throughout the war, which Britain had come through comparatively well.

Really, it's hard to see how Churchill has much credibility as a war leader here. Barely hanging on in North Africa and East Asia and letting the Japanese get footholds in Australia and New Zealand just doesn't cut it - although the belated liberation of France does at least at least redeem him to some extent I suppose.

So with many Conservatives seeing their support slipping away, Eden formally launched a party room leadership challenge on 23 May. Churchill narrowly defeated Eden in the party room vote a week later by 204 to 183, but the margin was not enough be convincing. It left Churchill wounded and the Tories bitterly divided.

An all too familiar picture... :rolleyes:

For general national popularity, I averaged the 1945 OTL outcome v the Paradox popularity numbers (many of which were zero in one column or the other). Interestingly, for Tory and Labour this gave a starting point fairly similar to the 1935 outcome.

A reasonable premise given what the game gave you as a starting point. It does look like an uphill struggle for Labour, though!

For the smaller parties, I then halved the number of seats they would have got had those percentages been applied nationally, adding the seats lost to the major party (Tory or Labour) closest to them in ideology.

This certainly gives a plausible model for the Liberals...

Because of the British voting system, one’s national percentage of votes does not really translate into the number of seats won (it’s exaggerated for the larger parties and usually under-represented for geographically diverse broad-based parties), given the winner-takes-all electoral system.

However, I think it's highly unlikely the far right would make any kind of breakthrough with these kinds of polling numbers. Five seats, maybe? The system really does make it extremely hard for minor parties to get representation. Thankfully so, in this case!

The die roll for the national swing was 97/100! This turned the election into a landslide of very similar proportions to the real one in 1945. Art imitates life. And it meant election night was never going to be close.

It seems your dice have far better political judgement than HOI3's algorithms! :D

While the new government focused primarily on setting their domestic reforms in progress, they also had to respond to events occurring overseas. On 20 August 1945 British Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin condemned Soviet policy in Europe – specifically Denmark, Germany and Poland as "one kind of totalitarianism replaced by another."

And that unfortunately, is Attlee's first mistake. We needed a clean break with the wartime coalition, so Bevin should have been out.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Really, it's hard to see how Churchill has much credibility as a war leader here. Barely hanging on in North Africa and East Asia and letting the Japanese get footholds in Australia and New Zealand just doesn't cut it - although the belated liberation of France does at least at least redeem him to some extent I suppose.

Depends whether comparing to OTL or not. Compared to that, the UK (not rhe empire) had a GREAT war. No domestic damage, no debt beyond manageable amounts, no fleet or air damage, no lost army equipment, no real army casualties, managed to bascially 'win' the war without doing anything except at the end when they retook France on the cheap.

In universe, they had an abysmal war. Didn't take part at all, abandoned every ally and dependant they had, including their own empire. Significantly burnt their international and empire reputation. Only reason France will talk to them is because eventually, they did help out. Didn't super build up air power or exp, so all they have is their super big fleet which they probably can't afford or even need anymore given the empire will be going soon. Destroyed all good will in the empire, both settler dominions and colonies with their attitude. Sleepwalked through Turkey taking over persia and middle east, and the entire conference aside from making things even worse with India.

Yeah...not great. Avoiding damage in the UK might even hurt the UK in the long run as they aren't forced to modernise and rebuild better.

As to the business with the Soviets...I think there might not be an iron curtain this time round. With only France not in the comintern, there's not much point of one. And with Turkey an ally and Japan for soke reason being openly antagonistic, the Soviets and comintern have more to gain being diplomatic with the US, which vice versa has a lot to gain being friendly with the reds (at least till Japan gets sorted). What with Asia still up in the air and the british empire collapsing, the US needs to be able to diplomatically agree on spheres of influence with Turkey and Russia, isolationist or not.
 
  • 5Like
Reactions:
I have to say, I've almost given up on HoI as a good "war" game. There's just too much leeway for the AI to absolutely be a dumb about how it manages a war. There's almost no balance, and this shows in things like doomstacks (both in HoI3 and into V3/HoI4) and the seeming AI penchant for absolutely abandoning an entire front for the single province uprising deep in the rear. This is how you wind up with a moderately successful US involvement in with Turkish forces, amply supported by massive USN task forces, while the Pacific gets... meh... subs? Because it was never shown/tracked, I couldn't rely on the Unrestricted SubWar conducted by the US against Japan (which was probably shaping the battlefield for the pivot to Asia). There was just nothing to show for it aside from a few SUBRON losses... I digress.

Basically, how p'dox handles how the levels of command from national to the division level are handled, it creates more headaches than it should. Would that I could spend the time to build a game engine to handle it properly...
 
  • 4Like
  • 1
Reactions:
as an election nerd I'm so much loving this!
 
  • 4Like
  • 2
Reactions:
Just an aside, but an interesting view into the US-Greece-Turkish relationship from War on the Rocks. One of the characters here even makes an appearance briefly...

Read the article here.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Read through the end of page 226. The big issue is the financing of the rebuild. Will America do a Marshall-type plan? Will Stalin transfer military spending to economic and to anyone outside the motherland? Turkey needs to catch up and has suffered one of the highest casualty rates among males 18-59. (Very aggressive and with the Balkan conflicts had one of the longest wars.) Though a secular nation, will Turkey become the leader of the Islamic world? Japan probably will not receive much foreign aid but home island damage is far less than OTL.

For someone who is unfamiliar with HoI3, how did the various AIs do versus their typical performances?

