
I just conquered Sanctuary and, then it hit me, how big has to be these slums or wasteland to cover a entire ringworld district?

Technically, they never said I could not remove the entire flora and fauna from the planet.
What the hell? What version are you playing on? I only started playing Stellaris after Megacorp, and am very confused by what I'm seeing.
It looks like the Super Crystal Monster imposed itself onto a pre-2.0 galaxy map.
Calculating...Playing as rogue servitor, one of my subjects had an AI uprising with another rogue servitor.
I realised that surrendering would transfer all of my federation's planets to them - effectively putting most of organic life in galaxy under protection and care of machines. Which was my empire's objective in the first place.
View attachment 561243
My War in Heaven experience:
Few year later, War in Heaven triggers. One of the FE that wakes up was the patron of my "loyal voluntary scion origin federation member"
- Started as Rogue Servitors
- Formed a Hegemony
- Forced an empire with "Scion" origin to join via war. FE master of said empire didn't even bother interacting with said war at all.
I got automatically called into WiH as an ally of said AE. No decession, no choice, no nothing, I was now part of the War in Heaven. Not as a subject of said AE either, no, as an ally.
So here I am now.
A robot empire.
Allied (not subordinate!) to the spiritualist AE.
In the War in Heaven.
Oh and they have closed their borders to me, because why wouldn't they.
![]()
The War in Heaven is the single buggiest event in the game. I keep seeing new ways for it to break the game.
That seems somehow apt.The War in Heaven is the single buggiest event in the game.
Doing an On the Shoulders of Giants start and just discovered this.
View attachment 561139
Underground.
Under. Ground.
That is a gas giant.
There is no "ground"!
How in the Great Blue Sky's name did these guys build an underground structure under the non-existent ground of a gas giant?
So.. could you just summon the Avatar by its name now?But even more fun to finally learn your Avatar's name, and have the option of promoting them to leadership.
![]()
I would not agree to that. Wikipedia states: "...gas planets can have a solid core. After the "Kern-Aggregations-Hypothese" this is even necessary for them to form..."
So, your gas planet can have a solid core, which can have a underground base.
Well, there's your problem, assuming there's supposed to be general consistency!I'm well aware that gas giants can have a core. However, even when they have a solid core that core is not commonly referred to as "the ground" (or a synonym of it, e.g. "the surface"), which at the very least makes the wording odd and suggests that this isn't supposed to target a gas giant. The younger races in Stellaris also don't seem like they possess the technology to launch an excavation on the core of a gas giant based on some anomalies regarding gas giants and difficulties regarding stuff in the atmosphere of one, which also makes it seem like something other than just the text is wrong if we assume that there's supposed to be general consistency.
The thing is, the term "gas giant" is just a legacy. It's not "gas" and "giant" simultaneously, it's "gas giant" with its own meaning.I'm well aware that gas giants can have a core. However, even when they have a solid core that core is not commonly referred to as "the ground" (or a synonym of it, e.g. "the surface"), which at the very least makes the wording odd and suggests that this isn't supposed to target a gas giant. The younger races in Stellaris also don't seem like they possess the technology to launch an excavation on the core of a gas giant based on some anomalies regarding gas giants and difficulties regarding stuff in the atmosphere of one, which also makes it seem like something other than just the text is wrong if we assume that there's supposed to be general consistency.
While you are technically correct(the best kind of correct), the "gas" of a gas giant doesnt stay gas for very long as you go deeper. It transitions to liquid, and, if the atmosphere is primarily hydrogen, metallic.A "core" of a "gas giant" is a planet itself, and gas around it - is just atmosphere. High, thick, dense, pressed by gravity of a planet. Forming relatively (to Earth's) high pressure on the surface.
Depends on pressure and temperature, yes, I remember)While you are technically correct(the best kind of correct), the "gas" of a gas giant doesnt stay gas for very long as you go deeper. It transitions to liquid, and, if the atmosphere is primarily hydrogen, metallic.
You wouldnt call the bottom of the ocean earths surface, would you? You wouldnt be underground, but also clearly not on the surface.
Tried to google it, to no result. Where does it come from?We also have a definiton of the surface of a gas giant. The "surface" is at the level where the atmospheric pressure is 1 bar.
After some searching, Ive found 2 Sources for it:Tried to google it, to no result. Where does it come from?
Depends on pressure and temperature, yes, I remember)
Surface, well.. I need to check the context and its terminology, to be sure. To be correct in common, I will prefer wording "the bottom of the ocean" (you used this as well), or coordinates including z-axis, at least because it describes the actual position.
Tried to google it, to no result. Where does it come from?