Well, it seems that England would not be at peace until one side annhilates the other.
Lovely.
Lovely.
- 1
What is needed is a unifying mission, something that any true Englishman would prioritise over petty squabbles. The solution is obvious - War with France.Well, it seems that England would not be at peace until one side annhilates the other.
Tall order, seeing as James II personally executed the previous Scot she shared a bed with.If the next scene in Scotland is her dragging James II to bed and getting an alliance with Scotland out of it I will in no way be surprised, after all she does have form for ill-advised yet bountiful bedroom adventures with inappropriate Scots.
Of course the best part of it all is that after the Yorkists and the main lines of Lancaster managed to murder each other, there’s two strong claimants left: the children of Henry VII by virtue of being the holders of the Beaufort and Yorkist claims, and the real holders of the strongest Lancastrian claim… the sisters of Henry IV who were the ancestors of the Spanish and Portuguese royal families, and whom by accident of fate and inbreeding had their claims concentrated into their common descendant Philip II of Spain. Really, though Philip was only recognized as King of England jure uxoris, he arguably had a better claim than his wife Queen Mary I, and had the winds been a bit kinder to the Spanish Armada, he really would have had no legitimacy issues with deposing his distant cousin Elizabeth I and uniting the English throne with the Spanish (and Portuguese and Burgundian!) thrones. Just everything else would be a problem for him.
it is just the threat to his beloved Queen that bothers him
I know I've said many negative things about Margaret's lack of talent or ability in the job, but this line is a reminder to never under-estimate her impressive skills in the bedroom.
What is needed is a unifying mission, something that any true Englishman would prioritise over petty squabbles. The solution is obvious - War with France.
That hardly counts, I mean everybody had killed an Earl of Douglas. It was a popular hobby that everybody (bar the victim) could enjoy, after the Scots outlawed both Football and Golf they needed something to pass the time.Tall order, seeing as James II personally executed the previous Scot she shared a bed with.
This is true. And of course an enemy led by a King who was blown up by his own cannon or his even less competent son probably is an easier target as well.It'll only be useful if Richard actually does become king and then needs an enemy to fight. Only Scotland is a much better target both because England can easily annex rhem and they're protecting the whore Queen.
Exactly.There's good reasons why the Tudors never called themsevles Tudors, but Lancaster. Their claim is very dodgy...
No matter how proper a claim, I don't think the English were ready yet to accept a foreign King. Even when the Stuarts inherited, they were not as foreign as a Spanish King. And of course, by then Spain was a mortal enemy. However, they did technically have the blood royal thanks to John of Gaunt.Of course the best part of it all is that after the Yorkists and the main lines of Lancaster managed to murder each other, there’s two strong claimants left: the children of Henry VII by virtue of being the holders of the Beaufort and Yorkist claims, and the real holders of the strongest Lancastrian claim… the sisters of Henry IV who were the ancestors of the Spanish and Portuguese royal families, and whom by accident of fate and inbreeding had their claims concentrated into their common descendant Philip II of Spain. Really, though Philip was only recognized as King of England jure uxoris, he arguably had a better claim than his wife Queen Mary I, and had the winds been a bit kinder to the Spanish Armada, he really would have had no legitimacy issues with deposing his distant cousin Elizabeth I and uniting the English throne with the Spanish (and Portuguese and Burgundian!) thrones. Just everything else would be a problem for him.
Margaret has done a fine job of using Somerset's hatred of Warwick to keep him to her side. Yes, and also her bed.Henry Beaufort is an odd one, at the moment I think his biggest mistake is lying to himself about his motives, though that is hardly an uncommon problem amongst the main players in this tale. I don't think he really gives a stuff about his oath to the King, it is just the threat to his beloved Queen that bothers him. Equally I wonder how much of his hatred of Warwick is actually because he is/was one of the most vocal against the Queen.
I know I've said many negative things about Margaret's lack of talent or ability in the job, but this line is a reminder to never under-estimate her impressive skills in the bedroom.
If the next scene in Scotland is her dragging James II to bed and getting an alliance with Scotland out of it I will in no way be surprised, after all she does have form for ill-advised yet bountiful bedroom adventures with inappropriate Scots.
That is not an untrue statement.Well, it seems that England would not be at peace until one side annhilates the other.