Thank you for your hard work. Will you do random roll for Inonu/Stalin power length versus OTL? Also, a roll for when Uncle Joe makes TBC gulag inspector as no one of competence can be tolerated.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1Love
  • 1Haha
Reactions:
More comment feedback: the next TT chapter (USSR & Warsaw Pact) is written and illustrated, will get it out after I've finished a similarly finished update on my CK2 AAR.
As reassuring as 400 Labour MPs is, 30 open fascists in the Commons is very worrying indeed. Hopefully they’ll all accidentally brutally stab themselves in the stomach while shaving the morning before the state opening and we can all get on with our lives in peace. :p
Indeed! Yes, I know. They'll (regrettably) have to be woven into the ATL event line for the UK at some point. Not quite sure how yet, but it's bound to be an unpleasant interlude, however it goes. They are unlikely to go quietly ... :(
Oh pissarro off Bevin, you old cow snatcher. People will be comparing you to me...er...Stalin...for the next 70 years.
You get the good, the bad and the ugly here in all their glory/infamy. ;)
To be fair to the Amercians, the britsh haven't been bombed, barely fought, and don't have any large debts to pay aside from...Well...to the amercians. So really, the British should be the ones paying them, and they (probably) can afford to start doing so.
That was indeed part of the calculation. Also in part a traditional Republican desire to reign in government spending, especially overseas. In theory, anyway!
Great to see the updates on post-war events and elections continue. Considering the starting position, which at least seemed significantly worse for Labour than OTL, it's impressive that they managed to get an even larger majority than OTL. Just goes to show that your methods do allow for the significant swings and surprises that do occasionally happen in real life elections. Of course, this means things for the UK will likely continue as mostly OTL, except for the fact that there has been much less destruction of it's cities. It might have been interesting to see how a notionally Churchill-led government would have done instead, hampered by conservative party divided between Eden and Churchill. Surely, such a government would be much more assertive in defending and maintaining the Empire, or what remains of it. The labour result means the differences are going to be more subtle, like the smaller reconstruction loan from the US, and maybe some pressures within the labour party, to move towards an alignment with a Comintern that came out of the war more successful than OTL.
Thank you! And the good thing about this one is it wasn't (fully) engineered by me for dramatic effect. In fact, the dramatic effect would have been a closer result. But art imitates life here. The post-war diplomatic challenges are going to be far more complicated and ambiguous than in OTL, as there are up to five poles emerging, perhaps more, rather than the us v them with the non-aligned on the side. USSR/Warsaw Pact; UGNR/Bucharest Pact; UK-led Allies; USA (still not integrated into the nascent Western Alliance); Japan/EACPS; then China (Nat v Com still) and possible smaller Arab and Indian-based unaligned groupings.
As for Turkey, it seems like it's going to depend on how quickly they can start pumping and selling crude in large quantities. If they manage to get the money flowing in before there is too much upheaval in the UGNR republics I reckon Turkey could do well, using oil money to fund an oversized military and police force that can hang on to most of the neo-ottoman empire that is the Bucharest pact and the UGNR. The deal with Japan for them to help fund oil extraction is definitely a good start. Of course, this only works if corruption and embezzlement of oil money is kept to reasonably low levels, so you'd need to have leaders who have loftier goals than simply enriching themselves and their cronies. Of course, the most profit and stability is to be had in the long term from Turkey developing it's own oil industry so it doesn't end up paying a premium for foreign expertise in perpetuity. How a supra-national UGNR or even Bucharest pact government-owned oil-conglomerate would be called is a question that remains to be properly answered:
UGNRPC is rather clunky. Taking a leaf from the Saudi book, maybe Turkish Japanese Oil Company, shortened to UGNR Tujaco, which would be less offensive to the non-Turks in the UGNR than 'Turkish Petroleum'. United Republics Petroleum (URP)? Or just keep it simple and call it Gulf Oil (maybe with those same colours and racing liveries...) as most of the extraction is going to be happening around the Persian gulf anyway.
Yes, oil will be big for them - and keeping strategic and economic control of it. Maybe we'll have to have a naming comp, like for the formation of the UGNR! Without Perse's easel and butchers paper, this time. :D
Japan is in a pickle. They were spread thin before Geneva. Having gotten more than expected, they now get to try and manage a massive non-Japanese population while it's armed forces are occupied staring down the Red Army over a piece of the Mongolian desert. Really, I concur with the others in saying that they need to swallow their pride and make a deal with the Soviets. Offer them all of Mongolia, maybe some border territories in Manchuria, in exchange for non-agression pact and non-intervention, as in neither party funds insurgents in the other's empire. Even then, it's not clear the Soviets would bite, because they are in such a strong position on the Eurasian mainland that they can just erode the Japanese empire from within over the decades, and there isn't that much the Japanese can do about it as going to war with this version of the USSR is clearly suicidal. The Japanese need friends, and both the Turkish and their sphere of influence and the Americans could be incredibly useful. The former to safeguard a plentiful and relatively cheap source of petroleum (maybe the Japanese can help the Turks build their navy), and the latter to pressure the Soviets into somewhat behaving themselves on the Asian mainland. The cold war is going to happen, even with the Comintern in place, and offering the Americans bases in Japan and Korea could be mutually beneficial and might even evolve into covert, or even overt, US support for Japanese counter-isurgency operations in China, and elsewhere, especially when the insurgents in question are funded by the USSR and/or Communist. After all this version of the IJA still has a massive punch and Japan hasn't demilitarised, so the IJA might end up being a much better ally against Communism in Asia than the South Vietnamese, or even the South Koreans. I could see a fanatically anti-communist US government in the '50s sending troops into China to help the IJA destroy Mao and root out Communism in China (or at least try...) maybe in exchange for part of China (probably the part 'liberated' with US support) becoming notionally democratic (but really with rigged elections and a vassal state to Japan and/or the US). That's probably the best scenario for Japan short of a deal with the Soviets which removes, at least, the threat of a Red Army invasion. As long, of course, as the US sees Communism as more evil than Japanese imperialism Japan might do very well for themselves.
Japan's position is nominally far stronger than in OTL's post-war, but their potential too is constrained by their complicated strategic situation and legacy occupations in Asia. Nor will they get the rebuild rebound in their industrial development in OTL and subsequent close integration into Western democratic trading systems. First, they need the reliable oil supplies GW2 failed to deliver to them. Their path ahead in Asia, global economic developments and at home (politically and economically) are fascinating, with many possible paths and outcomes. I suspect the probability dice will be getting a workout with many of their key developments and events!
Anyhow, I'm back up to date and looking forward to the next instalments of 'Talking Turkey: The Epilogue'
Really nice to have you back 'on line'. A couple more of the 1944-5 epilogue chapters to go (US, France & other Allies I think) before we launch into the integrated world ahead. For I'm not sure how long.
I know HOI3 isn't a political simulator, but good job Paradox turning Britain into a one-party state! :(
That it ain't! Much as I try to use the game as the story basis and re-arrange the angels on the head of that pin, some things just need to be corrected.
This definitely needed to happen ASAP.
Yes, the fates made their choice - Fortuna spoke! ;)
