-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I believe there is an issue with tank brigades stats, as there are the same (only supply, oil and ICdays changes) but softness is way better for InfTank/light tanks than Hvy
equipement is also the same with no mention of Hvy tanks for its brigade
equipement is also the same with no mention of Hvy tanks for its brigade
When my memory is correct the softness is the trick with both briagde's stats getting more diverse with the tech progress.
Keep in mind that TRP is working with its own recalculated stats. I will try to find our old files for stats but at the moment I think the stats arent wrong.
stats won't change as tech progress, some +1 in attack or defense but they all increase the same across the 3 tank brigades (IA/Med/Hvy)
Below the stats for the year 41 but it's the same across all the other years (FTR IA is light brigade on the left, Med is Hvy on the middle and Hvy is Super Hvy on the right)
clearly I would build IA everyday as it's 2 times cheaper (ICdays wise) than Hvy and gives me more softness reduction for 1 less HA
I'm keen on to know where in the TRP folder these modifier files are located to make me wrong, cause rn I only found the terrain modifiers which doesn't apply to much on brigade.
(We could continue on discord if it's more convenient to you)
We never had time to work on the scnarios at all so the "northern" route is always a sort of dead end.
The last thing I add to the event was the sleep leader/ministers/tech teams. The historical debate of the idea of a northern or southern push caused many problems within the japanese armed forces. So many naval experts will be deleted by the northern route because it would have shift the resouces away from the navy to the army and that would have end in a number of retirements by the navy.
I guess its better to stay here because I dont have the time I would need for a discord chat plus I have to look into all the files. PLUS Studti is prefering to read it here; Its more comfortable for him. TRP (and the current team) is now ~14 years "old". Studtis and my life had changed a lot so in the last years we had very limited time to work on something like TRP. So with a 14year background I have forgotten many details and discussions we had in the past.
With the brigades stats: most of these stats were done in conjuction with the division that can get those brigades.
So itsd worth to keep the divisions in mind here. Dropping some stats or get a small boost isnt great for the brigade but it works with the divisions that have "bigger" stats. So "a light tank" will drop the softness of a division that is very soft. A heavy tank wont do this because the mech and armored division are already at the low end of the softness.
Furthermore, I can remember discussion when we found out that the combat system (and its mathematic system) will always need "soft attack" to get any result at all. E.g. that is the reason why AT brigades have a sort of decent soft attack stats; It was needed to get the intented hard attack effects.
- 3
- 1
Hello! I am going to play Germany and wonder if this mod have the Z-Plane in 1939 or shall I build battleships earllier.Hope someone will give me an answere.
Thank you for your answere glad to know tht the game is not as Blood & Iron.Have a nice day.
Not sure what those pics should show. Any problem? Lack of leaders is quite common in TRP in the early years, more will come as time progresses. Other than that I have no idea what they mean.
True, there's not an explanation.
Just showing the Norwegian researched and accurate OOB, with correct forts and bases, missing leaders and all correctly coloured if team want to incorporate it
Anyways I've 3 doubts I ask the opinion of the community:
- Possible reduction of Oslo and Bergen naval base levels
- There was not any Cavalry division, but 3 independent regiments attached to the military regions. So, maintain the div or put the regiments as 3 strenghtcapped divs each one in their location
- Put or not the coastal forts in Narvik, as they were insignificant in 1936
Just showing the Norwegian researched and accurate OOB, with correct forts and bases, missing leaders and all correctly coloured if team want to incorporate it
Anyways I've 3 doubts I ask the opinion of the community:
- Possible reduction of Oslo and Bergen naval base levels
- There was not any Cavalry division, but 3 independent regiments attached to the military regions. So, maintain the div or put the regiments as 3 strenghtcapped divs each one in their location
- Put or not the coastal forts in Narvik, as they were insignificant in 1936
Last edited:
There is always room to discuss additions or adjustments to port and airbase changes. its difficult to rate base sizes at all.
Back in the days when I reworked the OOBs I decided to merge most of the small nations small cavalry unit into a division to boost the combat strength of the armies. But I wont add 3 cavalry divisions here because u have to keep in mind that these numbers could cause problems for a landing german ai.
And for Narvik; I'm not the naval expert so i have no idea about the Narvik naval forts at all
- 1
So has your partner weighed in?There is always room to discuss additions or adjustments to port and airbase changes. its difficult to rate base sizes at all.
Back in the days when I reworked the OOBs I decided to merge most of the small nations small cavalry unit into a division to boost the combat strength of the armies. But I wont add 3 cavalry divisions here because u have to keep in mind that these numbers could cause problems for a landing german ai.
And for Narvik; I'm not the naval expert so i have no idea about the Narvik naval forts at all
What do u mean?
We are still talking about TRP - and changes like OOB adjustments or map adjustments or officer adjustments are always a point to talk about.
- 1
I thought studti was the naval expert for your mod. So I wondered what his thoughts were.
Yes
He is more into the naval stuff.But we had discussions about the question what sort of guns or coastal defense should be represented ingame with a number or strength.
We were sure for the Maginotline because we thought it THE fortress of ww2 that would be ideal for a fort Level 10. But the rest... u could always discuss adjustments
- 1
Well, these should be pretty high up the ladder as coastal defenseYes
But we had discussions about the question what sort of guns or coastal defense should be represented ingame with a number or strength.
We were sure for the Maginotline because we thought it THE fortress of ww2 that would be ideal for a fort Level 10. But the rest... u could always discuss adjustments