Lovely.
You may be right, but we are not nearly to a place for that at the moment.What is needed is a unifying mission, something that any true Englishman would prioritise over petty squabbles. The solution is obvious - War with France.
That's true.Tall order, seeing as James II personally executed the previous Scot she shared a bed with.
England has only regained Maine and Cherbourg. There is still a good bit of Normandy to get back as well as in the south (especially if we wanted to go back to the Angevin empire.)Unfortunately France is so weak that the English have gotten their half back with no problems, and the other half requires fighting some other European powers. So yes, to fully annexed France, they'll need to unite...but everyone who actually benefits from having French lands already has them by now so...
It'll only be useful if Richard actually does become king and then needs an enemy to fight. Only Scotland is a much better target both because England can easily annex rhem and they're protecting the whore Queen.
I'm not certain who you find more distasteful - the French or the Scots. @El Pip answers "Yes."That hardly counts, I mean everybody had killed an Earl of Douglas. It was a popular hobby that everybody (bar the victim) could enjoy, after the Scots outlawed both Football and Golf they needed something to pass the time.
This is true. And of course an enemy led by a King who was blown up by his own cannon or his even less competent son probably is an easier target as well.
I'm not sure I'd say a three way civil war, but it does suggest that there will always be another to question whomever is in power.Huh. Is that talk of refusing the throne to Margaret's illegitimate child if Henry dies? A split among the Lancastrians could make things very interesting... especially if Margaret keep some support. Is a three-way civil war possible?
Wait. There is more than one potential claimant here. Maybe there will be more than three sides? That could be interesting.
The match itself, as suggested, could prove quite powerful given their lineage. Or...it could prove quite deleterious if someone wished to snuff out anyone with a whiff of the blood royal.Sir Henry Stafford just seems far too nice for this work, despite the quite unpleasant hand he has been dealt. As it stands he is looking at raising someone elses bastard child with a wife who is in love with someone else and couldn't give him an heir in any event, though given their close blood relations this is perhaps for the best.
At least the two of them are honest with each other, which is not to be sniffed at, though I do still feel quite sorry for Sir Henry. I'm mildly impressed with him for taking it so well, had it been me I'd have taken advantage of Buckingham snuffing it to find an alternate match.
Tis true, but as she says - she likely will never have another child as the first time rather destroyed her in that department.The best way to avoid Margaret B suffering from another childbirth is mercifully poisoning, beheading or quartering her.
Less pain for her. Be kind, sir.
Does her husband know that?Tis true, but as she says - she likely will never have another child as the first time rather destroyed her in that department.
It is one of Margaret's great failings. She simply does not understand the English mood not just of the Scots but so too many of those in the north of England. She only thinks of what can help her, not the realm.Actually rather sensible of Scotland. Give the Queen a token force, then banish her from the realm. She probably won't win, and just slow York down in coming after him, but if she does win, or stablemates the civil war, all the better for Scotland.
But also good news for the yorkists looking for more things to hurl at the Queen. Going to the Scots to invade England with a foreign army? Tsk tsk
Indeed he does for she told him.Does her husband know that?
Especially in this timeline, it does not make much sense for the Scots to want to ally with France, but I kept with it. That said, you and others are right. If Richard comes to power, he is going to want to hit Scotland eventually. James may be playing for time here. And also, may see what a ticking time bomb is this Margaret of Anjou. As he said, he wants to see the King, whomever it is.James is in a funny position. Richard of York is going to after him whatever he does. So he gives Dick more reasons to reduce Scotland to ashes by helping Maggie. Good.
In game, yes Scotland and France start the game as allies. And historically, the border between England and Scotland remains troublesome. I think James sees that Richard is likely to win out here and knows that he is not going to be as meek as Henry is as King. The threat of invasion is ever present (and frankly, on both sides.) As to how he handles Margaret, notice that he gains Berwick as the trade off for helping her. Nothing changed in game, but this is what she historically did. Yet another poor choice on her part.Why does the King of Scotland think that an attack on him is imminent? I understand why it would be now (aiding enemies of the crown), but he seemed to think it was inevitable even if he refused to aid Margaret. For that matter, why keep Margaret in comfortable arrest as a bargaining chip?
Are France and Scotland still allied here?