As indeed he had, and his own intransigence made matters worse than they might otherwise have been.
Hubris and tragedy, strength=weakness, etc. ;)
Here's hoping they make a decent job of it. If not, the League of Nations is more than welcome to its share of the blame.
Could go anywhere from shining beacon to bloody maelstrom or somewhere in between. Don't know myself yet ...
Really, it's hard to see how Churchill has much credibility as a war leader here. Barely hanging on in North Africa and East Asia and letting the Japanese get footholds in Australia and New Zealand just doesn't cut it - although the belated liberation of France does at least at least redeem him to some extent I suppose.
It's interesting trying to theorise what people would think about an ATL where they have no OTL to cross-reference to. In some ways they were flaccid, but in others could be said to have done well from a national and Allied self-interest perspective. TBC has had plenty of detailed and plausible analysis on this too, over time. In this case, they've still won and are the undisputed leaders of the Western Alliance; yes did liberate France and the Low Countries and have kept them in the Allies, it looks like the Battle of the Atlantic wasn't nearly so bad as OTL, same for the blitz and follow-on bombing in England, they retained pretty much all their holdings in the Med, Middle East and South East Asia, got Australia, NZ and New Guinea and the Dutch East Indies de-occupied without further bloodshed at the Geneva Conference, Germany and Italy defeated with Russia and Turkey paying most of the butcher's bill, etc. Could have been far worse. Of course, that approach cedes influence and clout to others. Other things as you say not so good and the India debacle led to the erosion of Churchill's credibility and then the fall of the government.
An all too familiar picture... :rolleyes:
Although it didn't happen then, I thought it was a plausible turn of events given how many other times such things have happened, in the UK, Australia, Italy (if you want to get extreme :D) and elsewhere where the Government and PM are decided in the legislature and the PM is essentially at the mercy of their colleagues on a daily basis. It was also a narrative device to help explain how the ridiculous HOI3 political readout for the UK could have turned around so quickly to make the 1945 election a contest.
A reasonable premise given what the game gave you as a starting point. It does look like an uphill struggle for Labour, though!
This certainly gives a plausible model for the Liberals...
I felt it was a good compromise between game outcome, RL and narrative credibility/potential. Glad it worked!
However, I think it's highly unlikely the far right would make any kind of breakthrough with these kinds of polling numbers. Five seats, maybe? The system really does make it extremely hard for minor parties to get representation. Thankfully so, in this case!
I did give thought to this, but assumed their support this time would be concentrated in some particular areas. I felt there had to be lip service paid (however unpleasant) to the fact the game popularity of these groups was far larger than all the rest except for the Tories. It makes one of the PODs from OTL, too. Some narrative potential in it, especially with a 'Commie-loving Socialist government' now in power with a massive majority. The right wing nutters won't be pleased. And if they feel under-represented in a system that seemingly gives them no prospect of being able to exert the power they want to, well ... could be ugly down the track.
It seems your dice have far better political judgement than HOI3's algorithms! :D
:D It was an amusing outcome, then when the dust settled, I could only marvel at how close to OTL it ended up being! The people obviously made the same judgement many of our commenters have. ;)
And that unfortunately, is Attlee's first mistake. We needed a clean break with the wartime coalition, so Bevin should have been out.
This one was of course drawn straight from OTL. Though it is likely to play out a bit differently here, there are grounds for deep British suspicion over Soviet domination of Germany. And on a comparative basis, the Soviets don't have the same stranglehold over the rest of central and eastern Europe they had in OTL. The Eastern Bloc is not monolithic and Whitehall would no doubt see opportunities (as some have already noted) for their classic diplomatic strategies being exercised in Europe, with France and the UGNR being central and a desperate need to wean the new Dewey government away from that GW2 US-Comintern 'marriage of convenience (I still think a rather convenient for me as player but silly game artefact) and integrated somehow into the Western sphere. We'll see if Bevin is up to such a game ...
Depends whether comparing to OTL or not. Compared to that, the UK (not rhe empire) had a GREAT war. No domestic damage, no debt beyond manageable amounts, no fleet or air damage, no lost army equipment, no real army casualties, managed to bascially 'win' the war without doing anything except at the end when they retook France on the cheap.
See above. I agree with much of this.
In universe, they had an abysmal war. Didn't take part at all, abandoned every ally and dependant they had, including their own empire. Significantly burnt their international and empire reputation. Only reason France will talk to them is because eventually, they did help out. Didn't super build up air power or exp, so all they have is their super big fleet which they probably can't afford or even need anymore given the empire will be going soon. Destroyed all good will in the empire, both settler dominions and colonies with their attitude. Sleepwalked through Turkey taking over persia and middle east, and the entire conference aside from making things even worse with India.
Maybe, though I have a somewhat more sanguine view, perhaps. On the con side, their fleet was hammered hard by the Japanese, so its not the naval super-power it might have been. The Japanese have already conducted their naval draw-down for them!! For Australia and NZ, yes, they were unable to help in the war, but did salvage them in the peace. An unlike in OTL, the US were no help at all, so who else does Australasia have to cleave to now? Yes, India was rather a mess and a black eye at the conference, but mainly for Churchill and the Tories than the UK more widely. Atlee was on the 'right side' of that one, and the India mess is already off their hands, a few years earlier than in OTL. And they did retain their commercial oil rights in the Persian oil fields. Not necessarily a complete strategic disaster ... but yes, Churchill's cred trashed more than the UK's. Atlee may have more to work with and greater international clout than in post-WW2 OTL.
Yeah...not great. Avoiding damage in the UK might even hurt the UK in the long run as they aren't forced to modernise and rebuild better.
Possibly, a version of the same conundrum that Japan faces.
As to the business with the Soviets...I think there might not be an iron curtain this time round. With only France not in the comintern, there's not much point of one. And with Turkey an ally and Japan for soke reason being openly antagonistic, the Soviets and comintern have more to gain being diplomatic with the US, which vice versa has a lot to gain being friendly with the reds (at least till Japan gets sorted). What with Asia still up in the air and the british empire collapsing, the US needs to be able to diplomatically agree on spheres of influence with Turkey and Russia, isolationist or not.
The Iron Curtain may still be perceived by some in the West, but if so it wouldn't be nearly so long as it was in OTL and would face in only one direction (along the border of Benelux and France and in Scandinavia, perhaps).
I have to say, I've almost given up on HoI as a good "war" game. There's just too much leeway for the AI to absolutely be a dumb about how it manages a war. There's almost no balance, and this shows in things like doomstacks (both in HoI3 and into V3/HoI4) and the seeming AI penchant for absolutely abandoning an entire front for the single province uprising deep in the rear. This is how you wind up with a moderately successful US involvement in with Turkish forces, amply supported by massive USN task forces, while the Pacific gets... meh... subs? Because it was never shown/tracked, I couldn't rely on the Unrestricted SubWar conducted by the US against Japan (which was probably shaping the battlefield for the pivot to Asia). There was just nothing to show for it aside from a few SUBRON losses... I digress.

