Netherlands = oil and rare materials. No need to torch one's own supply dump. There was also a comment by Johan about the benefits of keeping Netherlands neutral.
Alexander Seil said:Netherlands = oil and rare materials. No need to torch one's own supply dump. There was also a comment by Johan about the benefits of keeping Netherlands neutral.
Alexander Seil said:I don't really see the logic of that - what if Japan does not invade until Dec., 1941, or even later? Until then, the Netherlands would be quite useful. And, in the event of a Japanese attack, you can always occupy them before the Allies send in reinforcements.
rasmus40 said:To what extent do you use brigades for your land units?
Could you please run us through the composition of your army groups brigade wise?
Do you use an MP brigade for all your garrisons or is that wasting too much manpower?
Crisisman said:July 30, 1940 : Hitler meets with his Chiefs of Staff in a final review of the upcoming Operation Sea Lion.
873 said:While reading other threads, lots of other people complains on their TC problems (playing Italy or Japan, in another AAR) and the suggested solutions almost always are "try liberating a puppet or two". How does this help free TC and how come you don't share their problems? I'm guessing it's because of your very high IC giving you a TC of ~1000, right?
Please don't turn this brilliant AAR thread into another one of those classical rants you see about every Paradox game:boehm said:hmm thanks for the AAR...interesting read.
I just got the game myself the other day and havent really had time to start playing it for real...unfortunately now Im starting to think it was a mistake to buy it![]()
If Germany can do this...or anything resembling this the game is IMHO broken...if Germany builds a big prewar navy (prewar you build atleast 2 BBs, 6 CVs and lots of subs more than historically) the reaction of the UK would have been extremely paranoid Im sure....not to mention the US...both of which guarded their naval supremecy jealously. Additionally I fully support the view that GW CVs seem to be vastly overpowered...historically they were pretty worthless vs. modern fleet CVs...
Additionally to garison the whole of Poland, Hungary, Romania and yugoslavia with just 200k troops is rediculous...historically thats pretty much what Germany ended up having just in Norway...although ofcause Im sure half that was invasion defence...
rasmus40 said:Please don't turn this brilliant AAR thread into another one of those classical rants you see about every Paradox game:
He didn't do exactly like in real life = the game is broken.
Please notice that Crisisman has used his naval forces with great skill so this may not be something players such as you or me can copy. He has used only two large navies and fought smaller ai navies that were badly composed. This is of course bad on the part of the ai but that doesn't in itself mean that Great War carriers are overpowered. He has quite simply used overwhelming force and CAGs meant for more modern CVs. I would like to see restrictions on the update of CAGs used on old ships but that is a discussion for the general forum.
rasmus40 said:Certainly most of us would like to see the ai improve but it is a very complex game for the ai to handle. There are so many aspects to take into consideration. It would be fantastic if the UK would respond to a german naval build up by building even more ships or getting one of those "preparing for war" events allowing it to use more of it's ICs.
Now let's leave the scene to Crisisman and his potential world conquest.![]()
Hmm, but why doesn't Stalin do something? Crisisman just stepped on his foot very painfully, by taking the Baltic states. I don't beleive he'd just say "Aww, its all right. I didn't want them anyway.".boehm said:agreed, and my posts should in no way be viewed as criticism of Crisisman. Whom I thank for bringing us this AAR in the first place.![]()