So JPR is the spy. I suspected that a while ago, but no you guys said spies wouldn't be that obvious. Though I suspect that I'll be blamed for this like usual.
Err. I said that about Tamius and Cliges, not about JPR. Or you.
Which obviously is true, now that we have a certain spy in the set aedan/jpr/glio
Or are you talking about tamius handing the SL card to JPR? Because yeah, that's a bit too obvious, too.
Actually that would make sense JPR asked who we'd prefer everyone said me but he chose you likely to blame you, much more of a spy move imo.
Yeah. I fully agree with that one.
I don't want to say it but - scratch that, I absolutely do.
I told you so.
Repeatedly. But did anyone listen? No.
Oh, hush. It was fairly obvious you knew there was a spy in that last team. And possible the team before that, too.
You are just trying to claim credit to make yourself look good.
Sure, go ahead, give glio and randy a chance to sabotage a 3rd mission team in a row. Because that will somehow magically work....
Cards are rubbish as well.
Quite.
In the last mission there couldn't have been a completely foolproof way to avoid double sabotage but both are professionals. I would guess that whoever did not sabotage mission 1 did it now. Also possible is that whoever was mentioned first in the team roster did it (as a variant of the old leader sabotages theory).
Right. So we magically decided on a strategy out here in the open? I don't think so, TNT
Also supporting was not very much risk (for them). Worst case is, that both support. The exact same team would have been picked for mission 3 which would have given them another shot and their position really would not have been hurt very much.
Now you're just saying what you have to say.
I'm giving you an A for effort, though. Many people in your position would just have given up ..
If you asked about the first mission, that's trivial. One of them would have known that there is another spy on the team and would have switched to support in any case.
Edit: ItS might have complicated things but randakar could have been reasonably sure that glio would support in public.
Could have, would have - all of that is academic because it isn't true.

A spy has *one* spy name. Odds of me knowing glio was a spy in that case? About 1 in 3 .. and then, there is the little fact that I announced that spotlight card up front, and told you I would use it on other teams, too. There is no way I could have organized it like you describe under those circumstances.