Basically, how p'dox handles how the levels of command from national to the division level are handled, it creates more headaches than it should. Would that I could spend the time to build a game engine to handle it properly...
If only the concept could be tweaked to retain the good bits and improve the bad (AI and politics especially). This particular game didn't seem to have those same kind of problems so much, in part because I deliberately set it up to be playing a large minor instead of a major. I found the doomstacks in this and the Q&D games to be rather counter-productive much of the time, due to the stacking penalties. Flanking with corps-sized stacks on more than two sides if possible, plus concentrated application of air power, seemed to work best in heavily concentrated/high density fronts, while in more fluid ones the 'RAW' approach worked well. Let me know if you ever develop HOI3+! :D
as an election nerd I'm so much loving this!
Great! There will be more to come (in France, possibly India, and then down the track).
Just an aside, but an interesting view into the US-Greece-Turkish relationship from War on the Rocks. One of the characters here even makes an appearance briefly...

Read the article here.
This was interesting. It got me 'reading ahead' on what Inonu did in the post-war years, which was more and for longer than I had realised.
It is a Paradox. An HoI AAR being the prequel for a Vicky AAR.
True dat! :p
Read through the end of page 226. The big issue is the financing of the rebuild. Will America do a Marshall-type plan? Will Stalin transfer military spending to economic and to anyone outside the motherland? Turkey needs to catch up and has suffered one of the highest casualty rates among males 18-59. (Very aggressive and with the Balkan conflicts had one of the longest wars.) Though a secular nation, will Turkey become the leader of the Islamic world? Japan probably will not receive much foreign aid but home island damage is far less than OTL.
Glad to have you back and I see plowing through the Epilogue back-catalogue. :) Jury still undecided on a alt-Marshall Plan. If there is one, it will look quite different and exclude many countries that have now fallen under Soviet or Turkish control, while Japan is not an occupation responsibility/burden either. Stalin? Who can predict what Uncle Joe will do! Turkey has much potential - and many potential pitfalls too that comes from having fought for so long and won so big ... is it sustainable, and for how long? Japan, per above, an interesting situation, pros and cons.
For someone who is unfamiliar with HoI3, how did the various AIs do versus their typical performances?
I though they did unusually well, actually. And because a central premise of the game was that much of the rest of the war was AI v AI with no human major power player, I felt that kept things quite even. My principle is that if the AI has its problems, they even out more without humans running say Germany, the US, UK, USSR or Japan. Others may have different perspectives.
Thank you for your hard work. Will you do random roll for Inonu/Stalin power length versus OTL? Also, a roll for when Uncle Joe makes TBC gulag inspector as no one of competence can be tolerated.
You're welcome! There will be something like that, riffing off OTL but with the possibility of departure. I see TBC as some kind of cross between Rasputin and Beria in this post-war ATL ... and look at what happened to them!! :D:p

To All: Thanks once more for the very fulsome comments. All things being equal, next chapter up in the next day or so. It's another big/important one.
 
  • 4Like
  • 1Love
  • 1
Reactions:
Chapter 247: The Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact – October 1944 to December 1945
Chapter 247: The Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact – October 1944 to December 1945

Soviet Government and Relationships in October 1944


In terms of the private sympathies of their citizens, the ruling Communist Party held a significant majority of the population’s support. But their organisation (and thus practical political power) was supreme, at over 90%.

A6jU5q.jpg

While the rapprochement of the Geneva Conference had healed relations with Japan somewhat, a low level of diplomatic hostility remained after years of fierce fighting and occupation of most of the Soviet Far East since late 1940. This would worsen again in 1945. The relationship with Britain under Churchill was businesslike but not really friendly. Those with Roosevelt’s America and the provisional French government remained amicable enough. But all three democratic countries had already faced elections or would do during 1945, which would require a recalibration of diplomacy with them. Finally, the relationship with Turkey could not be any friendlier, ensuring the two core Comintern sub-groupings began the post-war period in diplomatic harmony.

I0Wyeb.jpg


---xxx---

The Stalin-Inönü ‘Brotherhood’ Continues

Relations between Inönü and Stalin remained warm all through 1945, thus ensuring the USSR-UGNR strategic relationship remained equally strong. Molotov (as Deputy FM during GW2) and Litvinov had maintained a very cordial relationship with the long-time Turkish FM Aras. Even though both their Pacts pursued their own specific interests, at this stage there was little to disagree over. Both sides had more than enough to get on with as part of post-war recovery and scrupulously avoided overt or even aggressive covert involvement in each other’s spheres of interest in this early post-war period.

qz2lPM.jpg

Brothers in arms and in peace.

---xxx---

Litvinov and the Allies

Soviet Foreign Minister Maxim Litvinov, long a proponent of closer strategic relations with the UK and France despite his grudging acquiescence to the Nazi-Soviet Pact of 1939, had been conducting negotiations with the French provisional government in the background of the Geneva Conference of October-November 1944. The culmination of his time as Foreign Minister came when France and the Soviet Union signed a 20-year Treaty of Alliance and Mutual Assistance on 10 December 1944.

naJACB.jpg

Maxim Litvinov addresses the dignitaries gathered during the signing of the 1944 Franco-Soviet Treaty in Paris on 10 December 1944.

France, very concerned about its rather weak and isolated position in Europe, wanted to shore up its strategic position as best it could. It would remain within the Allies and the more general Western grouping, but also prosecuted its own foreign policy. The agreement was in essence more a non-aggression pact than any type of military or mutual defensive pact, but France at least hoped it would stick while the Soviets would be happy to see France not take an actively anti-Soviet stance.

---xxx---

Poland and the Rise of Molotov

But Litvinov’s star would soon begin to wane. It started on 1 January 1945 when Britain refused to recognise the Polish Committee of National Liberation. Also known as the Lublin Committee, it was an executive governing authority established by the Soviet-backed communists in Poland. Litvinov’s long-time (and ambitious) deputy Molotov argued for a harder line against Britain in particular and the West more generally. He chose deteriorating relations with Britain as the vehicle to begin undermining his boss, who nevertheless still retained Stalin’s (always conditional, of course) respect and support.

F5pfGx.jpg

Vyacheslav Mikhaylovich Molotov (b. 9 March 1890) in 1945.

Molotov and NKVD head Andriy Pantilov began advocating for a harder line in Poland. On 6 March 1945, Soviet authorities began to arrest or kill anyone associated with the Polish Home Army or the Polish government-in-exile in London.

An attack on the NKVD Camp in Rembertów on the outskirts of Warsaw took place on 21 May 1945. A unit of the pro-independence Home Army freed all Polish political prisoners from the camp. This only fed into the Pantilov-Molotov narrative and hardened the Soviet line on Poland.

On 18 June the ‘Trial of the Sixteen’ was held where officers of the Polish Home Army were put in the dock in Moscow on charges of fighting against the Red Army. The verdict was issued on 21 June, with most of the defendants coerced into pleading guilty by the NKVD. Witnesses for the defence were declared unreachable "owing to bad atmospheric conditions", and no evidence was offered during the trial. Of the sixteen defendants, twelve were sentenced to prison terms ranging from four months to ten years, while charges against the four others were dropped by the prosecution.

ZJCTjl.jpg

The show trial of 16 leaders of the Polish wartime underground movement (including the Home Army and civil authorities) convicted of "drawing up plans for military action against the U.S.S.R.", Moscow, June 1945. All of them had been invited to help organise the new "Polish Government of National Unity" in March 1945 and were subsequently captured by the NKVD.

The Soviet-backed Provisional Government of National Unity had been formed to govern Poland on 28 June. The Polish government-in-exile did not recognise it. But on 4 July, the day before the general election in the UK, the Polish Provisional Government of National Unity was recognised by Britain and the United States. It gained their recognition by including politicians from the close political sphere of Stanisław Mikołajczyk, the former prime minister of the Polish government-in-exile based in London.

iuxHnP.jpg

Stanisław Mikołajczyk (b. 18 July 1901).

This ploy provided an excuse for Western nations to tacitly approve the fait accompli of Poland becoming part of the Soviet sphere of influence, and to legitimise the Warsaw government while withdrawing their recognition of the Polish government-in-exile.

On 10 July, Soviet forces and Polish communists began the Augustów roundup targeting the "cursed soldiers", anti-communist partisans and sympathisers.

The newly reappointed British Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin on 10 August condemned Soviet policy in Eastern Europe as "one kind of totalitarianism replaced by another." Litvinov’s hopes of a better relationship with the newly avowedly socialist British Labour government were dashed.

A day later, Litvinov was dismissed, finally replaced by Vyacheslav Molotov after years of agitating for the position.

eGNm6t.jpg

Molotov with Stalin, soon after his appointment as Foreign Minister in August 1945.

After Litvinov's dismissal, many of his aides were arrested and beaten, evidently in an attempt to extract compromising information. However, Stalin continued to respect Litvinov and he was not purged or completely frozen out.

The Soviets happily ratified the new LN Charter on 10 October and formally took up their role as one of the P5 members of the Security Council.

---xxx---

Japan

One thing both Litvinov and Molotov could agree on was suspicion and dislike of the Japanese imperialists. On 5 April 1945, as we saw previously in the Japan chapter, the Soviet Union confirmed it would not consider a Japanese proposal to revive the Soviet–Japanese Neutrality Pact of April 1941, primarily over the future of Mongolia. This apparently irrational intransigence over Mongolia thus rebounded and led to the resignation of Japanese PM Okada Keisuke, seen as an architect of the temporary rapprochement with the Soviets.

It seemed to the Soviets that Mongolia was being used by an anti-Soviet Japanese faction in some obscure Tokyo power play to promote itself and an alternate Japanese strategic approach. The Soviets would not let them off this hook easily!

As noted earlier when considering Japanese post-war events, the USSR’s flanks were secure in Europe and along the long border with the still-friendly UGNR (technically still a Comintern member albeit with its own developing Bucharest Pact sub-faction). This allowed the Soviets to ‘play nasty’ against the Japanese in Korea, Vietnam and China while maintaining a strong force to distract and occupy them along the Line of Demarcation in Mongolia and the long Manchurian border with the Japanese.

---xxx---

Mongolia and China

In February 1945, in negotiations with Nationalist China Stalin insisted on the Republic of China's recognition of Outer Mongolia's independence – something that it already enjoyed de facto even as it remained a part of China de jure. Chiang Kai-shek resisted the idea at first but eventually gave in. However, Chiang extracted from Stalin a promise to refrain from supporting the Chinese Communist Party against the Nationalist China, partly as a quid pro quo for giving up Outer Mongolia. A provisional pro-Soviet government was soon established as the Mongolian People’s Republic and incorporated into the Warsaw Pact.

nUduHP.jpg

Flag of the Mongolian People’s Republic.

The Chinese Communists had resumed their insurgency against the Japanese on 10 August 1945. As operations ramped up during the rest of 1945, Mao’s troops began to receive clandestine support from the Soviets, who secretly and continuously supported the Chinese Communist Party and the People's Liberation Army, but the Soviets claimed was support for the PLA’s liberation war against Japan, not against Nationalist China per se.

The Soviets controlled northern Outer Mongolia and Japan occupied its south and Inner Mongolia (Mengukuo) and Mao directed his efforts solely against the Japanese at this point, so Chiang was left with little practical choice and acquiesced. The Treaty of Friendship and Alliance was signed by the National Government of the Republic of China and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on 14 August 1945.

jgoMsX.jpg

Stalin and Molotov (in his first major diplomatic engagement after becoming Foreign Minister) look on as the Chinese sign the China-Soviet Treaty of Friendship and Alliance, 14 August 1945.

A referendum to officially assert independence from China was held in the Mongolian People's Republic on 20 October 1945. According to the Soviet election supervisors, voter turnout was 98.5% and it was approved by 100% of voters, with no votes against, according to official statistics.

---xxx---

Vietnam and Korea

As noted in the Japan chapter, the Democratic Republic of Vietnam was proclaimed on 2 September 1945 when revolutionary leader Ho Chi Minh declared independence from ‘Japanese overlordship’ exercised through their ‘Imperialist puppets in Hanoi’. They did so with covert (but separate) support from the Soviets, the US and France, the former colonial masters.

And from October 1945 the Soviets also laid the groundwork for covert (though obviously suspected) military support for the Korean Communists.

p2RXX7.jpg

Kim Il-sung, right, young and seemingly loyal to Soviet interests, poses with a visiting Soviet military officials on an ‘observation mission’ in Pyongyang, November 1945.

Late in December 1945, as Kim Il Sung’s Communists began to agitate and start low scale political violence aimed at restoring Korean independence under Communist rule, Molotov put a proposal to the Politburo in Moscow to begin clandestine financial and military support for Kim.

---xxx---

India and the Middle East

Soviet policy towards India soon saw it establishing a consulate in New Delhi in early 1945 as it tried to position itself to be an influential player in India. Similarly, the Soviet Union was an early supporter of the Arab League, though had to tread carefully where this crossed into the UGNR’s sphere of influence. But this did nothing to prevent them ingratiating themselves with whatever Arab government proved amenable and to taking a more interventionist approach in British-run or puppeted Arab countries.

Soviet policy in both the sub-continent and the Middle East would develop further in future years, but for now remained of second-order importance to consolidating their hegemony with the Warsaw Pact and the emerging ‘Cold War’ with Japan.

---xxx---

Relations with the US

Relations with fellow-Comintern ally the US were more complicated. Even before the Geneva Conference had concluded in November 1944, Dewey’s Republicans had won the Presidency but with a contested Congress.

When the new US Administration began with Dewey’s inauguration on 20 January 1945, the Soviets had to deal with a new interlocutor – and one with a number of political limitations at home. The story of the US in 1945 and its relations with the USSR (among other nations) will be told in a subsequent chapter.

For now, suffice it to say that early in November 1945, Litvinov was summoned from his short period of 'internal exile' to see Stalin and told his services were required as ambassador to the United States. In the US the appointment was met with enthusiasm. The New York Times stated:

“Stalin has decided to place his ablest and most forceful diplomat and one who enjoys greater prestige in this country. He is known as a man of exceptional ability, adroit as well as forceful. It is believed that Stalin, in designating him for the ambassadorship, felt Litvinov could exercise real influence in Washington.”

IFyhIf.jpg

Soviet Ambassador to the US Maxim Litvinov at a diplomatic function in Washington DC, November 1945.

---xxx---

The ‘Old-New’ Germany: Government and Relations in October 1944

Up until the implementation of the Geneva Treaty outcomes, Germany had remained under the DNVP (Paternal Autocrat) provisional government of Ludwig Beck and Oskar Meissner that had served as a puppet regime under Turkish direction following the death of Adolph Hitler and Germany’s capitulation to Turkey earlier in 1944. However, the majority of the German people remained Nazi supporters at heart.

at7l4S.jpg

With the close-run and controversial vote to cede a united Germany (less the cessions to Poland already agreed at Geneva Conference) to Soviet supervision in the Warsaw Pact, such popular sympathies and the right-wing regime then in power in Germany were never going to be tolerated by the Soviets for long. And so it would prove.

At Geneva, it had been the Beck government that had been casting Germany’s small voting bloc. When the armistice with Japan was declared in early October 1944 and the Conference began, Germany’s sympathies had rested heavily with their then-puppet master, Turkey. Most in the German government had hoped they might remain under their ostensibly like-minded tutelage.

anb1Wy.jpg

However, as new semi-autonomous members of the Comintern, the diplomatic relationship with the Soviets had improved considerably, while post-Axis sympathy with the Japanese persisted somewhat. Relations with the US remained frosty, France slightly more so and the UK remained an object of heavy German disapproval.

---xxx---

The German Democratic Republic (DDR): November 1944 – December 1945

The Soviets would soon begin implementing a command economy for Germany under the eventual control of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED). But first, the Soviets began a harsh program of extracting war reparations through the disassembly of German industry. Soviet troops, organised in specialised "trophy" battalions, removed millions of tons of materials and equipment, as well as large quantities of agricultural produce.

The Soviets sought to extract around US$40bn from Germany, in addition to the trophy removals [$10b in OTL just from the East]. In 1945 and 1946 an estimated 70,000 factories would be removed, amounting to a third of German productive capacity. The general population was greatly embittered, but the policy was ruthlessly implemented.

j94fb3.jpg

The Soviets wasted no time in starting to dismantle much of Germany’s industrial base that had not been destroyed in GW2. This caused great hardship across Germany through 1945 and afterwards and weakened it significantly in all respects of economic and military capacity.

Military industries and those owned by the state, by Nazi activists, and by war criminals were confiscated by the Soviet occupation authority. These industries amounted to about 60% of total industrial production. Most heavy industry (constituting 20% of total production) was claimed by the Soviet Union as reparations, and Soviet joint stock companies were formed. The remaining confiscated industrial property was nationalised, leaving 40% of total industrial production to private enterprise.

A decree of 10 June 1945 allowed the formation of antifascist democratic political parties (only) with all others banned, of course. A democratic-antifascist coalition, which included the KPD, the SPD, the new Christian Democratic Union (Christlich-Demokratische Union—CDU), and the Liberal Democratic Party of Germany (Liberal Demokratische Partei Deutschlands—LDPD), was formed in July 1945.

The KPD (led by Wilhelm Pieck) and the SPD (led by Otto Grotewohl) merged in August 1945 under strong pressure from the Soviets to form the Socialist Unity Party of Germany (Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands—SED). The SED was structured as a Soviet-style "party of the new type". To that end, German communist Walter Ulbricht became first secretary of the SED, and a Politburo, Secretariat, and Central Committee were formed.

sf2t3W.jpg

21 August 1945: Otto Grotewohl (right) and Wilhelm Pieck (left) sealing the unification of the SPD and KPD with a symbolic handshake. Walter Ulbricht is in the foreground to the right of Grotewohl.

iVgiBm.jpg

The logo of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED).

According to the Leninist principle of democratic centralism, each party body was controlled by its members, meaning that Ulbricht, as party chief, theoretically carried out the will of the members of his party.

Elections held in October 1945 rubber-stamped this arrangement, as the German armed forces were rapidly reduced in size and much of their industry was sent eastwards. The German nuclear research program was taken over by the Soviets and incorporated into their own.

G3I2YY.jpg

The new flag of the DDR, formally adopted after the October 1945 elections.

RJb5xb.jpg

Left: Wilhelm Pieck (b. 3 January 1876) chairman of the Socialist Unity Party and first president of the DDR. Right: Otto Grotewohl (b. 11 March 1894), first prime minister of the DDR.

However, rumours would persist that a large number of German nuclear and rocket scientists had fled abroad during the Geneva Conference. Some would turn up in the US, but most would make their way to the UGNR. There, they would meet up again with most of the members of the Beck government, who sought and received political asylum in Turkey after the Geneva Conference ‘disaster’ for Germany. But all would be required to keep a very low profile – for now – in order to maintain cordial Comintern relations.

NC4gWm.jpg

Ludwig Beck in exile in Ankara, December 1944.
 
Last edited:
  • 3Like
  • 3Love
Reactions:
Didn’t take long for the cracks to start to show in the blissful dream of a benevolent Comintern, then. The way things are developing, it looks a lot like we’ll be getting more of the old Socialism in one country fairly soon. But then Stalin’s gunna Stalin.

Better hurry up with arranging Uncle Joe’s accidental shaving accident, Butterfly!
 
  • 2Haha
  • 2
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Even though both their Pacts pursued their own specific interests, at this stage there was little to disagree over. Both sides had more than enough to get on with as part of post-war recovery and scrupulously avoided overt or even aggressive covert involvement in each other’s spheres of interest in this early post-war period.

That was the plan, at least. Very clearly define spheres and remove every possible friction so far as possible, meaning that by the time any new friction happens, we've had decades of peace and friendship to fall back on in negotiations.

The culmination of his time as Foreign Minister came when France and the Soviet Union signed a 20-year Treaty of Alliance and Mutual Assistance on 10 December 1944.

Ah yes, that should prove most useful as a starting point.

As noted earlier when considering Japanese post-war events, the USSR’s flanks were secure in Europe and along the long border with the still-friendly UGNR (technically still a Comintern member albeit with its own developing Bucharest Pact sub-faction). This allowed the Soviets to ‘play nasty’ against the Japanese in Korea, Vietnam and China while maintaining a strong force to distract and occupy them along the Line of Demarcation in Mongolia and the long Manchurian border with the Japanese.

Also part of the plan, and it seems to have worked. If necessary, we can afford to spend the rest of the 40s and most of the 50s attempting to either create and install Red China and as many communist states as possible, or at the very least ensure we have a ton of buffer states, satellites and red factions all over the continent.

The Soviets controlled northern Outer Mongolia and Japan occupied its south and Inner Mongolia (Mengukuo) and Mao directed his efforts solely against the Japanese at this point, so Chiang was left with little practical choice and acquiesced. The Treaty of Friendship and Alliance was signed by the National Government of the Republic of China and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on 14 August 1945.

Should have a problem with China then, whoever wins. We helped against the Japanese, we've provided help to both the nats and the reds, and it looks hopeful that Mao will still come through and win outright (he was much better at fighting the Japanese than the other side, and if we actually do get into a shooting war with Japan, obviously we'll be handing over all our territory to him afterwards).

We might not even have an ideological split, because stalin will be dead by then and who knows who will be in charge?

Vietnam and Korea

Going as well as it could be. Korea seems likely to fall to communism outright, which is great news. Vietnam is going to fall but the government is a bit more up in the air. Ho Chi Min sure did become a pretty good communist but his main aim was getting the French and then everyone else out of Vietnam. It seems likely that its going to come down to who plays their cards better: the USSR or US. And in this case, I think it might be us just because the amercians are going to be a lot more desperate and demanding for control, given the lack of allies and vassals they have in Asia.

Soviet policy towards India soon saw it establishing a consulate in New Delhi in early 1945 as it tried to position itself to be an influential player in India.

We will, but this is a long term investment so I doubt much will come of it unless there's a huge civ war at some point soon over Pakistan, Bangladesh etc.

Similarly, the Soviet Union was an early supporter of the Arab League, though had to tread carefully where this crossed into the UGNR’s sphere of influence. But this did nothing to prevent them ingratiating themselves with whatever Arab government proved amenable and to taking a more interventionist approach in British-run or puppeted Arab countries.

Mm, I suspect there should be too much friction, at least for the foreseeable. Our main concerns will be ensuring as little western influence as possible exists in the region, and that a big oul consortium (which we'd have huge influence over) is agreed upon by these soon to be massive oil producers. That would then give us even more common ground with Turkey, and even some more options in negotiations with Amercia (mostly positive) and Japan (can seriously turn the screws).

For now, suffice it to say that early in November 1945, Litvinov was summoned from his short period of 'internal exile' to see Stalin and told his services were required as ambassador to the United States. In the US the appointment was met with enthusiasm. The New York Times stated:

“Stalin has decided to place his ablest and most forceful diplomat and one who enjoys greater prestige in this country. He is known as a man of exceptional ability, adroit as well as forceful. It is believed that Stalin, in designating him for the ambassadorship, felt Litvinov could exercise real influence in Washington.”

A very good appointment. Dare I say, that sounds like the sort of thing that the conference team would do. Try for an approchment or at least reasonably friendly relations with any US government, and try to keep all their ire on colonialism, esepcially Japan (but with a suggestion of British too).

However, the majority of the German people remained Nazi supporters at heart.

THAT is going to change quite quickly, esepcially once we start publishing exactly how far and by what means the nazis screwed their own country over.

Relations with the US remained frosty, France slightly more so and the UK remained an object of heavy German disapproval.

Good, good, we can use that.

Elections held in October 1945 rubber-stamped this arrangement, as the German armed forces were rapidly reduced in size and much of their industry was sent eastwards. The German nuclear research program was taken over by the Soviets and incorporated into their own.

Nice. Seems like a pretty solid foundation for building a new comintern state. The nukes will be useful too.

However, rumours would persist that a large number of German nuclear and rocket scientists had fled abroad during the Geneva Conference. Some would turn up in the US, but most would make their way to the UGNR. There, they would meet up again with most of the members of the Beck government, who sought and received political asylum in Turkey after the Geneva Conference ‘disaster’ for Germany. But all would be required to keep a very low profile – for now – in order to maintain cordial Comintern relations.

Meh. For various reasons, the USSR and UGNR both having nukes isn't really a problem for either state (in some ways it simplifies matters nicely). Now we CAN'T attack each other, the whole of europe is covered by our combined nuclear umbrella, and the chances of a missile crisis are ever so slightly reduced because both of us will have gotten used to having nukes just over the border. Still means the amercians can make trouble in Rhodes though...but then again, so can we in Cuba.

Better hurry up with arranging Uncle Joe’s accidental shaving accident, Butterfly!

He seems to be doing...alright? Better than OTL anyway. I sense at least some of the hands that were behind the diplomatic coup in the conference are still high up in both power and favour in some of these decisions.

Hopefully that means one of them/us ends up winning the swift and high stakes game of succession when stalin dies. Or even better, gets anointed his successor by name.
 
  • 3Like
  • 2
Reactions:
He seems to be doing...alright? Better than OTL anyway. I sense at least some of the hands that were behind the diplomatic coup in the conference are still high up in both power and favour in some of these decisions.
Better than OTL, sure. Concerned about the German expropriations and the sacking of Litvinov, though. Not sure whether I’d want to carry along the path suggested by those decisions until Stalin pops it. Would seem like a wasted decade to me. (Though not for Russia of course…)
 
  • 3
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Better than OTL, sure. Concerned about the German expropriations and the sacking of Litvinov, though. Not sure whether I’d want to carry along the path suggested by those decisions until Stalin pops it. Would seem like a wasted decade to me. (Though not for Russia of course…)

Stalin"s on borrowed time due to several ticking health timebombs. Could be OTL seven years, could be within the 40s. Who knows? (I'd probably just roll the dice on this one @Bullfilter)

It's who's in his highest council and esteem that matters now. And who 'could' succeed him outside that group as well. If we get someone particularly gifted and far sighted, we'll be alright (and there are several of those in TTL). It's only if we're looking at the state terror contenders that we'll have problems.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions:
Even if nuclear opens as energy source rather than a weapon, someone will use one for military because this world does not have the lessons of Hiroshima/Nagasaki. It is the equivalent of a child being told not to touch the hot stove, until someone gets burnt, no one know how devasting the result will be. I like the Italian regional breakup. As newer countries (mid 19th century formation), does Germany and Italy still have regional identifications (Tuscan, Bavarian, etc.) or is everyone German or Italian? Is the current grouping of Morocco/Algeria/Libya/Tunisia the best or should the area be divided differently than the traditional colonial areas? With earlier independence and guidance from Sunni Turkey, will there be less migration from North Africa to Western Europe? Unlike Russia, Turkey does not have a large enough core population base or economic might to finance a long-term military domination of the Balkans and Italy. Turkey needs to emphasize that it is the only Islamic Security Council member with a VETO, so that it can lead the emerging independent Islamic nations of Africa/Asia from Morocco to the Dutch East Indies. Turkey should probably correct their borders with additional land in Thrace, Macedonia, Aegean Islands and Cyprus.

Cuba will never enter the Soviet bloc in this timeline as Washington goes more isolationist and very hemispheric. Washington will be more neutral and help anyone who wishes to buy American.

Palestine may create more problems for the UK than India. Turkey will veto any independent area in the Middle East, so that even if Britain releases an independent Jewish nation, it will be always a rogue country with little international standing. The places that a Jewish state could go would be a lightly populated area of US, Canada, Australia or southern Africa (my best guess would be Rhodesia or Namibia). Will India have more or less than the current four divisions (including Sri Lanka)? There are many cultures/religions that would like their own area.

Thank you for the updates. I love the theory crafting and I hope that we can have some more great discussions.
 
  • 4Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Cuba will never enter the Soviet bloc in this timeline as Washington goes more isolationist and very hemispheric. Washington will be more ne

Well...if its anything like OTL, even if the Soviets initially view it as a bridge too far and an obvious massive slap in the face for US relations, Cuba is pretty hard for the US to influence without a full invasion, which would be unpopular at home and really hard to win.

I'm not sure whether the Soviets will be able to help themsevles if Cuba does have a big communist uprising and the US fails to crush it.

On the other hand...this would be a great opportunity to use the other comintern members and the organisation as a whole to influence world and US opinion. If the people of Cuba overthrown a dictator and wish to be communist let them (etc etc propaganda etc).
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
@TheButterflyComposer, double post? The US will emphasize the Western Hemisphere at the expense of Eurasia involvement. Probably less of a cold war with SU. Africa and South Pacific could be interesting.

Huh. Usually catch those...

Well, obviously, if the comintern can get the US to basically pull up the drawbridge, put their fingers in their ears and do nothing foe the next 50 years, acknowledging the Monroe doctrine is a small price to pay.

We'll even help them out with that, supporting efforts to decolonisation the carribbean and South amercia etc.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Relations between Inönü and Stalin remained warm all through 1945, thus ensuring the USSR-UGNR strategic relationship remained equally strong.

To be fair, I would have expected nothing less. Both countries and their respective leaders have gone through so much in step with one another.

Soviet Foreign Minister Maxim Litvinov, long a proponent of closer strategic relations with the UK and France despite his grudging acquiescence to the Nazi-Soviet Pact of 1939, had been conducting negotiations with the French provisional government in the background of the Geneva Conference of October-November 1944.

This was somewhat encouraging. Although the UK doesn't want France to fall under Soviet influence, some kind of rapprochement with the Soviets would certainly have been desirable.

But Litvinov’s star would soon begin to wane. It started on 1 January 1945 when Britain refused to recognise the Polish Committee of National Liberation.

Ah... that was always going to happen to Poland, unfortunately. :(

After Litvinov's dismissal, many of his aides were arrested and beaten, evidently in an attempt to extract compromising information. However, Stalin continued to respect Litvinov and he was not purged or completely frozen out.

I suppose he should consider himself fortunate? His fate could have been a lot worse.

Chiang extracted from Stalin a promise to refrain from supporting the Chinese Communist Party against the Nationalist China, partly as a quid pro quo for giving up Outer Mongolia.

We know the Soviets are going to continue to support Mao, but it does occur to me that Chiang could just end up getting material support from Japan in this timeline, given the renewed Soviet-Japanese tensions.

According to the Soviet election supervisors, voter turnout was 98.5% and it was approved by 100% of voters, with no votes against, according to official statistics.

Of course! Who could possibly question the legitmacy of those polling numbers? ;)

Soviet policy in both the sub-continent and the Middle East would develop further in future years, but for now remained of second-order importance to consolidating their hegemony with the Warsaw Pact and the emerging ‘Cold War’ with Japan.

Seems reasonable enough. Uncle Joe has enough to keep him busy closer to home.

Germany had remained under the DNVP (Paternal Autocrat) provisional government of Ludwig Beck and Oskar Meissner that had served as a puppet regime under Turkish direction following the death of Adolph Hitler and Germany’s capitulation to Turkey earlier in 1944. However, the majority of the German people remained Nazi supporters at heart.

Again, inevitable, and German public opinion will just have to be changed!

Military industries and those owned by the state, by Nazi activists, and by war criminals were confiscated by the Soviet occupation authority. These industries amounted to about 60% of total industrial production. Most heavy industry (constituting 20% of total production) was claimed by the Soviet Union as reparations.

Considering it was Turkey and the USSR who technically attacked Germany, this is a little harsh. Regardless, nobody whatsoever is going to speak up for Germany now...

However, rumours would persist that a large number of German nuclear and rocket scientists had fled abroad during the Geneva Conference. Some would turn up in the US, but most would make their way to the UGNR.

This will be very useful indeed to Ankara! Science is the one area where the UGNR still lags behind the other great powers.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
This was somewhat encouraging. Although the UK doesn't want France to fall under Soviet influence, some kind of rapprochement with the Soviets would certainly have been desirable.

No reason not to be friendly to France, esepcially as unlike OTL, their empires collapse was not managed post war such that they bascially kept all of it or at least their influence and bases unaffected. TTL, France is a purely European nation surrounded by the comintern, with socialist sympathies itself. Much easier to talk to.

UK? Don't know. Probably not until after they get their final nose busting and imperial ambitions crushed at suez (or wherever).

I suppose he should consider himself fortunate? His fate could have been a lot worse.

US ambassador is a good call, keeps him around and no doubt if he survives stalin, will be useful to the next regime.

We know the Soviets are going to continue to support Mao, but it does occur to me that Chiang could just end up getting material support from Japan in this timeline, given the renewed Soviet-Japanese tensions.

Japan really doesn't have the infrastructure and industry for that, not with its own still far too large army having to be everywhere at once. Chiang isn't in as bad a position as OTL but Japan still existing as an empire really hurts China, who has no one really to turn to now except the Soviets. Russia attempted approaching the Nationalists before, when they were in an awkward union with the socialists and communists. I doubt that's going to happen again though.

Of course! Who could possibly question the legitmacy of those polling numbers? ;)

Certainly not the british!
 
  • 4Like
Reactions:
In February 1945, in negotiations with Nationalist China Stalin insisted on the Republic of China's recognition of Outer Mongolia's independence – something that it already enjoyed de facto even as it remained a part of China de jure. Chiang Kai-shek resisted the idea at first but eventually gave in. However, Chiang extracted from Stalin a promise to refrain from supporting the Chinese Communist Party against the Nationalist China, partly as a quid pro quo for giving up Outer Mongolia. A provisional pro-Soviet government was soon established as the Mongolian People’s Republic and incorporated into the Warsaw Pact.
Uncle Joe should've pushed for Inner Mongolia as well!

The Soviets would soon begin implementing a command economy for Germany under the eventual control of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED). But first, the Soviets began a harsh program of extracting war reparations through the disassembly of German industry. Soviet troops, organised in specialised "trophy" battalions, removed millions of tons of materials and equipment, as well as large quantities of agricultural produce.
I hope UGNR had been able to attract some scientists etc from Germany, leadership has always been the most lacked resource for this game!

The German nuclear research program was taken over by the Soviets and incorporated into their own.
ditto

However, rumours would persist that a large number of German nuclear and rocket scientists had fled abroad during the Geneva Conference. Some would turn up in the US, but most would make their way to the UGNR.
Yesss just as I was hoping! :D I'd like to note UGNR not only welcomes nuclear or rocket scientists but all forward thinking minds no matter the specialty be it theoretical or practical, positive or social sciences etc. Our friend and ally USSR already has a lot of scientists and engineers filling all the posts so German ones would've been redundant anyway. Comintern would be happy UGNR develop its technology to stay tough against the Allies!
 
  • 3Like
  • 1
Reactions: